Therefore we can see an element, that connects the two words: 'Bhu-gola' and 'Brahmanda'. That is the size of this universe: pancaśat koti yojana - 500'000'000 yojana * 8 miles = 4 bilions miles - panćasat = 50 - koti = 10'000'000 - yojana = 8 miles
>Dalmanita< Bhu-gola it is globe or sphere surrounding Bhu-mandala. 'mandala' is flat. 'gola' is sphere. Srimad Bhagavatam. 05.20.38 - 'pañcāśat-koṭi-gaṇitasya bhū-golasya' - 500,000,000 yojanas; gaṇitasya - which is measured at; bhūgolasya. Brahmanda is another name for Bhu-gola. CC Madhya 21.84 - 'kṛṣṇa kahe, “ei brahmāṇḍa pañcāśat koṭi yojana ati kṣudra, tāte tomāra cāri vadana' “Kṛṣṇa said, ‘Your particular universe has a diameter of four billion miles; therefore it is the smallest of all the universes. Consequently you have only four heads.(Krsna said this to Brahma).
Bhumandala = Bhugola = 500,000,000 yojanas (a 4 billion mile) flat CIRCULAR land. Bhu means land/earth. Gola means circular. Scriptures tell us that Bhumanadala is being held by Ananta Sesha. Also in some verse it says Bhugola is being held by Ananta Sesha. We can conclude that Bhugola is just another name for Bhumandala.
Sounds like you both agree, and that makes 3 of us, the earth is flat. The confusion lies with the universal covering is spherical with the flat earth within.
Challenging the Authority of Śrīla Prabhupāda's Books (Part 2 of 2) .. The HP also states that any statement from Śrīla Prabhupāda which is "non-Siddhantā", can be challenged by a follower of Śrīla Prabhupāda where it is "socially unacceptable" and "unpopular": "GBC: How should Prabhupada's followers understand and apply his statements that are largely socially unacceptable? DK: [...] ISKCON members may respectfully question the utility of Prabhupada's non-siddhanta statements that disturb the modern world. [...] Here is a statement about women, made by Srila Prabhupada, that was unpopular when he made it, and would be unpopular today: ‘Where is woman philosopher, mathematician, scientist? Not a single [one].' [Morning walk Bombay, Jan 9, 1977] If a member of ISKCON were questioned about this particular statement, it would be best to concede that Srila Prabhupada was mistaken. There are many women scientists, mathematicians, and philosophers." However, if one actually reads Śrīla Prabhupāda's statements in full, then one can understand the statement in context. And doing that here will enable one to not have to "concede" that Śrīla Prabhupāda was "mistaken": "Where is woman philosopher, mathematician, scientist? Not a single. [...] How they can have equal rights? Up to date in the history there is not a single woman who is a great scientist or great philosopher or great..." (Śrīla Prabhupāda, Morning Walk, 9/1/77) Śrīla Prabhupāda goes on to explain that he was referring to a "great scientist" or "great philosopher", etc., and only up until that time in January 1977 - "up to date in the history". And, since Śrīla Prabhupāda does not reveal here exactly what he means by "great", one cannot claim that there did exist before 1977, "great" women philosophers, etc., in the sense that Śrīla Prabhupāda meant, and that therefore he was definitely mistaken. Thus, rather than considering what may "disturb the modern world", which itself continually changes, one should try to use one's intelligence to defend Śrīla Prabhupāda instead of being quick to accept that Śrīla Prabhupāda made a mistake. Śrīla Prabhupāda Conditioned "DK: Srila Prabhupada's views were certainly not completely dictated by his cultural and historical context. [...] Srila Prabhupada's... core values and understandings were those of a pure devotee of Krishna." Consistent with the earlier statements that Śrīla Prabhupāda's scriptural writings are not completely authoritative and free from mistakes, the HP now gives an "explanation" for why this would be the case. It states that: a) Only Śrīla Prabhupāda's "core" values and understandings were those of a pure devotee of Kṛṣṇa. b) His views were "not completely dictated" by his "cultural" context, meaning that some of his views were "dictated" by his cultural context. But to claim that Śrīla Prabhupāda was even partially materially influenced is untrue, for a pure devotee is always above material influences: "A pure devotee, [...] is always above material conditioning and is always liberated." (SB, 4.29.65, purport) Time, Place, Circumstance "DK: In chapter 6 of NOD, Rupa Gosvami and Prabhupada distinguish between the unvarying basic principles of bhakti, and variable details that can be adjusted according to time, place, and circumstances. In his purport to SBh 4.8.54, and elsewhere, Prabhupada strongly urges that we adjust details according to time, place, and circumstances. He did not claim that only he could or should make such adjustments." In an attempt to continue to undermine Śrīla Prabhupāda's authority, the HP also claims that the details of Bhakti can be changed according to time, place and circumstances, presumably by anyone, since they claim Śrīla Prabhupāda did not state that only he could make such changes. They cite the purport to SB 4.8.54. However, the purport they cite specifically speaks of Ācāryas, such as Śrīla Prabhupāda, making changes: "One has to consider the particular time, country and conveniences. [...] Those who are not actually in the line of Ācāryas, or who personally have no knowledge of how to act in the role of Ācārya, unnecessarily criticize the activities of the ISKCON movement [...]" (SB, 4.8.54, purport) Given this, one would need a statement from Śrīla Prabhupāda that those who are not the Ācārya can change the details of the practices involved in Bhakti which he has given - but neither HD nor the HP present such a statement. Conclusion Unfortunately, there is nothing new in some disciples of Śrīla Prabhupāda seeing "mistakes" in his books. Śrīla Prabhupāda had addressed the situation when it happened during his physical presence as follows: Rādhā-vallabha: "He thinks, "If I think I see a mistake, what should I think?" I'll tell him what you just said." Śrīla Prabhupāda: "He cannot see mistake. He is mistake." (Room Conversation, 27/2/77) By and large the rank and file in ISKCON still consider all the words in Śrīla Prabhupāda's books to be totally authoritative, having been directly guided by Lord Kṛṣṇa, with Śrīla Prabhupāda acting as his pure instrument. It is regrettable that some of their own leaders may not fully share this sentiment. However, regardless of what anyone in ISKCON may think, rest assured that the IRM will always fight to defend Śrīla Prabhupāda and his authority in all circumstances. Return to "Śrīla Prabhupāda's Books" Index www.iskconirm.com/docs/webpages/Srila-Prabhupada-Books-index.html Return to Drutakarma dāsa Index www.iskconirm.com/docs/webpages/drutakarma.htm Return to Hṛdayānanda dāsa Gosvāmī Index www.iskconirm.com/docs/webpages/hrds_index.htm Return to IRM Homepage iskconirm.com Please chant: Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare, Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare. And be Happy! (End Part 2 of 2 Challenging the Authority of Śrīla Prabhupāda's Books
Jan . Do not go to the flat earth society, they just make it sound stupid. Research flat earth properly. You will be waiting forever. In 2000 years nothing.
Sadaputa dasa was not a mathematician. People say this, as if, the math is settled. The math has not been touched. I have addressed math in my RU-vid videos.
This guy doesn't know what he is talking about. The illusionary energy makes him think the earth is a globe when in reality the earth is flat according to Srimad Bhagvatam. Bhugola doesn't mean globe. Bhugola means circular (flat) land. Flat and circular like a lotus flower. 4 billion miles in diameter.
Srimad Bhagvatam 16.20.38 tells us that bhugola is Pancashat-koti - 500,000,000 yojanas (4 billion miles) So I don't how can anyone confuse that with a 24 900 mile Earth ball. I'm banned from commenting under the TOVP info channel. Their concoction is utter non-sense. Floating islands? No lokaloka mountain..? They took out the whole 1 billion mile mountain and Danavir Goswami's idiotic new globe lie presentation will be displayed there. This poison ball of the atheistic Jesuit demons should be completely driven out from our society. It's not Vedic, never was.
Yes, lotus leaf or flat like a round plate. It's easy to understand. The indoctrinated minds cannot comprehend. Danavir prabhu's goal is to raise $74,000 to make his new video of lies. On this propaganda website he actually quotes SB 16.20.38 partiality... giving Sukadev Goswami a slap in the face. Freemason demons like Einstein and Newton are also quoted. Than he shows a preview of his upcoming video looking like something the deceiver NASA would make. Why are these devotees so much influenced by demons?
@@dalmanita8177 At night we can see many satellites, ISS fly over, or new satellite train of Elon Musk. How to explain this, if the earth is flat? Thank you
@@gauranga1008 don’t see the difficulty. Satellites work on both flat and globe models (distance from satellite to earth will differ between the two models).
Why did so many devotees not adhere to his directives! Did somebody give him poison! He probably needed some the way 13 gurus devastated his vision!! It's in atrocity!
@Abhi Neo He portrayed himself with Ancient archaeology as an Independent thinker and scholar. This was good. You can't intertwine Science with cultish beliefs. It's ridiculous. His name is Michael....just Michael. It's ridiculous to posit beliefs without any evidence.
@@1neAdam12 Internally from my own inner monologue without relying on someone or some thing to guide me. In other words, I think from my inner self without need for petty guidance. Those who blindly follow are at the behest of those who lead them.
