I'm proud that President Biden and I were able to help pass the first meaningful gun safety legislation in 30 years -but we still have so much more to do.
It is concerning to observe the manner in which Kamala Harris presents herself. Her approach often seems to underestimate the intelligence of her audience. One wonders how many in the audience genuinely resonate with her perspectives.
“We passed gun laws.” “Guns go boom boom.” “It matters to not go boom boom.” Sad she got to keep baby talking to keep her supporters. They watch like “she’s so amazing and inspiring!!” “Listen to all the big words she knows.” Says a lot about them.
It matters. It matters the system matters along with the the passage of time at this point in time it is significant to remember the passage of time matters to the matters of the system.
Theives don't abide by gun safety laws or permits. Do you think a car jacker goes and gets evaluated to see if they are fit mentally? People who worry about laws are LAW abiding Citizens. It doesn't matter if you were to ban guns Criminals always find a way to get one even if they have to get one from another country. Drugs keep coming in this country even though it's illegal. Don't make it hard for LAW abiding Citizens to protect themselves. You have Guards not all of us can afford a bodyguard.
Obviously, it's not what you know it's who you blow. She got down on Willie Browns pocket rocket and here she is now. F'ing up everything for everyone.
I wish she wasn't laughing. If you see her speaking prior to entering politics, she was such engaging. Now, when she's off script, she sounds real. She's smart and it show's when she's comfortable.
This who's running the country into the ground "Joe Biden: “About 1:30 a container ship struck the Francis Scott Key Bridge which I’ve been over many, many times commuting from the state of Delaware either by train or by car.” That’s odd, considering there is no rail line on the bridge. The bridge was built for automobiles and trucks."
How about sitting down and getting your boss to stop giving armaments to Ukraine and picking up the phone and having a meaningful conversation with Vladimir Putin? What a novel concept that would be huh Kamala.
Wow, a talking 🐒🦧. I guess The Planet Of The Apes does exist. One of them is our President, the other one is our Vice President, and the other is our White House Press Secretary. Wow😮
Okay yeah i get it, the laws may suck a little but y’all are seriously taking it too far, if you get this mad over a little gun law than you shouldn’t own a gun then. i am a firearm collector and i’m glad there will be more safety laws, also that’s literally racism buddy lmao,
It is not a gun safety act what it is is an infringement on the only constitutional right that says shall not be infringed. our founding Fathers thought it was so important for us to protect our gun rights that they included the term shall not be infringed. The definition of infringed means to regulate restrict or deny which is literally what every gun law does. So technically speaking every politician that ever signed a gun law has violated their oath of office and should have been removed immediately then charged with treason for turning on the American people.
😂😂😂😂 Thanks NPR. We finally agree on something "A significant majority of Americans say they believe President Biden's mental fitness is a real concern they have about his ability to be president, according to the latest NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll."
When you were moved off the playground I learned about some people who would do anything to create a laughing stock of our lawmakers or any individual you'd have to ask around when you get the time. did enjoy foster care in California
Ma'am 😢😢😢1.000years of my Marine life old shit rolled up with pay 5$USD every Sentry and me everything in a day and paying them too much money and respect for broken ones that work hard to make money Back,Skrilla deala 😊 Grandmaster Kungfu Portland Police 3😂😂😂× fat man 117 inches long for 6
Если ехать на приосколье с жалобами то не надо ехать к главным нужно трудягам перед всеми деньги отдать и пусть скажут как живется. 70 тысяч рублей должны зарабатывать на приосколье у нас где то забирают в сбербанке деньги по бумагам.
I Always Stand With USA! If You (USA) Love That Countries, I Love That Countries Too. If You (USA) Hate That Countries, I Hate That Countries Too. 100% Support USA & Israel From Thailand. 🇹🇭🤝🇺🇸🤝🇮🇱.
I was told when I was a kid that private industry was using treasury accounts in order to money aside they don't have the time or motivation to hassle with in the office
I'm thinking about flood control. Contour the soil to control flooding but we're not doing it right you need to start in the middle of county ditches and large enough plant the vegetation and create food supply for the animals and hopefully keep off my highway. Lottery ticket thing hopefully curtail some drunk driving
The woman is beautiful. Do we need new gun laws or better education. Everyone who owns a gun should know how it works and what it's capable of and it's consequences
Greetings vice president Harris Where are the tangible results we've requested? In dissecting the convoluted landscape of geopolitical intricacies, one inevitably questions the glaring double standards in the plea for Israel to diminish the toll on Palestinian lives-men, women, children, infants, journalists, UN workers, Red Cross personnel-while simultaneously advocating for the reduction of destructive actions on mosques, schools, hospitals. This dichotomy unfolds against the backdrop of housing men, women, children, and infants, adding layers of complexity to the unsettling realities in Palestine. The nuances of this situation beckon an exploration into sophisticated strategies that the United States could employ to alleviate discord, challenging the prevailing narrative that simplifies it as solely a matter of self-defense. A crucial facet of this exploration involves addressing the intricate entanglement of settler violence, violent raids, and the detainment of Palestinians without trial-an imperative step toward cultivating a resolution grounded in justice. Moreover, the conundrum deepens as the United States, while ostensibly advocating for restraint, concurrently extends arms and military aid funding to Israel. This dichotomy creates a disconcerting narrative where, behind closed doors, a tacit approval seems to be granted, signaling a green light to actions that are at odds with the public facade of diplomacy and restraint. The intricate dance between public rhetoric and private support adds yet another layer of complexity to the already enigmatic dynamics of this geopolitical quagmire. Redirecting attention to the assertions attributed to the White House spokesperson, specifically John Kirby, it becomes apparent that his declarations, asserting maximal efforts to influence Israel towards minimizing civilian casualties and employing proportionate force, are met with skepticism. Kirby's audacious inquiry about any nation surpassing such efforts seems, in essence, a distortion of reality and an affront to intellectual discernment. The United States' purported commitment to mitigating harm is paradoxically juxtaposed with allegations of green-lighting and enabling a perceived genocide. The pretext, ostensibly denouncing Hamas as terrorists necessitating ethnic cleansing, is vigorously contested. The characterization of Hamas as akin to Islamic jihadists underscores a fundamental misunderstanding, as they contend against unjust detainment, violent settlers, illegal occupation, and other egregious circumstances. The plea to prevent Gaza from becoming a platform for terrorism echoes with irony, as the policies in place potentially foment an environment conducive to retaliatory actions against perceived occupation. The semantic labeling of such reactions as terrorism further amplifies the dissonance. Hamas, as portrayed in this narrative, emerges not as a terrorist entity but as advocates for the human rights and self-determination of the Palestinian people. The assertion that supporting Israel denies Palestinians their human rights and right to self-determination introduces a critical dimension. The ongoing conflict, framed as a war, elicits a blend of fascination and incredulity, prompting a candid acknowledgment that such proclamations seem enshrouded in diplomatic rhetoric, occasionally diverging from the tangible realities on the ground. In light of these intricacies, one must inquire whether the proclaimed efforts extend beyond rhetorical expressions, probing the depths of tangible actions that resonate with the complex nuances of international relations. In other words This so-called war prompts a blend of fascination and incredulity. Pardon the candor, but such proclamations seem veiled in diplomatic rhetoric, bordering on dissonance with reality. One must inquire, with bemusement, if these efforts extend beyond lip service. The dissonance between rhetoric and action speaks to enigmatic intricacies of international relations. The military aid to Israel, ostensibly well-intentioned, becomes an intellectual conundrum. Such largesse inadvertently fuels mechanisms labeled as genocide, settler violence, and distressing raids. It prompts contemplation on aligning actions with ideals. In a contemplative vein, permit me to pose a query echoing through historical consciousness: Why, within America's storied legacy, this reluctance to adhere to post-World War II international rules and laws? The absence of deference to the ICC and reluctance to hold individuals accountable demands an intellectual reckoning. Sincerely in pursuit of clarity, Consider American history, where opportunities to exemplify commitment to international laws may not have been fully realized. In the Vietnam War era, invoking legal channels might have scrutinized military intervention, fostering diplomatic resolution and mitigating human toll. Similarly, post-Gulf War, robust engagement with international legal frameworks could have provided nuanced approaches to regional stability beyond military prowess. The recurring theme prompts contemplation on intricacies in using legal means to curtail conflict, transcending conventional geopolitical power dynamics.
