I mean it's nothing to be proud about lol. You're aren't at anymore of an advantage than those who have flown on any aeroplane 😅 if anything surely you're more at a disadvantage. Except the ones that crashed of course.
Have you ever been a passenger in an automobile? The chances of dying in a car crash are 1 in 5000. The Chances of dying in an airplane crash are 1 in 11 Million.
@@mg123rules They were descending. The air flow would have pushed the plane down had they turned right or left. If they were climbing they could have made it. In the official report, the co-pilot was to blame as he thought they had cleared the mountain pass.
@@mg123rules Yes they had distance but they also had a fully loaded plane, that was preparing to land. If the plane had more fuel and less passengers the pilots could have made it, but weight is always factored in when pilots are landing or taking off. They were not flying very far so they would have less fuel to make a last ditch effort to climb above the ridge. Even if by some act of god they had made it over the ridge, they would have had less fuel to land as it would have taken a significant amount to climb with all the weight they were carrying. They would have ran out of fuel and crashed.
If you would like the livery for this aircraft, here: forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/files/file/35828-f27-600-fuerza-aerea-argentina-texture/&tab=comments Enjoy!