Unknown Facts About Gandhi & Jinnah DELETED From Your Textbooks 

Chavda sir is holding back a lot of things to avoid controversies..😝

Gandhi was the best policeman the Britishers had in India BRITISH MP ELLEN WILKINSON

read Gandhis Experiment with Truth . Tumhe pata chal jayega vo kitne bade Mahatma the. Gandhi not just weakened us socially but also he weakened us mentally . This is not land of Gandhi , Nehru this the land of shivaji maharaj , raj rajendra chola , subash chandra bose , sardar patel and Vishnugupta Chanakya

"Gandhi kohi sant Mahatma nehi hain valki ek chatur Politician hain" - Dr BR Ambedkar

Ranveer bhai Shaheed Bhagat singh ji ,Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose ji the Great Humans ke bhi podcast lawo ....🇮🇳

Abhijit Sir should write uncensored versions of textbooks.

I have always doubt about Gandhi from my childhood. For me I couldn't digest his participation in freedom fighting against British.

Damn! So Abhijit is basically saying that Jinnah was more of an Indian patriot than Mahatma Gandhi at least at one point of time 😲

Your assessment of Gandhi is 100% true he was a British agent and tried to make India a slave to Britain It's sad to say that the fault also lies within us because we supported Gandhi more than Bose If we would have fully supported Bose than the current situation of India would have been a lot different in a good way

I love how her never says Mahatma Gandhi, instead says Mohandas or Mr Gandhi 🥰

When I was a kid, I used to wonder how did we get independence Because it was not clearly mentioned in the books. It just stated several historic events of Gandhi and never talked about actual freedom fighters. And it was always in mind.... " So we just fought on behalf of Britain and they just left, ghanta " 🤷‍♂️

As a Pakistani our textbooks also follow a certain narrative. They do tell about Jinnah’s affiliation with Congress and his stance for unity but then they quickly mention that Quaid himself got to this conclusion of two nation theory. As you said in the video, in our textbooks there’s hardly anything bad mentioned about Gandhi g. They just mention this big narrative of Hindus vs Muslims and never portray Gandhi G as villain. At the end of day the narrative that Gandhi and Jinaah fought for the freedom is a big exaggeration in both the countries. Reality is Britain was broke after ww2 and they just didn’t have enough resources and power to maintain their rule. So jaaty jaaty b aesi divide ki ha k ub socho to khayal aata ha k is se acha na hi divide karty. Khud Quaid e Azam sahab to 1 saal baad chalay gaey bechary aur hum phass gaey hain because totally 11 people make decisions for us and we have unofficially defaulted.

Indian history have been interpreted by many writers through their own lenses. These lenses might have several motives behind it. So instead of coming to conclusions just by watching 10 mins podcast would be unfair. Keep on reading various books on Indian History and make your own unbiased narrative or I would say gain your own unbiased knowledge

Very rightly said by Abhijitji. People who were considered as real threats were served capital punishments or life threatening imprisonment. We can check the history of such people, 1. Lokmanya Tilak imprisoned in Mandalay for 6 years on sedition charge, far away from mainland. 2. Chandrashekhar Azad martyred in gun fight. 3. Bhagat Singh death sentence 4. Lala Lajpatrai succumbed to his wounds while protesting against Simon Commission was lathi charged brutally by British police. 5. Swatantryaveer Savarkar locked up in far away Andaman prison for life sentence. Why was there no such severe sentence against Gandhiji? He was basically a safety valve to clear discontent in public.

Jinnah's secularism is very controversial....He married a Parsi girl and happily converted her to Islam but when her daughter Dina wanted to marry a Parsi man Wadia he opposed that by saying that he is not a Muslim and a Muslim can't marry a Non Muslim....But when Dina asked Jinnah that he too married a non Muslim , her mother then he replied cunningly that her mother converted to Islam

Everybody here should know that i m not concluding anything..but remember "Gandhiji was a politician first before anything"

What he said about Gandhi is precisely word to word, similar to the foreword of Arundhati Roy in Ambedkar's Annihilation of Caste. Read that, it's a very good piece on the other side of Gandhi. So when Amit Shah called him Chatur Baniya he wasn't all that wrong. He wanted Imperial Brotherhood with the British Army, be an Imperial Brother. He helped the British while they were killing the Zulus. Usmain bhi British ne Aukaat Dikhaadi Ki Bhai Tu Ambulance Chalaa. And Gandhi, supported the Khilafat Movement, because his ambitions were more significant than just being the father of the nation of India, but a Father for all Colonies of the British. He was all about Marketing.

Jaise Gandhiji ne likkha 'I beg...' waise he Veer Savarkar ji ne bhi to 'I beg.. ' likka. But hamesha Veer Savarkar ko hi kyu nicha dikhaya jata hai?

Indian history should be written again. This is important information for all of us

Then why did Subhas Chandra Boseji call Gandhiji a "father of the nation". Rabindranath Tagoreji called him "Mahatma". I think Patel ji, Nehruji, Khan Abdul Ghafar ji, Rajendra Prasad ji and others did not follow Gandhiji throughout their life blindly. A large number of intellectual people present at that time followed Gandhi why were they blind in seeing these facts or not intellect as we. Today's UPSC board's Ethics paper questions are based on Gandhi's thoughts and his principles and this is not a small thing and the UPSC board is not a fool to guide their aspirants in the wrong direction who play a key role in the nation's development. I may not know much about Gandhiji but I think these facts are enough. I think I'm not wrong but if I'm then I'll correct.

In champaran satyagraha, which gandhi hijacked to his own political profit it was Raj kumar Shukla a local peasant leader who initiated the movement. He pleaded gandhi umpteen times to join it.Gandhi refused to participate in it Raj Kumar Shukla kept pleading but to no avail. When the movement became widespread Gandhi jumped into wandwagon and later on historians erased Raj Kumar shukla's name from the movement completely and made gandhi savior of indigo farmers.

Dusmano ne Bharat ka itna nuksan nahi kiya jitna gaddaron ne kiya hai.

He couldn’t remember a Muslim freedom fighter other than one and how cute of him to start the podcast saying ‘smart banne aaye ho na’😅

Imagine going from dedicating decades of your life to Hindu Muslim unity to then becoming the face of Islamist separatism and being the face of mass migration, g/nocide and the horrors of partition. Goes to show that humans are capable of anything when it comes to ego and power. The same goes for Gandhi.

As a student of history, it is awful to see a historian use the "internet" as a primary source for his writings. I can clearly see the ideological bent of mind here. Tells me that he is not a genuine historian. Your views about non-violence and other Gandhian Principles tells me that you're a real shoddy historian if a historian at all.

Thanks a ton Mr. Ranveer and Avijit sir. From this podcast I have known and learnt lot of things about Gandhi and Mohammed Zinna. Frankly speaking, for the first time i hear that Sergent Mohondas Gandhi...goosebumps 😲 At a time he was in military in South Africa. Actually this question always hit me and I am also so curious that how did Gandhi come in the super and supreme power in congress than how USA become superpower country in the world.

very enlightening talks . thank you very much.

Everytime sir said Mohandas Gandhi Instead of ‘Mahatma' 😄

Kyun bolege Pakistani gandhi ke liye bura tabhi toh woh Pakistani hai.

I am from Pakistan. And there is so much we haven’t been told. Why? I have no idea. The idea of partition came from where? We don’t know. We were always put in dark. By the way I follow both of these gentlemen and they are extremely talented. Love from Pakistan

A great broadcast . Very informative

He understood the Indian pulse very well... Simultaneously his thoughts of peace were good but whether relevant or not is a matter of debate.

ranveer looks like we need to revise our academics,thanks for the information

Gandhi didn't become famous overnight in India, it's his struggle in South Africa that made him famous

Difference between young jinnah and later jinnah is Quran He read Quran to become later jinnah

M. Ali Jinnah , he supported the unity , worked for congress but he understood that there are rlly two different nations living in the sub continent, and he understood that the equality he was dreaming of , was not possible. He knew that no matter what he does for this sub continent , he will never have equal rights and freedom, and all Muslims will somewhat suffer , so he left congress and joined muslim league. When i was in junior classes i used to think he was wrong, we were all humans , we could've lived together happily but as time has passed my point of view has changed and i believe he was right

As a Pakistani American who grew up in Pakistan till 18+, I can tell you Pakistanis are not taught to hate Gandhi or Nehru. Nehru is given a tinge of negativity as compared to Gandhi. They are taught very little about them and what they are taught is fairly neutral. Gandhi's non-violent movement is mentioned. They are taught more about Sir Syed Ahmed Khan than Gandhi for instance. Unlike popular belief in Indian RU-vid channels, Pakistani high school students are also not taught to hate Hindus. Rather they are taught Muslim history in Indian sub-continent in such a way that one starts to identify with that identity. That does not mean one starts to hate Hindus nor was that ever that came across to me. I am generally shocked to see what these RU-vid videos show as to what supposedly Indians believe Pakistanis are taught. Now what they teach the poor in madrasas specially ones established in late 80's and onwards that teach the Salafi version of Islam ... I do not know.

Chavada sir is a legend in assessing historical facts. He has connected the dots pretty well as far as MG and MJ are concerned. Earlier I used to doubt MG, but now I am 200% sure about his intentions back then.

Thanks for this video Ranveer..

Jinnah was reminded that once when he was in congress he was an ambassador of Hindu Muslim Unity. Jinnah said that yes he was once a student of primary class.

Thanks Ranveer sir for bringing such talented people on your show. I like all your podcasts... And hats off to genius mind Abhijit Chavda . I love your duo.

Nutshell - " Jinnah was right, Gandhi was wrong"

In my small opinion Gandhiji's one of the major contribution in Indian consciousness was that he taught us find a creative way of functioning with whatever is available at your disposal, yo find in you what can't be taken away, turned down by anyone else, something which you originally posses and take a stance of your rightful duty, like a gentleman without using violence at all. This was unique at the time Gandhi came in Indian politics. People got a fresh start with leader who acts more down to earth than the poorest but whose willpower is stronger than the Empire itself. Gandhiji's policy of allowing the oppressor any opportunity to change his 'heart' is hardly found in any mass struggle of the world. That makes him a true Mahatma. But no one is beyond criticism. A constructive criticism is good always. Thank you

1. "We won’t be required to sacrifice this colony at least till the year 2050. A few negligible revolutionary incidents may occur due to the agitations launched by Gandhi but nothing more fierce will happen in this country.

Mohd Ali and Shaukat Ali began discussing about the agitation and gandhiji thought that this was the chance of bringing muslims under unified national movement

Totally agree with the comments said on Last. We Pakistanis always respect Gandhi and other Indian National Hero's. There is a dire desire in educated youths of both countries to get to know each other, I hope there will be a day come where We can go to Amritsar and eat chola bathora and you guys can come to Lahore and enjoy our karahi''s. Lets Vote for peace and harmony among us.

Abhijit sir is having to add "Ji" with Gandhi😂

Did he mentioned that Hindu mahasabha had allianced with Muslim league...he will never tell.... chronology samjiye

LOT Of things missed out like Mr. Gandhi's views changed about the colonial administration and he started his satyagraha movement in South Africa for the upliftment of Indian community in South Africa for next 15 years. And he became popular in India and INC only after his efforts in Champaran Satyagraha and Kheda Satyagraha bore fruits and helped the local community.

Who knows ,maybe Gandhi was an actor on behalf of british govt, to prevent violent uprising and ensure liberation after India was totally destroyed. It all culminated with the knowledge that there was no benefit for the british to remain in India.

Everyone can understand who is the main culprit of India. Hai bhagban , is byakti ne kya se kya kar diya bharat ka....

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) was founded on September 27, 1925, by Keshav Baliram Hedgewar. At that time, India was still under British colonial rule, and the primary focus of the RSS was not to fight against the British colonial government. Instead, its main objective was to promote a sense of cultural and national identity among Hindus and instill a sense of discipline and character through physical fitness and ideological education. During India's struggle for independence, various groups and movements fought against British rule, such as the Indian National Congress, led by figures like Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru, and the Muslim League, led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah. These movements employed various methods of resistance, including non-violent civil disobedience and political agitation. The RSS, as an organization, did not play a prominent role in the Indian independence movement. Its focus remained on promoting its ideology and organizing its members through shakhas (branches) across the country. It is essential to differentiate between the RSS's historical role and the broader Indian independence struggle that involved numerous other organizations and movements working towards the common goal of gaining independence from British rule.

I think Chavda sir does a lot of research before commenting on anything.. listening to him is like reading many books ..

Gandhi,nehru were not freedom fighters.. Even if Britishers would'nt have left,kuch farak nahi padta inko...they wanted dominance.. We wanted freedom 🇮🇳

You are doing great work bro

A podcast about Nathuram Godse ji and his court trials should also come✌🏻

Exactly I thought the same which chavda sir explained about khilafat movement during my school days.

Reading this book Veer Savarkar the man who could have prevented partition. The many hidden stuff about Gandhi is written there. Unbelievable.

Informative

Just wow❤

If i am not wrong you are saying because jinnah was sidelined after arrival of gandhiji ,he was upset and then joined muslim league But ,jinnah joined muslim league in1913 and gandhiji returned in 1915,(according to known records) so your logic is false, if not then plz provide the dates and source of dates of joining of jinnah 's in muslim league and return of gandhiji

As a Pakistani i appreciate the non biased views about jinnah. And im surprised to know this side of Gandhi because in our textbooks he's a freedom fighter for his respective nation and he was murdered fighting till his last moment for his people 😮

Well said sir

wonderful

We Pakistanis don't hate indians. I personally have discussed Gandhi & Nehru in my leadership classes. We have no reason to hate indians or think bad about them. We're neighbors who aren't on talking terms.

Mahatma Gandhi was curse of India and Indians to and we call father of nation but the real truth is shubhash Chandra Bose ji the real hero of india

Hume azadi khoon se mili non violence se nai ..jai hind ...jai hindurastra🕉️🇮🇳

thankyou sir for this

Why they have not speak about Veer Savarkar, bcz without him the 1857 Revolt is incomplete....

I started doubting Mr Gandhi when I saw his picture with two girls, which people call shishyas. I taught he had adopted them and they were his duaghters but later I found out it was nothing like that.

Self proclaimed historian 😅 Gyan full on

Mujhe nhi malum ki ye kis Aadmi ka interview chal Raha hai, lekin main ishwar se ye prarthna karunga ki aap sabhi ko Gandhi ki life wala struggle jhelne ko mile, taaki aap log kuch Naya krk dikhaiyn.

Educate yourself reading books (not necessarily NCERT, rather the books written by all the schools of thought i.e. subaltern, Cambridge, nationalist or Marxist). But read, give efforts. Only then you will know. Please don't resort to Wiki, RU-vid or FB for knowledge. It will not only jeopardize your thought process but also of others in your surroundings. Please read.

भाई हमको कुछ समझ नही आ रहा है, कि ये क्या हो रहा है ? कौन सही ? कौन गलत?

The Lucknow pact in 1916/7 clearly showed Jinnah's attitude as leader of the muslims.His demand for separate electorates for muslims, which effectively made second class citizens of Hindus in muslim majority areas showed that he always worked for political dominance of muslims.I'm surprised that the congress led by Tilak fell for it.

Devil is relative....before blaming Jinnah....you should mention why he wanted a separate country...

The word Khalifa from sir abhijits mouth just made me smile for a sec😂

None of the movement of Gandhian era got successful, he bought calamity by applying double standards of ahmisha and brotherhood to Hindu community. It was thousands of unsung indians who devoted their blood we are breathing in free India

Great debate

Not an opportunist did Jinnah become, you can say that he came to terms with the reality. Without separation Muslims would get marginalized

Mahatma Ghandi had many enemys inside and out of India because of the caste system he abolished His enemies in Europe sprung because the British were genius at using the "Pen as a weapon " pay any journalist and it kills anyone faster than a Sword 1*If at all Ghadhiji was a British favoured Indian he will be driving around in a Rolls Royce , invited to every British Function , and would have been titled "SIR Ghandi " 2*Ghandhi was so hated by the British that they employed top journalist to write about him in the worst light 3* They never forgave him for bringing so much scandal and embarrassment to the Monarchy and the British Commonwealth 3*Ghandhi was so educated in laws of the country .rights of humans and he knew they used the caste system as the weapon to destroy India 3* When Ghandhi became peoples leader ,he dared to remain as poor as the masses of that time . 4* No leader could come to this state .He never lived a wealthy life ,he ate food like the common man and dressed like the poorest man 5*Why should he do that as he was a Brilliant lawyer and successful too 6*The British used journalist. and with the powerof the pen KILLED GHANDHI then and these irresponsible wicked biography written by him and against him now surfaces on social media to Rip of a man who died more than a century ago 7 Mahatma Ghandi .Suffered and was tortured in various jails by British for Indians ,Indian rights and Indian assets which was robbed by the British then 8*Its normal for people to fall "HOOK, LINE AND SINKER "for books and articles written by FOREIGNERS centuries ago but its a horrible shame and lack of basic psychological understanding of Human actions to jump into Negative conclusions of anyone for that matter 9* Hitler was the worst enemy of everyone so to fix Ghandhi at that period they pretend he is friend of Hitler and even gets to read a personal letter suposed to be written by Ghandhi to Hitler 10* Child molestation or abuse was a great sin then and now so to cause the scandal Ghandi fixed on the British in India ,they reciprocate with wicked lies in a book supposedly written by him 11* Every useless book on GHANDHI was written by Paid journalist of the British tabloids of that era Ghandhi was too simple and India could not have the paper to write or publish 12*All was published in Britain Indians were happy to use their palm leaves for messaging Fancy. book's, fancy publishers printing all belonged to British 13* Today we know for a fact the ARYAN INVASION . was a farce designed by crooked Authors to give " Intelligence and Superamacy to outsiders not Indians These Authors are being ridiculed and questioned why they distorted Indias History , religious beliefs and allowed European scholars to sponge all the KNOWLEDGE India owned Example Newton is given credit for his Apple theory . on gravity Electricity.magnetism, Surgeries Mathematics .musical notes .astrology ,numerology ,space .vimana, aeroplanes all were researched in India by Indians way before any foreign scholar or scientist 13* There was a need to publicise India and Indians as STUPID AND BACKWARD So the world of Science ,Physics Maths and Biology will never belief it was stolen from India 14* I hope Indians who wish to bulldoze and hammer down India or any Indian leader .Scholar, Freedom Fighter who sacrificed their life in History rethink his or her own mission 15* Be fair as you not only confuse young College Students but educationist too Do a thorough investigation into the era ,the typical stand taken by most countries, the actions and contributions and lifestyle of your subject to arrive at a honest conclusion 17* To recap If whatever said is true about Ghandi ..He would be SIR GHANDI knighted by the King or Queen of England .He would have travelled all around India in Full tuxedo like the Maharajahs and will be seen in a Rolls Royce, living in a home nothing less then a Palace gifted by the British Monarch 18*After Ghandi got independence for India, the British were not allowed to take Indias Textile and natural resources ;gems .literature Books and palm leaves 19* If Ghandiji fits into this Character Assasination FAMOUS writers of India during his time and later would have published the negative Ghandi long before his death ...RamdarSinghDinkar rebellion patriot essaysit Harivansh Rai Bachaan and mother of Amitabh Bachaan was a social activist writer poet Amrita Pritam novelist essayist loved on both sides of India and Pakistan and her books were translated to many foreign languages Suryakant Tripathi Nirala 1896_1961 Essaysit Novelist 20* These writers would have many negative things to write about Ghandi if at all these was genuine material Chinese have a good saying EMPTY "VESSELS MAKE A LOT OF NOISE " Lets be Alert and Proud of India

Why gandhi never punished, why gandhi was always on news media during that time print media was limited still he was a hero in newspapers. How? Others weren't, why he worked in British army ? I think people don't want to see truth.

1.He didnt became famous overnight.... 2. jinnah or gandhi ek dusre ke principal se different the to Gandhi ko kaise partition ka reason btaya jata hai.

Sir please make some podcasts with economists......🙏🏻

I would request everyone to read history books and not to come to conclusion by watching 10 min video ...the fact that netaji was first to call gandhiji father of nation tells about his contribution... The way Abhijit chavda sir talks,as if Gandhi came from nowhere and got credit...

There have been extensive research all around the world on gandhis writings and work... Nelson Mandela was inspired by his work... Martin Luther King used his methods to emancipate blacks in USA.... There is a popular saying in political science... If u can't understand Gandhi fault lies within u and not him. ....

I am in 10th currently and this video really helped me, textbook gives one sided observation. This video was eye opening

I totally agree with you sir

He is absolutely right and I am happy to listen to this pod cast. Truely I have never ever heard a single bad or even a negative word against Mr. Sri Gandhi sahab in my entire life. Infact we like him for whatever he did for India and its people. And it astonishing that Sri Gandhi sahab is not taught in the books in Pak even then people here respect him alot, not only this we know alot about him like Jinnah. Sri Gandhi was truely a great man!

Dr Ambedkar never called gandhi as 'mahamata' but called Mr. gandhi

Please make some video on Subhas Chandra Bose... The exemplary forgotten real hero

Mohammad Ali Jinnah was a Very secular man also he was a Nationalist man & hence he want a separate country (Pakistan). How Nationalist & Secular he was....... Respect For Such Great Man🔥💯💯😑

Okay so, which one of you is a historian, and can prove what your saying is true? you are saying that what we study in our textbooks might be wrong, but are just supposed to believe what 2 people with no proper research(by which i mean a 4-5 year PhD), over the qualified professors who write the NCERT and other board textbooks

It is very easy sir to find online readings that go against the man who stood for Spirituality and Unity. Jinnah was political and ambitious more than a nationalist and Gandhi was a humanist more than a nationalist and knew that hate against anyone would cause strife and further self sabotage.

Hello! I hope you're doing great. Can I connect with the host?

This person is so brave in calling Gandhi a british agent. I watched indian movie bhagat singh starring ajay devgan, where bhagat singh also deviate from being a fan of gandhi to his opponent. I feel bhagat singh, Subhash boss and other freedom fighter also realized that gandhi was not the person what he tried to pretend. And about Jinnah Being a Pakistani,We have learned that Mr. Jinnah worked for hindu muslim unity but later when gandhi joined congress. Jinnah was marginalized and he observed that congress was just working for hindus not for hindu muslim. whereas he wanted unity of hindu muslim. eventually he left congress. Later muslim league leaders approached him .Allah iqbal penned him letters in which iqbal used to tell him about situation of bharat and ask him to come back and work for the muslims

I hope that he gets an opportunity to meet people who had first hand experience with Gandhi till the time they are alive, As being someone who has been to sabarmati ashram and met people and historians who talk about first hand writings and experience with Gandhi I feel that this is manipulated and far from what he was... Just hoping that he gets in touch with people having first hand experience with Gandhi!

Textbooks always say that we got independence because of the peaceful protest organised by Gandhi lol seriously British those people purposely created a made man famine in Bengal because of which millions of people died & they didn't care and when they were asked about it they said why didn't Gandhi died & also said that don't worry Indians breeds like rabbits. Those are the same people who did jalianwala bhag massacre and yet Gandhi wanted to gain independence by peace. This shows how cruel they were. Do you really think that they cared about Gandhi going on strike? Do they left India thier looting spot just because Gandhi said them to do so peacefully? No we got independence by blood not by some kind of peaceful protest. Many legends have scarified their lives to gain independence and yet we are still thanking this idiot gandhi for our freedom. Even small kids also had scarified thier lives but sadly we don't remember them now also.

Both Gandhi and Jinnah were members of ILC Imperial Legislative Council. serving British Interests in this region.

Shallow analysis!