WARNO - NEW RTS THATS REALLY FUN! Reminds me of World in Conflict but bigger... 

Tbf they basically never engaged

This is why Shack should never be in actual command.

I feel like Mel Gibsons movie "We were soldiers" is Shacks favorite movie. He tries to copy that strat on every game he plays. Especially Empire at War. Then it gets combined with the 1st Battle of Geonosis which is basically a swarm of infantry engaged in civil war style line battle vs rocket artillery, tanks and droids.

I’m not surprised mate it’s basically a carbon copy.

Well it is the same developer :)

It’s wargame mixed with steel division it’s the same devs

@@chezmcdave didn’t know that. That’s cool to know. Thank you

It’s the same group and publisher

there are 5 campaigns of various sizes as of launch

there is not a "traditional" campaign where it has a in-depth story and plot line. What it uses instead is a "dynamic" army general mode which is a turn based overworld with formations of units that battle and turn into the actual gameplay battles which you can autoresolve, or play out, and has PVP and PVE (COOP) or single-player capability.

​@@MrCoolguy425 true. warno is basically wargame 4, and European Escalation is the only one that has a traditional campaign

I want captain shack to play the third campaign on the slowest setting😂

WARNO is significantly better than Broken Arrow, but I hope the Broken Arrow devs try again. It's nice to have competition.

@@WekBenHelixtry again? It’s not even out yet. They have time to improve it and add other factions and game modes as a live service

I think I'm getting to the point where I need to custom make my army. And you're totally right about the mobility of artillery. I need to find out how to turn off auto sell

@@CaptainShack The settings menu has a lot of handy tools when it comes to unit decision making. Rules of Engagement: Auto-resale in Gameplay Settings is the one you're looking for. Another of interest is Rules of Engagement: On Foot Pathfinding, it keeps infantry to treelines when giving orders.

@@CaptainShack Hey, just a Heads up, SEAD(Suppresion Enemy Air Defense) Missiles are what you Described with the Phantom, you had that for a while in your Lineup and i just felt the need to comment, love the content, long time viewer, Keep being awesome!

The division deck systems do enforce some specialization (e.g. airborne division usually only have very light tanks) just more realistic and less gamey than WiC. If you play in 10v10 modes, there's also room for you to focus on playing certain roles, more so if the server is set to have reduced income (known as tactical).

It's the same devs as the Wargame series and Steel Division (also RUSE, if you want to go further back).

The Quality of life features in this game make it a good bit easier to get into compared to WG Rd. There are solid ingame tutorials + the average Time to kill is higher so you have a bit more time to react. Its still for sure a big game and if you play with standard settings you have alot of units to control, but you can reduce the income and slow the gamespeed in singleplayer and there are also multiplayer lobbies with reduced income.

What you mean? Can explain?

@@PantherBlackRu that going to be hard

its so warnover

1.0 release last week🎉

That tail rotor line kept getting to me 😅

Wait….wait…wait…wait….zzzzz

No all Unit voice lines are spoken bei real humans, only AI voice lines are in the Tutorial and 1 last character in the Campaign, rest are all real voiceactors. Though the mixing aint perfect.

exactly what i was thinking when i saw that - it looks like they copy paste wargame...

I just commented that too

@@warallied I mean, it's the same developer. All of the games in the Wargame series play the same, both Steel Divisions plays like Wargame and WARNO plays like Wargame. This is the kind of game that Eugen makes.

@@Trve_Kvlt thats my criticism. Playing too safe isnt necessarily good. Same devs doesnt mean they cant make ground breakinh innovations.

It's by the same dev serving their fans. There are lots of QoL and gameplay features implemented by the devs based on the community feedback over the long years in their wargame and steel division series that i think are very positive. And there are STILL a bunch of diehard bitter WARGAME:RD players that hate changes and holds a grudge against the developers of daring to develop a WW2 steel division series back in the days. Lots of strategy series sequel that tried to innovate (I personally think were good attempts that could improve) got murdered by the community in their infancy. So it's definitely not just a reskin or playing it too safe. It's an actual sequel.

Why ?

WARNO is an indirect continuation of the Wargame series (same maker) which is way older than Broken Arrow. BA itself feels like a new World in Conflict.

Yeah, Warno is the 4th entry in the Wargame series, which has been going on since the early 2010s

Warno > Broken Arrow

@@blackburn1489 Too early to say. WARNO is a fully released game, BA had a short demo. There are things in WARNO I prefer, but also things in BA that I find better.