Veteran journalist Charles Moore on Meghan Markle and Princess Diana - BQ #2 

Sunnydreamer1470 : All credit goes to his university and the education he received there. His parents get the accolade for instilling in him the manners he portrays.

Samson’s I know many articulate mature young people who were homeschooled, away from liberal institutions. This doesn’t happen in college, this starts at birth.

Sunnydreamer1470 : I would like to think that his parents also had a hand in his manners and schooling irrespective of where it was administered. Education is a wonderful thing and we take the lessons handed down to us seriously if they whet our interest.

Superb appreciation!

@@ladyluck8314 I'm more surprised that he turned into the fine young man he is despite having gone to university. University students have proven over the last few weeks what happens when one gets brainwashed by the liberal "professors".

Yes, a very good unterviews, both of them👍👍👍

So true

Debbie Dalley : It is nice that they are not talking over each other and/or talking at the same time. The Sussexes are not concerned about anything but themselves. Care about others?? That is rubbish; they have NOT shown anything in their actions to indicate that they care about those much less than unfortunate than even an average person. The Sussexes are full-blown adults; they should be able to look after themselves, especially since the have the millions to pay for whatever they want.

Yes

There is a youtube interview of a royal photographer named Arthur Edwards (who worked for years with Harry) which is also very good.

Olivia Miller a breath of fresh air. Nice to see. Rational and balanced thought without resorting to hysteria

No hidden agenda

Agree. Refreshing.

Telephassa Rose you sense a journo with class and integrity. He is articulate, thoughtful and even handed. Harry and sparkle have charged off like bull in a china shop. Intruding on your own privacy puts it nicely I think.

Jeremy Fisher the

America's poloitics

@@skilso n

@@elsarawlins2734 ng W

People are snobbish about the sun because they printed lies about 69 dead women men and children

C J ,!

Unlike Piers Morgan , he talks more than the guest , that’s how “ we “ know he won’t succeed in the Larry king show , he TALKS tooooooo much .

Seen this young man interviewing before on youtube. Old style journalism with no bias. Unusual to see these days and so captivating. This is the sort of interview that made me want to be a journalist many moons ago. Never realized my ambition but I'm still in awe of interviewers like this.

That young JOURNALIST is NOT Piers as you say he let the interviewee speaks .

Agree, he is thoughtful, humble and not trying to upstage Charles. A rare find in today's interviewers.

I agree. This young man is very good. 👍

Silver Man without constantly interrupting too 👍🏼

@stephen morris and for the youth of today. Very well done, and respect for the young interviewer. Watched him in a couple of interviews and realised what a good analytical mind he has.

Are you clever

Charles Moore

⁸a pl l

⁰

@@johnpryce-jones7072 why is it only Harry people feel sorry for when walking behind his mums coffin, William is hurt as much if not more cause she confided in him 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

I dont like some of the answers but this is the only interview on this subject that has been civilised, fair and balanced. I really like the young man, I hope he goes far in his career.

I was shocked to learn yesterday that he didn't even attend University. If there's been a more harsh condemnation about what has gone on in the colleges of UK and USA over the past 20 years than that, I haven't heard it. Professors should be raging at their administrators that someone of his aptitude found what they offer superfluous.

He will,very well done 👍

Oprah interview

Yes, his headmaster and teachers must be very proud of him...

I quite agree. Makes a change!

Not too many so's either.

A flim flam salesman who is a typical conservative swindler.

Yes of course only middle and upper class people should ever be able to open their mouths. Language is for communication, and is all made up anyway as long as we can understand each other all ways of speaking English are correct. People from Shakespearean times would think you speak and write terrible English.

All accents are valid, true, but there's nothing "correct" about grammatically incorrect English. You can speak in a lower class accent and yet not use bad grammar.

Paula Wastel agreed!

What a beautifully spoken, civilised interview .A joy to listen to.

He's dense and doesn't live in 2021. Neither do the monarchy.

@@sherylmerville3971 WHAT ARE YOU ON?! "DONT" MAKE A "STATEMENT" IF YOU "CAN'T" BACK IT UP!!!!!!!

And what does it mean to "live in 2021"? Other than the literal meaning, of course?

What "behaviour" are you talking about? Meghan was treated with hatred and insensitivity.

@@karmad4491 H's wife is a pathalogical liar. Are you one too?

I want a redo of this interview. Excellent

@@karmad4491 what nonsense

or now...

Martha Arteaga possibly because your used to and hooked on sensationalist journalism

Bill Blinky snap

Me too.

steven edgington

This was an excellent , and educative interview and a few of our Media might ,with respect , take note- ask the question, and then button up. Educative and far ranging thank you. BroomeboyWA

So don't hate. Attitudes like that produce young men like this.

Don't hate .

Reply to what?

Overjoyed to read your comment Justin because it shows a complex reaction. You don't just dismiss him because of his newspaper, you show that a phenomenon can have BOTH good and bad; and I wish more people could evaluate in your way.

I think the Sun have more and more very good moments.

This Gentleman has to clear a minefield before Speaking/Printing .. I'm very critical with our media but Well done fella you've given me a bit of faith.. Cheers

What a shame all journalists can't be like him.

346 NYC he’s good. Been following him from his PoliticsUK days.

It is hard to be a good interviewer, but to be better than most if not all in the media all you have to do is to let the other person talk and make his case properly.

Agree, Steven Edginton is an excellent interviewer, hopefully destined for a media career as accomplished as that of Charles Moore.

Yea, you're used to jerry springer stfu.

First class interviewer - so refreshing in the media today - Charles Moore worldly erudite interviewee ditto Thank you

He did but didn't really ask the tough questions: why Johnson had two contradistinctive articles to hand on the European issue, why unemployment in the 1980s was used as an alternative Incomes Policy, why millions of people today are living pay cheque to pay cheque, why the elites such as Harry Windsor and Ms. Markle are so out of touch with reality..Did you notice also how the Establishment kept under wraps how Prince Charles was the one who mainly funded his two sons, because it raised questions about the Duchy of Cornwall and the income generated therefrom?

Very true!

stevebbuk those are (mostly, IMHO) valid questions but they had literally no proper place in this interview, with respect.

Ruth irwin I enjoyed this interview without the interviewer butting in and causing the interviewee to lose their train of thought. Very refreshing.

Kind of the opposite of Piers Morgan, isn't it? :) Good to have balance.

Padraic Walsh great comment. I agree entirely.

I wish Piers Morgan would learn something from this young lad. Piers makes it all about him, always - and loses track of the interview and interviewee as a result. He was terrible in the US and his programme lasted barely a year. Still full of himself now back on UK morning tv...

@@Shelsight the idea of Piers Morgan learning anything whatsoever involves a ship that sailed many moons ago. He also suffers from the fundamental learning difficulty of having his head so far up his backside that he is apparently unable to register anything not said in his own twisted and intellectually dishonest echo chamber. (I am not a huge fan, as you may have gathered.)

@@parrogakaparadise9477 that's an insult to learning disabled

@rachel hutchinson what is his name?? it isn't very British to acknowledge without NAMING!!

Isn’t he ex Guido Fawkes?

@@MsElke11 He says his name at the very beginning.

@@MsElke11 Stephen Edgington

@@mikereger1186 he was there for literally a couple of weeks before the Sun poached him.

ditto

Cindy M I would say it found favour in the U.K. its a considered and thoughtful interview with a respected and mature journalist giving candid views.

Jeremy Fisher Thank you!

One of the more popular and informative interviews so far in UK.! Based in fact and no nonsense. Very well conducted also. Excellent job.

Has gone down very well in Ireland too....so good to hear great questions and uninterrupted answers

Maureen Oneil - and Sir Charles was actually permitted to finish answering without being interrupted.

Yes agree, you get to listen to questions and answers, without both talking at once.

Yes refreshing isn't it

Karrie Dee Sadly we said goodby to that sort of professional approach years ago. These days interviewers and interviewees see it as a game of one upmanship. That said I am quite happy to see evasive politicians suffer at the hands of some attack dog like Andrew Neil.

THE LADY IS BITTER BIG TIME MEGHAN HAS SHOVED IT BACK TO OLD CROW THEY BULLIED THEM THINKING THEY CAN CONTROL THEM 👅👅👅👅👅 THE BITTERNESS IS THE SUSSEXES DO NOT NEED THE BRITISH MEDIA 👅👅👅👅👅👅

Saida Nyakaya The Sussexes are spoilt Snowflakes who should pay the British Tax Payer back all the money we have wasted on them. They should renounce their titles and pay for their own security now. Harry should apologise to his grandmother the Queen for being so disrespectful. She had found nothing but support him all his life. He was born to be a Royal with all the wealth and privilege that instils. If it is too much for the poor little boy then he should go away and not bore us with his little life.

@belleserpente You are clearly very wrong. Also, very biased and presumptuous!

Brian Musson, than your statement should apply to all the royals not just Harry and Meghan.

He's just as corrupt as the old regime monarchy

I did love this interview, but it gave me the chills when Charles Moore said "the Monarchy is more important than your personal feelings". What a thing to be born into. I think the Queen is the only person who has lived by that rule - in public, at least.

It was nice to see this interview. What an interesting knowledgeable man. I think Megan was in fantasy and thought she was playing a part, and after filmed, It was over and time for another movie. She was a duchess and now shes a voice over.

That's what Markle discovered,being Royal and subjugating oneself to service to one's Country, is not all beer and skittles!!

Yes, I feel the same way about him, not too many of his kind left in the world.

Good interview

They won't be now. Very kind that Charles is still subsidizing their lives... I guess. That makes me think he isn't angry, but this has to be sad, having his son and baby Archie so far away.

@@amylynnhunt55 --- As a grandmother, I can't help but empathize with the remaining Royal Family who are denied a relationship with Archie, a child whose relationship with extended family will be extremely important when he achieves adulthood, and well beyond. As said in the interview, feelings don't matter when you're part of the Monarchy. The Sussexes have been incredibly self centered and thoughtless.

They needed security protection until they could get on their feet. There are too many crazy people who pose a threat. Does Prince Charles want his grandson to be in danger of being kidnapped?

@@OceanSwimmer Harry doesn't want to walk behind his wife's coffin.

Richard Fellows You expect that from the BBC? 🤣🤣🤣

The BBC just interview their own correspondents most of the time now, not the actual people directly involved with anything. Also they do news pieces based on pre announced things, not events that have actually happened yet.

He is very young but his interview is very professional he let his guest express himself without cutting him off and distracting his guest. He is playing low key and let the guest shine and express who he would like to say.

Maria Vega So true but then again, the BBC has become FAKE NEWS and is laughable.

@@audraandrews4281 I don't care about BBC I just like the journalist and if someone doing good job should be recognize for that. He is so young he can switch to any station after he gets more experience and present himself well.

He is not a Piers Morgan

@@DrJudes Charles who?

Hebo Sabe your comment rather suggests that you are the idiot in the room

You are spot on. The Royal family has shown class where MM and PH have shown greed and betrayal .

correction .... C Movie actress, at best.

@@robdevilliers666 D movie actress, I'd never heard her name

@@karmad4491 They weren't talking about Andrew - it seems like he is the only "weapon" you can use in your "defence" of two people who have caused havoc, polarisation and shown disloyalty to the Monarch of our country AND its people. Andrew is more or less a pariah now despite not being proved to be guilty of anything. You learned nothing from what Charles Moore said did you? The interview with Winfrey has been exposed for what it was....a pack of lies. I don't like liars, as for the good old "hate" word, I don't hate them, they both have in their quest for fame and control have become a complete laughing stock. I suppose I should pity them. You too, for only hearing what you want to hear. Bye now, best of luck. No replies, hard talking to brick walls.

@@kimmib1987 And beloved Prince Andrew is the epitome of RF "class."

But Interesting to hear this different take on the new crisis which was claimed by some to be the worst crisis in 85 years. Many comparisons are being made between Megan and Diana but as Charles Moore points out, the sussexes are less relevant as they are further down the line of succession. Princess Diana was married to the heir whereas Meghan is married to the spare. They will make some money from the scandal but their story will become irrelevant (assuming it ever was relevant in the first place)

Too true. Not an easy prey to be rid of.

I agree I wouldn't normally sit through a forty minute interview but this one was exceptional from both men c.porter

This boy didn't do so well interviewing Nigel Farage.... He is obviously a remoaner, and his resentment showed.

@@veenapaulson4934 As I read , you are mistaken , he actually worked for the Brexit Party . Steven Edington is a brilliant interviewer , I dare say interviewing Nigel Farage he would have to play devils advocate .

I agree he is a very intelligent man, but a recipient of Thatcher's largesse and not a victim, as so many unfortunately were.

I am a dual citizen UK/"US and I have to agree

@Megan Cox I can't say what she loves and doesn't love. I doubt I would love my every move being scrutinized. She was a television star in North America and probably didn't realize the fame of a television star and being a part of the Royal family are two different things... I wouldn't go so far as to say this was all Meghan's decision either. I think her unhappiness prompted Prince Harry to make this declaration for his family

Exactly - they married waaaay to quickly, IMO. That's where William got it right - he dated Kate on and off for a decade before marrying her, so they both had a chance to see whether she was good at dealing with media scrutiny over a long period - and she had a particularly tough time with the media when they broke up for a while - not many people could've handled being hounded constantly by papparazzi as she was, having 50 of them outside her flat at all times, but she proved herself capable. I think Harry assumed Megan would be up to it because she was already in the public eye, but being a royal is very different from being a famous actress, in terms of how the person is expected to behave - it's not something most rational people would choose for themselves, because it involves such a curtailment of personal freedom. They've both been pretty reckless in jumping into this thing so quickly and by the looks of their antics last week, they're continuing in this vain.

@@lavienestpasunlongfleuvetr2559 exactly and she waz not famous most American s never heard of her shes b class. There are laws rules and proticols Shes not clever enough to handle it all. She wants more attention first tbing she did was jump on the social media band wagon that was wrong And she left her son out of the country on purpose she could have been stopped Her immigration statis is iffy right now shes got to live in the UK another 5 years to get dual citizenship and with out that she cant just come and go when she pleases I think this is going to back fire on her

@@rubyslippers-cn1wj Plus, the Q is also the Q of Canada.

Gullible as they come

Born Yesterday, You’ve misunderstood my comment, I didn’t say I believe everything he says, what I like is that he asks specific questions and gives the interviewees time and space to provide their insight, he is calm and polite, I despair at the Channel 4, BBC and some Sky interviews where people are harried and bullied in a dishonest and Juvenal way (“so What your saying is” nonsense) clearly this interviewer prepares properly. Ive seen a few of his interviews and like his style of interviewing, thats all, I wanted to give him the credit and support he deserves.

@@paulo1787 well say so then people would know what youre on about. I didnt misunderstand anything, you didnt make it clear what you meant.

Born Yesterday How Rude 😜

@@paulo1787 not rude at all. Just stating facts. If you meant something else then say so, dont say its someone elses fault for misunderstanding. Its you.

Right? I'm more than twice his age and he puts me to shame.

Excellent interview! Extremely well articulated by Charles Moore.

I believe he already is quite special, and he will rise in his chosen profession!

True. She was, however, barely 20 when she married Charles who was a decade older, and had come from a sheltered environment whereas Meghan was much more worldly wise.

@@pianorama Meghan just didn't get it. To "quit" on instagram was horrid. She didn't realize she wasn't in Hollyweird anymore.

The British people really should learn at school how to fact check. All the bad stuff Diana allegedly did is hearsay. There is no proof she ever said anything about Charles in a villa in Italy. I read many books about Dianas death, the media members are so focussed on the drunken driver, their guilt screams through this tunnel vision. The public knows that had there been no paparazzi, she would still be alive. Harry knows it. We don’t need the media to understand what is going on, because Harry said it last October. He won’t let them bully him into a game that killed his mother. As simple as that. All the hysteria and many stories of the media is trying to divert from this one very clear statement.

Angel 1 she never was in Hollywood they didn’t want her

Christina Mueller the press didn’t kill Diana that came from another source.

Ann Gent 🤩

Very much so! 🙂

How old is he? People are acting like he's 12.

Why would you post the same comment twice ?

Harry a token for what?

Paula Ify for her to climb that social ladder

Well said and so true! Hollywood drama crap 💩

I think it's a good thing that at LEAST Harry is fairly far down the line of succcession unlike, of course, his older brother William who's officially second in line. Otherwise, yes - I could see a potentially damaging situation like the King Edward VIII & Walis Simpson debacle in 1936.

@MELA Meghan wanted the fame, titles and money that's always been it, Harry is merely an ends to a mean. That staement released by "both" was Meghan demanding her own terms. The Crown always wins. Meghan is going to look a complete fool and the world will see what shes really like to her own detriment.

Though you discount the fact that Harry is far from the throne, and his adolescent behavior did show he had lots of anxiety and resentment towards the whole scenario of his parents breakup, divorce and the events that lead to his mother's death !!! Cheers

Harry was younger?

Brian Harrigan Unfortunately very common, in ordinary life too.

@@jemmajames6719 most people in ordinary life are left to grieve in private though. And William had more support after Diana died than Harry because William 'will be king' so all the support went to him, not Harry, he was left in the cold by most of his family. His mother was the only one who saw the special treatment William got from birth and so she lavished Harry with extra attention throughout his childhood. That's why he feels his mother's loss so much more than William. This was reported at the time just before and after her death.

BritishJamaican777 They aren’t brought up in a normal way as we know it, though I agree it was a mistake to make them walk behind the coffin, this was her brothers idea.Maybe Harry was indulged too much and not told about duty as much as William, because William is doing what’s expected and seems grateful Harry not at all. Harry and Meghan seem to be leaving their baby a lot, so he’s not learned much there.We cannot imagine the world they including Diana was brought up in. Diana always joked she had more pedigree than the Royal family.They have a skewed view on how the world is compared to ours, their lives are privilege and rules rules rules.

Trisha Post What goes around comes around, Queen exists cause taxpayers money. They causes a lot of damage and pain to Princess Diana and the boys, then pay for it!!!!

A heartless woman, who had dragged two bereaved boys to a church, in front of the world media, the morning of their mother’s death. The heartless Windsor’s were totally shocked, at the world’s reaction, when Diana died. They were only concerned about saving their precious Institution. Before they had gone to church, the Queen, aka Mrs Windsor shook her grandsons hand, and said that she was “sorry,” about their mother’s death. All you know is the lies they spread. Behind the. public glare, it is a , money making machine, void of any feelings, where only the heartless survive.

Milly Herzog - get your facts right. The Queen tried to keep them at Balmoral to shield them but bowed to public and Prime Ministerial pressure to bring them back to London.

J Felton I know my facts! Whilst you live in the fairytale world about the Windsor’s. Diana had dragged them ever so reluctantly in to the 21st century, it is because of her, and her sons ( because of the way, she had brought them up), that they are surviving. Before she married in to the world’s most dysfunctional family, the Windsor’s were very, very, unpopular. Totally out of touch, and the older generation remain so today. Charles never appreciated what Diana was trying to do. He was jealous of her popularity, ( like the rest of that heartless family) and never saw her as an asset, but a treat. He is a overindulged, petulant, self pitying, bouffant selfish wimp, who needs his mummy Camzilla to sooth him, and butter up his fragile ego. You know the two, do NOT live together! If you only knew the truth about them all, you would think differently. Good for Harry! He fought for his country in a war! He is suffering from a shell shock, and the fact, that he had never had a chance to mourn one person, who truly loved him, his mother. His own father had used him, and William, to score with the public after Diana died. Charles should never had married The Tampax Woman, he should have dedicated his life to his sons well being, and his duties. Instead, after Diana died, Camilla and her children, and her late father, moved in to St James’s Palace to live with him. When his sons came to stay there from school, they were never even allowed to mention their mother’s name, so not to upset the damn Mistress. They bottled up everything. Than Charles, Camilla, Penny Junor , and a very expensive spin doctor called Mark Bolland, hired by Charles, had embarked on a dirty, lying, character campaign to smear dead Diana, so that the public would accept, the lazy Camilla. Charles was desperate to revamp his damaged reputation. Patrick Jephsen, Diana’s former Private Secretary ( here on RU-vid) was not mincing his words, when he talked about how disgusting the Windsor’s had been to Diana. Diana’s sons know the truth, that is why they have not got a close relationship with their father, they see him when they have to, and Camilla hardly, mostly at official functions. In the meantime, they do, what the Windsor’s had done for decades, keep up with in appearance in public ( to fool people like you), in the Private, it is a different story. It is a toxic existence, , where only the toxic people survive. None of those people are close. ( The Queen’s Children’s.) They all have seperate, very competitive households, and communicate through their secretaries. William has no choice, he is stuck. Harry did have a choice, and he left. They will miss him. Apparently the Queen, and Charles now appreciate ( only too late), What Diana was trying to do. They see Harry is like her, with the public. They will miss that. He was a spare, and was never treated by them, the same as William, which used to infuriate Diana. He and his wife, will continue to do good, but outside of the toxic, unreal existence. Good luck to them! In the photos released today, if them getting off of a plane, shows Harry totally relaxed, happy, with no stress showing in his face. The hereditary monarchy is outdated, it will not survive for much longer. There is simply no room for it in our 21 st century.

People are judged by their actions. Tthe media has now discovered that the Sussexes have created businesses, trademarks, and sought deals well before this announcement. It is reported that Meghan actually completed the Disney voiceovers before she took her 6 week vacation. They did not listen to the Queen or regards to the BRF rules and protocols. They did not seem to care about the problems it would cause. Seems a bit selfish to me.

@Fionabuster D. In that same breath you are insinuating Charles Moore does.

adrian torres The Disney thing is for charity. They’re not making money off of it.

@@joycestewart8913 I'm sure the queen will have it audited. She doesn't want any scandlas.

@@joycestewart8913 they created a Clinton style corporation in USA which is a scam only 5% has to go to the charity they can collect the rest and put it in their pocket.

They were advised by Oprah Winfrey & Mr. & Mrs. George Clooney who know absolutely nothing about Britain's Royalty.

Perhaps it is me, but it appears their lives have been filled with chaos and significant changes since only 2018.

The Sussexes are self absorbed, entitled, and want the lime light in spite of their claims of wanting privacy, and a normal life.Theh love the attention as did Diana. Sure there were those less fortunate who benefitted through her good deeds, however her main goal was in becoming more loved and popular than the husband she sought vindication on..Very sad young desturbed woman who chose to run around with a world famous playboy, the nephew of the biggest arms dealer on the planet all the while preaching peace...Really pathetic.

@@jenniferhewson5831 --- in other words Harry and Megan consulted with three numbskulls. How sad and pathetic!

Yes, This is the outcome when a woman tries to rule over her husband. A Prince Edward, Walace type outcome, only worse because MM has limited communications skills and the inability to conduct herself like a mature lady.

Two journos in an absolutely engaging discussion. In a "Twitter" world, a decent 40 mins was magnificent Andy.

Another gullible idiot.

Great comment

Jill Harvey Meagan said by any means necessary,I am going to be the star,not Harry.She makes Harry look like her servant.The Harry we have grown up with is gone,a broken man and I believe we ain’t seen nothing yet.

That's exactly what I thought.

Jill Harvey - Fear of the media, yet yesterday in Canada she wound the window down so her picture could be taken grinning like a cat that caught the canary.

Do you remember before Harry married Megan when Megan was excited to become a Princess? Then, Megan said she could do more to "help other's" as a Royal. Now, she has gone back to Hollywood using Harry to get jobs. Megan will use anyone to get what she wants in my opinion she is a Narcissist and poor Harry being who he is will be bled dry and she will divorce him. My heart deeply goes out to the queen in all this! Esp. at her age. Megan couldn't handle the discipline in the best position in the world. So, be careful what you wish for Megan you just might get it.

Refreshing and respectful interview between 2 professionals from a different generation

@fifikhalifa barry I would think he means responsibility for being Royal, protocols, always showing they are doing the right thing as a family under the pressures of being a good example for the Country!

Agree. Love his optimism. It shines through.

@@joygrace7924 j

.Absolutely. Good luck!

And, how about reporting more respectfully AND honestly

And doesn't go to the BBC or Guardian

And failed.

Agree. She reminds me of a female Trump. Trump arrived at the presidency to transform it in his image. She arrived at the royal family to transform it into her image. May they both fail at it for the good of all. Just my opinion.

@@joygrace7924 she's not even a little like trump, who loves his country + the institution into which he's been elected -- in his serving us, he's trying to preserve + protect it whereas selfish ignorant meGain was never interested in britain, the monarchy or its history or the british people, she's only interested in what they can do for her, to enrich her life + brighten her star

@@joygrace7924 America is going down in a hand basket. We need a Man like The Presedent to stand up for 4he American people. All we've had , are crooks running our country for years.

@rae alikaj I agree 100% Trump is all about America and keeping our country great. The facts/numbers speak for themselves. MeGain is an angry feminist who’s all about making a name for herself for the sake of the feminist movement. She disrespected the monarchy and her husband who I pray find his way back to his royal status.

@Anita Hall 🙋🏿‍♀️🤯🙋🏿‍♀️🤯🙋🏿‍♀️🤯

@Anita Hall oh, but I can and I turn a beautiful, dark color!

@Anita Hall Its diskramination to say white Be intelligent 😎

@Anita Hall Have a nice day Lady Anita

I choose by luck First you can think all you want

Absolutely - should interview Ann Widdecombe too, she warned that Markle would be trouble.

Now of course we have the infamous interview with Oprah Winfrey. And what an interview it turned out to be. The Royal family were much maligned, thankfully not the Queen and Prince Phillip. Meghan is the consummate actress and portrayed herself as not being taken seriously enough when she was suffering from depression et al. Refer to the interview which took place on the 7 March and judge for yourself. How sad that it has turned out to be so acrimonious. I am a South African and love the Royal family.

@@scorpio85 How about Prince Andrew's interview with Emily Maitless? Did that do a little damage to the RF brand? You still love the RF after that hilarious disaster?

CMon719* I believe she was caught in her scheme and is being held accountable. The rest is her PR causing trouble.

Oh, for more experiences like this, and less of the shouting, talking over each other ,so called interviews which we experience these days.

Evelyn Fullerton so sad.This is just the beginning .I hope I’m wrong but just wait,she has already started wheeling and dealing.

Nancy Williams you know this how? What a stupid thing to say.

We all fell a little depressed initially when we leave the known for the unknown. Luckily he's not by himself. But why are people acting like he's banished from the UK and will never return. He has the means to be in Britain weekly if that's what he wants

I think we are hurt because we defended Megan and supported her when other people were against her Now they have no security or privacy the place they are staying in Canada is surrounded by reporters some with long range cameras that can see in the house I worry about little Archie xxx

@@evelynfullerton9136 I don't think it's the pictures that tormented the Duke& Dutchess. It's the words in print. The Canadian media may not be as cut throat. Canadians as a whole are known to be very very polite. So the long range cameras aren't the issue.

What a great interview. Thankyou.

Prince Harry has become an extension of Meghan Markle. When he is no longer an asset she will go on to other things and other relationships

Too bad they have baby Archie now. If they end up splitting then Archie will suffer for sure. Divorces are never an ideal situation for any kids to be in. I feel bad for Archie. He doesn't get to be around his royal family and play with his royal cousins and his future is certainly unpredictable for now.

Absolutely right

@@lindamew626 do not judge ask your mother first

Camilla shouldn't be compared with Megan.

ME TOO (ANGLO/AUS) BUT I DO BELIEVE THE UK WILL BE PULLED BACK FROM THE BRINK - DESPITE CHARLIE BEING A BIT NAIVE, BORIS IS A BULLDOG AND HOPEFULLY WHOMEVER COMES AFTER HIM WILL BE EQUALLY BULLISH.