I think this channel is auto generated by a Russian AI. Alarmist clickbait nothing burgers. The best description for this channel. It's like they want to be fair like a socialist communist. Equality of outcome but inequality of facts. 50 / 50reporting of Ukraine and Russian successes which means they have to underreport Ukraine's success and over report Russia's han
I've seen this too, many times in hollywood films. Like how they can locate a person no matter where you are. Unfortunately, the reality is, it took 20 years to find Bin Laden
@dedel6954 it took 10 years, not 20. It also doesn't matter because the fish ate him. The other scumbag turned into shredded pork from a drone. You can run, and you can hide, but no matter how long it takes, we will find you and take you out.
@@Navybrat64 yeah, killing one guy does not stop them from getting another person in place. So 9/11 season 2 coming soon to a skyscraper near you. And then find rhat guy who masterminded it for another 10 years LOL
The IRA did this in London with powerful homemade bombs. One was planted in the Brighton hotel weeks in advance of Mrs Thatchers party conference. I dunno how they pulled that off. How did he book a room that happened to be above Thatcher's bedroom. A huge chimney fell on her bed but the bitcz was up late 3am finishing off her speech. They had about 20 or more bombs planted at various hotels but the British police got lucky and caught the unit and one of them had a note in his back pocket with time and locations of all the bombs.
@@briantitchener4829 she wasn't the only murderer that night to get a brain injury and Alzheimer's. Not sure if the other guy was a war criminal also but she was a brave woman or maybe more stupid than a "Paddy" no not racist and he may have been an empathetic loyalist prior to thatchers strong woman stance 💪🏻. At least she got nappies although she was in a hell only an Alzheimer's patient experiences so it didn't matter I suppose. Still I hope karma is real and Putin gets pulled through the streets of Kyiv like the black and tans used to do to any of those stupid Paddy's that they caught. You should look up what they did to those they caught at crossbarry. Terrible 💔 . Stupid but brave but shur how could 100 farmer/IRA men with a months training (done with hockey sticks ) we call em hurleys , out fight 1,200 British ww1 soldiers in armoured cars at 2 AM. RIP lads 😢. ✌🏻 Churchill made our war poem famous tho by plagiarism against nazis. A Paddy poem. Thought that was written by intelligent people . Saved us from the Vikings too. Oh wait. No we showed them how that was done. Famine was our weak spot .....and empathy first until we started getting some American president's that escaped and washed up on American shores with a few survivers. Great history. Hats off to the Englishman who made ",the wind that shakes the barley" Unfortunately telling the truth earned him some bad reviews from even the self loathing gaurdian who stated " how much does.....he... (sorry for the bias) hate his own Country? Lmao
In Afghanistan the Western coalition has never talked about secret weapons, yet the war has not gone well there either. After twenty years of war and billions of dollars spent in vain, the world's No. 1 army, the super-technological US army, has fled Kabul in the face of a gang of ragtag Taliban armed only with AK47s and a few pickup trucks with machine guns. There is no word in the vocabulary to describe such a humiliating defeat. At least the Russians are fighting a real army largely supported by the major Western powers.
@@trumpforever6706 Lol low IQ Child after 9 Years and more losses then USA and allies in 20 years Russia ran from the same Sandal wearing farmers. Oh and never controlled nearly as much territory. USA and allies never lost a single battle in Afghanistan. not one. Taliban would run off then come back and fight another day.
@@trumpforever6706 An AGREEMENT to Govern Afghanistan between the Talaban and US was sign in Doha Qatar on 02/29/2020, the Afghanistan women will surely appreciate 🙏 your support youknow.
Quite literally, a tactical nuclear detonation can be delivered from artillery shells. As far as I have read, two man portable in terms of "suitcase" is about as small as anyone has or maintains. Smaller are possible and have been made, but it's not practical nor very effective bc the real power would likely be something much more powerful.
Now they can just put the warhead on a cruise missile type of platform. I was in a field artillery unit it would of been awesome to fire atomic Annie or nukes cannon even if it shortened life by a few years
@@georgewbushcenterforintell147 ------ > It wouldn't shortne life by "a few years". No one would survive a nuclear war. Whoever didn't die in the initial blasts would die of the nuclear fallout. The half-life of nuclear fallout from plutonium is said to be 250 thousand years. We're already facing problems with the utilization of nuclear energy. EPA Facts about Plutonium semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/176324.pdf
@@jannmutube also the EMP would destroy all electronics that are not shielded. Study by the US government said 90% of the population would be dead within a year without power .
Uranium materials they're talking about require recharging but that's not what's used in modern portable atomic demolition charges they don't require recharging because they don't use uranium they use plutonium and cobalt nuclear materials I know because I went through a lot of hazmat training
I once remember the number reported missing at the end of the Cold War was between 5 -11 missing suitcase bombs,; that s worrying enough, but 80+ is staggering.
The US was working on a longer life power cell that would last for 4 years, but that is still a short time if one has to go and recharge or swop out the cell.
@@uncuttcoffeeofficial yeah you suck d*cks that's right. You're all dumb and lazy, wants a desk job with a high paying income but does not fair well in education. The only thing you're champions at are your LGBTQ communities, drugs and abortions.
@@dedel6954you sound like heartbroken overweight middle school cheerleader that never made it on the team. What do you want me to do argue with you online with mighty words. Lol
@@uncuttcoffeeofficial i don't expect you to, i know the capacity of your comprehension and "mighty" is not something you all can be described with. LMFAO
𝗢𝗳 𝗣𝗼𝗽𝗲 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗶𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗪𝗮𝗿 𝗜𝗜𝗜 Last week, a conversation with Pope Francis was published, in which he related to the Russia-Ukraine war as the start of World War III. In a conversation with the editors of European Jesuit publications, and which was first published by the Italian Jesuit publication La Civiltà Cattolica, the Pope said, “The world is at war. For me, today, World War III has been declared.” Subsequently, he lamented, “What is happening to humanity that we have had three world wars in a century?” I do not believe that the Russia-Ukraine conflict is a third world war or that it should devolve into one. However, the fact that there is such a danger, or that there is war at all, shows that we have not drawn the right conclusions, which puts us in harm’s way again. It is clear to everyone that no one has anything to gain if the war in Ukraine escalates into a global conflict. That said, the war is yet another indication that we still do not know how to govern our desire for dominance and control. We have come to a point where our ego does not settle for controlling others. Nowadays, people are willing to destroy others for simply behaving or even thinking differently from them. If we want to prevent wars, we need to help all the nations realize that war does not bring any benefits, that we do not want it and do not need it. This is a process that must involve everyone, since each country must have its neighbors going through the same process, or belligerent countries will exploit other countries’ efforts to end violence. If countries do not adopt this approach, they will continue to compete against each other, exploit each other and deplete the earth of resources. We are already seeing the consequences of this attitude on our planet, but they will grow far worse in the very near future. Hunger, extreme heat, extreme cold, and countless other problems will overwhelm humanity and force nations to stop abusing others and focus on their own survival. To prevent this scenario from developing further than it already has, humanity needs to understand that we must learn to work together or nature will destroy us. Currently, many nations are still dreaming of conquests and subjugations of other nations. We must gradually make these nations understand that doing so will only harm them, and harm everyone else, as well. Unless we help everyone realize that we are dependent on each other for better or worse, and we must act accordingly, we will all be in big trouble.
@@sequenceofficial6141 If you think about it, he has likely planted these nukes in his embassies and other establishments in virtually every city in the western world. If the worst happened and with megolmaniacs like Putin it could, the whole world would be laid to waist, including Ukraine. I don't know if you have heard of the diplomatic bag. This is a centuries old system, where foreign nations can import goods into another country which goes straight to their embassy without being examined by customs or anyone else. It does not have to be a bag. It can be a large box or even a container. So it doesn't have to be a suitcase bomb. It could be far larger.
@@jinnbuster4753 Maybe some countries are naive and not well-equipped. But Putin definitely not planting anything in a USA embassy like that, things can happen but imagine the contingencies America has ready for Russia? Remember we have so much bases and influences in and around Russia if we wanted to start war pre-empitively we would decimate Russia quickly.
@@u-turnnewslive Well if we were talking about some third world country, Putin is not likely to waste his nukes on them, as they pose no threat to him. I am referring to the countries of the western world, most notably Europe , the USA, Australia and a few other countries. Around the world Russia has 147 embassies and a similar number of consulates, all with diplomatic immunity. There are also unknown numbers of "illegal" agents in most western countries. These people often pose as normal citizens leading quiet lives to avoid attention. We know this is true because our secret services do find them from time to time. I am not suggesting all of these are sitting on suitcase nukes, but the possibility is there. I can only speak for my own country, the UK. I do not think we have sited such devices in Russia. It is not the sort of things we do. However Russia has a long track record of carrying out "wet jobs" and this is typical behaviour for them. Britain has a clearly announced nuclear deterrent which could deliver between 40 and 80 nuclear weapons to the western part of Russia in the event of an attack on the UK. I say western Russia because that is where the vast majority of their population reside.
@@jinnbuster4753 your making stuff up. Ukraine is a racist country and usa should stop wasting millions of dollar on weapons. We should spend that money on ourself to build better medical schools or fund stem education or use it to build a new technology
In all cities in US they have nuclear detection systems that are so sensitive they detect a nuclear watch worn by a person. (If) a suitcase nuke was used on US soil a full nuclear retaliatory strike would occur.
@@xxmobstrxx8535 It's not true: the real surprise is that Russia would win the conflict on points, because a poor nation of only 145 million inhabitants would take the satisfaction of annihilating the much richer USA (330 million inhabitants), the whole of Europe (750 million) and all other allies, including Ukraine (40 million). Trump had warned of the danger: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-71kvy99SV8w.html If it happens it will not be Trump's fault, but someone else's.
Petr Cibulka in 2005: “I am convinced that Russian military intelligence (GRU) is directing terrorist activities against the United States and the West. This is Moscow’s main option for defeating the West. Therefore the GRU is supplying the Islamic terrorists with Russian nuclear weapons so the planned attack against the United States by Russia, China and their allies can follow.”
not really... its BS here is my comment '' if Putin makes the mistake of using the nukes then the West will have no choice but to send all possible weapons to Ukraine which will cause the defeat to Russia. We can't give in to nuclear blackmail once... otherwise all countries possessing this weapon will do the same to get what they want!''
I don't think they are missing or at least stolen, if so they would have used at least a couple by now. That is not to say that Russia still may have them at its embassy compounds around the world but if this were to happen, Russia would be no more!
@@frankrenda2519 Another empty threat by a military that has had trouble tying their boots on so far. Frank try it just try it and you will unleash a whirlwind on the Orcs, A piece of advise don't be anywhere in the proximity of your Reptile Putin!
@@armanicharles5336 We in the west does not care if Russia has 90% of the Nukes. NATO will never allow those genocidal psychopaths in your beloved totalitarian country or that reptilian Putin to get anything close to a win in Ukraine!
Ukraine isn’t fielding a Warsaw Pact/NATO sized force or has anything that, if wiped out by such a strike, would turn the tide of the war. Considering the order of battle, Ukraine might lose a few hundred soldiers (and civilians), but the fallout from this ground burst would be floating over not only their own troops, but their own country. What would be worth even such a small nuke detonation when the IMMENSE cost that would be exacted against Russia, from even their erstwhile “allies”, following such a strike, which would certainly FAR outweigh any benefits? No, Putin may be an ass, but he’s not suicidal. And even if he was, those in the military that control the missiles, and the FSB that control the warheads certainly aren’t. Especially when there is no existential threat from Ukraine.
@@briant5685 Good luck with that! For having the supposed “second most powerful military” Ukraine has been handing you your ass “conventionally”. How many months has it been now since your military has actually gained ground rather than losing it day after day? How many of your troops, treasure, and all that equipment wasted? And now having to go hat-in-hand to N. Korea, China, Iran, and India. 😂 But I understand having to play with your nukes in public in a sad attempt to salvage at least a little pride, because in every other respect it must be so embarrassing, so humiliating, to be a Russian nationalist these days. 🤣
Saw my first "suitcase" Nuke about 30 years ago at an Air Force Base in New Mexico, in a facility open to the public, yes, it was about the size and shape of a regular suitcase, but of course there was NO REAL BOMB inside of it!
I lived through the cold war days,when we had nuclear drills where we were all trained to hide under our tiny desks. And if there is one thing I learned from it, it was that my OWN goverment was in on the fear mongering, and used it to manipulate us all. THEY KNEW that desk wasnt going to save me, yet they insisted on terrorizing 3rd graders with nukes. Given the fact that my own government would bullshit us all like that, why would anyone be surprized that our worst enemy would make up stories about having nukes buried in US cities? Even if they had, I wouldn't have been nearly as pissed at our enemy for doing that as I was at my own government years later, for sending all us terrorized 3rd graders diving under our desks once a month *Just for the FUN of it?
The backpack nukes the Soviet Union used to have Putin said he had some stashed in America well if he did like any battery that you ever had the pit would have corroded and it would no longer work does he still have backpack nukes only if they've remanufactured the pit that is in them because they corrode and break down and have a limited shelf life
@@zhoubaidinh403 there's not a battery to maintain the pit the pit like a battery corrodes and then it's no longer round and then it doesn't work because it's not the right shape
This all stems from a guy who was voted “Top 20 Most Corrupt Members of Congress,” was known for his theatrics, and made his entire political career by pointing out “bad guys,” from local motorcycle gangs to foreign intelligence officers. He enjoyed the spotlight and making headlines, but wasn’t exactly credible.
While that is true, you made it sound like no developed countries ever having such social gap. Or maybe I'm just being prejudiced after consuming a half full liquor.
Only a coward will use this nuclear weapon in Ukrainian: but the Russian will be fried too so help us God . Slava Ukrainian ❤ God is with you to victory ❤
worrisome news! The report should have been dedicated to bots who comment shamelessly that Putin's nukes won't explode. "Generations to come with scarce belief that such a man ( sorry, modern-day bots) as this (these),in flesh and blood, walked upon this Earth"
Having to maintain these things for thirty years for whatever plan people had for them without any detection of them or showing up anywhere in all this time makes the whole story seem like bullshit.
Nobody is attacking Russia and neither intends to. The only thing is for Russia to withdraw from Ukraine. Then why talk about nukes??? Also, has Russia considered what will happen to Russia and the President himself after the country uses nukes?
The fissionable materials these smallest of tactical low yield weapons would lose their ability to create critical mass within a matter of months. I have to imagine that a major terrorist group would have already attempted to use any of those that they had managed to purchase them as "ready to use", and if not, a this point they are useless as a bomb . A country such as Iran however could theoretically maintain such a bomb although that hasnt been a story it seems.
Tidbits for the curious * Thaddeus Taylor - Gifted fission bomb designer, said to have even sketched out the design of a new bomb on the back of an envelope. Designed the most efficient fission bomb, the largest fission bomb, the smallest fission bomb, (25 lb but may have/ may not have been built. Promoted thorium powered reactors to reduce the threat of nuclear terrorists. * Front Line (PBS investigative reporting) - "Russian Roulette." Feb-99. Excellent, maybe more pertinent now than in 1999. This may have discussed-- In the 90s, a nuclear storage facility of highly enriched uranium east of Yakaterinburg was essentially unattended. Western news sources investigated, (Russia was relatively open to outsiders at that time), and found rogue elements had likely stolen hundreds of pounds of weapons grade uranium. (Pakistan exploded its first atomic bomb, 1998. Coincidence?)
the atomic bomb " gun barrel " design is just a tube with uranium at both ends then a explosive charge fires the uranium bullets at each other . the impact and heat cause a atomic detonation ... these can be made small enough to fit in a howitzer shell .and uranium last a long time no need to re-fuel . so atomic briefcase might be more accurate ..[ look up " little boy and fat man " ]
The problem of the Russia nuke weapons and they dont have safety measured and they dont have a Double Lock Key System on Nuke weapons on there Arsenal and unlike Western Superpower such as US , UK and France and they have Double lock key system.on their Nuke Arsenal
You may not know but Russia has nuclear bunkers larger than Poland they have quarter continent type underground city's in mountains and nuclear valleys that existed from 32 past global resets the same as Tibet sacred citys
Crux we have been asking you to give us report on kremina,we need to know what happened to the Ukrainian troops that entered kremina few days ago,🤣🤣🤣🤣 Everybody needs to know
Внимание, российские солдаты, вы должны как можно скорее сдаться Украине. Вторжение России в Украину не оправдано. Международное право запрещает использование военной силы одной страной против другой, если только это не осуществляется в целях самообороны или не санкционировано Советом Безопасности ООН. Такого разрешения на военное вмешательство России в Украине не было, и действия России нарушают международное право. ПС: с Новым годом
Not a problem: two Ohio class SSBN can destroy all major Russian cities within 30 minutes. Every Russian, Chinese and Iranian leader knows this and acts accordingly.
