Тёмный

Wave Functions in Quantum Mechanics: The SIMPLE Explanation | Quantum Mechanics... But Quickly 

Parth G
Подписаться 237 тыс.
Просмотров 168 тыс.
50% 1

Ever heard of the term "wave function" in relation to quantum mechanics? What does it mean? How is it interpreted?
Hey everyone, I'm back with a new video! This time, we're going back to basics and understanding exactly what a wave function is, as well as what it represents, in the world of quantum physics. This video is going to be the first in a series I'm going to call "Quantum Mechanics... But Quickly". In this series, I want to discuss some fundamental quantum concepts, and explain them in as visual and intuitive a way as possible - without having to sit through an hour long lecture, or understanding complicated graduate level mathematics.
A physicist named Louis de Broglie once suggested something amazing. While scientists were busy debating whether light was a wave or a particle, de Broglie suggested that even matter - things with mass (e.g. electrons, protons, atoms, etc.) - could behave like waves. This idea was revolutionary due to the mountains of evidence scientists had up until that point that matter behaved like particles. However, the quantum world was soon to revolutionise everything we thought we knew about the universe. And as it turns out, de Broglie's suggestion was right.
His suggestion of matter waves permeated into the work of Erwin Schrodinger. Combining the idea of matter waves with the principle of Conservation of Energy, Schrodinger came up with the equation we now know as the Schrodinger Equation. This ended up being the governing equation of quantum mechanics, and crucially contained a function known as the wave function. This wave function contained mathematical information about any quantum system we happened to be studying.
The key question, then, was about what the wave function actually related to. What did it correspond to in real life? How should we interpret it? Well, there are a few different interpretations of quantum mechanics and how it relates to our real-life universe. The most commonly accepted one is the Copenhagen interpretation. And this interpretation suggests that a wave function is directly related to the probability distribution of a system. Specifically, if we take a system's wave function and square it (well, technically if we take its square modulus), then this will give us the probabilities of various results occurring when we make a measurement on a system. For example, the wave function of a system could tell us the probability of finding a particle at a certain position in space. Or it could tell us the probabilities of finding different spin states when measuring the spin of an electron, for example.
In this video, we discuss these examples in detail. Additionally, we briefly look at the consequences of wave functions having imaginary parts. Lastly, we look at how the Schrodinger Equation (or at least the time dependent Schrodinger Equation) governs how a wave function changes over time - apart from when we make a measurement on the system. This measurement causes a discontinuous and jarring change in the wave function, known as the "collapse of the wave function". This collapse has caused many philosophical problems for physicists over the years, and it continues to do so to this day.
Thanks so much for watching this video! If you'd like to support me, please subscribe to my channel and hit the bell button to be notified when I upload.
Patreon: patreon.com/parthg
Instagram: parthvlogs
Second RU-vid Channel: Parth G's Shenanigans

Опубликовано:

 

5 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 268   
@keppa3635
@keppa3635 3 года назад
Now I am in a state of both "confused" and "excited".
@eyewaves...
@eyewaves... 2 года назад
Collapse your state of mind to determine the actual state ;-)
@dionisiaevadionisia405
@dionisiaevadionisia405 2 года назад
KNP Benny MUKUL KARENA 59A
@dionisiaevadionisia405
@dionisiaevadionisia405 2 года назад
Benny MARAH BANGET KNP TIDAK PUASA TIDAK KENAL Bisa Dengar telepom
@dionisiaevadionisia405
@dionisiaevadionisia405 2 года назад
PAPA AS MR HARUS HIDUP TERUS
@swish6143
@swish6143 Год назад
If you can make jokes about it, that means you actually understood it. I think about it the same way sometimes.
@BenjaminTMilnes
@BenjaminTMilnes 3 года назад
Schrödinger: 'I've come up with an equation that's good at describing hydrogen atoms.' Dirac: 'I'm gonna end this guy's career.'
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 3 года назад
Some professor in the back: What career? WHAT CAREER?
@sunithasomalingam2668
@sunithasomalingam2668 3 года назад
@@ParthGChannel Bro.. Here "Dirac" A English Theoretical physicist "Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac " After listening to Schrödinger Eqn. He decided to quit his Career of Being Physicist. 😂😂😂 It's A Joke
@viradeus4322
@viradeus4322 3 года назад
@@sunithasomalingam2668 he probably knows dude
@sunithasomalingam2668
@sunithasomalingam2668 3 года назад
@@viradeus4322 Indeed He knew.. I jus Laughed at mine Condition after reading Schrödinger😂😂
@soumyajitroy4385
@soumyajitroy4385 3 года назад
Being a physics undergrad, getting to revise the concepts in such interesting way WITHOUT TEDIOUS DERIVATIONS is a blessing ❤️ thank you so much. Your explanations are amazing!!
@joshuamunson2876
@joshuamunson2876 2 года назад
Something that blew my mind about the collapse of the wave function through positional measurement is that a free particle can be theoretically anywhere in the universe until you measure it.
@TheDavidlloydjones
@TheDavidlloydjones 10 месяцев назад
...but like any other excuse you try out on your Mummy, some possibilities are more likely than others. Heisenberg uncertainty doesn't cut in until after a whole lot of decimal places...
@towhid6476
@towhid6476 Год назад
It really helps a lot. Such a fun and formal way to enjoy learning such complex topics. Loving your work, Parth.
@jinggin2177
@jinggin2177 3 года назад
You are the best RU-vidr who totally grabbed my attention! I love the way how you put the quantum physics in, it is so fun!!!
@shanmugamshans4252
@shanmugamshans4252 3 года назад
Hi parth you can introduce some math also in this series which we would love to see.🙏
@iziz772
@iziz772 2 года назад
I've spent much time reading and watching, trying to understand a bit about this equation. By just focusing on a picture of the wave, you have clarified what I was looking for. I won't forget this, but I will forget all the math derivations that I sweated through!
@linezero9016
@linezero9016 3 года назад
I make a living on explaining what the wave function is. I am happy to see that there is finally a reference video giving a quick dirty introduction. Love your video, keep it up!
@Lucky9_9
@Lucky9_9 Год назад
How do you bake a living explaining what the wave function is lol I want fun job like that
@drawforge3920
@drawforge3920 Год назад
@@Lucky9_9 he/she's obviously a physics/chemistry professors
@djayers
@djayers 3 года назад
Nice and clear, thanks. I want to get a handle on this stuff, but it's far from anything I need to do, so I can't really justify sitting through 1hr videos. Looking forward to more!
@bengriffiths9631
@bengriffiths9631 3 года назад
One thing that blows my mind is that if you measure the particles position within that box in example 1, it will instantaneously collapse into a delta function (100% in one location) at that position which is obviously not one of the energy eigenstates (sine waves) shown. The bit that blows my mind is that in order to replicate this delta function in position, the particle instantly goes into a superposition of infinitely many energy and momenta eigenstates. This example is a great way to introduce commutation relations if you want to delve into the linear algebra in later videos
@anonymes2884
@anonymes2884 3 года назад
That's easily a contender for the best 10 minute explanation of the wave function i've seen to date. Concise and coherent (heh :). Looking forward to further videos, especially about foundations of quantum mechanics (full disclosure: partly because my impression is you're not a fan of Copenhagen and i'm always interested in cogent arguments for other interpretations).
@raghakeerthana9358
@raghakeerthana9358 2 года назад
Wow thank you so much❤ my sir took lecture for about 2hrs nd I can't even understand what he is trying to say but this 10mins video explained me the concept in short nd crisp way thanks a lot once again
@ffhashimi
@ffhashimi 3 года назад
Great Explanation!; I hope you extend this to a very simple system and explain how exactly physicists do there calculations, let's say a hydrogen atom what physicist do from preparing there experiment to doing there calculations until doing the experiment and finding the result; I know I may asking too much; but you are very good in explaining this topic and such a simple system example would put every thing said before into a very clear prescriptive; thank you for your excellent job!.
@thejuniorastrophysicist
@thejuniorastrophysicist 3 года назад
Hi Parth! Thank you for this video...I've finally got the point of wave function
@jeanchauvus3337
@jeanchauvus3337 3 года назад
Very good!! Clear explanation easy to follow even in different langage for me at 75% speed.. Merci beaucoup
@eyewaves...
@eyewaves... 2 года назад
pretty good short and relatively precise explanation with limited uncertainty !
@sanatanseconnection7014
@sanatanseconnection7014 3 года назад
I am science graduate, seeking how to interpret the universe by physics and mathematics. You have done wonderful job, complex theory in so simple manner. I never want to miss you
@myothersoul1953
@myothersoul1953 3 года назад
Interpret (verb) to give or provide the meaning of; explain; explicate; elucidate. I think physics can only describe the universe, to find it's meaning requires something else.
@sunithasomalingam2668
@sunithasomalingam2668 3 года назад
I always wait for Parth Bro's Video❤️❤️ Now Wave Function 😁 Love dis Channel 😍
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 3 года назад
Thanks so much for your support as always!
@fundamentalsofphysicsfop3531
@fundamentalsofphysicsfop3531 3 года назад
Your explanation are very reliable and easy to understand ...
@aghost3016
@aghost3016 2 года назад
THANK YOU I'm so happy I can actually follow information about this 😮
@Higgsinophysics
@Higgsinophysics 3 года назад
Happy to see you are back! Another killer video
@rajaradi802
@rajaradi802 3 года назад
Oh iam your fan
@Higgsinophysics
@Higgsinophysics 3 года назад
@@rajaradi802 ty bro
@Mtheory11
@Mtheory11 8 месяцев назад
Taking quantum right now. This video is very helpful 👍thanks for explaining so well
@user-wr4yl7tx3w
@user-wr4yl7tx3w Год назад
Just the video I was looking for.
@samherz4092
@samherz4092 2 года назад
Just an amazing video! Helped a lot ty!
@nabhoneelchatterjee2692
@nabhoneelchatterjee2692 3 года назад
clear cut explanation as always💙
@yoloswag6242
@yoloswag6242 2 года назад
Thanks man. Great companion video for David Griffith's textbook.
@cementos7922
@cementos7922 2 года назад
Thank you so much for the video. I'm not a mathematician, but i want to understand this topic
@ayeshajaved9987
@ayeshajaved9987 3 года назад
Thank you very much sir for this video nd I will waiting for ur more amazing lectures quickly.....
@sharma_anuj00
@sharma_anuj00 3 года назад
Great one🔥🔥❤️
@pawanbhatt314
@pawanbhatt314 3 года назад
please make video on Electrostatic potential and energy, I'm hell confused with these terms. It'll be a great great help. Thank you!
@surprisemokwena6590
@surprisemokwena6590 2 месяца назад
Me too. Guy sparked a glimpse onto something materially realistic yet mind bending
@mrscookiecutter1606
@mrscookiecutter1606 3 года назад
thanks to you quarantine isn't as bad as it's supposed to be
@kabandajamilu9036
@kabandajamilu9036 3 года назад
The best teacher thanks good explanation sir
@nerffan1
@nerffan1 2 года назад
You've managed to explain briefly what my QM professor couldn't do in my QM courses. QM undergrad really flew past me - I somewhat understood the math (as always, math is just following rules), but had no idea how to interpret it. Right now I'm applying to grad school hoping they don't penalize me too much for getting a C in QMII
@sakshidwivedy1677
@sakshidwivedy1677 3 года назад
What an explanation!!!!!....great job
@abhishekaabhi4992
@abhishekaabhi4992 2 года назад
Great idea video all about wave nature of electrons special feature as wave not just particle behaviour
@justinotherpatriot1744
@justinotherpatriot1744 6 месяцев назад
These are great man. God bless you
@KipIngram
@KipIngram 3 года назад
Ok, that was good. You didn't get to the parts I'm most interested in, but I enjoyed it nonetheless, and your narration voice is pleasant too.
@JagdishCVyas
@JagdishCVyas 2 года назад
Beautiful, short is sweet. Colapse of a wave function at a boundary a recreation of new wave fuction is inherent idea of Indian philosophy of death and rebirth of individuals, as written in bhagawadgeeta, which is a small part of great epic the Mahabharat.
@curvebal
@curvebal 3 года назад
Enjoyable video, at some point in your quantum mechanics videos please discuss the other interpretations that attempt to explain super position and entanglement. Thanks
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 3 года назад
Oh definitely, that one's high up on the list!
@shahkhan4419
@shahkhan4419 3 года назад
Thanks for explaining this really helpful
@georgecorrea4262
@georgecorrea4262 3 года назад
George: Great Explanation .
@saintboimike
@saintboimike 2 года назад
This man is a genius, thank you sir
@rajaradi802
@rajaradi802 3 года назад
Nice one! !
@ruchirsugandhi2254
@ruchirsugandhi2254 3 года назад
Thanks for making it easy.👍
@tolibelom
@tolibelom 3 года назад
Nice work man, between 15-20 mins would be great, but probably not much less than 10 mins.
@grandgamersunion1030
@grandgamersunion1030 3 года назад
Woowwww I really love this channel. I have some questions ❓❓"if quantum mechanics is soo powerful why doesn't it implies on the macro world?". One more "1:09 do macro objects also have probabilistic waves and please give some examples" .This channel is really helping me! Thanks
@dhritimanroyghatak2408
@dhritimanroyghatak2408 3 года назад
Let me try to explain that altho it won't be as good as Parth. So quantum mechanics is not the Physics of subatomic world or something it (along with relativity) are our current best model of Physics available. That means that the places where classical mechanics fails to explain things QM successfully can (Infact this is how and why this branch emerged to explain the drawbacks of classical mechanics as it was reaching its limits of applicability) but in addition to that QM is an improvement over CM as it began to explain a more general case scenario of which CM became a special case scenario (scenarios where objects and masses are large enough that the "Quantum Weirdness" is not significant). For example an apple also has a wavelength associated to it given by De-Broglie's equations and also Obeys Schrodinger's Equations but since it is so massive and has such a big size (compared to atoms and all) That the result you end up getting is what u would get from Newtons laws of motion. Infact if u plugin those simplified conditions into the Schrodinger's Equations they BECOME Newton's second law of motion. So in a nutshell Quantum Physics is the general case scenario of which classical Physics is a special case.
@SilviaSolden
@SilviaSolden 6 месяцев назад
Rather in a macro world you are dealing with properbilities highly centered around what you can see with your "eyes". Ie. you could throw a ball at a wall and in a million times the age of the universe, expect that ball at some point would appear on the other side of that wall.. @@dhritimanroyghatak2408
@rh7686
@rh7686 4 месяца назад
Wow. Great exposition.
@ayeshamajeed6682
@ayeshamajeed6682 3 года назад
I always wait for you owsome video..
@5ty717
@5ty717 11 месяцев назад
Please address in a future piece: Are all fermions/ bosons, particles, photons, neutrinos etc etc evolving “naturally” in their continuous but individual superpositions til measurement decoherence or entanglement after which they will again blossom with evolving superposition unless zenoed or again interfered with… And Is the waveform universal to each type (and/or all) types of particles? Very precise yet accurate work my friend… thx for your insight.
@Bushmani
@Bushmani 2 года назад
This is excellent
@Archita_Rajpoot
@Archita_Rajpoot 3 года назад
A perfect Vedio 👍
@jean-micheltorres6925
@jean-micheltorres6925 3 года назад
Awesome , thank you !
@60pluscrazy
@60pluscrazy 2 года назад
Excellent explanation 👌
@vindalsacademy
@vindalsacademy Год назад
Thank you young man
@abdullahalnadrun3727
@abdullahalnadrun3727 3 года назад
sir please make a playlist of all series of Quantum mechanics we are not able to find in an order. so please.make a playlist where all basics and in a seriall way we will get to know nicely about quantum mechanics
@zzpipozz6365
@zzpipozz6365 2 года назад
such a good video
@neelabhachatterjee4715
@neelabhachatterjee4715 5 месяцев назад
|psi> generally represents a state vector. The wavefunction psi(x) is written as psi(x)=. Many people can think psi(x) and |psi>> are the same by watching this video, while in reality they are not.
@JamesCampbellPPG
@JamesCampbellPPG 2 года назад
Great video. Very clear explanation. Still absorbing, but that's on me, not you! lol. Also, please consider a piece of black tape over the red light reflected by your eyeglasses. I got distracted like a cat watching a laser light. lol.
@userr_aa
@userr_aa 2 года назад
thanks.. really clear and helpful... how can 4 hours lecture be this short? it's even easier for me to understand. Good job sir
@kushal2761
@kushal2761 5 месяцев назад
Thanks a lot 👍
@frankieclayton9303
@frankieclayton9303 3 года назад
This is important to me.
@abhasoodan7982
@abhasoodan7982 3 года назад
Thanq for this video, can you make a detailed video about schrodingers equation with its solution and everything please ?
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 3 года назад
For sure! I've already made a video a while ago describing the Schrodinger equation (you can find it here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BFTxP03H13k.html) but I haven't discussed solutions in great detail :)
@abhasoodan7982
@abhasoodan7982 3 года назад
Parth G yes I’ve seen that one, was wondering if you would make one with detailed maths, which you tend to leave out for our understanding 😅
@musicoscope
@musicoscope 10 месяцев назад
excellent
@starfragment7535
@starfragment7535 3 года назад
Please make a video on tachyons a hypothetical particle which travel faster than light
@ayhamhalalsheh221
@ayhamhalalsheh221 3 года назад
pleas make a full course about quantum physics
@mehanaziqbal5434
@mehanaziqbal5434 2 года назад
I’m so happy to have found your channel.. I’m rooting for ya😊✌️
@shivangprasad
@shivangprasad 3 года назад
hey , i wanted to know if a you trim a frequencies cycle per second in terms of time ,so is it no longer the same frequency now? sorry so not relavent the topic lol
@HilarionWon
@HilarionWon 2 года назад
Thank you, thank you, thank you....you've answered a question I have been wondering about for a long time...namely what happens to the election/elementary particle once you have measured it?....the answer is that it doesn't remain in a collapsed state for all of eternity, it eventually evolves back into a wave like state.
@themartian9634
@themartian9634 3 года назад
Hey Parth! I love your Videos and how the way u Teach and Explain ! But, Parth please make a video on Vedic Physics ! All humans are forgetting that advance Physics ! Their knowledge was not less than Modern Physics ! Then How that's built and Engineered that Ancient Temple in Cambodia with an accuracy and precesion of Modern GPS Level ? Please Cover That ! And for more info follow Praveen Mohan who also given Many Lectures on Ancient Alien Series on History TV 18 ! 🙏🏻
@goldibollocks
@goldibollocks 3 года назад
Okay, but what if the electron is not in a box bouncing from wall to wall but rather shot out in a straight line into some direction? Does it still travel like a wave and will only have a high probability of being measurable at certain points along the travel path? Or will it travel at a constant speed and we can accurately predict where exactly it will be after any given amount of time (and also always measure it there)? Also, how does the wave function look when we want to describe an electron that is part of an atom? What exactly is 'x' there?
@notlessgrossman163
@notlessgrossman163 3 года назад
How is that different than tossing dice and 'measurement' is you sticking out your hand to catch dice on your palm to read the result? Do we say dice is a superposition of 1 to 6?
@KipIngram
@KipIngram 3 года назад
2:45 - That didn't seem wishy washy to me at all; you described exactly how to get the wave function and how to go to a probability distribution.
@preetkaur2912
@preetkaur2912 3 года назад
Please make a video on quantum Zeno effect
@ratnabesra8959
@ratnabesra8959 3 года назад
Please make more videos like this
@s......ali8572
@s......ali8572 3 года назад
Sir lectures about schordinger wave equation must be in series like lec 1 lec 2 to avoid from complexity for begners
@vindalsacademy
@vindalsacademy Год назад
You are doing well.
@geetchandra36ningthoujam54
@geetchandra36ningthoujam54 3 года назад
Sir please make abouth 1. Conservation of probabilty 2. Probability current density
@Ubaidullah_Khalid
@Ubaidullah_Khalid 3 года назад
It is interpreted very well.
@mohammadrashedkhan486
@mohammadrashedkhan486 3 года назад
ধন্যবাদ ভাই।
@jarredallen
@jarredallen 3 года назад
this equation are similar to what we use electrical engineering. mainly how predict the peak voltage in an rms value(root mean square), phasor value and hysteresis value in a magnetic core.
@dhritimanroyghatak2408
@dhritimanroyghatak2408 3 года назад
Fun fact Paul. A.Dirac (One of the Founding father of Quantum Mechanics, unified Quantum mechanics and Special Relativity and laid the foundations of Quantum Field Theory) did his Bachelors in Electrical Engineering and so did Louis De Broglie. I know u did not ask for this but just for the fun I did :)
@Arya-cs7kj
@Arya-cs7kj Год назад
"WTF is a wavefunction?" Is my exact sentiment while studying this topic. The thumbnail is appropriate. 😂😂
@TheAyoubi
@TheAyoubi 7 месяцев назад
Dear G, can you please answer my question wether psi wave function can interfere constructively and destructively similar to a classical wave "A real electromagnetic wave" ? Thanks
@hamdaniyusuf_dani
@hamdaniyusuf_dani 3 года назад
when you square the half sinewave function in 3:24 the result should have 0 gradient at both ends.
@ItsMe-dj6pl
@ItsMe-dj6pl 3 месяца назад
Amazzzzzing
@polkamolka4396
@polkamolka4396 3 года назад
Please can you explain laplace transform. Thanks
@joelkositsky4263
@joelkositsky4263 2 года назад
Nice. But you should make sine squared probability function have the sin-squared (and not the sine) shape.
@neutronenstern.
@neutronenstern. Год назад
If we have a wave function of light, then we know, that the wave it represents is a wave correlating to a electromagnetic field that oszillates. But do we know, what field or what... does oszillate, if there is a matter wave? Is it EM-field in case of eg. electrons, strong interaction field in case of Hadons, and weak interaction field in case of paticles with weak charge ? Or is it something else?
@kavyathaniyarasu6880
@kavyathaniyarasu6880 2 года назад
few videos about statistical mechanics please
@mrfinesse
@mrfinesse 3 года назад
Thanks for a easy to understand video. In your examples you restricted the WF to inside the box. I was given to understand that the WF is non-zero outside the box (depending on the walls of the box). Perhaps that was not the focus of the video.
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 3 года назад
Usually, the wave function will be nonzero outside the box. However, this not true if the walls of the box are "infinitely high". Of course this is unphysical, but is a commonly studied theoretical system because the mathematics is a good stepping stone for studying real systems!
@richmondvalentine9738
@richmondvalentine9738 3 года назад
6:37 when you introduced i, taking the absolute value first would still give you i\sqrt{3}/4 so then squaring would give you -3/4 so the sum of probabilities would be -1/4, not 1. Should it be that the abosulte value is taken after the square? And also squaring a modulus seems pointless anyway. Or rather taking a modulus first seems pointless because squaring will do that anyway... or is there another reason to take the modulus first?
@emiliopelaez9810
@emiliopelaez9810 3 года назад
Complex modulus is defined as |x + iy| = sqrt(x² + y²). So it does get rid of the imaginary part and the sum of probabilities is equal to 1.
@richmondvalentine9738
@richmondvalentine9738 3 года назад
@@emiliopelaez9810 oh yeah of course. I guess this is the point of the modulus then
@sonugeorgealex
@sonugeorgealex 3 года назад
Which text do you use?
@Rexyyy99
@Rexyyy99 Год назад
If I may ask why does Psi squared give probability distributions and not Psi cubed or Psi to the power 4,5,6, etc. what's special about the square?
@Beli1921
@Beli1921 2 года назад
MAY GOD BLESS YOU
@wayneyadams
@wayneyadams Год назад
5:19 This idea of a particle being in a blend of states is what led to the famous Schrodinger's cat in a box narrative. This was meant to be a derogatory example by showing how ridiculous it was to have a cat that is both alive and dead at the same time. Lo and behold, somehow it caught on and now Physicists use Schrodinger's cat to illustrate the Copenhagen interpretation. But it was not intended to be used that way. Another famous example is the term "Big Bang" which was also a derogatory term used by Physicists who held to the steady state model of the universe. The problem here, that nothing actually bangs in the traditional sense of an explosion. Pauli is driving along a highway with Schrodinger in the passenger seat of the car. A policeman pulls them over for speeding. He asks Pauli if he knows how fast he was driving to which Pauli answers, no he doesn't, and neither can the policeman. This annoys the officer, so he decides to search the car. He opens a box in the trunk and calls out to the two men asking why they are carrying a dead cat in the trunk of the car. Schrodinger replies, "You killed my cat!"
@raghavendranomula124
@raghavendranomula124 3 года назад
If possible please try to give short pdfs as you provided for entropy video.
@theoreticalphysicsnickharv7683
@theoreticalphysicsnickharv7683 3 года назад
Parth, the mathematics of quantum mechanics represents the physics of ‘time’ with an emergent uncertain future. The wave function Ψ² represents the future unfolding at the most fundamental level. Classical physics represents processes over a period of time as in Newton’s differential equations.
@KrappyPatty-ry6lj
@KrappyPatty-ry6lj 3 года назад
How is the wave function of an electron in a molecule related to its energy? This one thing is messing up all of my understanding of Molecular orbital theory pls help
@beyondmathandphysics3720
@beyondmathandphysics3720 Год назад
What excactly we mean by making a measurment? When we have a measurment?
Далее
D3 Ваз 2107 Не умри от зависти!
18:57
Do Quantum Wavefunctions Actually Collapse?
11:13
Просмотров 46 тыс.
Quantum Wave Functions: What's Actually Waving?
11:04
Просмотров 457 тыс.
What is The Quantum Wave Function, Exactly?
13:05
Просмотров 254 тыс.