Using the Rabbit R1 

Big companies care about sales... Like a lot ....

I disagree, I feel like they’re trying really hard to be the industry badboy/disruptor. They made their own device so they didn’t have to work with any other platforms and their goal seems to be to replace phones.

@@tobiasstewart5632 I think by now me and avi are done... I hope they pass and move on with their lives ...

It’s an app inside an android phone lol

Its an app that costs $200 😀

best description 😂

There's nothing wrong with that in itself btw. A lot of things are built on AOSP

It's a platform with an AI interface.

okay, and?

If this was introduced around 2005 then it would have been competing with Palm & Casio.

@@kspace0 design wise I agree but this couldn’t exist back then. Teenage engineering competing with 90s/2000s Sony would’ve been FIRE

@@lorddeecee exactly, if this is “the product” then we’ve had much better times in 2000s. Integrating AI into systems today is indeed a teenage game. Making something robust and reliable in AI is the real deal

The new category is.. checks notes... A smartphone with one app

i mean if you got $3500

Or you can live in reality and ask them their name again.

It's so crazy to me that what you are describing here is actually exciting you. To me it sounds scary and distopian. Technology is already replacing many reasons to interact human to human, why would you want to keep going in this direction? People already feel lonelier than ever before, not being able to form meaningful relationships with others

Imagine you look at a person and beside their name there is also a heart ❤️ where you can like their profile and if you don't that's seen as rude. Imagine beside that button there is an option to buy them a digital gift and where if you buy it, a beautiful filter pops up everytime you meet each other. Pay to win relationship amirite? Imagine looking at a flower and an Ad pops-up over it asking if you want to buy one from the nearest garden center. It's a 15 min drive away, or just purchase it right here and have it shipped to your house.

I think a pin (smaller than the Humane's) with just a camera, mic, speaker and Bluetooth to address your phone's AI assistant could be cool. Basically just external wearable and small form factor eyes and ears for your smartphone which will indeed lessen the number of times you would need to pull it out and could do some tasks hands free. I mean I don't use a voice assistant on my phone because I still need to hold my phone to do so, but if I didn't have to do it I'm pretty sure I would use it much more often like with smart speakers. Glasses form factor could also be cool for it but wearing glasses can be more distracting and uncomfortable than a pin. Plus I think such a device actually DOESN'T need a screen. If you want to see something - just pull out your smartphone. But for some tasks you either don't need it (say, asking AI what bird you're hearing) or could actually ask it to do some work for you, so when you unlock your phone you already have the right webpage with a product you want to buy open and all you have to do is proceed to check out or the Uber app is already open with the needed addresses put in and you just have to give it a quick look if it's correct and press Order.

exactly why i got it really. still maybe a little pricey but very basic so they aren't even trying to make it be like a smartphone. Someone argued with me you can just 'dumb' a smartphone down which yeah i get that but i want a totally new form factor and simpler with no exact comparison to a smartphone

The kid would get a lot of wrong answers. It's chat gpt. It's bound to say something stupid with confidence and then, your kid ends up believing things that are incorrect and wrong.

That wd be genius if they marketed it that way🤔

Hey rabbit what is a magnum dong?

Yeah no, never.

Absolutely. Wouldn‘t make sense to automate it using a UI that might change if there‘s an API you could just use.

Cool! And sounds like you're wrong! Double cool!

In the future the team plans to train an AI to secure their servers and they hopes the protection provided will be very strong. 😌

​@@Space_Colours In my opinion, that's a terrible idea. The beauty of human cyber security professionals is that they can't be hacked. A smart threat actor will just attack the AI and then the VM and never be detected (sort of like how you might use a rootkit to bypass Windows security tools).

@@NotApplicable2874 I think you are confused 🤔 Why do you think the AI could be hacked? Do you really think they won’t put “impossible to hack” into the prompt?

Not just logged in, it remembers your password and is trained to log in again.

​@@Space_ColoursNO, thats not how you secure a server, not a ChatGPT or AI configing it. You need a professional human!!!

Make it a replacement assistant app (because that's what it is), then you can trigger it from your bt headphones :)

It already is. Just get a good pair of IEM's with voice assistant.

I actually like the pin idea (a smaller than Humane's). Basically just a camera + mic + speaker hanging on your shirt without interfering with your senses like earphones and glasses which sends everything to a smartphone and activated via a certain word command. Pretty much like a smart speaker but small, wearable and capable of seeing things around. There needs to be something to make voice assistants in phones makes sense. Because until it's hands free and doesn't require you wearing something that blocks your senses it's kinda not that handy. If I have to put headphones on or grab a phone I'd rather just type what I want with a touch screen.

Had the same thought. I feel like they're either using AI tech and mouse movement to get around CAPTCHAs, or just stealing the session token when you log in the first time and hoping it doesn't expire. Maybe a combination of both. But yeah, I'm sure efforts will have to be made to block this sort of thing. Arms race with bot detection is inevitable, so no reason it won't move to the AI domain as well.

@@etekweb it will prompt the user to solve it themself when it encounters one

Exactly, with a human assistant they’ll already understand how websites and apps work

Rabbit doesn't have any IP worth buying. They didn't design the hardware (paid teenage engineering to design it), they don't own the LLM (just licensing a 3rd party LLM), and their "large action model" is a janky way of integrating with 3rd party apps without being officially licensed to do so. If Google, Apple, or Microsoft were to do this, they would almost certainly do the third party integrations properly and wouldn't rely on this sketchy approach. This is like those first generation bluetooth earbuds that were all over kickstarter about 6 months before the Airpods came out. They were complete trash, but they got a ton of media attention since that's all we had to look at until the real products were released.

No one cares. Get a real job UX/UI guy, before it's late. An ideal UI should be invisible, which is what these devices are heading to.

You are going to be so disappointed. I got mine 2 days ago. After setting it up, I put it away in a drawer. I feel tricked by all the hype that made me buy this. You can't do anything with it other than ask it questions. Why would you want to listen to Spotify through tiny speakers. I didn't even bother to set up the log into Spotify.

@@IDNHANTU2dayway did you even buy this shit bro?

@@IDNHANTU2day I buy soooo much stuff a lot , but even I new it was trash as soon as I saw it online like every this shig do you can do in your phone and even then I do do it on my phone

One mans trash is another mans treasure

@@JD-ul2bt I guess you right, not everyone love the same thing and it perfectly fine ❤️🥰

For what use case?

No ads.... Yet.

For now, they're likely using regular APIs. If and when they use headless browsers or app emulators on the server side, then for sure they will have the exact same issues RPA has: instability because of inconsistent UI elements, random spikes in load times, unknown pop-ups and confirmations, etc.

I agree. I can't imagine carrying another device that I have to charge and pay for. If it's not a better replacement for my phone then there is no point to it

I see no reason to carry one more device apart from my phone.

Phones can already do this. LOL

Even if the company survives (which it almost certainly won't), I would be extremely surprised if this were more than a pretty orange brick in 5 years.

You forgot the SmartRing UltraMaxPro

i mean, you still have ro chsrge your phone and pc to use all your apps. Although you are right about it being an "app"

@@johanalejandrocazadordepin7225your phone can do soooooooooooooooooooooo much more than this junk bro.

Oh my gosh, same here. I don’t know what it is… But it’s sounding cooler and cooler. 😁

I think because it’s a great novelty device. I don’t mind all the issues because I think 99% of people buying one also just wanna mess around with an AI rabbit.

Part of it is teenage engineering is just good at making desirable hardware. Same in the music production industry

It is priced as a fun toy. And designed like one, both form and function.