Wanted: A Science of UFOs | Alexander Wendt | TEDxColumbus 

Einstein's relativity would've had no chance, because 'it wasn't corroborated by scientific evidence' in the beginning :D

@@popovicititus i mean it was like that at first, it took 20 years for the scientific community to "accept" the idea, then more years to study and peer review it, he got a nobel for it decades after it's first theorization

Yes, it's completely ironic. It is true that this is the speaker's opinion, but isn't that the whole point of TED? I'm not a "UFO Person," but do believe the public has the need and right to know what is going on. We don't need to know the "how," but need to know and have a right to know the "what," and "when." End the taboo, open the subject to scientific interrogation and public information.

Exactly its more unscientific to not allow the debate and conversation. We can accept the notion it doesn't exist but let us also hear the other side and play devil's advocate.

@@vigneshsubramanian2511 "I'd rather have questions I can't answer than answers I can't question," Richard Feynman.

Exactly.

spot on. so ridiculous....how are we meant to make any progress on this topic if people who look into it are labelled as crazy

EXACTLY WHAT I THOUGHT!!! if there is something fishy its not UFOS its this fear of making real science. when will we really work on tesla inventions for real. ted is mainstream. at least we have this talk uploaded. i have seen an ufo , so i imagine how many people already did too

Zackary, you're so correct. Most people are afraid of the truth. I think just maybe, one day we all might get the shock of our lives, all seeing a large UFO at the same landing.. And it can't be hidden.

TED and all other such entities will be the laughing stock of history. Scientists need to learn about the Canadian gov research aka Project Magnet. There's also the French archives and other countries.

And we are in the third part now

And Neil deGrasse Tyson will happily take your money to be in all three camps

In schopenhauers day, philosophers were by nature, interested in all aspects of science and at his death he owned over 200 books on science. Being a polyglot, he was fortunate in being able to read science in many languages. I would suggest you read about him, the fact that you know how to spell his name right is a good start on your part.

@Chris Pacheco For someone with a PhD you're sure boastful and insecure.

@Chris Pacheco 'm not going to waste any more time with you but I think I can sum you up. You probably have at most one or two years of Philosophy which is your dream subject, but you're not smart enough or don't have enough money to get your bachelor's degree. You're working in a job like janitor which you hate and you probably can't get a woman because you don't have any money and live with your mother.

"how this subject has changed"... I know what you mean, but how ridiculous is that? What has changed? The mainstream morons saw it on 60 minutes so now it's credible?

​@@bafflezbiz If the subject is actually studied and we find there is something profound about it, then who is more moronic? Will it be those who wanted some modest funding to study the unknown? Or will it be those who didn't want to study it at all? I can understand being skeptical about this topic, but there is a difference between skepticism and trivial dismissal based solely on personal bias. If we study the phenomena and we find there's nothing to it, then we've spent a modest amount of money on it in the grand scheme of things. No big. However, if we find there is something to it, that revelation may very well change our fundamental understanding of physics and our place in the universe. Sounds like it might be worth some study to me.

@@quantumac I agree with you! I was referring to the fact that nothing has changed other than mainstream media has run out of stories (Trump is no longer center stage, thank God) so they glom on to this specific UFO story that has been running for over a decade. And now, of course, Congress has requested a report (but I doubt we/they will learn much if anything, Harry Reed has been requesting this info for years). The subject hasn't changed, but the opinion of the mindless masses has been changed by the media. Unfortunate that this is what it takes to bring this subject to a new level of acceptance. And it clearly has a long way to go.

Go figure a little scientific inquiry at the military level now has everyone knowing the phenomena is real and is occurring all over the world 🌎

Where is the flag

Massimo Teodorani this UAP footage he shows dates from 2004, see the ‘Phil Larson declaration’ issued out by Obama in 2011 and then you’ll understand why they have flagged it.

Massimo Teodorani Those who say that UFOs cannot exist because there’s no proof are incorrect from a methodological and epistemological point of view. Requiring the kind of definitive proof to satisfy a scientific consensus is an inherently wrong headed way to look at the phenomenon. Scientific methodology was developed to understand the natural world, with it’s pattern of phenomenology that is not affected by the intention of sentient beings. Clearly the many craft being seen are piloted by intelligent beings with intention that are outside of the natural order; therefore we cannot use the standards of scientific “proof” to determine whether the phenomenon should be studied. The beings piloting these craft aren’t going to “naturally” leave the evidence that would amount to a consensus developed proof, for us to find. It’s illogical to make the demand for proof in the traditional sense, for such a phenomenon. Although yes, technically we cannot prove the existence of such craft in the conventional scientific sense, that is not the argument we should be concerned with. When multiple lines of evidence converge to support a given hypothesis or theory, those multiple lines of evidence greatly increase the probability of supporting the hypothesis or theory; even when none of those lines of evidence provides a “crucial test” that serve as a proof. The “debunkers” always make it into a “either it’s proved completely, or it doesn’t exist” argument. They don’t realize there are other levels of evidence besides absolute proof. While yes, they cannot technically be proven to exist, there are plenty of lines of evidence supporting the possibility and which support the argument for studying the phenomenon. Absence of evidence is not evidence for absence. The conventional arguments made against studying the phenomenon are not logical. We have just convinced ourselves that they are logical using rationalizations that are not methodologically sound and that have no epistemological basis. Scientists have used every possible argument to try to convince themselves that the phenomenon is not worthy of investigation, but they haven’t thought through their arguments fully.

keir farnum it comes down to simple logic in the end....either these craft exist or thousands and thousands of people are lying about it and in the case of the military, wilfully falsifying radar data. That said see the ‘Phil Larson declaration’ issued out in 2011 by Obama.

Mr Science here plainly said (paraphrasing) "aliens are probably not green but grey", without presenting evidence or argument for it. See no problem with that? Also he says navy classification of the things in the videos as "unidentified" means that the navy doesn't know what it is. Assuming it is indeed correct that the navy classifies them in this way, which some sources seem to dispute, it is not a straight logical conclusion that they therefore genuinely don't know what is is, in light of the fact that it could be classified things flying around that they don't want to talk about.

Also Mr Science says before the wright brothers it was thought that flying machines would contradict the laws of physics. But no rational engineer or physicist could have seriously thought that - because they all have seen birds fly.

Barry O was the Illinois Enema Bandit, TED has never did a talk on that. And Michael was his right-hand hand-job man.

TED sucks!

@carlos angel :not the responsibility of ted to condone content of video but it is their responsibility to cleverly advertise their videos to increase number of viewers which flagging might be another way to do that.

Exactly what they did to cannabis. Basically "We don't study it." That's why it's a schedule 1... "no medical benefit" because they try not to find any. FDA: we are unable to say that meth is worse than weed. And absolutely no discussion on why it was to become prohibited (Canada). Cops put people in jail by enforcing a law that has no reason to exist. One of many reasons why people want to reform the police. Chauvin: the system is broken.

amen bro

Yes. It ironically reinforces his very point!

His point exactly! We can’t take UFOs seriously if we want to stick to science. That’s why we still know so little about genuine UFOS. We won’t know more, until scientists are ‘allowed’ to investigate them seriously without jeopardizing their career. It’s obvious that something is moving/flying/... Negating that fact, is starting to make people sound ridiculous. Which is good. Jumping to the conclusion that they are extraterrestrial with the evidence we have doesn’t sound reasonable either. More research is very much needed. ASAP. It’s one of the biggest mysteries at the moment. Anyone the least bit concerned with National Security (hopefully our government and military) should have the biggest interest in investigating the phenomenon until we know more.

"which are not corroborated by scientific evidence" - his whole thing was about the obivious lack of scientific exploration, how could there be corroborating scientific evidence? This makes no sense

@@bettina4374 "genuine UFOS" LOL read the again. Genuine UNIDENTIFIED !

Imagine if it was a talk about how children should get HRT if they identified as trans.

yes, the scientist said "if", and stated facts, which is that UFO phenomena is a taboo tho mb a more accurate description of it, is by just saying its a phenomena and leave it as that it could be a social, cultural, psychological, spiritual and not only physical

@Jack Steward You completely missed the point of his talk. The crux of what he is saying is that we need to conduct research to obtain those original ideas. He's not presenting a theory. Look at the title of the video. He's saying we're not conducting enough research on the phenomenon and he's 100% correct.

@Jack Steward I think his main purpose was to open our own mind's to the possibility of et. I think religion is the main obstacle. It's hard for people to say "oh there's other life out there?" were not the only ones? How does GOD fit? There's other" stories" outthere

Archimus Prime Yes. The sad part is that our government is uniformly omitting results of their studies and outcomes relating to UFO interactions at least since well before Roswell. Blue Book was a carefully constructed hoax on the public. There exist worlds of evidence that knowledge of government research into UFOs has been heavy-handedly suppressed for years. Our WW II bomber pilots saw phenomena that resulted in scientist’s assessing that the phenomena was otherworldly. These phenomena ( ‘foo fighters’) happened many times in the European and Pacific theaters. Doctor Steven Greer has hundreds of videos recording compelling government military research whistleblowers describing astonishing UFO reverse engineering, captive ETs, distribution of ET tech to companies, and much more that confirms the existence and activities of ETs here on Earth. The government has spent more money on security and suppression than the research itself. How do you think we ‘lost’ $15 trillion of unexplained costs in the last ten years?

@@Jack Steward : yes, what academia does best is to educate people about ideas that other people have thought to be enough to make theories available for discussion and experimentation.

Agreed. Pathetic bunch of cowards.

w hy is everyone talking about "flagging " videos" idk what flagging video even means. Someone help me. Also 5000 mphs seams very fast for an object just saying

If they didn't want to show the video, it wouldn't be on their channel. This is average UFO believers logic at work.

@@Bibibosh You can read it in the videos description dropdown.

It just invigorates the taboo in soceity hes talking about.

Guaranteed the government pressures the scientific community away from these types of studies. Think about Roswell. The air force said they captured a flying disc. Then, all the sudden, they say it's a weather balloon? Is anyone else uncomfortable with the idea that our military personnel cant distinguish a space ship from a balloon?

@@jacobknox2380 When a weather ball0on prompts 500 military men, scientists, machines and cranes, trucks,, and weapons to cordon off a 15 mile perimeter, man, that's some weather balloon!

@Chris Pacheco what did he say that wasn't supported?

@Chris Pacheco even where a professional witness was involved, all occasion were covered up. Only few governments around the world released their reports. They're blatantly stopping any investigation/scientific research by hiding evidence. The rest of what he said where that statements or procedures given to the navy personal. I mean,, even Nuclear warhead command centers have encounters these situations. We should be allowed committed to research these incidents and the right to information act needs to function, not just kept away for top secret.

TED run by idiots?

So funny that TED flagged this video a little over a year ago..... That did not age well. I do NOT fault them for flagging certain videos. Sometimes it's legitimate. But not here. I'm a very skeptical person....I don't buy into conspiracy BS. But, the UFO/UAP phenomenon is different. There is a there...there. And it is way past time we soberly and honestly start studying the reality of that. It is SO bizarre how this has all of a sudden become mainstream. That is a very good thing. I always knew it would eventually happen. But it's still rather jarring to realize it IS happening...NOW.

Hahahahaha

Where is the flag

Tedx probably think its not their job to look into UFO phenomenon.

yep.

The pea counters in science, don't want to be disturbed by counting peas They are more related with their careers reaching times of pension, than being curious. It's a shame how unscientific these minds are, ignoring all hints not fitting into their beloved narrative. What is scientific with such ignorance, not only in the field of unidentified objects, but also in many others. This community has become an ideological group of lemmings defending their mediocrity. Think they are also afraid being pushed from their pillars of false competence by higher cultures than ours, after millennia of arrogance and superiority posing, finding themselves in comparison with imagined higher cultures again on the level of apes, losing their unearned status of being the successors of all gods. No, the big era of Einsteins, Maxwell, Faraday, Tesla is over long time ago. We still enhance their true goodies, but real novelties don't come out of these emperors with no cloth, too bad

as long as he mentioned climate change, he was allowed to talk.

@@chrisdodt so true lol

quaz imodo yeah 👍 I reckon they don’t travel vast distances 🤔 I think they could very well be hiding here (underground) maybe even from here🤯. Also the taboo/stigma with UFO’s, a lot of it in my opinion is down to religious beliefs,reasons why they refuse the idea.

@@arcticbadger1 thumbs up and thanks for your comment. You may have something there. I agree.

He has guts because he's getting paid.

@@avery1234530 you may be right. My questions would be. (a) Who's paying him on a steady basis other than just TED for this one talk ? (b) How much ? (c) Do you have any specific evidence other than just your cynicism ? (d) What do you imagine the agenda is of those who promote such ideas ?

but can he speak a bit quieter?

He is listed as a speaker for the TedX Columbus 2019 season...so my guess would be late 2019? No mention of Corona, plus RU-vid sums the time up as one year ago, which could mean as much as one day less than a year and a half ago?

Verdict of what

@@enporter Supposedly the verdict from the intelligence communities on what they have found over the years on UAP/UFO phenomenon.

They call it Unidentified Aerial Vehicles, but they're not vehicles. They are ancient beings, two billion years old. To call them intelligent beings is an understatement. We are not equipped enough, we are not capable enough to understand them. They are not even a they. They carry and build countless worlds, realities, consciousness that are very far more advanced than our current understanding of consciousness. They carry impossible worlds made of antimatter that you can't even begin to imagine. You cannot come near them, you can never study them. When you die, wherever you are, a copy of your consciousness will be preserved inside it. The capsule shaped objects that can defy the rules of physics were builders, they were building. They call it Tic-Tac, they are capsules. They are self dividing, splicing, and self replicating under our oceans. How did they get here? We got their attention after a massive extinction that we call KT-extinction that happened 66 million years ago. Since then, they have diverted countless of giant asteroids that could have hit Earth. The tetrahedron encounters of the U.S. Navy, that could appear and disappear in an instant, is our only way to read them. They are not attempting to communicate with us. They have no interest in us. They're in different shapes and sizes, mostly in the form of platonic solids, and the Russians who reported the underwater sightings knew about it. It's their only expression that we can understand, universal shapes. They are countless consciousnesses united and in sync with one super consciousness. The Navy pilots keep on chasing them, try not to chase, they will come near.

thenewaeon 4 secs in the 70’s, saucer came silently overhead at 1,000 feet changed me forever.

The thing changed night to day for almost a minute. Sporting bright pink and light green! I saw this! My entire neighborhood saw it as it was a blackout and people where out of their houses.

Outstanding! I have long said "not believing" in UFOs is much like not believing in the Moon. It doesn't matter. It's still there, believe in it or not.

I have seen them two times in my 37 years of life. There were more witnesses. I am also a PhD researcher for a European institution. I have never spoken about this topic with people from the organization or even close to it because I don't want to see my reputation harmed. And, in the middle of this Covid19 crisis (I am confined at home in Spain) I am raising self-awareness on some deep thoughts and beliefs. And my conclusion is that I am sick of this taboo. If we made a survey among a heterogeneous and large population of several socioeconomic strata in different geographies, we would find an amazing reality in terms of recurrence of the phenomenon. And if 5-20% of the cases are unexplained, something is happening that is remaining untold. In my view, there is research on the phenomenon. But it is carried out with opaque funds because it is a problem that concerns not only national security, but the logical basis on which this world is built: we as a center (a thing that is leading us to destruction once we have ignored that we are part of a complex system and the planet is not ours). Imagine they are extraterrestrial beings, or human beings from parallel universes, or human beings from the future, or manifestations of an interdimensional reality that permanently coexists with us. In order to prevent chaos on a civilization scale - perhaps the current Coronavirus crisis is the first to occur, since the Second World War did not affect all states - a layer of disrepute, a taboo, is being spread and funds for researching the phenomenon are being cut. And it has worked very well for 70 years. But this has to change. If we have problems on a civilization scale, we also have to focus our responsibilities and our sights on a civilization scale. And this phenomenon has been present, according to the testimonies, for a very, very long time. I think it is very time to wake up to this enigma.

@Accelerationist yes but they denied it for that long. 75 years wasted.

@Accelerationist of course they do. they probably have deals made with them...but to what end? Do "They" want to remain hidden or is it the govenment thats doing the hiding and dismissal ?

LoL

There’s a certain slogan that’s printed on the American dollar which reads “in god we trust” and without reading too much into that it can kind of explain the reluctance of the American government to tell the truth about UFO’s...as a large diversely religious country, it would question a lot of bases that the American government was founded on

@@O-D-P I think we've seen plenty of evidence (in the last few years, especially) that a large percentage of people will continue to believe what they want to believe - regardless of facts or evidence.

So true.

So funny that TED flagged this video a little over a year ago..... That didn't age well. I'm a very skeptical person....I don't buy into conspiracy BS. But, the UFO/UAP phenomenon is different. There is a there...there. And it is way past time we soberly and honestly start studying the reality of that. It is SO bizarre how this has all of a sudden become mainstream. That is a very good thing. I always knew it would eventually happen. But it's still rather jarring to realize it IS happening...NOW.

The irony is complete. It is almost like they were trying to help make his point. But on the other hand I have learnt through the years to never underestimate the sheer stupidity with which the scientific community approches this subject. Ignorance, stupidity and arrogance abound. Curiosity, humility and objectivity are scarce.

If you examine what is off limits and marginalized it's kinda obvious 🙄

amen bro

Hahaha, exactly !

Other comments said the same thing, but you put it in the funniest way 😄 Agreed!

No, not TedX. TED.

They sort of proved his point for him.

So what do you know ?

I am intrigued. I've only been on board with this for three years now. Amazing

Tell us what you know....you cant leave us in suspense !!!!!!

SO have I... this is all ridiculousness You don't know anything anyone already hasn't made up out of this subject. One thing I have learned in 5 years is people like you just keep getting more outrageous every time you are debunked.

@@joulesafrica Nothing... he knows nothing... and when he says nothing or nohthing new that is proof he knowes not

@@atlasto9052 Very good point, doesnt matter if its ET or not, the TECH BEHIND THIS IS THE KEY TO EVERYTHING!

@@atlasto9052 1000000 times this

I agree, but it seems that politicians and the scientific community just dont want to know, so its up to the people to force this disclosure, remember that next time you vote.

@@@nyttag7830 : voting has not been helpful in the past many decades.

So true 😄

Its ridiculous.

He has a book on this

nobodyisperfect yeah 👍 I reckon they don’t travel vast distances 🤔 I think they could very well be hiding here (underground) maybe even from here🤯. Also the taboo/stigma with UFO’s, a lot of it in my opinion is down to religious beliefs,reasons why they refuse the idea.

nobodyisperfect me too bud and I bought some TTSA shares because of it.

Saw 3 together in 2014. I know they're real.

whos they?

@@Dina_tankar_mina_ord I have no idea.

Absolutely

Hi there UFO Jesus! Great to see you in the comments section. Love your channel. PS. I agree with you, I'd love to see the original FLIR1 video.

Probably they are referring to standard view HD film of the objects, the FILIR Is such low resolution. THe standard view HD video (visible light,) this would likely tell us much much more what was filmed, weird they are not showing this piece?.

@@CharlesTLam the navy said its because of national security but maybe we will get access to it in 2020

@@kerryn6714 yes,i'm dying for !!! Bonjour de France les amis ✌😉👍🇫🇷

Post Disclosure World ...Mick West would just say it was a high resolution seagull or cockpit reflections Ryan....ya know it!

EXACTLY....

Israel Anderson , elaborate on your statement, please.

I don’t know what these unidentified things are, and neither do you. But something that has been picked up on radar, that fighter jet systems have been able to lock onto, that multiple credible witnesses have seen simultaneously...that’s something that is worth scientifically looking into.

What did you see exactly??

@@SatanicDonut i had drum lessons in Ridgewwod and was sitting on the back porch of my Mom's boss' house. This was not at my house. It was a bright sunny day, no clouds in the sky and across from the small backyard, there were just woods and lots of pine trees. To my right I noticed a metallic flying saucer moving slowly across the sky. It was metallic because the sunlight was bouncing off of it and there were no indentations or windows, no markings. It was NOT a blimp. It was just a perfectly round, oval shaped disc, as if it was made out of one piece of silver metal. I kept wondering how the person flying it could see outside, because there were no openings or windows. It moved slowly across the sky and went behind a group of tall trees and I waited for it to come out from behind the trees and into my sight again, if it was continuing the same path that I saw it took, but it never did. So I am guessing it changed directions and started to move away from the house towards the woods. I thought a lot about what it could have been. Also, as i watched it move across the sky, I would say that it was about 3 inches across. I don't know how big it really was or how far away it really was.

@Colin Mike crazy, isn't it? My sister told me that a lot of farmers in the Midwest - her job is there - see UFOs over their farmland.

Exactly. Neil Tyson loses ALL qualifications to call himself a "scientist" when he acts that way about ufology.

@@theultimatereductionist7592 Tyson can't open his mind to UFOs. This is unfortunate because he is very smart and maybe culd help the funominon.

I saw a UFO over a military base, I'm an ex-Army 1st Lieutenant. My parents saw one, my business partner, and 4 other friends saw one. In my case it was a ball of light hovering in one spot for about 15 minutes. No colors, no smoke, no noise and at night.

I heat tyson 🤬

Tyson is a pork chop chasing clown a buffoon

Shame mexico has no fighter jets lol

@SonOf McGringus patronizing pretentious comes to mind, well behind the times , stealth was never misidentified as a ufo stealth is primitive tech jet engine super loud , nobody mentioned stars where ufos and nobody could ever misidentify a star or meteorite guess you never watched the actual presentation

It always bags me why would aluens let them selves be visible on foreign planet by puting thir lights on.

In Mexico you aren't Alone, but you might be Asada!

@@vedranavidicevic7159 you'd have to wonder why they'd be concerned about being seen, especially when you consider the events with a nuclear missile silo in Montana

Did you ever think the right question is not where's the evidence but why is so much evidence rejected?

@@darrellowings2343 evidence about UFO or Religión?

Great point.

A science of UFO's (unfucked orifices). Its the result of not going out anywhere. PERIOD!!!

@Good Krypollo yeah? what evidence? ifi have to believe it before you show me doesnt count

unidentified SUBMERGED objects

@@theultimatereductionist7592 You are right, and will correct. submerged include strange sightings at various deep lakes.

fred sobel yes it may be that scientists are afraid of what’s out there but I think more afraid of losing their reputations. Billy

BrexitGaming yeah 👍 I reckon they don’t travel vast distances 🤔 I think they could very well be hiding here (underground) maybe even from here🤯. Also the taboo/stigma with UFO’s, a lot of it in my opinion is down to religious beliefs,reasons why they refuse the idea.

Is he a unic?

mobley Mobley I reckon that is the opposite of a eunuch 😆

He is NOT a scientist, himself. He's just a political professor. Nevertheless, everything he says is true & important.

He is NOT a scientist, himself. He's just a political professor. Nevertheless, everything he says is true & important.

70s huh?? were mushrooms involved?

Geffo Me until today i didn't believe in ufo, but that video makes me wonder. 5000mphs right hand turns?

@@mitchellnewman9670. Drugs were just for pop stars back then and I wasn't intoxicated in any way. So please try to understand that I'm not some believer shouting ET! I'm just saying that UFOs are worthy of scientific research.

@@Bibibosh. The tic tac video is certainly interesting. But I do wonder it it's one of ours. A high tech drone of some kind. The things I saw in the 70s were glowing spheres, one of them being quite large. And they seemed to be intelligent. Keep watching the skies.

Geffo Me the way in which you worded that last comment alerts my sense to believe that truth and deception are woven in a tight thread. until one can truly understand what is true and true only, only then will truth be light!

I'm actually a little skeptical of this. Seems like its going to be catching a lot of bugs, birds and conventional aircraft. Infrared would be a must if they did do something like this though. I like the idea of privately owned radar.

Over Carroll county Georgia every night

Phil ail he obviously hasn’t heard of the TTSA then.

Yup. He must feel great and deserves it.

" The great names of history we're ridiculed for this" -- So were the clowns and charlatans and crackpots. That's a silly argument. The subject deserves better.

@@jimoberg3326 No doubt this subject brings in some unstable minds. It is unbelievable. Everything is unbelievable until we can prove. Proof I guess would be mass acceptance of the subject. Even if it's all an illusion, it still is one of the most fascinating interactions.

@@user-tl2rb9qt2n -- Whatever the odds, even long shots with high payoffs are worth pursuing. Watch the skies, but be careful where you place your feet. .

Jeff G mass hallucinations which get tracked on radar.....hhummnnn

A hallucination wouldn’t show up on military radar lol

no both do not need scientific analysis only one does. don't be a dolt

once you witness one you would not call it a hallucination.

It's way beyond that. The Navy and Pentagon have declared they exist. We're beyond the point of reasonable doubt. Most don't understand because of the subtle nature that disclosure has to happen. We've been given a huge piece of information to digest. After a while we'll get another.

just not from our civilizations. let it be Extraterrestrials or something else we will soon know.

@Fascino93 you would because everything humans care about is money and you would make lots ot if

Look into "break away civilization"

Nazis have Antigravity in Argentina. Allies have Antigravity in British Columbia, most sightings are in Canada 2per week. Then You have a half dozen Civilizations in Hollow Earth.

Yes I agree that disclosure is forthcoming when the scientific community releases the stigma of ostrasization associated with admitting UFOS exist... I know the Pentagon secretly investigated them after closing out Project Blue Book led by Alan Hynek who was advised by the gov. to debunk the existence of UFOs. Then more recently Billionaire Robert Bigelow went on Sixty Minutes and stated factually that UFOS exist and he has investigated the fact more than the government spending millions doing so. He currently has a huge contract with NASA building floating apartments for families when we have to get off this planet due to global warming or an apocalypse of some kind. He is a visionary.

.....he didn't "stay in between the lines".

What if, long ago because of the powers that be around the world looked down upon the scientists because of Religion and other reasons, forced a lot of scientists underground. And the scientists we know as the best that has been - is NOT the best that was ever around? What if the myth of Atlantis is based on these Scientists? The best scientists 100's of years ago, would have nothing to impede them to advance scienctific discoveries. That would be a possible answer to who is behind the UAPs.

Well, even though Wendt does go out of his way to say "I'm not saying it's aliens", it doesn't take a genius to see that's exactly what we're dealing with. I've read those books; they got me to research this phenomenon further and I ended up in agreement with the basic argument that ET is not here to help us - but rather unfortunately to exploit us. Sucks, but it's true. Abductees who remember their experiences know how awful it is. Only question is whether or not we will continue to allow this violation of our human rights.

I also have read and studied these briefings and found them to be compelling. As time unfolds it seems there is an increasing amount of evidence pointing to their authenticity. In the briefings it suggests something very similar to what Mr Wendt suggests with cameras focused continually and broadly on our skies to begin our intelligence in this great matter.

I resonate with the Allies's message as they make clear that the topic is taboo because behind the scenes, in the corridors of power (commercial, political, religious institutions) agreements have been made to allow abductions and testing of people and animals in exchange for more power, indirectly corroborating Deepstate unethical practices.

@@Louve81 Sad but true.

Talk didn't ask that question at all. It asks why we do not study these phenomenon and that is all it asks. Read the first briefing. Nobody of significant intellect is going to read past the first 5 or 6 paragraphs except out of pure curiosity as to how ridiculous it will get. Get on with your life and leave the thinking to thinkers.

To be frank, we don't spend that much on either. The military budget was just increased to about $800 B. A google search said we spend maybe two or three dozen million a year on research looking for extraterrestrial life (SETI and similar projects), which is absolutely nothing; it's the cost of a few minutes of a sitcom on TV. That's not to say I necessarily support SETI because I have some issues with their methodology and assumptions, and I agree whatever money we spend sending signals into space could be spent on UFO investigation. I just want to point out that these types of research get much funding either way.

If ET is observing us they must be doubled up in laughter, that is of course if they have a sense of humor.

They’re already here, old historic paintings are just one of many valid resources that show evidence of this. Another, people removing organic implants that have off world metals producing radio frequencies that can be measured.

Seti is the practice of waiting for a phone call when the things you want to speak to are in the same room as you!

exactly

The tedx person identifies as xir

@@BlastinRope Is he still living in his Grandmother's basement?

What do you mean?

It's not in the sand they bury their heads.

I'm not sure his premise that "no one knows" ...is entirely accurate. Just because the "mainstream" is clueless, doesn't entitle one to say "no one..anywhere.". That's an unscientific leap. In my humble opinion.

@@bigcity2085 Wake up sheeple

he's not a scientist.

*political* scientist

Exactly, this is the first thing to look into.