Great mental workout Ian ! Actually, a lot of it makes sense to me...kkk...should i be worried? So, when i open my eyes and look forward in any direction i see the past and the future is behind me...does that mean that in essence we are a representation of the universe itself....with eyes closed we see only darkness, emptiness the void...then you suddenly open our eyes and bang! You see light, feel the existence of time and space and history unfolding before our eyes..... Yes., now i am worried! I always enjoy your lectures. Take care.😅
The multiverse is physics. Are you a physicist ? Its not philosophy . Multiverse is not something physicists want or make up. Its were observation/“facts” lead them. Or are you a physicist? Then i apologize
The multiverse is hypothetical. It is one possible way to conceptualize n-dimensional space-time. The idea that there are parallel universes is a way of simplifying an expanded view of linear time, which is, in turn, a way of simplifying a view of existence in which what we perceive as 3 dimensional objects are n-dimensional polytopes. There is no statistically significant evidence of parallel universes, and the concept is unfalsifiable. The infinite-worlds idea goes back to pre-Socratic Greece. But there is no evidence that such worlds are linear, connected, or coherent. Multiple universes might exist in the same way that different ocean currents exist. They might interact, intersect, or have perpendicular or parallel causality. I have tried to find a useful version of multiverse theory. But each attempt fails to provide any model that is more practical than flat-earth theory. We might think of our own existence as an n-dimensional polytope. But even this is subjective to our own memory, and is as ephemeral as the alignment of water droplets in the ocean. No. I am not a physicist. I barely graduated from high school. But I am old, and think that finding answers is less important than finding the questions, and figuring out why the questions are the questions in the first place.
You truly are mixing up philosophy (as in the non physical transformation kind) that is made up of thought. And actual physics or astronomy those are science
Я благодарю вас за вопрос. То, что вы видите в этом видео, называется "жонглирование лезвием бритвы". • Любая кошка умеет играть на пианино. Но для игры Баха нужна тонкость. • Любой диктатор может кидать обычную биомассу во вражескую артиллерию. Но чтобы выиграть войну с минимальными потерями, нужен коллективный разум. Туйшоу включает в себя множество типов методов обучения. Он включает в себя 36 базовых упражнений для двух человек, упражнения на крутящий момент и давление для ног, базовую тренировку для талии и ног и векторное тестирование для рук. Это также включает применение этих принципов к ударам, манипуляциям с суставами, пинкам и оружию. Чтобы быть практичными, эти навыки проверяются в формальных тренировках, свободных спаррингах, спортивных соревнованиях, боевых симуляциях и сценарных тренировках.
