Scenes comparisons between WALL·E (2008) and BURN·E (2008). Scenes Comparisons Playlist • Scene Comparisons Famous People Portrayl in Movies Playlist • Playlist
For all those asking why BURN E has E at the end of his name even though he is in space, the reason why that is because his name stands for "Basic Utility Repair Nano Engineer"
@@scream6664 a simp is a guy who does everything for a girl without getting anything in return because he believes she likes him. What does that have to do with a robot with OCD that keeps messing up while only getting a bit of comfort at the end?
BURN-E doesn’t give a damn that they just landed on a new planet they’ve never seen before. He’s been through so much shit tryna fix that light that it’s all he cares about 😂
@suseJ Well they can have their memory chips replaced. And a robot factory. Do you think the ship can't replace broken robots? They would've died in space ages ago.
@@mysterymenz99playstation13 Actually, there's a bit symbolic there. If Wall-e didn't intervene with the peoples lives on Axium, to a greater extent EVA's. Then everybody's lives would run as smooth as ever. And that includes Burn-E. If Wall-E didn't travel on that spaceship, no lamp needed repairing. If Wall-E got lost on the way, the lamp would be easily be fixed. But fate wouldn't have that, and everybody's lives where chanced forever, including Burn-E's
I absolutely love the implication that wall-e caused all of burn-e’s suffering. And how every major plot point seems to take place on the same side of the ship he’s on. Comedic genius
Can we acknowledge for a moment that Pixar actually REANIMATED every bit that they had to for BURN.E? The scenes are actually detailed differently, having changes to the movie, like the background for where BURN.E has to fix the light. The lights in there are changed entirely by the door frame.
No they didn't. If you look carefully only few scenes who was in the movie are reanimated. Probably because they haven't enough good model for that scenes at that time. Usually they create that stuff before they finishing main montage. So some scenes who is exactly the same as it is in the movie have different lighting.
2:18 I like how there's different different designs of the ship and the airlock door when Eve and Wall-E return. It fascinating they've put the effort into remaking the scene to make it look better.
From the looks of it, it appears that BURN-E was made first due to the lack of detail on the exterior of the ship compared to WALL-E version. It's more that likely BURN-E was made before the finished product.
@@Nick-jl2yp You are correct about it being made before the final product. On Burn-E Eve sounds a lot more quiet and on the Burn-E when it shows the Wall-E parts there’s less sound effects making it sound empty.
Since BURN-E has a considerably shorter runtime but runs contiguously with the movie, that means he would have had to spend a ludicrously long time welding the light into place and/or travelling through the Axiom for another lamp. If I was him, I'd go crazy too
@@mikadosannoji553well first it would not require inert gasses for protecting the liquid metal from oxidation. Gravity would not be a factor given that artificial gravity appears to be produced in some arbitrary direction that the ship must align with. So welding would probably be even easier, or at least a smidge cheaper.
@@stavkous4963 even if the ship had it’s own g-field, that scene doesn’t make sense. The way that all happened implies that the gravity is directly below the ship, without any connection to it
Centripetal force still applies in space. If he was closer to the side when the ship moved, he would've been flung outwards. Still doesn't make perfect sense, since there's no "up" or "down" in space; with the AG, everyone would still be fine even if the ship turns, since the floor would stay on their relative "down". But perfect science usually make for very boring movies.
That's probably how BURN-E would say of he ever found out about WALL-E and EVE's shenanigans on board the Axiom, as well as making his work a lot more needlessly difficult.
@@Pear-bg1qm I mean, they kept on distracting him from his work & hot him locked our. I'm pretty sure he has a right to be angry. Though some of it his own fault. I don't think WALL-E & EVE would say "Nah, ah" to him or just say sorry, even if they save the world. I sort of disagreed with that response, unless they are totally ignorant BURN-E's struggles outside of the Axiom. I would imagine that they have a more better mutual understanding of each other once BUN-E heard their struggles & would be more amicable to each other rather than WALL-E & EVE denying anything.
Yeah, I agree. As much as I adore this movie, I really don't think a sequel to it could work. But I do think seeing the story continue in some other form, like a short film, book, or comic could be interesting.
As a kid, you always have the dream to have a great adventure like WALL•E. As an adult, you just can relate to BURN•E so much with pain and such hard workings.
So creative that they can make a short film out of that one clip of a robot getting stuck outside. Somebody was inside a development office at Pixar and saw that scene in development and asked. Who was that droid? what was his life like? what was his job? was getting stuck outside the only bad thing that happened to him that day?
2:19 despite being produced by the same studio, it's kinda funny to see the big difference in quality from the short and the final movie. Colors, lines, everything
@Isaac Teo maybe YOU shouldn't reply to a comment that was 11 months ago and people rarely even uses this joke so please be quiet and stop lashing your bad day on others, thank you.
2:19 difference Wall-e | the light is very bright Burn-e | the light is very blue Wall-e | the door has no caution stripes Burn-e | the door has caution stripes
It is possible that some kind of simulated gravity exists in the axiom, or else everything would hover just like the chairs. Tho it doesn't explain the burn-E scene
@@inkedseahear , it would be impossible to orient itself to "down" without a frame of reference. So why would they choose to use an object beyond the ship as the gravitational frame of reference when it could just use the ship itself (especially since it would have to be redefined every time the ship moved to a new location)? Pixar just really screwed up on that one. There is no reasonable explanation for why turning the ship like that caused the tipping effect.
I love how while Wall-E is just gazing at the stars, while Burn-E is working his servos down to the core....Feels oddly relatable actually :/ Anyway, nice sync! Nice to see from both of their perspectives 😀
Its disappointing that the scene where wall e and Eva fly into the door and lock burn e out that the two doors don't match up, like on the inside of the door before it closes its a different pattern and the red lights on the outside in wall E aren't there in burn e, I know it doesn't really matter but they should keep up continuity.
Yeah, hopefully wall-e sequel won’t be like incredibles sequel (1-sorry if I spell incredibles wrong and 2-honestly, I didn’t watched incredibles 2 but I wish that if there’s a wall-e2 people won’t say it was bad)
0:49 It's pretty wholesome that WALL-E waves to BURN-E, and BURN-E waves back. Hopefully they get along back on Earth, and hopefully BURN-E will forgive WALL-E and EVE's distruption of his work.
One of the details I always found really interesting here is how the patterns on the door BURN-E gets locked outside from are different in the movie, versus in this short. (See 2:21 for comparison) I've always wondered why they ended up being so different; it doesn't really make sense to me.
Looks like it's probably a difference of original design and final design. The short having the original overcomplicated design, the film having the final, less detailed one.
I think they changed a lot of stuff for the short film because they didn't have the budget. A side-by-side comparison really shows the difference. It's evident in the scene where the door slams shut and the other one where the Axiom banks to the left. That sucks.
Its ironic that Wall-E is able to fix the lämp from the Pixars outro in single try even he's not a built in to repair stuff while Burn-E keeps repairing the lämp
4:01 Burn-E was deathly lucky to have entered on time with how abrupt the Axiom’s hyperdrive was. Had there been delay of even a second, he would’ve been thrown out of the starliner, doomed to float alone in space for eternity, light years away from Earth
Do you think Burn-E would get a spin-off series of shorts of him getting work done. Edit: I would to see a sequel of Wall-E but what’s there to make a good story
Neat! I like stuff like this, where different versions of the same scene are compared. . .even as it proves BURN-E's timeline can't QUITE sync up to the movie's. (Though I think it wouldn't be that difficult to edit in BURN-E's scenes into WALL*E -- hmmm. Replace WALL*E's original landing with the BURN-E version where he's waving, make sure to use the BURN-E shot of him trying to get in the airlock during that moment. . .)
