When they pull each other on tarmac it is interesting. More weight gives more traction. The same engines and programmed to nearly the same power. But the tractors weights nearly the same in the specifications. But in the video the Valtra front weight seems to be a bit bigger (it weights 2300 kg) and it has rear wheel weights so this probably tip the scale in it's favor.
Kurwa mać ludzie jcb to jest ciagnik transportowy lecz ma swoje zastosowanie także przy cieższych pracach polowych ale na pewno nie jest taki dobry jak inny ciągnik o tej samej mocy...... Teraz niech pokażą wykresy generowanych kosztów podczas transportów to valtra się schowa
Oh look the valtra has wide tyres and the JCB narrow tyres, Plus everytime they pulled the Valtra was pulling before the JCB, therefore the test concluded nothing but tractor porn.
+Butschi Butschi It is a Sisu engine (or "AGCO Sisu Power" nowadays) in the 8310. I just checked the specifications. I'm not sure about the exact model but they both have the same displacement and bore x stroke. I don't know about the gearbox.
Valtra > JCB, pod każdym względem. :) No, może prócz walorów transportowych, bo to jedyne do czego Fasttrac się nadaje, każdy rozsądny człowiek do pierwszej lepszej pracy polowej wybrałby tą Valtrę...
Hem bunlar massey 135 mide erken kaldıran götürür muhabbeti ordakiler iş makinesi güçlü olan götürür sınırsız şanzıman vs vs yani nereden atıyosun sen..
+Gerry Meade Well that should have better effect on traction ,on concrete.More flat tire,batter grip on concrete have.I not have any of these tractors,and i like more JCB,but here i think valtra won.
Hold the phone here, I thought us Americans were "stupid and wasteful." ? More of these "style" of videos from Europe than any I've seen from the USA or Canada.....
