Тёмный
No video :(

Weird lenses are fun | Blazar Remus 1.5x Anamorphic Unboxing and sample Video 

The Camera Nerds
Подписаться 178
Просмотров 2,4 тыс.
50% 1

Unboxing the Blazar Remus 1.5x Anamorphic Lenses with Blue Flare. Purchased these straight from their website and had them shipped to New Zealand.
Video shot with the Sony FX30 as main and top-down angle. Anamorphic video shot on the Sony FX3 in 16x9, so the footage shown is the full de-squeeze without cropping to 2.35:1 or anything.
Edited in Final Cut Pro
Color Graded with the Moment Film Vision II LUT
Music Licensed from Soundstripe.com

Опубликовано:

 

27 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 17   
@KaceyBakerFilms
@KaceyBakerFilms 2 месяца назад
So happy for you.
@watzmaaname
@watzmaaname 2 месяца назад
Would love to see more footage. Cheers!
@juridawedeit
@juridawedeit 3 месяца назад
great video! i'm very ineterested in buying these lenses!
@AL3XFPV
@AL3XFPV 3 месяца назад
Nice! can you please make a video with the 45mm with a scene with much chromatic abberation at lowest F stop, then I would like to see how increasing the F number have an effect on the chromatic abberation and also bokeh, for me it seems like this lens have way too much CA at T2.0, so wonder if its more usable higher up without loosing to much smooth bokeh
@yoshiYoishIRL
@yoshiYoishIRL 2 месяца назад
what's the full length of these with all of the cover on?
@thedronetravelers
@thedronetravelers 3 месяца назад
I finally received these, and I'm having a bit of trouble with aspect ratio since I stink at math, but nevertheless, the lenses are pretty amazing!
@owenjenkinsofficial
@owenjenkinsofficial 3 месяца назад
if your sensor is 16:9, just multiply the 16 (the horizontal measurement that will be desqueezed) with the squeeze. So 16 * 1.5 = 24 -> 24:9 which 24/9 = a 2.67:1 ratio compared to a 2.4:1 or a 2.39:1 ratio that is the usual widescreen. If this was a 2x lens then you'd have a super wide 32:9 or 3.55:1 ratio. If 1.33x stretch, then you'd get a practically perfect 2.39:1 ratio with a 16:9 sensor.
@thedronetravelers
@thedronetravelers 3 месяца назад
@@owenjenkinsofficial you rock!
@Garretlike
@Garretlike 2 месяца назад
im still a beginner and wanna do a short movie, would it make sense to use the 65mm or any of those with the zv e-10 camera?
@StarskiYall
@StarskiYall 3 месяца назад
I have the 45 and the 65, they are amazing
@David.g0mes
@David.g0mes 3 месяца назад
just a heads up, you graded the letterboxes 😉👍
@KevinFedde
@KevinFedde 3 месяца назад
Ha, good catch! Since I was matching aspect ratios I just had a black matte underneath the anamorphic footage!
@iamkubrick
@iamkubrick 3 месяца назад
Way to much sample footage …
@Bo_Hazem
@Bo_Hazem 3 месяца назад
Did you pay $300 for 3x EF mounts or just $100?
@KevinFedde
@KevinFedde 3 месяца назад
I think it was about $140 or so total. Since I paid in New Zealand Dollars I don’t quite remember how much is was converted to USD.
@Bo_Hazem
@Bo_Hazem 3 месяца назад
@@KevinFedde Oh so then the $100 is for 3x EF adapters. Thanks a lot!
@MightyMigi
@MightyMigi 3 месяца назад
I can tell your retention is like 30 secs
Далее
Blazar REMUS Lenses made my videos 100x BETTER
12:47
Просмотров 12 тыс.
Cute kitty gadgets 💛
00:24
Просмотров 14 млн
Ajdarlar...😅 QVZ 2024
00:39
Просмотров 377 тыс.
HOW DID SHE DECIDE TO DO THIS?!
00:27
Просмотров 8 млн
I Wish I knew THIS Before Buying a Lumix
12:07
Просмотров 31 тыс.
Why Zoom lenses are a Nightmare for photographers...
12:02
10 reason WHY the FX30 is BETTER
8:14
Просмотров 3,8 тыс.
Unboxing and Babble - Blazar Remus 1.5x Anamorphics
18:49
What Makes Anamorphic Lenses Different?
13:19
Просмотров 27 тыс.
These Budget Anamorphic Lenses Don't Make Sense
11:30
The World wasn't ready for these Crazy Lenses
12:18
Просмотров 229 тыс.
Testing the BLAZAR REMUS 1.5x Anamorphic Lenses
11:58