Was Ibn Al Qayyim A Sufi? Sheikh Abdus Salam Ash Shuway'ir 

Yes, every well explained.

Tru

Yeah many fail to see the semantical issue. Tasawuff in its classical sense refers to tazkiyyah and zuhd whereas some today portray it as khurafat and quburi stuff

biased against sufism

@@AC-mp7cx of course we are against sufis who say certain people control the universe, this is shirk and kufr.

The video explains the extent to which people isolate themselves.

I agree. With regards to Tariqas, I'm not really sure as to whether they're legislated or not, I'd need to look into this issue to see what the classical ulama have said. And of course every tariqah is different, some are attributed to great Imams of guidance as the sheikh mentioned, whereas this isn't the case for some. The student of Ibn Kathir for example mentioned that Ibn Kathir was part of the Shadhili Tareeqah, but after he found out about certain statements of the founder of the tareeqah, he remained uncertain as to whether he should continue or not. So this narration gives the impression that Ibn Kathir viewed following a Tareeqah to be fine, but it's just that he didn't like the particular tareeqah he was upon

Read the book Tabless ul-Ibless of Ibn Al-Jawzi there he very succinctly explains this topic.

@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq with all due respect Ibn Al Jawzi in talbis iblis is not referring to every tariqa, rather he is pointing out that there are people who join tariqa for the wrong reasons, and that there are people/sects that go to extremes in matters within the tariqa... He mentions such things as individuals who go to the extreme in leaving worldly affairs to the point they have no worldly duties/concerns,...etc People who go to that kind of extreme, and the other extremes he mentions... Are leaving matters of the Deen, worldly obligations,...etc There unfortunately are sects among all the Muslims that go to extremes in all directions. And we are not to be a people of extremes but rather a middle way. Tariqa is not something bad, but it can become something bad for individuals who have the wrong niyat, who abuse it, who think the purpose is to live like monks and completely give up worldly affairs...etc basically all our classical Ulama followed a Tariqa. It really comes down to people's actual understanding of what Tariqa is and it's intended purpose, in all reality a Tariqa is no difference than a madrasa, you have an Imam that is teaching the students ilm, and the students should intend to learn, and apply that knowledge within their daily lives, that in reality and simple terms is what a Tariqa is.

@@TheMuslimConservative Yes, I know Akhi read my message in context, half of his book is a refutation to pretty much all of the Tariqas.

@@TheMuslimConservative We already have the Tariqa of the Salaf, and that is sufficient for us.

the link is of this same video

Ibn Taymiyyah was a scholar who was the teacher of Ibnul Qayyum, not his “sufi master”. Abdullah Al Ansari influenced many, myself included. None of this has anything to do with a tariqa.

@@eesaabdurrahman1569 A tariqa strictly speaking is a path, it essentially involves a student being under a Shaykh for a number of years. Ibn Qayyim's most influential Shaykh was ibn Taymiyyah as Abdullah al Ansari's Abu al-Hassan al-Kharaqani

@@youngomniverse35 ok, I see.

Tariqas evolved in the same organic way the madhabs of fiqh evolved. They are simply different schools on how to discipline the self through knowledge and rememberence until someone attains the station of Ihsan and pure tawhid

@@massimoajmonebasso pure Tawheed is known through proper understanding. You can sit with a tariqa for decades but if you supplicate to other than Allah you’ll never have tawheed. I’m not saying a tariqa is a bad thing, but it must not contain bidah or shirk. Proper understanding of Tawheed means understanding that Allah is the Lord of all things, that ONLY He is to be called to in prayer and understanding His names and attributes. Tawhid isn’t a station, it’s belief and practice. You can’t “attain” Tawheed.

Wa alaykum as salam. Of course, no problem in sha Allah

@@subulassalam6067 JazakAllahu khairan

@@flash8628 again all sufi tareeqas are wrong. True Sufism comes from the word Safaa Al Qalb and is Salafia . But today's Sufism comes from the word Greek Sofia which has nothing to do with Islam. No Sufi today is on the true path since Ibn Taymiyyah said that all the Sufi groups did Ghulu in different ways. Even non qubooris still say Ya Ali, Hussien ,Abu Bakr without being qubooris. For example ,in today's day there is no such thing as true Shia of Ali . Shia if Ali were ahlu sunnah and are supporters of Ali. But no sunni today calls himself a Shia since the Shias today are known to be astray. Sheikh Salih Al Munajjid Said: Sufism nowadays But what Shaykh al-Islam said about the view of Sufis depending on their situation is almost too theoretical for our times, when the objectionable matters that he referred to have become part of the path of those who call themselves Sufis nowadays, in addition to the different occasions they celebrate such as the Mawlid, and their exaggeration about their living shaykhs, and their attachment to shrines and graves, where they pray and circumambulate the graves and make vows to them, and other well-known practices of theirs. This is what was agreed upon by the Standing Committee in their answer to a question about the ruling on the Sufi tariqas that exist nowadays. They said: “Usually those that are called Sufis nowadays follow bid’ahs (innovations) that constitute shirk, as well as other kinds of bid’ah, such as when some of them say “Madad ya sayyid (Help, O Master)”, and call upon the qutubs (“holy men”), and recite dhikr in unison using names which Allah has not called Himself, like saying “Huw, Huw (He, He)” and “Ah, Ah (a contraction of the word ‘Allah’)”. Whoever reads their books will be aware of many of their innovations that constitute shirk, and other evils.”

@@flash8628 nope madhhab is different than Tareeqas . The word Sufism was not known at the time of the Messenger or the Sahaabah or the Taabieen. It arose at the time when a group of ascetics who wore wool (soof) emerged, and this name was given to them. It was also said that the name was taken from the word soofiya (sophia) which means wisdom in Greek. The word is not derived from al-safa (purity) as some of them claim, because the adjective derived from safa is safaai, not soofi (sufi). The emergence of this new name and the group to whom it is applied exacerbated the divisions among Muslims. The early Sufis differed from the later Sufis who spread bidah (innovation) to a greater extent and made shirk in both minor and major forms commonplace among the people, as well as the innovations against which the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) warned us when he said, Beware of newly-invented things, for every newly-invented thing is an innovation and every innovation is a going-astray. (Reported by al-Tirmidhi, who said it is saheeh hasan). Today for example there is no such sunni who calls himself a Shia since the shias are known today to be far from the Sunnah. It was only possible for the true followers of Ali during his time who are true sunnis

@@flash8628 plus today the innovated tareeqas claim to follow the hanafi madhhabs . So tareeqa is not a madhhab

@@flash8628 nope again tareeqas are different ways and they can differ in many ways like the khawarij since Ibadi khawarij are different than other khawarij sects. And some scholars have divided the khawarij into those who have aqeedah which can make them leave islam and some khawarij who are still in the fold of Islam but are misguided like those who rebel against the rulers but have full aqeedah of tawheed

@@flash8628 nope tareeqas are not mathahib plus there is no proof imam shaffi said this through correct transmittion. It might been other than the context u took it in since imam shafi said: If being a rafidi means loving the ahl al bayt, be a witness that i am a rafidi. This is not literal and doesn't mean imam shafi is a rafidi like some deceivers try to put it

Until the extremism in worship started to crept in. Now a days they have created there on forms of worship. Read the book Tablees ul-Ibless of Ibn Al-Jawzi, there is goes in depth regarding this topic.

@@MuhammadAli-mz4pqsame goes for salafiyya. There’s levels in all these groups

I am also a revert Al hamdulillah. Purification of the soul only comes by following the Quran and the sunnah by the understanding of the pious predecessors (Salaf as Salih). Salaf follow the methodology of sahaba and the pious generations. It is a duty on every Muslim including reverts to find the truth even after being guided to Islam. May Allah guide us all Muslims upon the Quran and the sunnah by the understanding of the salaf as salih. Also, do not speak without knowledge. Allah has blessed knowledge into the chests of the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah.

6:20

I don't know whe you're here but you're entertaining ngl

Source? I knew he was involved in Kalam but not Tasswuf

@@HamzaHamza-rv5we okay

@@HamzaHamza-rv5we Ibnul Qayyim thought some elements of Zuhd in Madarijus Salikeen. He was a Zahid, thought putting dunya and materialism in our hands not in our hearts, and travelling back to Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala. But that was time after he learn from ibn uthaymeen (Rh) but before ibnul qayyim (rh) was into sufism like Imam Al-Ghazali (rh). I believe this is truth. Anyway I didn't watch this video at all.

@@abdurrahmanal-ows9251 Ibn Taymiyyah not Ibn Uthaymeen lol may Allaah have mercy on Shaykh al Islam Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn al Qayyim. BarakAllaah feek Akhi

@@abdurrahmanal-ows9251 la bas I think you meant Ibn Taymiyyah but wrote Uthaymeen ?

ah are you calling one of the Scholars of madinah, A well known scholar of Ahlus sunnah a murji? Fear Allaah and seek knowledge akhi

It is just you fortunately.

Alhamdulillah, steamrolled over a thousand years of grave worshipping, shrine building, saint worshipping shirk. You can keep your art and architecture, the people are in need of tawheed.

@@jayceylon ☝🏽

@@jayceylon جزاك الله خيرا أخي

@@jayceylon Imagine the arrogance of you …. You think you know better than centuries of ulema.

Jabir ibn Abdullah reported: The Messenger of Allah ﷺ would praise Allah in his sermon, as He deserves to be praised, and then he would say, “Whomever Allah guides, no one can lead him astray. Whomever Allah sends astray, no one can guide him. The truest word is the Book of Allah and the best guidance is the guidance of Muhammad. The most evil matters in religion are those that are newly invented, for every newly invented matter is an innovation, every innovation is misguidance, and every misguidance is in the Hellfire.” Source: Sunan al-Nasā’ī 1578 Do not speak of what you have no knowledge of, and do not speak of your opinions. "No one in this world has the right to say bidah.. except Allah." Indeed Allaah has declared what is a bid'ah and what is not through His seal of the prophets and messengers, Muhammad the best of mankind ﷺ "Just don't push yourself into fire, trying to say that something is bidah. Silence and patience will be rewarded with Jannah." Abu Sa’id al-Khudri reported: The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said, “Whoever among you sees evil, let him change it with his hand. If he is unable to do so, then with his tongue. If he is unable to do so, then with his heart, and that is the weakest level of faith.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 49 Fear Allaah regarding your statements and follow nothing but the Haqq that comes in the Qur'aan and the Sunnah and the understanding of the Salaf thereof.

Good response

"No one has the right to say bid`ah, except Allâh" ...what?

According to 'Amr Ibn Zarara, 'Abdallah Ibn Mas'oud (may Allah be pleased with him) stood next to me while I was telling stories. He said to me: "O 'Amr! Surely either you have innovated an innovation, a misguidance, or you are better guided than Muhammad and his companions!" Then I certainly saw people depart from me to the point where there was no one left with me. (Reported by Tabarani and authenticated by Sheikh Albani in Sahih Targhib n°60, Hadith Sahîh li Ghayrihi) According to Al Irbad Ibn Sariya (may Allah be pleased with him), the Prophet (may the prayers of Allah and His salvation be upon him) gave us an eloquent exhortation that made our hearts tremble and our eyes water. We said: O Messenger of Allah, this is like the exhortation of one who is bidding farewell, so give us some advice. The Prophet (PBUH) said: "I advise you to Taqwa (1), to listen and obey even if an Abyssinian slave (2) takes power over you by force. And certainly the one of you who is going to live will witness many divergences, so cling to my Sunnah and to the Sunnah of the Right and Well-Guided Caliphs after me. And beware of new things, for certainly every new thing is an innovation and every innovation is misguidance." (Reported by Abu Daoud n°4607 and authenticated by Sheikh Albani in Sahîh Targhib n°37, Hadith Sahîh) It was narrated that Ibn SIrIn (a tabi'iin) said: "They used not to ask about chains (of narration), but when the Fitnah occurred, they said: 'Tell us about your men (in the chain of narration).' They would look for the pep1e of Sunnah (in them) to accept their HadIt, and they would look for the people of Bid'ah (in them) to reject their HadIth." delete this comment, you talcked without knowledge and an advice: fear ALLAH and ask him to increase knowledge, because of that: According to Mouawiya (may Allah be pleased with him), the Prophet (may the prayer of Allah and His salvation be upon him) said: "He to whom Allah wishes good, He instructs him in religion". (Reported by Bukhari in his Sahih n°71 and Mouslim in his Sahih n°1037) and the opposite is also true, the one that ALLAH does'nt want good for he make him difficult the science. "Who is worse unjust than the one who was reminded of the verses of his Lord and turned his back on them, forgetting what his two hands had committed? We have placed veils over their hearts, so that they do not understand (the Qur'an), and put a heaviness in their ears. Even if you call them to the right path, therefore, they will never be able to guide themselves. وَمَنْ أَظْلَمُ مِمَّن ذُكِّرَ بِـَٔايَٰتِ رَبِّهِۦ فَأَعْرَضَ عَنْهَا وَنَسِىَ مَا قَدَّمَتْ يَدَاهُ ۚ إِنَّا جَعَلْنَا عَلَىٰ قُلُوبِهِمْ أَكِنَّةً أَن يَفْقَهُوهُ وَفِىٓ ءَاذَانِهِمْ وَقْرًۭا ۖ وَإِن تَدْعُهُمْ إِلَى ٱلْهُدَىٰ فَلَن يَهْتَدُوٓا۟ إِذًا أَبَدًۭا " (verse 57 in sura 18 THE CAVERN / AL- KAHF) and because it is obligatory: According to Anas (may Allah be pleased with him), the Prophet (may the prayers of Allah and His salvation be upon him) said: "Learning science is an obligation for every Muslim". (Reported by Ibn Maja and authenticated by Sheikh Albani in Sahih Targhib n°72, Hadith Sahîh) barakallahfiik

When you take innovation literally, every thing you see around you becomes an innovation. What you don't realize is that your modern understanding of the Quran based on actual possibilities makes you think that everyone else are fools for believing in the old ways. The Salafi thinking only came to be in the past 150 years and to claim that Muslims before that were doing shirk for 1300 years... The verse 11, 12, 13 from Surah 2 Al Baqarah inspires me a lot: وَإِذَا قِيلَ لَهُمْ لَا تُفْسِدُوا۟ فِى ٱلْأَرْضِ قَالُوٓا۟ إِنَّمَا نَحْنُ مُصْلِحُونَ And when it is said to them, “Do not spread corruption in the land,” they say, “Indeed, we are only reformers.” أَلَآ إِنَّهُمْ هُمُ ٱلْمُفْسِدُونَ وَلَـٰكِن لَّا يَشْعُرُونَ Undoubtedly, it is they who are indeed the corrupters, but they are unaware. وَإِذَا قِيلَ لَهُمْ ءَامِنُوا۟ كَمَآ ءَامَنَ ٱلنَّاسُ قَالُوٓا۟ أَنُؤْمِنُ كَمَآ ءَامَنَ ٱلسُّفَهَآءُ ۗ أَلَآ إِنَّهُمْ هُمُ ٱلسُّفَهَآءُ وَلَـٰكِن لَّا يَعْلَمُونَ And when it is said to them, “Believe as the people have believed,” they say, “Shall we believe as the fools have believed?” Undoubtedly, it is they who are indeed the fools, but they do not know.

😂😂 shaykh al Islam ibn taymiyyah rebuked the sufi.

@@nasirabdiwahid2942 it’s semantics. 1. If tasawwuf = tazkiyyah and zuhd by that definition even ibn Abd il-Wahhab was a Sufi 2. If tasawwuf = quburiyyah by that definition ibn Taymiyyah doesn’t fall under it.

Please don't speak without knowledge. Ibn Taymiyyah was upon the sunnah.

@@Faizaanms when did I ever say otherwise?

@@flash8628 he was probably talking to the other person.