If you lived in a world that was seeking justice your so called Paliestineians would have accepted one of the many offers for peace and statehood rather than perpetuating conflict
@@tiffanylaserna1288 Sorry sweetheart, the bible isn't the world's rule maker, but thanks for demonstrating your bloodlust for all to see and read. It will help with the growing movement to hold Israel and it's government responsible for being the 21st century's version of the nazis.
if you really want any progress maybe abandon the slogan that involves eliminating israel.....you really should swallow your pride. if israel did to you what palestine wants to do to Israel you wouldnt be alive right now so consider yourself lucky
Not being negative .With the most Far Right goverment in Isreal politics i see no settlement in this conflict . 70 years of resolution with no veto makes the UN ajoke .
We all expected to condemn annexation only done by communist regimes not so called democratic nations and where do we go from here in the world where we don’t hold our friends accountable for breaking the international order and we hope to hold accountable only those who are not our friends
And Turkey is a communism regime ? Turkey annexed north of Cyprus and everyone seems fine with it. The international order was broken by your friends. The other side warned long enought that there was a red lin not to cross, and now they are force to establish a new order because your order was to kill them.
@@nbgoodiscore1303I do recognize the hypocrisy of my country's position, where we shut down Cuba from forming alliances with our enemies. That doesn't mean I don't stand with the Ukrainian people in their quest for freedom and sovereignty. At the macro level, the politicians play their games, while at the micro level people suffer.
The world is sick of resolutions that do nothing. Sick of words, with no actions. This has been going on for 75 years! Israel needs to be held accountable, for it all! DEFUND ISRAEL OF OUR TAX DOLLARS!
Ask yourself were USA is spending money in the world- find the figures- find the benefits the USA citizen are getting in return. You will find that Israel is getting relative a small part and in return pays back the biggest part. I think that if someone is a real USA patriot and not an anti- Israeli propagandist he will apologize for his comments and ask USA to require all the others to imitate Israel contribution to USA. All the struggling poor communities in USA itself will move to middle class. USA gives to Israel and gets back from Israel. It is a mutual benefit.
Amnesty International declared Israel to be an "Apartheid State" much like South Africa and America used to be and I think Amnesty International got this one right on Israel.
@@CHMichaelThey claimed it to be apartheid because they believe Israel owns and controls ALL of Palestine. Once you realize Israel doesn’t control all of Palestine and is merely trying to defend itself it becomes clear that Israel is not an apartheid state.
@@CHMichael that's not the reality for Palestinians. There are many families separated by a wall for that religious and ethnic apartheid, which should have never have occured but for the inequitable displacement of the Palestinian people
@@heathercloete7450 As is your prerogative. I said "South Africa", I didn't say "All South Africans". The Republic of South Africa has already voted and made it's position clear at the UNSC on this issue.
“Since its establishment, Israel has engaged in brutal oppression of the rights of Palestinians. Thousands of Palestinians are imprisoned, beaten and tortured; children are taken from their beds and beaten by soldiers who are armed to the teeth.”-Miko Peled
I hope Palestinians get their country and home back, and Israel pay back the damage and jailed all their government officials and the Palestine will be the judge for their crime.
@@dogsinspace3536 Danny Seidemann who's funded by the Europeans to promote his anti Israel agenda and Danny Seidemann who's a Palestinian terror apologist like Al Jazeera. In response to the installation of metal detectors at the Temple Mount to increase security following a terrorist attack that killed two Israeli Border Police officers in July 2017, Seidemann tweeted, “No gadget can be effective in blocking the drive for liberty. The new mechanisms may make Palestinian lives miserable -they won’t stop them.”
Lol. The people that works for Israel, or who ever they work for. How in the world they can say they do not oçupy. 😂. This people from Russia, Poland Ukrania, or God knows where they came from, Really want to convince themselfs Palestine is their land.
@@SecretEyeSpot Yaa you can imagine such possibilities and I also can suggest many more ways... That's doesn't matters... Main thing is no one has courage to do such if someone doing also their actions are irrelevant or not effective in current situation...
@@bibhuduttamisra6065 I think this initial action is a step in the right direction where US Citizens can gain the courage to condemn the fascist regime that is Israel.
@@Nope991 I think we can cease trading weapons, and cease training if they refuse to comport with our Human Rights standards when it comes to the occupation. The death of one of our journalists by the IDF should be the final straw in accepting its indiscriminate killings and human rights atrocities.
What very good outcome do you see? Will HAMAS make peace with exKGB agent Abu Mazen or with Islamic Jihad? Will all of them together start spending sponsors money on building hospitals and houses for people instead of splitting that money and keeping it in their private offshore accounts? Abu Mazen is very rich already, can't say it about other Arabs of Palestine.
Won't work, the people of those four regions exercised there democratic rights to join Russia....so Russia has the moral obligation to protect those rights, as it is doing :)
@@MrThartofwar What democratic rights? Those regions were just invaded by russia and they suffered a mass deportation and selection through filtration camps. That's not democratic.
@@nbgoodiscore1303 There democratic right to vote to join Russia. All do they not get that right? why do you think Ukraine did not like Elon musk solution of new elections? let the people of the region speak for themselves? Ukraine is afraid of democracy, it attacks the democratic rights of those four regions! The western media has done a great job in brainwashing some of you guys lol, so focused on other things, can't see what is right in front of your face lol
@@nbgoodiscore1303 Let the people of those four regions have there voice heard democratically? That there sounds like the best solution, let them speak, then there will be no argument from Russia or Ukraine. Tell me why did Putin agree, and Ukraine was insulted by the idea? Does true democracy really threaten Ukraine so much?
The people of the world are with you Palestine, the people of the world want to see the persecution, discrimination and evil been committed upon the Palestinian people to stop.
Every country has a right to self determination!! . Imagine if we paid the same attention to the palestinian as to what the Ukrainian conflict. The world has so many double standards 😢.
You really have to question the mental health of Israeli society at this point. Or is it natural? Maybe people who understand that they stole they land out from under another people will naturally respond the way Israel has. Is it guilt? Is it fear? They seem to have embraced their international status as a pariah state. They cannot seem to admit to the crimes they've committed, even though they're obvious to everyone.
How it would solve the issue where the USA is illegally or illegally blindly supporting Israel and working best interests od the Israel. What do we expect from the USA?
the problem on this is, that 87 countries that were a favour, almost everyone are unethic countries like Russia, China and friends. The Against and abstentions are the mostly ethical and democratic ones, atleast from the western perspective. This resolution will not be of any impact, perhaps, benefits Israel motivations. Meanwhile powerfull with influence countries likes to trade with Israel and the Palestinian state has vinculations with terror groups, Palestine progression will move backwards. There must be another way to put the peace on that area. No ocupations and no terrorism.
Jesus was born in Palestine too. So what would Israel say to the christian world in regards who deserves to live that part of the land. So Everyone should have right to live and share the land to live in peace.
Ohh yeah. Palestine will be wiped out and Israel will establish the real Israel which was under king David in BC 1000. Do you have any idea how many Palestinians moved out is last 20 years??
(1) Israel must negotiate for Peace with Palestinians immediately. (2). Israel STOP greed to more lands, stick to land given originally in 1948. (3) IDF stop Killing innocent Palestinians. (4) New Government must rollback settlements in West Bank and w Work to create 2-state solution....this solution is possible and concrete as all others back and forth trials are wast of time.
I request all muslim brothers & sisters to curse all news & Israel every second of your life atleast we all can do this favour for Masjid e Aqsa & our lovely Palestinian brothers and sisters
Brother Jimmy, you must know what most people do not know 😉 Since you seem to be certain about God of Israel in your bible, please help us understand your God. Is that the same God that commands genocide in 1 Samuel 15:1-3: “ Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.“ Or is that the God that forgets and regrets! As in Genesis 6:6-7, Sam 15:11 and many more. Are those attributes of a true God?!!
How do you occupy your own territory?! The entire land belongs to the Jewish state. There was never something like a Palestinian state, complete nonsense.
FROM JEWISH TALMUD: "Murdering Gentiles [non-Jews] is like k¡lling a wild animal." [REFERENCE: 1. Sanhedrin 59a] "Even the best of the Gentiles should be k¡lled." [REFERENCE: Abodah Zara 26b]
I think the right legal proceedings would be an action or complaint against the occupation itself, not just the consequences of occupation. The motion implicitly tolarates the occupation, but is seeking legal remedies which occupation entails. Secondly, what the motion is seeking is only an advisory opinion, as opposed to an executory order or decision or judgement, which legally speaking can be enforced by legal enforcement measures available under international public law. The advisory opinion is just that, it has no teeth except additional political legitimity, but very symbolic legal effect. So the legal affaires of the Palestinans are run exactly in the same way their political affaires have been handled since 1948. That is why is Israel has only showed some anger about. And that perhaps why no one is expecting something practical will come out of those legal proceedings. It is very frustrating in many ways
Israel and the people is such a progressive and great country...where would this part of the world be without them? What are the palestinians doing in such..
There's a UNSC approved determination for Israel to leave the occupied territories (if I'm not mistaken). We must remember that a lot of Israelis fight for the rights of Palestine like did former IDF officers Matti Peled and Isaac Rabin.
@@patrickmahony8641 That part of the world is one of the cradles of Western Civilization. When Queen Isabel's forces took Toledo they found on a mid size library more titles than there were in all of Europe. The result of the transmission of Classic knowledge back into Europe resulted in what we call The Enlightenment.
The occupier and those that support injustice will continue to act in a way that makes the oppressed feel hopeless Each of these moments and initiatives will be cumulative over time to appeal to and touch the nerve of humanity and justice - but this will take time The turning point to end apartheid in South Africa came about by an uprising amongst ordinary people that stood for human rights and justice , International pressure on the state and widespread support from civil society There is a major difference here , where in the South African context there was never a talk of 2 states where the racist oppressors will have a state alongside the rest of the people. This notion of a so called re rival or reviving peace talks of a 2 state solution is a smoke screen under which the oppressor is flourishing to a point where that will by default not be possible any longer The only hope for the Israelis and Palestinians is one state where all are treated equally. What is also very disappointing is that no matter how right wing and oppressive the Israeli regime becomes , so called law abiding and liberal Jews in other countries in the rest of the world blindly support this Israeli regime ?
Hey, mister, what about Uigurs in China, what about 40 million Kurdish people, which still don't have independence. What about Russia-Ukranian war, in which already were killed more than a hundred thousand people, what about Kashmir , and so on. Please keep your idiotic advices for yourself. Israel 🇮🇱 doesn't care about this resolution and will continue to thrive!
@@nickmatatyahu9464 My point exactly You fit the profile of the typical arrogant racist , Are you drawing similarities between Israel and all those other nations that are also oppressing people ? My suggestion is one of peace and not of anger and conflict My suggestion is not some made up thing If you know history you will know that this is exactly what exists in South Africa post apartheid , where all are treated equally and not one oppressing the other -- understand that simple concept first You speak of thriving , at the expense of oppressing and displacing other people The white minority also thrived at the expense of subduing and oppressing the black majority in South Africa
@@selloc7433 Let me , mister, to explain to you, that in the arab-israeli conflict there is no racism at all. Arabs and Jews belong to the same white race , and more of that, they belong to the same family 👪. Jewish people were oppressed for the last 2000 years in the Christian world and in the Muslim world. Finally, they got their independence, and many in the Christian and Muslim countries cannot accept this fact. They cannot sleep, when they see Israel's prosperity, and trying to do everything to destroy a Jewish state, forgetting about thousands of cases of injustices in the world. I would recommend you to study history not from Tik-Tok, but from the reliable sources.
@@nickmatatyahu9464 Jews and Arabs are white ? Really Got their independence? This platform is for intellectual debate and not for bigots and racists There is no point in debating with you
Will make no difference UN has several resolutions against Israel on occupations as is the case with India on Kashmir. Only USA can look into this injustice
@@hannanaby Shalom, Salam, Peace. Jordan Is Jordan. Palestine Is Palestine. Israel Is Israel. If 70 Years Of Hatred Is Not Enough For You, Then Try Another 70 Years. They Must Have Their Own State Next To Israel, Then Move On With Peace.
@@hannanaby Shalom, Salam, Peace. A Narcissist Gaslights, Troll & Abuse, Anyone Whom They Disagree With, They Put Themselves On A Deluded Grandeur. DENNY = Reject The Quran [Last Testament] ATTACK = Claim Islam Is Copy & Paste. REVERSE = Claim I'm Crazy. VICTIM = Play The Victim Card. OFFEND = Abusive Communication.
Except no Palestinian state existed in history. Between the fall of the Kingdom of Judea and the re-establishment of the State of Israel in 48, the only state that existed there was Israel. Jerusalem wasn't the capital of anything else except Israel.
@@rxtr664 I’ll explain which international law is the only one that matters in this situation. The national borders of Israel were set in 1922 at the conference of San Remo before the UN ever existed. All of the countries who signed onto the League of Nations agreed to be bound by the international laws that came out of the League of Nations. The Conference of San Remo was a League of Nations conference after World War I that set that borders of many nations now in existence. The only international body at the time voted and all the nations agreed. The borders were set for the Israel, Jordan, Syria, and Iraq to name a few. The national borders of Israel were set at this time during the Mandate system even before they had gained their independence. And what is now called the West Bank sits securely inside these national borders. Nothing the UN says or does later can nullify the international law that set the borders if these nations before the existence of the UN.
*_"This Organization does not exercise any regional sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, on the Gaza Strip or the Himmah Area. Its activities will be on the national popular level in the liberational, organizational, political and financial fields."_* PLO Charter, Article 24
This is an example of a Satanic trick in a dispute. You ask a question about your point of view, while acting as if your point of view, or your accusation, were a fact. For example; as a teenager I saw a school mate catch another schoolmate with this trick question; he asked, "John (but any name would do), isn't my pen1s the best you have ever tasted"? My friend rushed to loudly exclaim "NO!", but then when he realized what he was actually admitting to, he changed his answer to "I mean, yes", only to realize a second later than he had moved from one trap to another. The ruth lived in neither answer. The unproven, and actually false, accusation contained in question was slipped in undetected by wrapping the accusation in a question. Another example is a car salesman asking, "In what color would you like the car better, white or silver"? Whether you say white or silver you are in effect taking mental possession of the car, and you are obliquely admitting to liking the car, even when in your mind you are just admitting to liking on color better than another. Word trickery. The same trick is used here because there CAN BE no LEGAL CONSEQUENCES of Israel occupying Palestinian territory because THERE IS NO PALESTINIAN TERRITORY. Israel is occupying it's own territory called the state of Israel. How can there be Palestinian territory when Palestine as a nation never existed? How can someone TAKE FROM YOU something that was never yours? How can you LAY CLAIM TO something that was never yours? If I steal a car, keep it 's rightful owners from enjoying his property for any number of years, and spend $10 000 "pimping out" the car during that time, when I am caught the car goes back to the RIGHTFUL owner WHO DOES NOT EVEN HAVE TO COMPENSATE ME FOR THE MONEY I SPENT ON THE CAR. He does not even have to thank me. I have no ownership claim to the car, neither from my having "occupied" the car it for a number of years, nor from having spent money on changes which I consider to be "improvements" to the car. Theft is not "transformed" into something other than theft by either mechanism of time or money spent. The deceivers, who deceptively mislabel themselves as Palestinians, are trying to lay claim to "International Squatter's rights" - which does not exist. And why are they complaining about the high wall that keeps them separated from the Jewish people when they fire rockets into Jewish neighborhoods, and their leaders have never retreated from their statement that they are going to drive the Jews into the sea? Israel, like all other nations, has certain rights; these include: The right to occupy their own territory without apology or explanation to anyone. The right to self defense when attacked. The right to build out the physical infrastructure on their territory in such a way as to reduce or eliminate threats to themselves; ie; the right to "Physical Security". This absolutely includes the right to build walls as high and as strong as necessary or chosen. The International Court of Justice will prove itself once again to be as useless a UN body as are all the others if it does not dismiss this novel accusation, which is based on the nonsensical premise, that a nation can "illegally" occupy it's OWN territory. There is an Arab League. There should be a Christian League. This means that libtards who are anti-Christian and who block this body from being born, must be removed from the seats of political power.
Besides, I agree with the riddle posed by Dan and repeated by Bill about the "known", "unknown" and the "unknowable", indeed we are entering a NEW ERA in which "fixing horse or dog races" would be far more difficult due to multipolarity, I think it was a sensible warning to the incumbents...
There was Never a Palestinian state. They never owned/controlled the West Bank. Jordan controlled the West Bank. If Jordan didn't decide to invade Israel in 1967 the land would still belong to Jordan, not the Palestinians and not the Israelis.
I would just like to make one point of clarification from a strictly legal perspective. The panel seems to be confused about the nature of the International Court of Justice's advisory opinion on the Wall, and as a result, on the pending question before the ICJ on the legal consequences of Israel's occupation of Palestinian territory. From a legal perspective, any ICJ advisory opinions, as the ones at issue, requested by the UN General Assembly are *non-binding*. Simply put, Israel was _not_ bound to follow the advisory opinion...this is despite the fact that the ICJ determined that Israel violated international law. It is well-established in international law that no state can be compelled to submit itself to the ICJ's jurisdiction, and Israel did not consent to be party to a dispute before the ICJ...these are not contentious cases. In other words, these matters are not brought to the court in a state versus state context (e.g. Israel v. Palestine), which would result in binding legal obligations for the parties. While I commend Al Jazeera for its reporting on the impact of the expected ICJ advisory opinion, I would recommend that a lawyer be consulted before production or, better yet, retain a lawyer who could explain this important distinction, as well as other consequences resulting therefrom.
