Тёмный

Visual Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality 

Mathematical Visual Proofs
Подписаться 179 тыс.
Просмотров 55 тыс.
50% 1

This is a short, animated visual proof of the two-dimensional Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (sometimes called Cauchy-Bunyakovsky-Schwarz inequality) using the Side-angle-side formula for the area of a parallelogram.
If you like this video, consider subscribing to the channel or consider buying me a coffee: www.buymeacoff.... Thanks!
To see a longer (slower) version of this video, without words, check this out: • Cauchy Bunyakovsky Sch...
This animation is based on a visual proof by Sidney H. Kung from the February 2008 issue of Mathematics Magazine (www.jstor.org/... - page 69).
To learn more about animating with manim, check out:
manim.community
#math​ #inequality ​ #manim​ #animation​ #theorem​ #pww​ #proofwithoutwords​ #visualproof​ #proof​ #iteachmath #algebra #areas #mathematics #cauchyschwarz #algebraicidentity #mathshorts​ #mathvideo​ #mtbos

Опубликовано:

 

21 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 62   
@ruthvikas
@ruthvikas Год назад
I love the graphical representation of maths. It just feels different and more clear.
@buffalonels988
@buffalonels988 Год назад
this was real intense for me
@MathVisualProofs
@MathVisualProofs Год назад
too much for the shorts format? Too fast?
@rayansuneer
@rayansuneer Год назад
Theres too much information going on that it's a bit hard to understand Maybe make this a video?
@MathVisualProofs
@MathVisualProofs Год назад
@@rayansuneer Here it is without words: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-mKg_gVagHy8.html . Perhaps the "matrix" cyberpunk music might not be your style :)
@rayansuneer
@rayansuneer Год назад
@@MathVisualProofs it was perfect. Down to the smallest detail
@realcontentgamer
@realcontentgamer Год назад
This man is literally better than my school teachers
@MathVisualProofs
@MathVisualProofs Год назад
👍
@ts.nathan7786
@ts.nathan7786 Год назад
First thing school teachers can not make graphical animations on blackboard. Secondly , they may not know the graphical representations.
@Zangoose_
@Zangoose_ Год назад
This is what I needed back in college. Thanks, man
@Tiago-
@Tiago- Год назад
I didn't get any of this, but the shapes were pretty
@oliverpackham6278
@oliverpackham6278 Год назад
I always loved dot and cross product equalities. Michael Penn has a linear algebra playlist will all sorts of cool ones. The vector dotted with itself = it's magnitude^2 is a fun and easy one you could do a short on.
@abdullahyasinyagmur4687
@abdullahyasinyagmur4687 Год назад
This is just amazing. It's always nice to see the intuition geometrically
@rafaelrezende7953
@rafaelrezende7953 Год назад
NEVER STOP THIS VIDEOS
@asparkdeity8717
@asparkdeity8717 Год назад
This is so beautiful! Every linear algebra proof of Cauchy-Schwarz that I have come across is so messy and always involves the determinant of some quadratic, but u couldn’t have explained this in any simpler way, using nothing more than simple trigonometry. Thank you so much
@MathVisualProofs
@MathVisualProofs Год назад
:)
@imchillbro479
@imchillbro479 Год назад
That's wonderful
@MathVisualProofs
@MathVisualProofs Год назад
Thanks!
@flamurtarinegjakyt3745
@flamurtarinegjakyt3745 11 месяцев назад
I needed this for calculus II, thank you
@wryanihad
@wryanihad 11 месяцев назад
Wonderful proof
@StratosFair
@StratosFair Год назад
Ok, I have to subscribe to your channel after this
@MathVisualProofs
@MathVisualProofs Год назад
Welcome!
@matthewbell4273
@matthewbell4273 Год назад
My main takeaway was how shapes can be really pretty
@mathematicsman7454
@mathematicsman7454 Год назад
You are doing great like mind your descision
@alvargd6771
@alvargd6771 Год назад
when I saw Cauchy in the title got scared 😅 but it wasnt nearly as bad as I expected
@AnglandAlamehnaSwedish
@AnglandAlamehnaSwedish Год назад
Lol ik cauchy i was like wtf no way lol
@SeanSkyhawk
@SeanSkyhawk Год назад
When will you be posting the Pythagoreran Theorem proof as recently published by Jackson and Johnson?
@MathVisualProofs
@MathVisualProofs Год назад
Is a good idea! I will see if I can get around to it. I saw a few other videos done about it, and I haven't looked into it carefully yet.
@SeanSkyhawk
@SeanSkyhawk Год назад
@@MathVisualProofs It's quite elaborate and deals with infinite sums but in the end it's surprisingly clear and independent. As far as is known, this was the first proof that completely bypasses the so-called Pythagorean identity, which come to think of it can itself be proven via infinite series.
@MathVisualProofs
@MathVisualProofs Год назад
@@SeanSkyhawk yes I know the details. I also know there is at least one other trig proof of the Pythagorean theorem though (see cut the knot website for instance). But the new one is much nicer (uses law of sines only). It’s a great accomplishment by them for sure. I’ll see if I can figure out a way to do it justice :)
@TheCyanKiller
@TheCyanKiller Год назад
The number of times the word absolute was said was more than the number of times a word that was not absolute was said
@Rócherz
@Rócherz Год назад
Now animate the 3D inequality *with cubes.* (It’s the meme of “now draw her stealling the Chaos Emeralds”, I’m neither actually asking nor demanding it.)
@MathVisualProofs
@MathVisualProofs Год назад
But it is a good suggestion regardless :)
@Joffrerap
@Joffrerap Год назад
prerequisite: - pythagorean theorem - area of a parallelogram - triangle inequality and absolute value property ok not as much as i thought.
@viking148
@viking148 Год назад
Lovely just lovely I wish I had you in my school
@jupjup9737
@jupjup9737 Месяц назад
You can also prove this using the dot product formula: abs(a•b=|a||b|cosθ) Since |cosθ| is less than or equal to 1 this also proves the inequality. However the proof for the dot product formula is more complicated than the one on the video.
@teaaa2525
@teaaa2525 Год назад
Very nice
@srikrishnaghosh7660
@srikrishnaghosh7660 Год назад
I have become fan of yours. Assuming this particular equation will be dealt with only after having the idea of dot product , it is quite straight forward that, ||(a,b)•(x,y)||=||(a,b)||•||(x,y)|||cos(z)|
@arvindsrinivasan424
@arvindsrinivasan424 Год назад
I feel like this is better visualized with the vectors and using projections defined using dot products
@AnglandAlamehnaSwedish
@AnglandAlamehnaSwedish Год назад
Woah really u musta had a protractor born in ur hands n attached to ur hip ur whole life jk
@robertogajim470
@robertogajim470 Год назад
Tanks bro😮😮😮😮
@lolzhunter
@lolzhunter Год назад
Oh yeah of course
@yeeter2785
@yeeter2785 11 месяцев назад
damn bro explained common sense wowowowowowowowow
@mikaeo23
@mikaeo23 11 месяцев назад
I'll watch this again when I'm sober, stoned me can't understand 😅
@javohirtursunaliyev5036
@javohirtursunaliyev5036 Год назад
I love inequalities but didn't know any book please tell me friends inequality books😢
@MathVisualProofs
@MathVisualProofs Год назад
A good one for visualization is "When Less is More: Visualizing Basic Inequalities" by Roger Nelsen.
@robertogajim470
@robertogajim470 Год назад
¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ ͡⁠°⁠ ͜⁠ʖ⁠ ͡⁠°⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯
@robertogajim470
@robertogajim470 Год назад
.⁠·⁠´⁠¯⁠`⁠(⁠>⁠▂⁠
@marshelldoonan7798
@marshelldoonan7798 11 месяцев назад
My mind blue screened
@OmnivorousOtter101
@OmnivorousOtter101 Год назад
Is that Mozart d minor fantasia in the background?
@MathVisualProofs
@MathVisualProofs Год назад
Yes
@aidenhastings6341
@aidenhastings6341 11 месяцев назад
Is there an error when changing the inequality as sin(z) is removed? If 0
@MathVisualProofs
@MathVisualProofs 11 месяцев назад
When you remove the sin(z) on the right it is removing a multiplication by a number less than 1. So the equality is gone and the right hand side got larger (or stayed the same).
@aedes9902
@aedes9902 Год назад
а Буняковский..
@MathVisualProofs
@MathVisualProofs Год назад
Yes. I should have included that. It is in the original video description (ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-mKg_gVagHy8.html)
@robquinnpc
@robquinnpc Год назад
But why? Why do any of those things? Make it applicable.
@DOLfirst
@DOLfirst Год назад
Alrighty then
@siguy715
@siguy715 Год назад
I know some of these words
@AnglandAlamehnaSwedish
@AnglandAlamehnaSwedish Год назад
Dot product i didnt know i would see that. Cool as f if its the dot product from physics i didn't do it in my notebook n stop n pause n rewind a million times i got not enough notebooks gotta by some more n pens n find my dam markers for my marker white board
@수하긴
@수하긴 Год назад
Jesus Christ......
@regularperson5647
@regularperson5647 Год назад
I'm too high for maths
@alessandropozzi2214
@alessandropozzi2214 3 месяца назад
totally unintelligible explanation... awful, even knowing it this is absolutely unnecessarily complicated
Далее
A Visual Attempt at 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
9:56
HA-HA-HA 👊  #countryball
00:15
Просмотров 2,2 млн
БЕЛКА РОЖАЕТ? #cat
00:24
Просмотров 802 тыс.
Functional Analysis 10 | Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality
10:06
How to lie using visual proofs
18:49
Просмотров 3,2 млн
Every Infinity Paradox Explained
15:57
Просмотров 281 тыс.
Mathematical induction with inequality
12:53
Просмотров 28 тыс.
Goldbach Conjecture - Numberphile
9:59
Просмотров 928 тыс.
This Is the Calculus They Won't Teach You
30:17
Просмотров 3,2 млн
Researchers thought this was a bug (Borwein integrals)
17:26
Actual Proof 1+1=2
3:02
Просмотров 155 тыс.
HA-HA-HA 👊  #countryball
00:15
Просмотров 2,2 млн