So many Russians in the comment section that don’t know history. The US has never put boots on the ground for Israel, but has put boots on the ground for South Korea.
@@A_Derpy_NINJA you also don't know history. In 1973 , they wanted to, but Israeli leaders denied claiming it wasn't worth losing American lives fighting for Jewish lands. That supplying them with weapons was just enough. Israel can get whatever they want from USA while other nations can't.
@@robertoppenheimer8976 your talking points don’t add up ruski. You’re here whining in the comment section because Russia can’t even conquer is neighbor, one of the poorest countries in Europe that barely even had a military before the fighting started.
I love South Korea, but they have to be very careful with U.S, just try to use satellite image of Ukraine, you will understand that U.S doesn't really care about you😂😂😂, just their interest..........Note: there's no permanent friend or enemy, the only thing permanent is Interest, in this case U.S interest
if you going trough news back a five years then you going to find all escalation started on jan 2021 when biden got in office before that china-taiwan issue was almost nonexist ukraine didnt think about nato dreams Trump met with Kim Jong basically everything worked biden changed everything for worse africa just kicking out west BRICS devaluating dollar gasprices are more than doubled singlehandedly by joe biden
I am a very good military strategist, the North Korean army is much stronger than the US and South Korean armies combined. I just said that the Ukrainian army in 2022 will be very strong, but will not last long. I was right in 2021. But Ukrainian army is number one strongest military force entire the Europe, but their mistake was not making an agreement with Russian. Now Ukraine is ruined and weak like Polish.
The military alliance between North Korea and Russia means that if North Korea is attacked, Russia will intervene. This implies that even if North Korea attacks South Korea first, Russia will intervene if South Korea retaliates. Moreover, according to the clauses of the North Korea-Russia military alliance, the decision on whether North Korea has been attacked is solely determined by North Korea. This means that even if North Korea attacks first and South Korea retaliates, if North Korea claims that South Korea attacked first, Russia will support North Korea. In recent years, North Korea and Russia have repeatedly claimed that the Korean War started due to South Korea's aggression. Consequently, South Korea might find itself in a situation where it cannot retaliate against North Korea's attack. If South Korea decides to go to war with North Korea after being attacked, it will have to face a 3:1 fight against nuclear-armed countries: China, Russia, and North Korea. The United States is unlikely to directly intervene in a war with nuclear-armed states. This scenario resembles the situation of the Ukraine war, highlighting why South Korea needs to develop its own nuclear weapons.
Why won't the Houthi sail in the Red Sea anymore? The US with no effort made the Houthi hide. The Houthi have managed to stop no operations in Palestine. The Eisenhower operated for 6 months with no trouble and no goes home to rest. The Houthi can't even operate in the Red Sea for 6 days.
I love to see how the US plays divide and conquer at the level of Mastery. May South Koreans/Japanese become the human sacrifice between these superpowers, a war that they never owned
The US navy is a joke they couldn't even secure the red sea. US always getting in other nations business . Aircraft carriers are dinosaurs of the past...lmao😅😂😅😂
@@Charliedavis14744 a fat, bald bird would be nothing more than a nuisance. the fat, bald, arrogant bird is surrounded by superior military tech, yet remains oblivious.
Fun Fact: US taxpayers own more registered hand guns than all other populations ADDED TOGETHER on the planet. Over 700 Million and counting. This does not include all "hunting rifles", shot guns and hand grenades/special permit firearms/explosives (yes, even explosives are legal with the right paperwork). Fun Fact: The United States remains the only nation on earth to use nuclear devices upon another nation, even after militarily defeating the enemy. The US does not "threaten" the use of nuclear weapons. The United States uses them. US taxpayers approve. Fun Fact: February 2nd, 2024: B-1 Lancer bombers took off from Texas, USA, flew to the Middle East and dropped bombs on targets in three Nations. Then flew back to Texas, USA. This was a pointed demonstration of technology. US taxpayers approve. Fun Fact: Polls show US taxpayers are in favor of using a nuclear weapon to remind the world we will. Speaking of cowardice, are you volunteering to FAFO?
You realize a carrier really means 60+ ships? It's not just floating around un-defended. Its a Carrier Group. Complete with nuclear attack submarines and an Ohio-class ballistic missile sub at its disposal. "its only symbolic" is a lie poor countries that can't afford them tell themselves. At the cost of operation, if they were "symbolic" the United States wouldn't pay to operate 11 Carrier Groups, they would only operate one. They are capitalists.
@@Antonio18677 Not losing. Moving. The US is energy independent. There is no security interest in the middle east nor the trade routes there for the US. It's why they suddenly left Iraq instead of just keeping the oil fields. United States security interest is now with Pacific trade routes with 1. High consumption economies such as India, Indonesia, Philipines coupled with 2. Cheap labor pool 3. Pacific access. Expect the US to become highly involved and focused on the Indo-pacific and Pacific routes. The US has energy to sell, of course with an added political cost. The US strategy is to get India to patrol the middle east energy trade routes. Because if India doesn't, China will. Both China and India are dependent on importing most of their energy. Saves the US Billions just in food for sailors on it's carrier patrol groups. This is also why the Saudi's are suddenly abandoning the petrol dollar. The US isn't going to be worried who leads Saudi Arabia anymore. As in the United States doesn't really have a use for MTB so is not going to continue to prop up the Saudi Government. There have been many diplomatic gains over the last few years, including joint military exercises between the US and India. New US bases in the Philipines, massive military aid for Taiwan, Japan, Philipines, Indonesia and Vietnam. Nope, not a loss of influence but a change of where the influence is focused and why.
The U.S. is like the high school parking lot bully, who sits in his big car and revs his engine loud trying to intimidate the other kids. But he doesn’t realize that no one cares anymore.
@@jamespattinson-so7fu China and Russia are doing it in their garage. The US wastes fuel and thinks they have enough fuel to challenge others in a race.
USA the best ....Vertical landing rockets ,Stealth; Starship,Air craft Carriers ...THe best and only country in the world with such technology...ususususuus
The USS Roosevelt, nicknamed "the Big Stick". Russia has no Carriers. North Korea has no Carriers. This reminds Russia, they have no counter to US power. China has no counter to US power.
LMAO aircraft carriers are useless in modern warefare, just a big and slow floating target... you're in Russia and NK's backyard, they have a number of submarines and land and sea based anti-ship missles and drones that can sink "The Big Useless" 🤣🤣🤣
@@lahaes got any evidence for your claim? My bet is you are trying to excuse Russia for failing to build a carrier. When was the last time a carrier sunk in combat? They have been involved in many conflicts, so why has it been 80 years since the US lost a carrier?
@@corvanna4438 If "the Big Turdd" stayed any longer in the red sea they would of been sunk by a locally made Yemeni missle 🤣instead they flee now to South Korea to be some big useless power-projecting prop, let's see if "the Big Turdd" can flee from Russian hypersonics"
@@lahaesyou’re underestimating. You don’t know what the US is capable of. They are not making a lot of moves since they don’t want to escalate conflicts any further
The US at first downplays actions of Russia, for example Russian navy in Cuba then sends destroyers and a submarine, as well. Always the same proceeding: First criticising, then downplaying and in the end copying the action of their opponent.
Russia promising help to North Korea if it is attacked is a " bad thing" according to South Korea and USA, and presents a " threat". North Korea defending it's own people on it's own soil is a " threat". How would the USA react if North Korea, Russia , China and Iran started building military bases in Mexico along the border from San Diego to San Antonio, and started arming and training drug cartels , and then said: " No, we are not sending any signals to the USA, this is for the safety of Mexico".
Technically no, the carriers themselves do not have ICBM capability. But yes, they have the capability. They do carry F-35's and F-16's that are officially on US approval list for nuclear armaments. They also have at least one Ohio class ballistic missile sub assigned to their carrier group that carriers 24 missiles with up to 6 warheads each. (remember a carrier group is 60+ ships and subs) Also various other carrier capable planes have been approved and removed at different times that are still in service such as modified C-17 and C-130 cargo planes for the Rapid Dragon System testing (palletized nuclear cruise missiles, talk about overwhelming force!).
According to AP from 3 days ago, "USS Theodore Roosevelt - Based in San Diego, it has been deployed in Indo-Pacific Command since January and is in the South China Sea." According to Naval News, "During the Shangri-La Dialogue 2024 held in Singapore from May 31st to June 2nd, the Defense chief of the Republic of Korea, Japan, and the United States agreed to hold joint multi-domain exercises this coming summer under the name 'Freedom Edge'." So, Freedom Edge has nothing to do with Putin's visit in NK. If anything, Putin's visit was timed to coincide with the joint exercises. By the way, the three countries, USA, SK, and Japan held similar exercises in April this year. Good reporting a click bating do not make good company.
