Тёмный

Using the Residue Theorem for improper integrals involving multiple-valued functions (2/2) 

Michael Barrus
Подписаться 9 тыс.
Просмотров 43 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

22 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии    
@Dogzz13
@Dogzz13 3 года назад
Great explanation. I'd like to point out that Z^(1/2) has only finitely many values. Yet there are 'many', so we want to define a branch cut.
@scienceuser4014
@scienceuser4014 4 месяца назад
perfect video, exactly the level i need. Thanks
@Anders3000
@Anders3000 3 года назад
So is there any way that I can reach you? I tried to use the methods in your video to evaluate the integral: ∫x^(1/3)/(x^4+1)dx from 0 to infinity. Of course I can deal with it and solve it by using other methods, but I want to see if I can solve it by the method you use in the video. However, when I try I cannot succes, so can you please help me? Best Anders
@arunbnair5686
@arunbnair5686 7 лет назад
these videos explained the concept perfectly sir, but just had a doubt. how can we know the shape of required contour?
@joyride6062
@joyride6062 5 лет назад
you dont.
@TechnoCoderz369
@TechnoCoderz369 11 месяцев назад
Use the semicircular contour in most cases. But if it is passing through the singularity, then use the Keyhole contour or the contour in Dirichlet Integral
@enriquemejia9641
@enriquemejia9641 6 лет назад
great video. explained keyhole contour perfectly!
@srikanthtupurani6316
@srikanthtupurani6316 6 лет назад
it is really wonderfull video. it is not clear from your explanation why the integral around A and B converges to the required integral as r tends to 0 and R tends to 0. what is that you are using to justify this.i have solved the same problem but never thought why it converges.may be dominated convergence theorem may help us here.
@callummunro5400
@callummunro5400 7 лет назад
thanks, this is really useful.
@IndianspacePrograme
@IndianspacePrograme 6 лет назад
Sir, Could you please explain how did you get the contour ?
@mopsiu50
@mopsiu50 7 лет назад
hmm why we cannot take half circle and isolate point 0 with small half circle?
@enrienri1815
@enrienri1815 3 года назад
I was wondering the same... would it be the same?
@MariaMartinez-tz2jl
@MariaMartinez-tz2jl 2 года назад
@@enrienri1815 I just did it, and i got the same solution
@javiergilvidal1558
@javiergilvidal1558 Год назад
Along the real axis, you want the integral to depart as little as possible from the original integral. If you use half a circle, your integral will traverse the real negative half-axis. and there´s no real square root there. Going (almost) full circle will give you the integral you want on the real positive half-axis.
@adrikadasgupta4620
@adrikadasgupta4620 4 года назад
how did u find that value of e^[1/2(log|i|+ipi/2)] in the residue part?
@studymood7401
@studymood7401 4 года назад
Well, he just replaced i by exp(ln(i)) and the expression of ln(i) you find it in the previous video. Then he replaced exp(ln(i)) by cos()+isin()
@adrikadasgupta4620
@adrikadasgupta4620 4 года назад
@@studymood7401 thank you so much ☺️☺️
@sayanjitb
@sayanjitb 3 года назад
You can also write it as i^(1/2) = e^(i*π/4) = cos(π/4) + i * sin(π/4) Which is more direct 🙂
@mohdhasan8473
@mohdhasan8473 2 года назад
@@sayanjitb is the residue at z = - i correct? I am getting positive sign
@gnydnnk8384
@gnydnnk8384 7 лет назад
Won't the two horizontal line contour pieces cancel each other out?
@gnydnnk8384
@gnydnnk8384 7 лет назад
I don't see why the argument is 2\pi. I thought you define the branch cut to be where: 0 \leq arg(z) < 2\pi. The 2\pi is not included?
@srikanthtupurani6316
@srikanthtupurani6316 6 лет назад
i also thought about it. but surprising thing is both turn out to be same as r tends to zero and R tends to infinity.
@yuanruichen2564
@yuanruichen2564 4 года назад
math isn't always intuitive lol
@gokuvegeta9500
@gokuvegeta9500 Год назад
@@gnydnnk8384 Correct. And if then if AB lies on the real axis then it will intersect itself which isn't allowed
@javiergilvidal1558
@javiergilvidal1558 Год назад
@@gnydnnk8384 It´s a passage to the limit. The way you defined the branch cut, you never go across the positive real axis. Now, FIX a small r > 0, and a large R > 0. Because your arguments are in [0, 2pi), points z on A have (very small) positive arguments, theta(z), which are uniformly bounded above by r. For FIXED R, letting r go to zero makes angles vanish, and in that first limit you have the integral of your function between 0 and R. Now let R go to infinity, and the integral over A goes to your desired integral. Again, FIX a small r > 0, and a large R > 0. Because your arguments are in [0, 2pi), points z on B have (very large) positive arguments theta(z), very close to 2pi, but a little smaller than 2pi, which are uniformly bounded above by 2pi - r. For FIXED R, letting r go to zero makes angles go to 2pi, and in that first limit you have the integral of your function between 0 and R, multiplied by e^i(pi - 2pi) = e^(-i·pi) = -1. However, in doing so you are integrating ON THE FINITE SEGMENT [0, R] traversing it from left to right, whereas your motion along the closed circuit demands you traverse it from right to left, thus causing a second sign shift. All in all, for FIXED R you obtain, in the limit as r goes to zero, the integral of your original function from 0 to R. Now let R go to infinity, and the integral over B goes, again, to your desired integral. Therefore, IN THE LIMIT AS r goes to 0, and R goes to infty, the integrals over A (left to right) and B (right to left) tend to the same value. But you NEVER integrate over the positive half-axis, segments A are always ABOVE the (+) half-axis, segments B are always BELOW the (+) half-axis, the arguments of points of A are very small for very small r, and the arguments of points of B are very close to 2pi (but always smaller than 2pi) for very small r. Hope this helps.
Далее
ТЕСЛА КИБЕРТРАК x WYLSACOM / РАЗГОН
1:40:47
iPhone Flip станет ХИТОМ!
00:40
Просмотров 80 тыс.
Handsoms😍💕
00:15
Просмотров 7 млн
Ребенок по калькуляции 😂
00:32
Просмотров 188 тыс.
Complex Analysis: Dogbone Contour Example
58:10
Просмотров 7 тыс.
Complex Integration Using Branch Cuts
12:55
Просмотров 34 тыс.
ТЕСЛА КИБЕРТРАК x WYLSACOM / РАЗГОН
1:40:47