Excellent video, Bill Roach! I see how definitive it is to deal correctly with Inspiration, which has a direct impact on Inerrancy or vice versa. I would like to advise that Dr Michael R. Licona will be releasing a new book this month (the 28th) titled "Jesus, Contradicted: Why the Gospels Tell the Same Story Differently". I would like you to provide a concise and unobtrusive Review of this work, given Licona's neo-orthodox views of Inspiration (and Inerrancy) and also that you have a long history of critical interaction with Licona's previous works. Hugs!
The most exhaustive philological study of the meaning of theopneustos is John C. Poirier, The Invention of the Inspired Text: Philological Windows on the Theopneustia of Scripture (London: T & T Clark, 2021). The book goes well beyond what both Roach and Licona say about the word. And (to answer Roach's concern) it also addresses how a consideration of the context of 2 Tim 3:16 helps us understand what theopneustos means. I hope you will give it a read.
Person X denies inerrancy, Person Y defends inerrancy. Person X is damaging the church and contributing to people potentially shipwrecking their faith. I don't care how "nice" Person X is, they need to be marked, avoided and rebuked. Playing nice only enables them.
Isnt Licona trying to become the new Gundry and Peter Enns???? Licona is acting just like Andy Stanley acted and came out when his father Charles Stanley died.
