If you want a straight line, there's not really an ocean in the way as there is the entirety of Eurasia between them. Though considering that China and Russia make up a lot of that territory, it's probably safer to sail around south africa at this point.
@@SophiaAstatine First, he lives on an island of Great Britain, and she lives on an island in Japan (most likely Honshu), so the ocean is there regardless. Second, regardless of what you might think of the countries you mentioned the idea that simply travelling through them is somehow dangerous is laughable.
Prenup signing stream, marriage stream, divorce court stream... they have a lot to look forward to "Twice a year you get to use the boat... but not by yourself." the most under-the-radar date proposal ever anny: "Boats have horsepower?" someone in chat: _Seahorses_
@@M3d3rickPgf But he did agree tough.. So indeed they are techically engaged.. In fact in real life Both of side don't have to agree or have to fall in love to be engaged to each other.. You only need to agree with someone to do some marriage later.. That's basically what engagement is.. Contract marriage also a real thing BTW.. There's also engagement via parents where's the two individuals know nothing about their engagement.. but I don't think it's the case here..
@@KomboEzaliTe a prenup is less to keep all of your assets and more to dispute what specifically, in detail, can be taken and not taken in the case of divorce and to be used in future disputes during a divorce. In the event of divorce it was never intended to be the "end all save all" document that can let you keep everything that one may consider theirs for that invalidates the concept of alimony and asset disclosures to begin with, whether you agree with that concept or not. A matter of fact if the end result of a prenup is too one-sided that is another reason it may be voided. It was meant to settle very specific disputes, not let one keep all their crap.
@@kaos-qc5honoone views it as an end all be all save me document and moreso a protection of unshared assets that weren't discussed as being something shared in the marriage that gets treated as shared. Most people would share the notion that anything made or shared during the marriage that was created or worked towards during the marriage is typically fair game. A prenuptial is mainly to protect assets that weren't earned by either party togerher so as to protect them in the event of a fall-out in the marriage which statistically will happen. The way you're phrasing it makes it come off as entitled. When its literally not entitlement to care and protect your own assets lmao. While what you have said is literally true in the most legal sense overall, its dumb as shit and calling it coercion is just misleading in general as its literally not the other persons stuff.
I can imagine if they do marriage stream and neuro took the priest role. It would be a really short stream or took hours since she can or chose not to proceed lmao. Also the idea vedal steer boat goes somewhere while we can see the front of the ship while neuro can speak to vedal and react to it could be entertaining. But idk if it possible tho. That yatch need to have a really good internet and not too far from the coast which is dangerous and not that exciting.
Broo, If the boat fund goes well, then they can sign their Prenups on the boat and get married all on stream with Evil Neuro as the wedding offical XD Also, those innuendos peppered throughout this vid.... hmmmmmmmm~
you can start complaining about people getting your net worth wrong when they are at least a decimal point wrong, half a mil is still a pretty obscene amount of money
