awesome explanation! I have been lost for three days trying to understanding the truth table. These videos gave me a clear idea of validating deductive arguments using the Truth table.
An argument is valid if the conclusion is true whenever all the premises are assumed to be true. An argument is invalid if its is not a valid argument.
What is elementary valid argument form? Prove the validity of the following? (a) p>q .....p.... therefore q (b) p>q....q>r..... therefore p>r (c) P.... therefore P v q. Plis help🙏
A. Unseen question B. Reduce the passage below to the simplest symbolic logic Premise 1: The girls who have reached puberty will be taken into the bondo bush or they will be stocked by an enactment of parliament. Premise 2: The girls have attained the prescribe stage and the parliamentary enactment will not stop them. Conclusion: No conclusion give Please i am in need of argument solution please help
