Watch Harahan City Council's heated 'no confidence' vote 

Me. Lmbo. I thought I was the only one. 🤣

just stumbled into this rabit hole myself, there goes my weekend!

Absolutely. 😁 They’re hilarious.

Second!

YOU'RE GODDAMN RIGHT I DID!!!!

Glad I checked first.👍

Guy probably missed his lunch break....I don't blame him. He's pretty much saying "Fuck you, I'm gonna eat when I should be paying attention to this pathetic meeting".

Just a dude enjoying his snackage. Got time for a meeting?? Got time for some tasty snackage and a cold beverage to warsh it all down. Might vote later...But FIRST...WE FEAST!!!!!!!

@@muttley8818 ….LOL!!! Snackage time!!!!!

@Todd Jones Holy shit guys, I think Sherlock just entered the comment section!

as he brushes the crumbs off his hands under the table lol. Front row seat for the cat fight. Wahoo!

Yes,,, it was to Maria.....

No, the yeas only had three votes.

@@thepubliusproject 3 yays, one nay and one abstained. Sounds like the yays won so why didn’t she leave? The majority was yay. Honest question here. I’m confused. Please explain

@@devinw5150 well, part of the confusion is the lack of context. I actually don't even know for sure what they're voting on. Do you? If so, how do you know it because there's no real explanation in this video. They could be voting on whether or not to shelve the issue, to order pizza, or the five minute break that the speaker is referring to. So... I don't know why she didn't leave. I don't know why you think she should, either.

@@thepubliusproject Read the title of the video. It explains what they’re voting on. At least that’s what I took away from it. It was a no confidence vote so that’s why I thought she should leave. The yays were the majority

@@devinw5150 the title of the video is the title of the video. I can write "The Publius Project wins Pulitzer!" as the title of my next video too. That doesn't make it true or accurate. I'm looking for _actual_ evidence as to what they were voting on. In fact, the fact that this was published by a group that apparently wants to portray itself as a news outlet, but that the video has no context or narration along with it, makes me _more_ skeptical, not less. Even so, let's say it's a no confidence vote. A) Is that even a real thing in this jurisdiction? B) What does this jurisdiction's charter say _should_ happen if someone loses a no confidence vote? I mean, was this even a real vote? What ordinance, rule, statute, or other formal procedure is being used here? Or is it just a, "Hey, who likes Coke? Who likes Pepsi? Let's just vote for fun!" kind of thing? I see zero - _absolutely zero_ - evidence that this was a legitimate vote of any kind, or even for certain what it's about. I _really_ don't know what's supposed to happen according to the law for this jurisdiction under such a circumstance. So again, I don't know why "she" (whomever that is) didn't leave. I also still don't know why anyone thinks she was supposed to.

Explain your statement what did they do?

So character and morals just go out the window…

I don't agree with that statement specifically, however I do believe that CERTAIN women with CERTAIN viewpoints shouldn't be allowed to hold political office because most of the ti... well no, actually EVERY time it turns into a drama fest that nobody but those women understand and when a guy addresses it like "Ok so what the fuck is this hearing about?" they immediately get shut out of the picture like they weren't paying attention or something, yeah were paying attention it's just that we don't necessarily understand what the fuck is going on and why it is going on.

So, that's sexist. It has been proven again and again that women are just as, if not more, stable and adept leaders than men. Fucking idiot.

@@Abracastabya Have you... have you ever seen men argue in a council? It's way worse.

octaneblue6 I’ve seen a lot of things, hearings involving men tend to be about frivolous nonsense and hearings involving women tend to be about trivial drama struggles - it’s all the same really; incoherent babbling of children with no real goals or just too many goals that you can’t decide on one. This system we use is worthless, it lacks a clear pathway to any foreseeable future and should be re-evaluated based on intelligence rather than status or funding but that will never come so we must bath in the deluge of ignorance until our deserved extinction.

@@octaneblue6 lol, bullshit.