Webflow vs Framer: Which is better in 2024? 

Yes you can for sure expand Framer with code. My complaint with how they’ve set it up right now though is that you don’t get easy access to classes/ids (they are autogenerated) and you can’t set data attributes on elements. So even though you can extend Framer with code the UI makes it harder to target elements in your custom code. It makes it so you can’t use other no code solutions that are attribute based (like memberstack) with framer. I’m excited to see where framer evolves though and hopefully they make some updates that make it more dev friendly as well

@@bradfordjhuber it’s definitely far from perfect. I do like that I can scale up as needed. Everything in Framer I can build pretty easily in React and use Framer Motion for animation. But there is also everything in between. Maybe it’s just me but I like true component based development, like React, Svelte, Vue etc. Regular HTML, CSS and Jquery is just too much of a pain to scale up if you need to.

@@OneBrighDay Framer motion is a really nice library. I’m excited to see how framer evolves for sure. Competition is great for all users as framer is bound to get better and webflow will be forced to get better to compete

Framer scrolls in a jerky way. Smooth scrolling in webflow is the best. And the base scrolling is better right out the box.

@@bradfordjhuberthis was helpful. Thank you. I plan on extending Framer and I can see how this would be a problem. Depending on how much integration it can be quite tedious gathering class names and IDs.

Is that for all file types? For webflow images are limited to 4mb, documents to 10mb, and videos to 30mb. I that limit is pretty fair because atleast for images as long as you optimize them you shouldn’t need to get even close to that size

Put ur file in Figma then use the html figma to framer pugin and ur asset is in framer

i think its per site

We'll see, they are shipping updates really quickly so it's going to keep getting better.