Warner Bros. 100th Anniversary - Theory11 - Deck Review! 

Yes, that is indeed the top from Inception :) 100% agree with the critique about the courts, that's why there's no way this deck will ever be a part of my collection, and that's ignoring the pathetic selling tactics t11 employed to "rarify" this product. Doesn't feel like WB at all with how restrained their choices were. In fact, it doesn't make any sense whatsoever to make such a deck if you're only going to nostalgize the courts and not the number cards, because there's too much classic stuff to include. Using 2 courts on Scooby-Doo is insane, as is pushing Batman, a deck t11 has already produced. I might have given more credit if the Batman art were modelled more around the animated series and if Harley's art were to match, but neither of those things were done. Where's 2001: A Space Odyssey, or Pan's Labyrinth, or The Matrix, or Magnolia, or The Fugitive, or Rush Hour, or Full Metal Jacket, or Goodfellas, or Nightmare on Elm Street, or Blade Runner, or The Shining, or Enter the Dragon, or Blazing Saddles, or The Exorcist, or The Maltese Falcon, or Casablanca, or The Lego Movie, or A Clockwork Orange, or The Treasure of Sierra Madre, or etc. etc. etc. I could go on for a LONG time. There is SO MUCH missing here. I get it, licensing fees and whatnot, but don't call it a WB deck if you're going to show us like 2% of the memorable properties.

With so much material to draw from, it is a missed opportunity to add characters to the number cards. As you and others have said, it's an unusual selection that they have gone with for the court cards. I agree that it would have also been better with a red tuck and back design. Seeing the 2 ad cards that were in red makes me think they will offer that version in the future.

Wow. Theory 11 have struck again. Cheers

Definitely a deck fits for those who loves Warner Bros lovers - especially if you like Tom & Jerry, Scooby Doo, or DC Superheroes. This is the icing for the cake for those who collects WB stuffs, to celebrate the 100 years. Shame Fred got "chopped liver" (at least he could be referenced onto Daphne since he liked her XD), but it would be a GRAVE mistake (that might resulted in a witch hunt) if they left out both Shaggy and Scooby. Haven't watched the Goonies to be able to recognize JoS, until after watching this hahaha (don't judge me - I will watch it if can); so as the Ace of Diamonds that features the Maple Syrup referenced to Elf (will watch that too). And correct, the AoC is that top from "Inception", one of Nolan's best work! - the top is something the Dreamers used as a sign whether they are still in a dream or not. Great review as always~ You will always be my guide if I lack the knowledge on some characters in a deck ;)

Looks a great deck. On my list of things to get!

I definitely agree with your commentary. I would have loved to have it be more nostalgia and a more cohesive choice of characters. That being said I love this deck and the art style, especially. I personally love the minimal tuck front despite being a departure from the ornate T11 style. Great review!

aww man, such a missed opportunity smh

Strange the Joker wasn't a Joker?

Where can I get these cards ? I checked Amazon but they don’t have them.

Very few of the cards are really WB properties but acquistions. Tom & Jerry and WIZARD OF OZ are MGM, Willy Wonka was a David Wolper production released by Paramount; his library was later sold to WB along the intellectual property. DC was bought by WB. LORD OF THE RINGS was a New Line film and they too were bought by WB. Scooby Doo is Hanna Barbera and played CBS and then ABC. In 2001 Warner bought them. Obviously they were looking at pop icons they own and not celebrating Warner Brothers from JAA SINGER to Bogart, Cagney, EG , Robinson, Bette Davis , Errol Flynn, John Wayne, The Exorcist and many others. I am not too sophisticated about card rules but why no eyes?

Honestly, I miss the original decks from Theory 11. It’s now just IP hype which doesn’t interest me in the least.