Violent History of Indian Kings 

Ok hai

It happens

I think we all are getting brainwashed by our government. But the thing is we are not even noticing it just like North Korean(but usse kam)

Lekin wiki peh toh 4 years before kalinga war Bola hain

Thank you. I just don't get why Indians see our past as being glorious when the modern age is the most peaceful & living standards are much better now! Maybe, it's not wanting to face the reality that for a thousand years, we were enslaved by "foreigners", when in reality there was no concept of "country" here before 1947. Plus Monarchs were no friends of the civilians & absolute power has always corrupted people, absolutely.

behind every great fortune , there is a crime... that explains all

Muslim used to kill and covert Hindus and hindu king used to fight for power. And that's not same totally..

Politician Name - Lal Bahadur Shastri Ji ❤ Go and reasearch on Shastri Ji 😌🙏

@POWET619 but his infantry and cavalry did commit crimes in Bengal ... see brother , nobody is saint here, everyone has got blood on their sleeves

@POWET619 extremist of anything is not good for you and society 💀

😂😂

But what about the affair of indumati and Chhota Bheem😅

Oh gosh your comment make me laugh 😂 I was very serious about the topic and your comment just awesome 👏🏻

best kingdom ever

And the army of dholakpur is most useless

Video is myth

Show me Tamur Lang . Changes khan. And Eidi Amin. Evan tamur killed lot of Muslim in world

Quran padho aur ex-muslim jaferheritec ki the mahamad series dekho sachay jano islam aur Allah and paigambar ki

Well said..

Bhai tu khud ko history ka student kahna chor da,, in hindu religion text it is clearly mentioned that buddha is the 9th avatar of lord vishnu, to kiya us time ka king padhata nahi tha kiya ya bas reels scrool karta tha,, in pa belive karna walo sudhar jaa?,,koi apna hee religion ka statue ko kyu Toraga

😂😂😂😂

Bro there are endless possibilities no one knows the exact detailed history . So stop writing these nonsense comments 😅😅😊😊

Even we guys being Hindu don't know the actual event even we rely on the sculpture and books

​@@SAreez-if it is fiction come to Bihar you will know it 😂

HE KILLED THEM BECAUSE THEY KILLED ACHARYA CHANAKYA BY PLANNING AND ALSO THEY WENT AGAINST THEIR OWN COUNTRY BHARAT . IN REALITY SAMRAT ASHOK WAS REALLY GREAT BECAUSE HE ALWAY HEARS THE CITIZENS NEEDS AND ALSO HE DID'NT KILL ANIMALS HE WAS A PURE GREAT KING

Andhnamazis attendance 👇

​@@_Vagabond_Sourav Bhai pahle mere comment ko toh samajh lo 😆😆😆

Rest of the Andhbhakts attendance 👇

We all know these things. But we outgrew such things. We dont praise our violent acts by the violent kings. Problem is today peaceful community will gather and use these stories to justify hatred for anybody who isnt Muslim and justify oppression of all non-Muslims all over ummah to this day.

​@@tarun1982nobody did that and second, since you are talking about present times, it's Muslims all around the world who are suffering the most not the other way round.

Ashoka hindu thodi thaa he was budhist

Ashoka Kaling ke battle se phele se hi Buddhist thaa

@@abhinavkumar6223 🤣🤣🤣, Oh okay,maine socha bhuddism hinduism se aaya tha, any way when it benifits gobars they change there stance

How did he say truth?? He just is believing what "historians" said. You need archeological and archeo-astrological proofs for your videos, not just blindly believing the stuff that "historians" say.

@@JayMehtaJay exactly, see you need dna test to prove that your dad is whom your mother says. without evidence yoi cant simply accept your current DAD

Aree yaar jisko sab leftist bolte hai wahi tumko unbaised lag rha h

lol as if no Indian knew this....He was a narcissist who was avoided by his own Father, always craved for love went on mltiple battles...killed many to prove his worth and yet was invisible....he is considered great in today's India is because of his teachings and works post Kalinga war. Let me Educate you - he made multiple statements about his remorse and regretting on killing and captivating. he changed by admitting his mistakes, started thinking and worked on the futility and Tragedy of war. Post then he dedicated his life and huge wealth towards building a society where people lived by the rules of virtue and good moral behavior. There are some of his words carved on the walls by Ashoka about the religious tolerance "Should one blames other religions or over glorify ones own religion, they are infact doing harm to it and an act should not be done". Ashoka erected pillars ( Ashoka symbols ) all across his kingdom where the official reads scripts written by Ashoka to the poors where his official took the complaints and compliments for the betterment. *HE IS GREAT BECAUSE he became the first Indian king to think about the welfare of the poor rather than using them just for tax revenue* as he stated "the final conquest is the conquest of the right and not of the might".

@@rachnasingh9774 even if he's leftist, is he wrong? Did he make up facts or said something which was not documented? I'm a right winger, and I vote for BJP but this is a history video, and should be perceived as such.

true apart from jain kings in souther india from 2 nd to 12 th century,all were biased

​@@dankpanda-hl3wnand shivaji maharaj

Absolutely. In fact, never idealize (or idolize) anyone. Everyone is/was human.

​@@righteousrebellious2330nah he looted surat because it was important port for mughals and he killed militants not innocent people

Mohammad was also a warlord still people think he was a prophet 😭

Andhnamazio attendance 👇

@@mirraza4692 darpok toh tu hai 😜 saley andh namazi 😂

Exactly. We must not be selective pickers but tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History.

​@@NeerajMishra03Well you can see his Research Manager is a Hindu. I have been following Mohak for a long time now and he is not super picky about the content. He also made a video on Aurangzeb. The thing is you are not able to digest the history.

Dollars Trilogy refrence?

Andhnamazis attendance 👇

Ashoka the cruel never change to God person he was always a evil person mass murder who killed his brother for greedy of throne he killed millions of innocent civilians people who don't accept Buddhism He killed millions of innocent civilians people in Kaling he killed all anika

पैदा तो सनातन वैदिक धर्म मे हुआ था ना 😂 बादमे तुम लोग 14 अक्टूबर 1956 मे नव बुधिस्ट बन गये ... तुम्हारे भी बाप दादा पंढरपूर के वारी मे जाते थे इसका मतलब हिंदू थे ..... अब सिर्फ तुम लोग आरक्षण के लिये हिंदू दिखाते हो जाती(महार) के प्रमाणपत्र पर ... सिद्धार्थ गौतम ने सनातन धर्म से तंग आ कर अपनी अलग एक विचार धारा बनाई ....धर्म नही बनाया । तुम उसी विचार धारा को धम्म/धर्म बोलते हो .... पर धर्म तो सिर्फ एक ही है सत्य सनातन वैदिक धर्म 🕉️ दम है तो रोकलो...

@@keshavmishra07bhai tum log Eurasia se aae ho hum logo ne kuch bola?, nav bodh nahi, its Buddhist there nothing called “neo Buddhist”.

@@keshavmishra07 according to generic study ( r1a gene ) tum log toh arab, Eurasia se aye ho.

Very true. This long history of violence that we have based our whole society on sometimes makes the idea of nonviolence sound funny, even if that is what many of us want.

Andhbhakts attendance 👇

True. But the western world came out of medieval barbarity sooner than we did. If not for the Britishers (It's a constitutional monarchy), we would still be divided & under some dictator's rule! Sometimes you need an advanced civilization to make you free from shackles created by your own people.

​@@VitaminProtein4256librandu attendance 😂😂

​@@VitaminProtein4256 andhnamazi spotted 😂😂😂

this video is litrally politics and helps to counter the narrtive like muslims king were all good no bad muslim king only hindu king bad and hindu were all good no bad hindu king only muslim king bad .

Thanks mohak

Look at India from the lens of jaati and you will understand what jaats was violent and what were peaceful. It was the Mongolic and Turkic people that were vilest of the vile. They justified it using Islam and Islam supported it unlike dharma.

@thezoldics7648 nazi ka jo hal hua yad rakhna

This guy makes half researched videos. He haven't even read Bhagwat Geeta but still think he can give us Geeta gyan on "caste".

Exactly history should be about reason, facts and philosophy instead of personal ideas, opinions and dates.

Wrong, the goal of history should be to make us feel proud of our ancestor's achievements and understand our roots and culture. From where we belong and what our identity is.

Muskil se 17 19 dates yaad karni hoti hai wo bhi nahi hoti baccho se toh fir wo kya karenge , for classes upto 10

​@@malharaher904Nope. Then what could German make proud of ? Nazi Germany ? . It's not about proud because political parties use this for propoganda and communal violence .

The goal of learning history is to not repeat the same mistakes. But humans have a tendency to do exactly that.

You observed rightly dude😎

Yes it probably is midjourney. However it is a paid platform. I have not seen better AI images in any other AI platforms than midjourney and Midjourney is way better than stable diffusion and other AI Image tools.

If Pushyamitra did not killed his King then India be Greek colony go and check history

​@@Shubham12887 aise to aladdin khLji ne bhi mangolo se bharat ko bachaya tha

@@rkv08 Bhai Jake history padh agr vishwas nhai hai to European or Persian history ki books padh mangols ne kabhi main army se attack nhai kiya tha or Khan general India ki respect karta tha Or Khilji ne india ke liya nhai apne riyast ko bacchane ke liya Mangols ke 3 battel army ko harya tha jisma mangols kaam the

Andhnamazis attendance 👇

being in power need crueity,,,wrna RAJA HARISH CHAND TO SABKO IDEAL LGTE HAI

Andhbhakts attendance 👇

@@shrutiagrawal8700 isn't there a difference between being cruel and punishing cruel people.

​​@@VitaminProtein4256 andhnamazi spotted 🤣🤣🤣

True that he killed 150,000 men women & children as per his own edicts. By this time he was already Buddhist. Daya river on outskirts of Bhubaneswar turned red with blood....

Ashoka never exiated

Hinduism never existed as a religion during Ashoka time,its the brahmin propaganda that hinduism is older than Buddhism, if you read Balmiki Ramayan, Ayodhya kand Shri Ram and Rishi Jabeli samvaad it talk negatively about buddhism even though Brahmin claim Ramayan is various thousand year before buddhism

@@loney403ou can’t create empire before violence, Ashoka was responsible for bringing civilisation in uncivilised peoples of orissa and other regions, his empire was only empire which ruled almost Akhand bharat,as per Buddhism, it has whole traditions of wrath god worship and violence for dealings with uncivilised layman only shramana are expected to be non violent and a king is not shramana or monk, non violence of buddhism is propaganda of brahmin who want to blame them for muslim rule

@@max-cs9ko Killed 150000 n injured another 100000 men women and children to civilise them. Who is left to be civilised. Is not it very similar to the tyrant and mass murderer Ghengis Khan. Remember that Kalinga was the only land that could not be invaded by his ancestors, so there is no question of its people being uncivilised.

Exactly💯 People just forget to use their brain...

Not with Muslim ruler cause ther motive was to convert and kill kafir unlike other Hindu rulers who fight for thrown and power lust not world domination. There is difference

Just like today's leaders except their motive is to get more $$$$$

Maharana Pratap had half of the India if he accepted the Akbar's offer.

@@therayr.7619 *Haan sochta reh*

true

​@@omsahoo4370yes bhai ek baar prove kardo offensively nahi puch raha hu just asking normally 😊

No we have hero chatrapati shivaji maharaj

Lesser evils are heros in comparison to worst evils, it has to be seen with the lens of net positive or net negative

@@zhreyaz its mean you don't know about chhatrapati shivaji maharaj

True, violence is almost inevitable in monarchy but I believe its not wrong in the larger picture, but hey, we aren't a monarchy now, we're a democracy now, or are we?

Andhbhakts attendance 👇

@@VitaminProtein4256 abb tere papa ko kaha sai lau

​@@VitaminProtein4256u mean all the ibrahim k najayas aulads?😂

Monarchs suck. End of story.

Andhnamazis attendance 👇

Biased video." Violence" done by kings is used as a means to justify Islam in India and how we all should be tolerant towards Mughal kings. "Violence" is pointed out as a common quality shared by both hindu/mughal kings and therefore its suggested that Hinduism is no different than Islam. It is pointed out, that the Hindu kings are also "violent" towards foreign religions and therefore it is only fair Mughals kill Hindus and destroy Hindu temples. The youtuber suggest that we all should hate the Hindu kings equally as Mughals🤣 because "VIOLENCE"🤣 All the while the video ignores the main points of Islamic ideology: how it is intolerant by design. how it is political by design. how it is a foreign religion and not indigenous. how many violent verses it contains compared to Hinduism. how the scriptures preaches violence against other religions. (does Hinduism do that?) violence is common in power struggles across all religions. WW1 was Christians vs Christians (of the same family). Violence is an outcome of war, And war is fought for Ideology. Is the youtuber implying that we should view the Hindu kings in the same disdain that we view Mughal kings because "violence" is a common factor in both? Ideology does not matter apparently.

​@@I_dont_need_a_nameburnol lele 😂

​@@ehaaronhow does it even matter if violence is used for religion or not? Violence is bad anyway, and religion was just another tool to use in justifying the violence. Just read more books, and you will find hundreds of more examples by Hindu/Jain/Buddhist kings b

​@@ehaaronpolitical? Violent? You literally have writings preaching politica and violence 😂😂😂

Wrong he is shatriya originally

@@pokemonfanbeast393 tf?

Or maybe he was on his way to become a Buddhist

​@@manishadwani386 yes Chandragupt mentioned as Kshatriya in Buddhist Text

Chadragupta accepted jainism Bindusar accepted ajeevika Ashoka accepted ajeevika earlier but later he accepted bhuddism. But they were kshatriya Asoka accepted the policy of dammagosh cultural conquest

Hi aap bhuat qut ho

what do u even mean

@@DellConagher1Muslims should accept Muhammed is not messenger of God and Islam isn’t a peaceful religion Because it was Aurangzeb wouldn’t have invaded to demolish temple

We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"

Tell him to make about minar e do dinner and he will know about the real truth that who is most crucial.. muslim ruler or others ruler

@@NeerajMishra03 absolutely right bro .....I think people shouldn't learn from this shit people like this guy and @dhruv rathe ...they don't even tell the people right also and they are doing just to are money only .........so, I request u all that if u want to know about Indian history than read a book donn't learn from this shit guy.....they are totally misleading the youth......🥲🥲🥲🥲

He also killed jawli king chandra rao more Whole family beheaded. "Every kings sword tasted the blood of enemy" Yahi bat es video me bataya hai mohak ne.

​@@yogeshtayde3263Chandra Rao More is commando of chief of Adhilshahi sultanate

@@yogeshtayde3263 he just killed chandra rao not whole family don't lie

equating hinduss and muslims is this what we call unbiasness, showing fabricated claims made by marxistt historians is it being neutral LOL

Unbiased? I don't know what his personal motives are, but he did not research well for this video. It's the first time I am watching something like this from him. Never expected that.

@@mysterious5678 elaborate

@percygekkouga2151 @percygekkouga2151 OK. So from starting 1. He cherry-picked lines from the Mahabharat episode, and it would seem like Shri Krishna wanted war. But the reason why Shri Krishna said not to attack first was because it is crossing the limits of Dharma. There is literally a 'Shanti Parva' in Mahabharat where Shri Krishna tries really hard to establish peace despite knowing the fact that Mahabharat will happen. You can literally see how much Hard Work Shri Krishna tries to put in order to establish peace and says that if for peace any Pratigya is sacrificed, then it means that Shanti is quite cheap 2. I don't get it why he took Ramayan example despite there being nothing wrong there. 3. He mentioned half truths about Samrat Ashoka. 1) Samrat Ashok never had 99 brothers. The Ashokvadhana is an overexaggeration. He maximum would have around 6 brothers. 2) Samrat Ashok was not always violent. He was a pretty peaceful guy at the start. He infact managed to stop a rebel, which his elder brother Sushim couldn't without any bloodshed. He was pretty famous among people due to his good governance. He became much more violent after his mother death as it was Sushim who killed her and also tried to kill her pregnant wife when he was on exile. It was Radhagupta who saved his wife. 3) Samrat Ashoka never killed any ministers. The reason is that all ministers liked him and were convinced that he should be the king. He was righteous, and his subjects in Ujjain were living happily, and he was an expert at stopping rebels. Only one two ministers were on Sushim's side. However, Sushim was pretty much useless as he couldn't stop revolt in his own regime. He was flirty and much more. Under Radhagupta, all ministers tried to convince Bindusar that Ashok should be the king, but he had too much love for his son. He died like that, but before Sushim came, all ministers summoned Ashok and declared him as king, which led to 4 years long Civil War. After Kalinga's war, he was convinced on Non Violence but made a strict rule. 3. He mentioned Jalouka as the son of Samrat Ashok. However, there was no son of Ashok whose other name was Jalouka. Historians like Romila Thappar say that Jalouka might be Kunala, but that's highly unlikely reasons being. 1) He was taking care of Takshashila Province and not Kashmir. 2) Based on some of his stories, he is someone who will never go against his father. 3) He never became the king due to the fact that he was made blind by Tishyaraksha (Samrat Ashok's wife). 4. Tishyaraksha was jealous of Bodh Tree, but she never destroyed any Bodha temple. In fact, Samrat Ashok was already Buddhist before marrying her. So it made no sense. She was given a death sentence for blinding Kunala. 5. I don't know why he mentioned Krishnadevaray and Tenali Rama as they had no role in the next story. 6. The King Shashanka fact is correct. However, some historians also suggest that it was done as political motivation, and Buddha people lived peacefully under him. 7. He mentions that Chanakya Neeti also promotes violence for the throne. However, in order to understand Chanakya Neeti, you should know some basic principles of Neeti. Chanakya Neeti is for making of a perfect king and nation. Neeti is subsect of Dharma meaning ways to establish Dharma within society. There are four Principles of Neeti namely 'Sam (Peacefully talking)', 'Dam (Using greed of a person)', 'Dand (You know)', 'Bhed (do anything)'. The order of using this principle is same as above. That's the reason why Violence is necessary. So this argument is pretty stupid as in order to maintain Dharma (Dharma does not mean religion). Not all kings who used violence were good. I agree on that fact. The fact is wrong that Chanakya Neeti promotes violence. 8. This fact is als wrong that Jain and Bhudhism gain popularity in 6th CE due to acst discrimination. This religions were always there in the society and a big number of people followed it. 9. I agree the fact that many Kings before Mughal were bad and they did wrong. However, the one I see people idolize are- Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Maharana Pratap, Krishnadevaray, Kuvar Amar Singh, Raja Raja Chola-1, Samudragupta, Chandragupta-2, Chandragupta Maurya,etc. Also the reason why we should celebrate Ashok was because he saw faults in his way and changed for better. Also the fact that he never intentionally hurt his subjects or other people. That's the reason why he got two names as Chand Ashok and Devanampriya Priyadarshi. It would have been better if he had divided the video in 3 parts and did proper research.

We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"

Can't agree more.

Fr

Anti national go to Pakistan

fr

i think your most likely conflating issues , i imagine its not facts that there was issues with rulers , i most likely think its a religious issue , so that they see facts but one set is just because , whilst the Muslim ruler was due to religion , the trouble is they are correct that Islam played a role in the crimes , but so did all other religions and its that fact i think they dont want to accept , however i have to say i have also found this among Muslims when it comes to Islam , and Christians on Christians crimes

Andhbh4kts attend4nce 👇

​@@VitaminProtein4256 andhnamazi spotted 😂😂😂

​@@I_dont_need_a_nameandhpujari spotted

​@@Mahmood786 andhnamazi spotted 🤣🤣🤣

@@Mahmood786 surat kisanae ki

Succesfully narrated sanghi propaganda. ..😂 It's all a false information

a small factual correction! there is nothing called conversion in the dharmic religions,it is an abrahamic concept one does convert to buddhism ,he/she just practice that way of life be it sanatan,buddhism,jainism etc

Ashram se bahar aa ke ek baar google se history padh lo

wait a sec, does ncert glorify buddhism as most non voilent ,like king see the brutual world and convert into buddhism ,perfect story as it seem and if he was converted into Buddhism before then it was all show off , he didn't understand what buddhism is all about

Yes it is true that Ashoka wanted to patronize Buddhism and wanted to make the entire subcontinent Buddhist, but he could ofcourse not for reasons

He already Buddhist - Kalinga war SE pehle.Sushima Jo older brother tha Ashoka Ka usko Ashoka ne dhoke se Maratha,

Meme army 👇

No, in some sources he was a shiv bhakt before war

@@gaurakshsinghi9219 which source giveme source

​@@ayokshayuska source WhatsApp hai bhai 😂

andhbhakt?

Nai nai bhai education liya hai . Comment karne ke liye payment Gau mutr mei liya hai ya rss mei premium membership ka coupon.

@@mohammedadnan8497ni ayesha dii hogi ek trip💀💀

Andhbhakt 🤡

We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"

@@NeerajMishra03 I know that I’m not that qualified but I still think that even though a king how good or bad but chivalry itself can’t make you a leader sure that we would have respect for them but for an empire to exist it just can’t be formed on chivalry itself. Labelling them “ Jihadi rulers “ because the action taken by them were cruel but every empire and king will have these exact moments. And logically speaking I already talked about this in the above comment giving perspective to them is futile. If you want to continue with this debate I'm right here.

​@@NeerajMishra03 ohh C'mon Hindu rulers were barbaric and uncouth as hell You're just a butthurt person

Ashoka Was Already a BUDDHIST before the KAlinga War.

Bhai log ye mt bhulna is video ki researcher Zaira Khan hai.... Baki tum Samajhdar ho

I am from CBSE board and the books barely talked about the history of violence.

Andhbhakts attendance 👇

He very briefly said Aurangzeb decapitated Dara Shukoh. It was asked to Dara Shukoh by Aurangzeb if he'd punish him , he said he'd have dismembered Aurangzeb's body and his body parts displayed at every corner of his kingdom vise versa

😩😩😩😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 if only he was

@@WasimAhmad-bv9mx so us nae apne bhai ka sath aise kar bhi Diya how cruel insan tha yeh jallad

Before 2014 it wasn't like today, hinduz were taught to hate their Hindu kings and lick the boots of mughal invaders for the sake of congressi secularism.

I agree hindu rules were also very violent but It's not all about violence..Hindu rules did not marry there own daughter or married there sisters.. And they didn't not make female trafficking a big business and didn't rape females of other religion in front of there fathers or husband if the refuse to convert.. You need to study more before defending your mughal idols 😂😂

Their violentness was not motivated and justified by their culturee and religion, even the facts he is stating are fake created by marxistt historians, sita ram goel ji wrote letter to romila thappar to mention sources on which she was saying hinduss destroyed and looted their own temples and also budhistt sites. lol

Ashoka never existed

Today majority of hindu act like andhbhakt they don't want to accept facts and they just want to blame people of other caste, religion. That's why our country ranks 137th on happines index

He actually did that you mentioned in your last sentence.

​@@hitesh8512Do you know about battle of Patan?

@@hitesh8512 oh did he!! I heard it for the first time from Pakistani Historian Ishtiaq Ahmad in one of the Lallantop videos.

@@hitesh8512 you won't agree with facts cuz you may be andhbhakt

@@daviddiveroli9331 and u andhnamazi 😂😂😂

correct gald to glad.

All Raja, Maharaja, Kings, Monarchs, Bhrahmins, Priestly Class, Kshytriyas, Shenshah, Knights, Barrons, Vassals, Vaishya, Ulemmas, Maulanas, Rasukhdars, Shahukar, Zamindar, Landlords, Warlords, of all Feudal class of Hindus, Christians, Muslims who are all Extremists in the guise of Religion, man-made God's this Tribes/Clans has all Bloods in their Hands and are killers, murderors has killed Gazillion of Civilians i.e., Farmers, Peasants, Workers & Working class and they are still doing it in 21st century through Economic Exploitation, Inflation, Taxes......

Bhai obrigado ka mtlb ?

As a history student you should be ashamed that this guy is using news articles and analysis articles as historical sources. Delusional lmao

You are truly gald

You are right fools should stay away from politics anyway😂

L take , don't support any party cause all have one inclined bias for specific religion... even Never vote Evm machine are hacked ... Never eat cause u are gonna poop , just suicide cause u are gonna die.

😂

😅

🚩🚩

😂

Bengali people: sure...... 😂

We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"

facts made by who? will never understand people who call themselves factual about history, because history is never factual😂 you all lack common sense, better to forget the past look into the future

@@shivam_nagar69 facts made by stratigraphy, radiometry, thermoluminescene , palaoenology and much more, ask for detailed archaelogical report of kalibangan from respective departments with reason why they don't publish it, eating habits of "proto indians" might ignite some sentimens, u can't ignore everything u don't like, just accept and move forward would be a wiser approach

Ashoka Was Already a BUDDHIST before the KAlinga War.

@@KARAN__SAPRE--------55 yes and buddhist tried to portray this that he chose the dharm of peace which is buddhism .. they were promoting their belief and manipulatig people .. which is why our king's had to kill them and demolish their temples

7 crore😅

@@gmd2455 😂😂

Andhnamazis attendance 👇

Chemistry syllabus has been made specific....for science students only and periodic table.will be taught in class 11th science.....i am science PG and I studied periodic table in class 11 in congress ruled state... so dont fall for political propaganda. Because the govt which promoting quantum computing cannot ban periodic table.

I think the syllabus change is only for 1 year

Also evolution in biology

And evolution which is the basic concept crucial to general knowledge

No.

Please refer to mohak bhai's correction bro.

​@@naveedhasan5365he was

He became a buddhist extremist after battle

lol as if no Indian knew this....He was a narcissist who was avoided by his own Father, always craved for love went on mltiple battles...killed many to prove his worth and yet was invisible....he is considered great in today's India is because of his teachings and works post Kalinga war. Let me Educate you - he made multiple statements about his remorse and regretting on killing and captivating. he changed by admitting his mistakes, started thinking and worked on the futility and Tragedy of war. Post then he dedicated his life and huge wealth towards building a society where people lived by the rules of virtue and good moral behavior. There are some of his words carved on the walls by Ashoka about the religious tolerance "Should one blames other religions or over glorify ones own religion, they are infact doing harm to it and an act should not be done". Ashoka erected pillars ( Ashoka symbols ) all across his kingdom where the official reads scripts written by Ashoka to the poors where his official took the complaints and compliments for the betterment. *HE IS GREAT BECAUSE he became the first Indian king to think about the welfare of the poor rather than using them just for tax revenue* as he stated "the final conquest is the conquest of the right and not of the might".

True lol

This is so true 💯

*THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONQUEST AND INVASION* , Cholas indeed conquered southeast Asia but they never forced their beliefs on them , they never put their women in "harem" or butcher children before the eyes of their mothers and I see totally different realities when turning to Brutal islamic invaders .......

Tell me any genoside done by chola king towards normal citizen

Please name of that book???

Showing violence without mentioning the reasons is an act of fraud, and this video was full of that. I can write a whole book explaining the stupidity done in this childish act. However, one scene that affected me was the usage of the Ramayana clip, the clip of the slicing of the nose of Ravana's sister. I understand the point you wanted to touch on, but this video shows that you need to learn about history; please take help from professors.

​@@bxseries1085Battle of Patan Ncert book me nhi Diya hai. Online padna padha.

We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History.

​@@NeerajMishra03you have to much time to write this on every comment having a degree in history.

Andhnamazis attendance 👇

Khoka Ghumalo Para Juralo, Borgi elo deshe Bulbulite dhan kheyeche khajna dibe kishe? Dhan furolo, Paan furolo, khajnar upay ki? Ar kota din sabar kor rashun bunechi Dhaniya Piyaj geche poche sorshe khete jol Khora bonnay sesh korilo borshar fashal Dhaner gola, chaler jhuri shob sudhu khali Chinno kapor joriye gaye shoto shoto taali. Only for Bengalis. Showed maratha violence 😢

​@@I_dont_need_a_nameits not about muslim... I am a hindu, and yes marathas invaded bengal!!

Not just bengal. ...marathass captured and rap.ed bihari womens too They massacred a large amount bihari population ...theur is no mention of this atrocities in bihars curriculum

Here is the mention of peshwa Marathas not chhatrapati shivaji maharaj

No bro 😂😂

@@itsspyop1541 pehle pursat se niklo aur jaake ithihas padho

So what?

Btw so what?

😅 Bhai A66a Hua APJ Abdul Sir Tere Mobile Pane Se Pehle Hi Apna Sab Kam Kar Liya Tha

​​@@MrCool842n this video ....the writer DN JHA a pro leftist and many others .... Abb ess baat se to pta chalta hai ki kya propagate karna chata hai......ess mohak ko jab mahabhart or ramayan ka gyaan nhai hai to......Mention kyun karta hai.....He mention Pandav want's hastinapur by violence.....but real is they want their kingdom Indraprast.......

​@@MrCool842abb kal ko to yee mohak ...ramayan pe question karega ....ki Ram bhagwan ko Ravan or raksho ko nhai marna chaiye tha.....vo bhi violence hai....😂😂😂.....Agar war ladenge nhai to dusra tumme mar dega ....just simple

caNo one is comparing mahatma gandhis ideology with the past ideologies. there are different ideologies with different perspective. a sensible person can make use of both the ideoplogies. but gobars /andbhakts doesnt have the IQ to understand this

There was no concept of country before 1947. There were only kingdoms. Some kingdoms extended up to Iran, will you call that our country?

Andhnamazis attendance 👇

What must watch...if he consider only DN jha a pro leftist writter.....it's show how much he biased......and his video researcher also Zaira khan then what we can expect now..😂

I don’t think so , it’s clearly written in those books about the cruelty of the kings.