Тёмный

Urban Neuroscience - 24-01-04 

Classic Planning Institute
Подписаться 777
Просмотров 332
50% 1

AIA CEU Number: 24-01-04
Number of Credits: 1.0 HSW
Course Title: Design Neuroscience
Keywords: Data, Behavioural Analysis, Psychosocial Wellness, Public Space
Session Description:
This session explores the importance of understanding the emerging field of neuroscience and its impact on architecture and built environment. Our unconscious behaviour directs our built environment experience: where we go, how we move through a space, and what we look at and see. The use of biometric tools, including eye tracking software and facial expression analysis can be combined to assess any design. This course explores the polar views of simplicity and complexity in architecture and reveals how modern neuroscience can help the architect know what people will enjoy, look at, and interact with. The allure of fractal patterns in nature and in traditional architecture is based on the finding that fractal patterns have an ability to alleviate stress and enhance cognitive well-being through the profound experience of aesthetic beauty. These are the tools designers can use to elevate the human experience and promote physical, mental, and social well-being as we interact with their design.
Learning objectives:
1. Understand that our unconscious behaviours reveal how we are affected physically and psychologically by our physical environment.
2. Learn that data-driven modern neuroscience tools like eye-tracking and facial expression software and tracking pedestrian routes and speed can inform the design of spaces that support psychological wellbeing of stakeholders.
3. Understand how the conclusion that architectural complexity may be more psychologically beneficial than simplicity might be.
4. Understand that mathematical proportions, geometries, and fractal patterns in architectural design are imperative for promoting human health and well-being in that they relate to familiar patterns and environmental cues in nature.
Our built environment directly impacts our psychological state, revealed by our unconscious behavior and social interactions. Assessing how architecture supports public health, safety and welfare must also consider psychosocial wellbeing. This session will inform attendees about the latest neuroscientific studies and data-driven tools which designers can use to assess the impact of built projects on human psychology, assess how stable or varied these effects are across cultures, and utilize this knowledge to supplement their design process.

Опубликовано:

 

26 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 5   
@nintendowiirulz
@nintendowiirulz 7 дней назад
Not sure how I've stumbled across this but it was very interesting thank you
@goncalodias6402
@goncalodias6402 7 дней назад
if the disfunctional urbanism, the non durability, impracticality and cost of the buildings and the complete unsustainability of the car centric world we built, specially with climate change dosent convince the profession to radically change, we must admit that modernism is totally ideologic and theres no use in trying to argue with them. The focus must be in the democratic ways that the people can influence their built envoirement, modernists cannot be allowed to override democracy for some architect to have his/her artistic freedoom. there's hard science now to tell us what is good building design and what is not, the argument that beauty is subjective just doesnt work anymore, there's proof. Thank you for your work.
@legoneb
@legoneb 6 дней назад
A reconsideration of car-centric urbanism shouldn't include a reactionary turn to the belle-epoch. Everything you said until the last line, your conclusion about the subjectivity of art, is right. I'm not sure how these precepts flow into that idea. You can cluster details in modernism.
@goncalodias6402
@goncalodias6402 6 дней назад
@@legoneb unfortunatly modernism has proved itaelf unable to do that. And we also forget that the car-centric urbanism is a feature of modernism, not a bug, the whole idea of the stand alone masterpiece building sorrounded by empty space is still present to this day, judging by what is awarded and praised in architecture magazines. Not to mention the urban projects for housing, completely disconected for the urban fabric, totally oblivious of what makes a street or a community. I wouldnt call going back to the principals of the last era of big urban expansion that was actually successfull and call it reactionary, i would say that continuing with the same ideas of the last 100 years despite the imense proof of their unpopularity, unsustainability, and unpracticality expecting it to work now is the definition of madness. What if we follow what the studies show is better for us psycologicaly, phisiologically, while being economically more resilient, phisically more durable and more envoirementaly sustainable and the result ends up looking like a medieval town? Should we be progressive and reject it or be reactionaries and do what the evidence shows to be better? This reactionary talk is not valid anymore, modernism is more than 100 years old
@kylejmarsh3988
@kylejmarsh3988 8 дней назад
Oh no! Our choices are between Venturi and Jeanneret?! How about somebody who actually built something worth looking at? lol other than that good presentation with lots of great slides.
Далее
The Criminal Indictment of New York City’s Mayor
26:44
The Imitation Game - 24-01-02
2:00:30
Просмотров 118
5-Ring Architectural Neuroscience Circus
1:00:43
AI and the Future of Architecture
54:47
Просмотров 425
The Art of Planning Cities like Paris
1:15:28
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.
21st Century Fabric and Urbanism
1:50:02
Просмотров 1 тыс.
Prof. Witold Rybczynski on Why Ornament Matters
2:13:02
Просмотров 2,8 тыс.