#audio #audiophile #hifi Well here it is, HiFi Tribe !! The grandaddy test. Old School vs. New School ! Pull up a chair ! Your favorite RU-vid Audio Freak, OCD Mikey ! Vacuum Tube = 1:48 GaN FET = 4:00
The reason this channel is better than others is that mikey takes the time to show us the sound along with a brief explanation of a wide range of audio technologies.He has probably touched more audio gear than anyone else on the planet!
Thanks Mikey for the comparison. I agree that the AGDs sound better, esp. noticeable with the wind instruments. I remember way back when you first spoke about them, yes, I have known of you and your channel for many years now. Great stuff.
Great video, best presentation of "tube" sound I've ever heard. Like you I prefer the clarity of the class D. Tubes certainly bring a different character to the music and it's easy to see why some people prefer them.
GaN FET Class D amplification is also used in the Orchard Audio Starkrimson amplifier. Gan FET amps cost more so they're used less often, but they're revered for the top end detail and ability to control speaker diaphragms with an iron fist. I saw an audio engineer explain that GaN FET amps switch 3 to 4 times faster than standard class D amplifiers, and this eliminates crossover distortion. Regardless of the impressive tech specs, there's no denying that they sound amazing.
I appreciate the vid Mikey, very interesting comparison - agree completely with your take - - - can't say that I'm a fan of those speakers - first thing that struck me was the sound of boxes, a bit of an exaggeration but just to describe how they came across to me - that said, same thing, regardless, I'm still grateful to have the opportunity to hear them and glad that you used them in your comparison.
The class D amplifier sounds very clear and analytical. However, it doesn’t have any warmth or body or emotion to the sound. Harvey Rosenberg once said: “everybody out there is trying to find a Wolitzer jukebox sound.” Unfortunately, the class D sound is something I think most people will relish at first, but get tired of it in the long run. If you can’t have absolutely real sound, then we as humans want a more emotional sound. Think about it, when you hear an old wooden tube radio play, there’s just something that draws you into the sound that makes you want to listen. You can call it warmth , body, emotion, but there’s just something that attracts people to such sounds. Bob Carver try to make class D amplifier’s and failed miserably with it. Yes it may be the newest thing out there but if you look it up, you can buy amplifiers that use that GaN Fet technology for about $1700 bucks for a pair of mono blocks. And you’re selling a pair of them for over $7500.
Welp, I respectfully disagree with your assessment of class D technology. I own both the Dunlavy’s SC-IV’s and later SC-IVa’s, both of which sounded great with my Spectron Audio Digital One class D amp. I moved on to newer GaN-based class D designs from Orchard Audio after my Spectron Audio amp opted to self-retire after 30 years of service. 🤡
I suppose China sells shit ass anoxic filtration and plenums as well for a fraction of what American made Crucial install level calls for. There's a reason Elon Musk cut China out of the Space X Vendor supply chain 100%. There's always gonna be cheaper shit to buy, but would you build a rocket with it ? .. I'll tell you what.. a Saturn 5 is FAR more Emotional of a lift off than a Space X reusable, landing, guided rocket... far more inefficient, but WAY more emotional. When we get to mission critical equipment, (Like HiFi is for me) then I choose what's smart, not what makes me emotional. Strippers make me FAR more emotionally charged than my wife... same with Drugs and Alcohol... FAR more of an emotional guy.. a freaking emotional mess is most accurate. So these days I prefer balance and the smart choice that brings no anxiety with it. Tubes have far too many variables. They sound different all the time, depending on their temperature, age, country of origin, manufacture date, materials used, vacuum pressure, pin surface corrosion, vibration of the glass, etc. It's a big ball of anxiety for most of us if we actually get real with ourselves.. so the woody radio is cool simply for the fact that something that old is actually working. It's neato. I love it too. But we can't compare its function with what's better in every way. I suggest that the "emotion" you speak of is actually audio anxiety, brought on by distortion. I also suggest that it is similar to addiction in that it excites us but never completely satisfies. There is never an end to it. And Bob Carver crap is old and crappy. I agree...
Mikey you might kill me, but I strongly prefer the tube sound here. To me the class D had a slightly flat sound and it was as if there were a film of plastic around the music. The tubes evinced a feeling of realism from me. I felt like the singers were there with me.I could hear the harmonic glow, but it's a positive if anything. This was one of the starkest differences I have heard yet. Very different sound characteristic.
In this Case the tubes sounded more woolly and a bit slower. Maybe you prefer this because it’s cold outside? 😅 To warm your ears… One would have to try it with different music and a bit longer term…but here in this sample this Class D was simply more vivid and clearer…
I agree .... its the same story that it has always been - the tubes sound more three dimensional ...... the class D lacks that certain something - the best bet is an output transformer less tube amp or a pure class A solid state amp which split the difference of tube and SS down the middle .
The 300Bs have better rounder mids. The other amps are cleaner sure but flat, why even bother having a tube enclosed circuit? Plenty of less expensive class D products out there that sound similar and better at half the price. Sorry!
@@bikemike1118 I guess I'm not looking for clear at all costs. I think the emotional impact is the most important. I can't put words on it, but whenever I hear good tubes, I just say wow.
@@TheRealAudioDidact everything comes down to personal taste at the end of the day. I generally like tubes as well (I have a tube preamp in my chain). I get it. But I found out that there are also better and less good tube amps out there… some too sound open, dynamic and holographic…others sound too warmish and woolly and a bit blurred. But in general I have no bad feelings about tubes. As I said: in this very sample and via RU-vid…to my ears the „new“ amp sounded better. This may change with different music etc… 👍🏼
The next A vs. B challenge in this setup must be the Rowland Model 125 Class D amp against AGD Audion Class D amp(s). To be fair, one might consider allowing 2 Model 125 amps configured as single channel, non-bridged mono-blocks for the comparison against the AGD Audion mono-blocks to offset the power supply differences between a stereo amp against two mono amps. Or alternatively, compare the Model 125 stereo amp against the AGD Tempo stereo amp. Let the struggle session begin for Mikey!! 🤡
@@OCDHIFiGuy I actually viewed that clip from a year ago, wherein you compared the Rowland Model 125 to the AGD Tempo. You characterized the results as being the Model 125 having superior craftsmanship, value and power than the Tempo. You deftly avoided the sound quality question, perhaps for good reason. 😊
Thank you Mikey for a wonderful comparison, the sound demo was rewarding in many ways....! My opinion is relative to what you want to hear : Both amplifiers sound great, the 300 B sounds warmer, sweet, easy to listen too for a longer period of listening time, reproduces the even harmonics slightly better than the D Amplifier. The D Ampifier using Gallium Nitrate Technolgy sounds great, however it has a Digital Haze what i mean is that whe i listen to the sound it seems a little on the edgy side maybe slightly grainy ( Granular ) The antithesis is the following Gallium Nitrate is an intersting upcoming technology but still reuires refinement; if anyone sitts down for a longer period of time listening to music the 300 B will be more plesant to the ear and the individual will tend to listen longer to the content. In summary and this is my opinion only; in todays market one cannot justify the high cost of a Gallium Nitrate Amplifier over a 300 B. I personally own high end SET amplifiers and transistor amplifiers. Is one better than the other i always come back to the Vacuum Tube Amplifier ....! Why because i have no listening Fatigue when i listen to source music on this type of technology.
I hear what you are saying, but you are describing the job of the front end. And so you know, class D is an 100% ANALOG amplifier technology. There's nothing digital about it... ;-) the only Digital haze possible is from DAC
I am about to pull the trigger on the AGDs, likely the Duets. Matching the AGDs with speakers is now my focus. I do hear the benefits of both, but the AGD, much more to my preference.
Thanks for the video. I've been listening to class d amplifier since 1990. Suddenly there are lots of musicians playing music and not faking fiddling violins. Not good for those whom just laze around in the house 😂
I love GaN class D. I have a number of them and they all sound great, included in those are the AGD Audions that Mikey played. They are great. But I have to mention that Mike has such nice taste in music. I think you should have a music discovery channel or something. I would subscribe!
@@phillipmorris9847 Orchard Audio Starkrimson Stereo Ultra. I also have a pair of Jeff Rowland Model 125 amps that I bought from Mike. They are class D. But don’t think they are GaN. They are great nonetheless.
@@phillipmorris9847 very well. I haven’t done a formal comparison. But it’s a very transparent amp. Lots of detail. I have a small collection of amps. To me it’s like collecting art. Except I limit the size of the collection. 😀
GAN has more controlled bass notes over the tube example here. Though been told the AGDs were voiced after Japan Bakoon amps. Don’t doubt that AGD SQ..But hey it’s all rumorville. Thx for the vid Mikey.
I’m always astounded when the difference is so clear on RU-vid. As a solid state guy, I’m shocked at how much more I preferred the tube presentation. The vocals were night and day different, so much nicer than the GanFet, I’m still not a class d fan then.
I'm always perplexed by how people can't hear how much better something is. GaN, which is nowhere near regular class D, kills every tube amp we've tried to date. I'll keep trying. I suppose you love Vinyl too...?
Been a while since i"ve watched your channel, glad to be back. What field coil speaker are you using? Edit: Oh I see, Feasterex. I've only seen the smaller ones. So no sub was used in this cliP?
Solid state has me feeling like, okay, this an incredibly bad ass amp and doing exactly what it’s supposed to do. Yet the tubes have me feeling hypnotized and wanting to hear and more and more; even though I know it lacks the speed, power, and articulation of solid state.
However high end class AB amps both in separates and integrated form from the 1970s to early 1990s have the speed and articulation of class D amps but lack the listener fatigue and have a warmer sound.
@OCD HI-Fi Guy I listened, sitting in a Tesls Model S, playing the music through the built-in stereo system. I usually listen to solid state at home. But inside the Tesla, the thicker sound works better because the Tesla's stereo is a little thin in the midrange.
First abort vinyl now abort tubes also, what you demonstrated got my attention. Hard to go into denial with what my ears and emotions tell me after listening to your session. I may have to look at downsizing the weight, size and complexity of some of my gear! Thanks
I run a cec belt drive transport, dht tube dac with tube regulated power supply and 6sn7 tube preamp in front of my class d amps, sounds great. I get a little of the best of both worlds without too much sacrifice on either side, my listening buddies agree, fwiw.
Kids learn to 'not touch' hot vacuum tubes exactly the same way they learn to 'not touch' a hot stove. Either they listen to the adult and believe, or they use their fingers if they don't believe. Either way they learn and it won't kill them. Naturally I expect very good (high end) Class D amps to out perform any tube amp when it comes to accurate sound reproduction. Yes, tubes change the sound, and some people really like that change. To each his/her own.
Definitely the class d. The tubes sound warm and nice, but real life doesn't sound like that. I wouldn't want to have the tube sound injected into my entire music catalog.
I realize that listening like this is very different from being there, and I certainly don't have super hearing or anything, but in both of them I hear a hardness in the upper midrange that's very similar to what I heard when I built a speaker using the Li Audio Silver 8 driver.
Jeff, Mikey actually compared the Rowland Model 125 to the AGD Tempo about a year ago. You can search this channel and locate it fairly easily. I’ve seen so many vids on this channel that I forgotten that I had already seen that one. Lol
The Addition of the Live Vibe platforms under the new speakers made as much difference as the amp swap out. The platforms will work forever and not wear out. No need for a change. Will up grade any component.
Hi Paul, Thanks for watching. When someone truly innovates technology, they may want to punctuate their design prowess or maximize their design integrity by not simply stopping at the box. Instead, by going 100% with the design through the circuit all the way to the aesthetic, one makes a stronger mark in the memory of listeners. It's an industry first, in several ways and I love it, actually...
Interesting comparison. When you hear the first rendition, it’s sounds even and very pleasant. Nothing shouty and very well sorted for what it is. The second rendition sounded… let’s call it forward. Obviously more bloom in all instruments and voices. Like small filter has been lifted. I wouldn’t say the mids are lifted but rather more present in the recording. All aspects of the finishing of notes are crisper.
The 300b sounds fuller and more natural, the other might be cleaner but not as pleasing. If class D is your thing there a plenty of amps out there at half the price giving you similar if not better class D performance. Peachtree being one of them. Personally not a fan of class D myself either but maybe someday if they can do better. Next time try a KT-150 tube amp and see what people think. In a true blind test, it won’t even be close.
Well to all of us here , the class D was much better sounding. We know the exact circuit of the Peachtree and its measurements and its nowhere near AGD.. remember brother, this designer worked FOR the company that MADE the chips for everyone.. LOL, Ive got some KT150s to sell, you want to buy them... Ive fgot 2 pair of KT150 Monoblocks Ill sell cheap.. Made in USA ... LOL. One day my man, you'll have no other choice but Class D... Accept it now or accept it later but it will be swallowed by you one day, or if you refuse you will leave HiFi..
There are measures of the switching power supply that says something different but you are on the cutting edge with these two designers of agd and playback design, I will try a good 211 or 845 or 45 all nos preamp tubes and verastar, they are unsustainable for the money, Japanese trasformer are different they say…we are nostalgic like who shots films photography, broken and without work ;)
This is a real eye opener, Mike. You are firing on all cylinders. Never have been a tube power amp fan. Too soft. But tubes in a preamp or phono preamp - now you're talking.
The tube is like looking at a sunset through a dirty window thinking it so beautiful, then you step outside and see the truth what beauty really is with the Gan FET. When you can tell the difference from RU-vid has to be huge improvement in person.
For sure, Chris. What we have here is a disruptive technology. It smashes the traditional belief system, and people don't like the idea that what they've believed to be true may no longer be true. It does not mean people still can't enjoy tubes, but the proof is in the pudding. One has less distortion and sounds just as natural. ;-)
Mikey, try one of the current Conrad Johnson tube amps. They are awesome. Jeff has done a tremendous job with the current CJ products. No slow, syrupy, overly tube like sound with these. Fast, detailed, powerful and very smooth.
Hi Barry, if there's one thing I really don't like, it's a tube amp trying to be like a solid state amp. I'd rather kick its ass with a solid state. Prime example Balanced Audio Tech... just buy SS and get the job done right. To me, tube amps SHOULD sound tubey... that's why we use them. Otherwise, use SS... just my opinion...
@@OCDHIFiGuy The CJ amps have the attributes of SS but have not lost that wonderful sound people love about tubes. I have a CJ Art 150 but I use my SS amp 90% of the time. It sounds just as good without the hassle of tubes. If you get a chance you should still listen to a current CJ amp. I haven’t heard your class D amp but every one I’ve heard so far sucks.
Mikey, we've recently learned of a field coil speaker that has no spider and no surround; nothing to slow or impede cone travel. They also have a cabinet of stacked plywood like our old Magico M5s. The speakers are Ilumnia Magisters; have you ever heard them or have an opinion? Thanks.
Could not hear much of difference over my computer audio system. I would have to listen in person to make an assessment as to what amp suited my taste. In any case, could you list the artist and track you used for your Demo? Really liked it. From the tube gear I have auditioned over the years I have always felt Cary gear to be a bit too cloying. I really wanted to like them, nonetheless I preferred the sound from brands like McIntosh, BAT, ARC, Rogue, Atmasphere, Primaluna, and the VTL. I guess my preferences lean towards the new generation of tube sound versus the stuff that tries to emulate the sonics from 50 years ago.
I hope I'm not offending you, but I think it's not a completely fair comparison.. I was just wondering which tube amp you used for the comparison as it seems like the one with the worst sound quality was picked. If you don't mind, perhaps you could consider trying a better quality tube amp for a more accurate comparison. Was that a SE amp? The Tubey sound that people speak of IMO is the sound of the coupling capacitors. Coupling capacitors tend to slow the music (tubes themselves are quite fast). Try eliminating the coupling capacitors and use directly coupled and interchange transformers to drive the output tubes. You will be quite surprised.
Hi Frank, thanks for talking like a civil Human Being. You make a valid point. These are $10K MSRP S.E.T. amps using a single 300B at 8W. I figured it was a fair price comparison vs $7500 GaN monos. I'll move on to some $30,000 monos soon and compare as well. Perhaps people need to buy the Primo Tube amps do really hear the prowess of a tube. The output transformers will make or break a tube amp. Perhaps Canary Audio is total crap.. the tubes were from $200 to $500 each though ....
the AGD amps sounded way better. You have so many box speakers now! Must be in a new gear acquisition phase. No wonder you're designing your own with the Nemesis 11. Very curious how those end up
Hey Mikey I can hear the difference on my phone, but would definitely need to hear it in person to get the true perspective I currently have two Carver 350 watt mono blocks which sound great My buddy has 2-400 class D from Tommy O’Brian (god rest his soul)watt mono blocks which also sound great, he has spatial open baffle speakers and I have ARS Aures MI so totally different systems and I would be happy with either, to your point of getting out of HiFi, that said I do like listening to different rigs Take Care
@@OCDHIFiGuy lol. Nice phone. I had the note 3, note 4, 2 Note 9s and now the note ultra 20. Great phones. I am curious. I know you have great hearing and you use great equipment. I have noticed a few people comment on hearing something off on some of these recordings and I am able to hear it as well rather I am inside listening to my main system or my car. It sounds slightly over driven to be honest. If you are using your phone it makes total sense, especially while also sending via youtube. Have you heard of Ron from new record day? He has something going on with his recordings despite using youtube. I don't know if he is still using the binaural head mic that cost several thousand to record or what but it's worth a listen/look. I'm sure if anyone can figure out how to perfect these recordings, it would be you. Being able to hear your A/B comparisons with the best quality reasonably attainable without spending a ton would be most excellent
@Mr flimflam fremdippity danyet I'll go back and re record at lower volume. I'll also try different music and different amps. I intend to drive this point home. ;-)
Thanks for the comparison. To me, the tube amps sounded a bit out of focus if that makes sense. Not as sharp, but not bad. The AGDs sounded more in focus or in phase. I guess that what you mean by 'Clear'. The only catch... what happens when you want to go to an active speaker? 😈
I can hear spatial definition cleared a bit with the GaN-Ds. But the tubes sound more forgiving on the speaker. The classDs will stir-up your critical mind and then...(guess who's going to be the culprit, especially if you try them with some Maggies too!). To me, the only reason for one to go tubes-way, is a good, simple, class A, SET, ZERO-FEEDBACK amp. Paired with a clean, sharp, uncolored speaker, not needing more than a couple of watts to sing properly. Not the easiest thing on audio-earth, of course.
Now I’m having a Audio Note system but thinking to go your route > SET + Cube Audio full range.. To me tubes sound more organic and with soul. Btw I have ocd to but to my these ‘harmonic distortions’ calm me. For me the ‘clear’ and ‘clinical’ sound does not touch me. Perhaps a tast thingy! There is no good or bad here.
@@nicktube3904 Ideally, reproduced music should sound almost identical to live music. This requires both the good things of tubes and the good things of solid state amps, without their shortcomings (suppose we'd have the perfect loudspeaker). From this point, we all have to pick our poison. I picked low wattage class D (Tripath) amplification as the best "all-rounder". Checks all my quality boxes better than tubes EXCEPT for the dynamic liquidity that a good, class A, SET, zero negative feedback, single power tube per channel design can deliver. (But then, even this becomes weaker than class D, at other areas). A SET + Cube Audio, by the way, is a great choice. Not exactly world class, because the Cubes have their own limitations too (colored- although in the beautiful, technicolor-like way), but perhaps you'll never ask for more if your main music is small classical ensembles and acoustic jazz. (a world class loudspeaker should be able to play any music, with the same quality, at similar loudness levels. The bigger Cubes almost do this but distortion is heard at realistic playback levels).
Hence tube known for warm sound…I like that quality too, I wouldn’t be able to endure listening as long on the modern stuff, I accept we all have specific qualities, give me the older vacuum amps.
Mikey discusses soul in music, connection to music, i.e. through the correct rig setup. Completely agree with that and was never one for over detailed or forward sounding rigs, perfering to listen into music instead of being forcefed it. I've listened to many class D amps and have owned several and for a short while, been impressed, but eventually find them a facsimile, lacking soul and presence when compared to class A/B, even when those A amps are less cost than D. So I'm very surprised to hear Mikey advocate any class D. OCD plays it straight, and has music reproduction taste similar to mine, so I have to assume he just has found some class D amps that don't sound like an over hyped AV receiver, but actually sound smooth and linear through full band width. If this is the case, then the case for A/B and tubes is fading except for nostalgic purposes. As of now, I'm sticking with A/B until I get a chance to listen to one of these recommend D's for a couple of weeks and not for a couple of minutes.
Two different sounds. I prefer certain aspects of the GaN but I also prefer certain attributes of the tubes. Guess I need to own both and actively biamp
Not all 300B sets or sets in general sound has those syrupy sounds. Listen to Kondo amps to hear what a good SET can do. SETs are simple devices and are very response to tube rolling changes. If you use syrupy tubes or have mushy sounding caps, you will have a mushy sound.
Mushy sounding Caps ? Very responsive to different tubes ? Thats the LAST thing I want in my audio system. Something with sound that is always changing or can be changed easily. I've got 5 pair of tube monos including $30K monos. 4 stereo tube amps, 3 rube preamps, a tube crossover and a tube EQ. One Day it all gets old when you realize a tube rig = change of sonic performance anxiety.
So I thought my tubed monoblocks just didn't get along with my olympia 1 stand mount speakers. Always tizz, fuzz, harmonic--whatever. THEN I got a Marchand electronic model 44 xover and got a e-purify based Class D for the lows and used the monoblocks just for the highs. Magic. Perhaps GanFet is even better but I heard your pal speak at Cap Audio Fest and well he had a short fuse so to say. Mychal of Mytek had to bail him out.
Mr. Kutheis attended the seminar organized at CAF22 this last November, the seminar was specifically about GaN MOSFET in Class-D topologies. Michal Jurewicz and I proposed and coordinated the event in collaboration with the CAF22 organizers. A seminar that based on the collected feedback was extremely appreciated by all the attendees, maybe except for Mr. Kuthesis During my presentation, almost 50min long, Mr. Kutheis asked in different moments, various questions that were addressed and answered in full and in real time by me; his final question which by the way was not pertinent to the theme of the seminar, was what I thought about Mr. Putzsey and its Class-D products. I replied that as a rule, AGD does not comment on any competitors in the industry (for professional courtesy and for ethical standards we strive to honor), and as a personal discipline, a discipline I learnt in the hard way in a few years of life (62): I don’t comment on people or things I have no knowledge of. This was (and is) the case of Mr. Putzsey, which I never met in my life, and the case of the Purifi products, which I never had the opportunity to study or test. Mr. Kuthesis insisted to know more about why the technique to cope with the noise of the Purifi products (reading his comment I understand he was probably looking to a reassurance about the choice he made in acquiring those products). Again, I tried to address that question by describing the many components of the noise in an audio circuit, and how in general designers may use different techniques to cope with it, among them filters and high negative feedback loops, which sometime I remember I said, can have a detrimental effect on the quality of the sound produced. Again that explanation was apparently not satisfactory for Mr. Kuthesis, he insisted on the subject and at that moment Michael intervened by providing an answer that although very generic, produced the successful outcome to make Mr. Kuthesis silent, so we could continue and finally conclude the seminar. So if Mr. Kuthesis thinks that I have a short fuse, he is certainly entitled to his opinion, and he can post his opinion anywhere he likes, as he did already on another video about the review on another AGD product. What is however weird to me is why he is so pedant in recounting something so peculiar and yet by omitting key facts. I believe I was very professional and accomodating Mr. Kuthesis, but clearly he likes to smear our brand using the excuse of an alleged short fuse...may be he should lear to listen more, and not just the music.
@@Albert-nj9xm I have no opinion on this matter, but I appreciate your detailed explanation. From my past experiences with you at previous AXPONA events, you’ve always held yourself out as the paragon of patience and professionalism. See you in April!
@@OCDHIFiGuy The brand new premium ones that are Just coming out? I just heard them at a factory open house and I ended up preordering them. I was looking at KT88 Tube amps and I was blown away how clean etc. Plus a pair of monoblocks for a tad over $2k including local tax didn't hurt. Being an avg. guy with bigger eyes than wallet, I couldn't even think about $13K-$34K (model dependent) plus for the AGDs. I would love a direct comparison! Plus, I am and always will be a Benefits/Cost kind of guy, being 90-99% or more there works for me but not everyone and I appreciate that. Thanks for the response, as I enjoy your YT vids, its appreciated! :-)
Mike that's an unfair comparison 300b is old school schlock. Try a CYMER Southern Star 13E1 and you have deadly competition. They get the transformers right and the 13E1 is the finest tube I have ever heard. All the airiness and depth of tubes and solid state like dynamics tightness detail, transparency and DEEP TIGHT BASS
In Room, the tubes were midrange forward and aggravating. We had to search for songs that we could play. Not so with GaN. The GaN sounded better in the room. It was easy to hear. Perhaps Canary Audio is shit. Even with top level tubes. I'll retry this with some $30K Tube monos to see...
Thanks for the video! Going back and forth jumping in the video, using decent head phones - I couldn´t hear any difference. I really tried but no. People seems to hear a difference using theirs phone... Am I deaf or are people biased...
yo mikey i promised no more tube talk but since you are still on the matter...i specialize in guitar amps and owners of home tube gear are not that different from guitar players, they are not orientated about swapping tubes, like i was before i was enlightened to be a local guitar amp tube guru. i didn't want to fuck with it or tube roll i wanted to play guitar, till i had to swap tubes and the new ones were horrible so i sold the amp...years later working as a backliner on gigs with guitar amps that sounded bad i went into the vintage tube rabbit hole with a digital tube tester, a guide-the tube king and my ears and guess what? even the most professional guitar players have no clue about vintage tubes ,the best parts ever made for the gear they use, most people with tube gear home and guitar amps, will never hear it properly, the full potential. i used to tube roll now ,after ten years and dozens of retubed amps i don't have to tube roll anymore and i don't get people into that idea ,i just pick the best part ,nos for every position in the amp and jaws are dropping since i replace modern junk with holy grails and it's easy to get great results. most of the magic to my opinion is in the preamp so comparing power amps will show the tubes weakness less grip on the bass usually less power, you should compare no preamp to a good tube preamp(your pick) thanks for a great video i'm still biased about tubes...(got that? biased...)
And thats why you should never judge the sound of an audio system based on the RU-vid - they both sound terrible, but in the different way - both very tuby, muffled, muddy, not realistic, lika a speaker wrapped in the feather quilt.
WTF is your problem ? You just threaten me with bodily harm on a public Forum ? Real Smart Carl.. and no. I'm not afraid of stating my opinion. It's called freedom of speech. First Amendment.. got a fucking problem with it ?
@@OCDHIFiGuy I couldn't afford the price you'd want but I do hope to afford some of these amp some day. I'm just trying to build up a knowledge list of what's available from what I see and hear from youtube. and thanks for the offer also I think your doing a good job of giving Info. Sorry for the grammatical errors.
Clearly, the AGD Audion monoblocks extracted the best audio from the Feastrex field coil drivers. Not even close in my listening. Dump the tube amps to one of your tribe members who wax poetic over tube sound. Awesome clip, Mikey!
@@OCDHIFiGuy I have both tube amps (DIY rebuilt Dyna ST70 and Mk III’s; Hurricane 200 amps) and preamps (AI Modulus 2, 3A, and 3B units and Juicy Music Blueberry Extreme). I love them. But gear I’m running at the moment is solid state.
Mikey, Now I understand, Squirrel Food feeds the Anxiety! Free your mind and Free your Soul! The Creation becomes the Creator! But the Anxiety of the Flesh still remains and can only be Fulfilled when we reconnect with the Creator! The Quest for Fire continues! 🔥
For people that can't quite afford to spend $2000+ on a GaN FET amp, Peachtree Audio has their GAN-1 on sale right now for around $1300. It's a GaN FET amp with a DAC-less design. I recently picked up the GAN-1 and the Bluesound Node "stack" combo for just under what the GAN-1 normally sells for and this combo is amazing. Still going through the burn-in period with the amp but even out of the box I was blown away by the soundstage and clarity of this amp.
Yeah, sometimes I say simply be patient and save for higher level up, because I know what's inside a Peacthree... ;-) but if it makes you happy, do it !!
