jazz is a logical next step after baroque. The classical and new age era are very different while baroque and jazz sound a lot like eachother. Check out early FRESCOBALDI canonza for instance, verrry jazzy. Smart you hear the connection.
@@TiwazGoudsnor I couldn't find Frescobaldi canonza, but I found some Frescobaldi canzona -- I'll check them out later. Edit: Did this. I wouldn't call canonza (at least I - IV) jazzy, but the point stands that some Baroque and some jazz do have something in common. This is more readily noticeable with some of the works of Vivaldi (for instance, some of the concertos from La Stravaganza).
I still don't understand how microtonal music hasn't seen wider popularity and further advancement with how technology and manufacturing have advanced to allow not only more complex designs of instruments, but more complex design of the music itself.
In cases like this, usually the simpler answer is likelier: the added complexity for both the player, listener and instrument builder apparently does not weigh up to the increase in musical enjoyment for most audiences. Another point might also count, namely that in music without tempered instruments, such pure and microtonal harmonies can already be enjoyed. In that sense, it is already widespread in a sense, which would be contrary to your point.
my edge-lord hot take : our society is such that it does not produce western tonal harmony composer on par of the great composers of before, i think because we simple do not work enough. These geniuses started working every day of their life in early childhood. We simply do not have that level of commitment nowadays to that precise style of music, because its not like there are no musical geniuses anymore AND THEREFORE since we do not produce such geniuses to dedicate themselves to the new technocological advacenments, there are less works to be appreciated by the wider public. 'cause i think we can all agree this isntrument is just incredible and i am pretty sure that if this instrument had been around in the days of the previoulsy mentionned geniuses, we would have seen tonal harmony compositions where quarter tones are a thing and tonal harmony would have had to adjust to this like how do we even go about analyzing quarter tones? sorry i am very naive and enthusiastic just sharing my very biased opinions i dont see this as the absolute truth haha
I'm by no means a musical expert but I feel like the microtonal realm has a lot of diffrent emotional potentials. The disapointing thing I see in it is that many people often fly from 1 idea or feeling and rush to the next far too quickly. Instead of expaning on 1 unique chord or small progression and seeying what it has to offer there seems to be some need to move to the next thing. I think this is a shame. I'd love to see a piece that expands on one idea and explores it's possibilieties so the listener can get used to the motive or (mode).
This might be the best version of microtonality that I’ve heard, IMO. Sounds like it’s tempered to provide more true intervals as options, rather than just smaller equal subdivisions. Am I right? Usually microtonal instruments sounds more “out of tune” to me, but the majority of what you played here sounded more “in tune” than 12 TET to me. Are your microtone options the true major third, true perfect fifth, true seventh, etc based on the overtones, by any chance? If not, I’d love to know what you’re doing to make the chords work so well. Bravo!
Only sounds out of tune because your ear is trained to listen for the "normal" scales. If you listened to nothing but this style for a few years, modern pop would sound out of tune.
those are some really interesting cadences and resolutions. Not being a big music buff (getting back into studying theory that I heretofore ignored because I found a lute... and not tuning in equal temperament is fascinating), how do you reconcile trying to get perfect(er) intervals while still meaningfully moving around the tonal center? it seems to me (relative layman) that the more you try to preserve the purity of intervals, the harsher the voices clash. That feels like a limiting factor to how well you can modulate. Is that... true? oh! is it possible for that instrument to do the Collier modulation to G half sharp?
The problem is that when you are limited to a manageable number of pitches, improving the purity of one type of interval tends to worsen the purity of others (aside from fortunate synergies that are the exception rather than the rule). To improve the purity of multiple types of intervals generally requires increasing the number of pitches, which makes them harder to use and makes building a fixed-pitch instrument more difficult and more expensive (the latter is especially true for a pipe organ). You can get some mileage out of going to an unequal temperament, but after a certain point this limits your ability to modulate to other key signatures.
@@romeolz ohhh i remember that from an adam neely vid. I remember hearing jacob collier explain it himself and i couldve sworn it was just gradually shifting up but i could be wrong
This probably is equally tempered to 31 tones per octave. So most diatonic intervals are cleaner than in 12-tone equal temperament while it has a manageable number of tones. Transposition works like in any other equal temperament. Modulation to G half-sharp exactly is not possible because there are no quartertones, but modulation by a neutral third is possible.
Can you clarify in the video description above whether this is in 31-tone equal temperament or whether the 31 divisions of the octave are based on (unequal) natural intervals?
I believe they're natural intervals but I can't be sure, you can look for this specific one by looking up the clavemusicum omnitonum, which studio31 has as linked in the description
He isn't exactly gentle with some of the enharmonic shifts in his chord progressions. This music is very layered and I don't reckon was made to be accessible. There's a lot to stomach here but I like it. Not all microtonal music is like this
Honestly, this is the best example of microtonal music that's actually listenable that I've personally come across (not that I listen to much though but anyway). Very nice ideas here and there but barely coherent. It's a story which goes nowhere but ends up all over the place. This is what I imagine a musician would do with the have-baked melodies that I, a non-musician, come up with and humm to myself sometimes.
I can't tell if everyone is serious, but this is way too dissonant for my ear. You are undoubtably a very talented musician and you worked overtime getting something nice out of the instrument. I need to listen to some bagpipes to bring me back to earth.
I think it sounds great but I am still glad we went for the present tuning standard. The dissonance in that also has its virtues. For instance by giving certain scales their tension. The best keyboard however is the Janko layout. Inspired by it I have developed a 4 row standard keyboard adapter which combines the best features of a pianokeyboard and …. an oldfashioned typewriter! 😁
Мой организм сначала хорошо воспринял, но очень болезненно реагировал во время второго прослушивания. Да, мне было физически неприятно. Дело привычки. Мы с детства приучены к ХТК Баха.
First time seeing this type of keyboard, and my pianist brain is asking whether all the parts each key are playable, if not, brain getting a little confused at first. It's just me.
There's a lot of competing "standards" for microtonal notation. In 31 equal temperament (which is what this instrument uses), C to D would be 5 'steps', so one option is to notate those as C, C half-sharp, C sharp, D flat, D half-flat, D (and all of those would be different notes; the enharmonic rules in 12TET don't apply here).
It looks like this video got popular in weird circles. “Micro is unnatural and can’t get anywhere blah blah blah”! 😐First-grade BS from people who don’t just stop and think: what do I _really_ know about the matter, what can I _really_ make myself hear and feel? But I wish to hope the world will turn for the best. Kudos for the performance! Is it quartercomma meantone or just 31edo?
I love how this microtonal piano looks. Instead of being a weird hexagon board, it's more like... the sequel to the piano/harpsichord It's piano but more
@@Kids_Scissors the design of the lumatone makes it super easy to just play around in, it gives an intuitive feel to many new tunings that make you truly get what makes them tick (it's an isomorphic keyboard which means there is only one shape per chord that you can transpose where ever you want)
Though microtonal music may seem modern, this harpsichord is based on an original instrument by Vito Trasuntino, 1606, currently located at museo Internazionale e biblioteca della musica di Bologna. Studio31 has also made instruments with 36 and 24 keys per octave.
honestly i think the concept of microtonality is really a reflection of what european music theorists took for granted in the context of their own music. "Microtonal" or non-equal temperament music has always been present in other music traditions and continues to do so. That's what's normal for them! So hopefully someday we can understand these different music traditions according to their own understanding of tonality. It would be a music revolution.
@@RRRRRAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH yeah. all music is about getting used to it, you wont like a hard rock sound in first listen and it might sound like just noise to you but someone who listens to those types of music will call it a masterpiece. people just arent used to hearing microtonal notes, and they classify their sound as "wrong" because of what they are accustomed to, but after listening it for a while it starts to sound really unique and beatiful.
@@RRRRRAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH Equal temperament is great tho’. While I enjoy microtones, It’s rarely pleasant to listen to. In this composition, chords don’t even resolve, there’s nothing to grab onto, so many notes, and they all have weird relations,it just moves like a drunk person, almost with no intention. I feel like it should be done in moderation, with taste. And I think that some people really support this, just because they think that 12tet is some kind of western elitist conspiracy, while in reality 12tet is just a logical, easy to understand, learn, and use tuning. Idk I’m yapping sry
@@brucerain2106 certainly within this song there are some stylistic and aesthetic choices being made. Listen to Gamelan Pegulingan or arabic music or smth and you'll see how non 12TET traditions manage a cohesive and subtle system of note and chord relations.
@@alexloveday6430"It's jazz so it doesn't matter if it's microtonal." That is one of the more astute comments here. Just think of what Billie Holiday and Ella Fitzgerald do with their voices! But perhaps, in jazz especially, the keyboard usually serves as "the reference" in matters of pitch, the "instrument that is neutral and doesn't stray from the true note", and so it is a shock when it suddenly abandons its time-honoured neutrality. Like Grandpa suddenly getting up at the dance and turning cartwheels.
There are a lot of parallels between Jazz and Baroque, both are improvisatory and emphasize modal harmony, polyphony and chromaticism (they also led to a simplified harmony in later styles, i.e. classical era/rock and pop)
True. However, Bach inter-wove advanced chordal colorings into this works. Therefore, jazz. // Further, and in a real way, Debussy literally transferred these chording out of Classical Music and singlehandedly opened the door to jazz music. Debussy was aware of Scott Joplin's ragtime piano pieces (The Entertainer, Maple-Leaf Rag, etc), and publicly praised and defended his work, esp. Joplin being a black composer in the post-slavery US). Joplin composed in sonata from, and besides his novel rhythmic structures (swing), he lived and communicated in the tonality of the Classical composers. Generally good jazz musicians are familiar with and understand Classical music. @@gehirndoper
It's not coincidence. Jazz composers intentionally borrowed baroque tonality to create bebop. Taking a ii-V-I phrase and jamming another relative ii-V-[I] or a relative-V or a tritone sub in the middle of it all like a mutant chord-sandwich is basically Bach's calling card. And the rules of counterpoint created a wonderful structure for melodic improvisation. It was a damn good idea.
Indeed! From Bach's fascinating usage of fleeting, transitional jazz chordings, to black-slave Gospel sining, plus Debussy & Scott Joplin. Jazz came from these things, and generally, good jazz musicians take an active interest in Classical music and understand it on a deep (theoretical) level.
yeah i don't know. maybe i just need these shifts in tone introduced to me gradually, phillip glass style, so i can digest what i'm hearing. obviously the player is very skilled, but it just sounds out of tune to me. the woodworking on this keyboard however is indisputably beautiful. liked and subbed.
I am not capable of even understanding a single word in the title, let alone comment on the hypnotizing sound produced by this instrument and musician.
It's microtonal - it has pitches that fall between the notes of the 12-tone scale which comprises basically all of Western music, like a note between C and C#. That's why it has so many buttons
This shows how complex blues and jazz are to employ those kinds of microtones, it evokes that cozy warmth of those genres when listening to this. I wish I could learn to play that
This is brokenly bittersweet 🫥 Imagine being in a stunning garden, only to realize that the world is just a dream, and nothing is truly real. Yet, it feels strangely tangible, evoking a mix of derealization and awe-inspiring beauty. * × . + ° . * ☁️ * • . ⛅ . •. + × ☁️ + 🕊️ . * ☁️ . . * • ☁️ +. • × • ☁️ * . ° ☁️ + . ☁️ . 🥀👁️🗨️🥀 🌺 🌹 🌸🌷 🌼🪻🏵️ 🏡