What Does The Strong Nuclear Force Look Like? 

unlike the previous kids, we dont need to retain information when its accessible like youre saying

@@MrPaxio that takes us down another rabbit hole but I have looked into reconciling these societal problems.

Check out @MathAndScience , longer videos for learning

When ahhh was a keeeed, we didn’t even have a youtube, you lil' whippersnapper

I WALKED TO SCHOOL UP HILL BOTH WAYS IN 7 FEET OF SNOW WITH NO SHOES OR SOCKS YOUNG MAN

More than 20lbs. The strong force is what must be overcome, and that's the energy released.

It’s funny how much more interesting the world is when you get real answers and not lazy dumbed down ones. I know when I was a kid, I’d much rather a real answer I didn’t quite understand over a simplified answer that just caused more questions than it answered.

and then you realise you are made up of countless bombs

Agreed! I had no idea that it was so strong! 🙂 💪

For me it was the fact that the force u need to separate 2 quarks is equal to the energy that creates 2 quarks so after u separate 2 quarks u end up with 2 pairs of quarks its nuts

That was the EM force. Strong force x >100 stronger than that.

The strong force is more easily equated to the towing ability of a large pickup truck.

@@ml4319 got it.

The video you linked is about a device called the "EMDrive," which is a type of magnetic propulsion device. The EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust. The EMDrive has been the subject of much controversy, with some people claiming that it works and others claiming that it is a hoax. The video you linked claims that Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of the EMDrive. However, this is not true. Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of a device that can be used to detect and treat cancer. They have nothing to do with the EMDrive. The video you linked also claims that the EMDrive has been tested by NASA and that it has been shown to work. However, this is also not true. NASA has never tested the EMDrive. In fact, NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology. The video you linked is full of misinformation about the EMDrive. It is important to be critical of information you find on the internet, and to only trust sources that are credible. Here are some additional details about the EMDrive: The EMDrive was invented by Roger Shawyer in 2001. Shawyer claims that the EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust. The EMDrive has been tested by a number of independent groups, with mixed results. NASA has never tested the EMDrive. NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology. The EMDrive is a controversial device, and there is no scientific consensus on whether or not it works. More research is needed to determine the true potential of the EMDrive.

This isn't quantum locking. The floating magnet is held in place by frequency basically. By the time it wants to move the rotating moves and changes its "target" and the floating magnetic vibrates in place more or less

@@HassanEido1 So, basically you can say its cuz of property of inertia of an object?? Pls explain if im rong

@@HassanEido1 meaning there is a delay between action and reaction...

​@@vibhavshivadeker8288 means the magnet gets attracted to a pole but as it moves towars it, the poles gets switched because the other magnet is rotating. Then as the magnet starts to repell, before it could move farther the pole switches to the attractive one again. Which leaves the magnetic object in a constant state of attraction and repulsion, locking it in one place. And yes it does rely on the object's inertia. This is what as far as i understood. I may be wrong though.

​@@sanchitsharma3260 there's probably a frequency response to each magnet's material susceptibility creating a hysteresis curve with the proximal field intensity necessary to accelerate its mass at a given mutual polarity?

Yeah, I Love These Experiments.. Lots Of Potential For New Ways To Intrigue The World.

I studied physics in college and that transform equation kool aid did not register with me. I don't know how you can see it and admire it, unless that's just rote memory knowledge. The transform equations create a new reality for you by changing your numbers so that light speed can BECOME the constant that it is declared to be. Light is not "observed" to be constant relative to the observer. That comes after the math changes everything. This leaves an alternative non-transformed reality behind, and everyone acts like it just disappeared with no consideration at all. Gamma Ray Bursts, ALL of them, arrive here in order of wavelength. A proper scientific method would be to allow that different waves have different speeds. Modern science does not have THAT proper scientific method. Today, they declare a constant, then invent new things to maintain the constant. NEVER SECOND-GUESS A CONSTANT. It is a belief system through and through.

​@@jnhrtmn I've never seen any science experiments that show that gamma rays would travel faster or slower than say x-rays or red light.... Could you point out some?

@@christianheichel Gamma Ray Bursts. I said that already. Those all arrive here in order of wavelength from across the Universe with radio sometimes a month late. They will not say it that way, because to them it’s not true, even though that’s what they see. They invented a blast wave to fix it.

You may appreciate the movie Pi then 😅 I haven't watched it but love the concept in the trailer how the world around us can be understood with numbers (which to me means when you understand the world through the lens of numbers) you now have the ability to reverse engineer it and then re-create it (or the very least, aspects of it)

How does the chain work?

who cares bud

@@originstarstudioshey no prob! In a nutshell, i used a scheme where a floating magnet tends to spin and accelerates to match up to the rotor frequency. By adding another angled magnet to the first floater, it can function as its own rotor to support a secondary floater beneath the first. Which results in this cool vertical chain of floating magnets. Its very touchy but possible!

@@username4441 probably folks who are already watching a video about MBS?

@@colinmcnamara344 wrong

It oscillates. See the twitter channel in the description.

I was gonna say quarks spin so in effect this is EXACTLY what’s going on on a quantum level.

1:58am for me

I have some visuals and texts in my twitter and yt channels for that

The video you linked is about a device called the "EMDrive," which is a type of magnetic propulsion device. The EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust. The EMDrive has been the subject of much controversy, with some people claiming that it works and others claiming that it is a hoax. The video you linked claims that Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of the EMDrive. However, this is not true. Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of a device that can be used to detect and treat cancer. They have nothing to do with the EMDrive. The video you linked also claims that the EMDrive has been tested by NASA and that it has been shown to work. However, this is also not true. NASA has never tested the EMDrive. In fact, NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology. The video you linked is full of misinformation about the EMDrive. It is important to be critical of information you find on the internet, and to only trust sources that are credible. Here are some additional details about the EMDrive: The EMDrive was invented by Roger Shawyer in 2001. Shawyer claims that the EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust. The EMDrive has been tested by a number of independent groups, with mixed results. NASA has never tested the EMDrive. NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology. The EMDrive is a controversial device, and there is no scientific consensus on whether or not it works. More research is needed to determine the true potential of the EMDrive.

This is what causes nuclear fusion. The point of fusion is to get the protons/nucleus close enough that strong nuclear force overcomes electromagnetic repulsion.

Yes, it is called ferrofluid. James has plenty of videos featuring ferrofluid. He's used it to make osmium float, due to secondary buoyancy from the magnetic "weight" of the ferrofluid.

Quark Gaming RGB Elite

I think that the speed of the spinning magnet necessary for this to work is in direct corelation with the inertia of the suspended magnet. From what i understand about this effect, the suspended magnet is trying to fly towards the tilted end of the spinning magnet, but since it has close to 0 speed initially, it needs to work against its own inertia to start moving. However by the time it starts going towards the closer pole, the field has been flipped, and now it's repeling it, and again, the suspended magnet has to fight its inertia/velocity, but in oposite direction. And so the suspended magnet keeps vibrating ever so slightly forward and back, and as a result it stays locked in place. So things that i think could potentially influence the needed speed of rotating magnet are: - size/weight of the suspended magnet (the amound of inertia influencing the acceleration of the magnet entering the magnetic field) - medium properties (introduces drag/resistance the levitating magnet needs to push against to accelerate) - the geometry of suspended magnet (asimetric center of gravity preventing the magnet from flipping itself as easily as a simetric magnet of the same weight) Basically, the more drag or resistance or gravity shenanigans you introduce, the harder it is for the suspended magnet to turn and flip around and the less rpm you need to keep it suspended. That being said, aproaching the minimum rpm value, this position is highly turbulent as the suspended magnet is almost able to follow the magnetic field, but not quite, so higher speed you use, less vibrations you get.

Silly Jellyfish is correct. I made this levitation device, it requires about 1 watt of energy to a DC motor, 12v and RPMs range around 5 to 10 thousand rpms, depending on magnet sizes.

We can do rotating magnetic filed as used in brushless or three phase asynchronous motor.

I think it will work. But you need to change polarity with different intervals to make attractive force little stronger/longer than repellent (I hope I said something reasonable, but my English is not good enough, I mean your electromagnet has to pull more than to push away). Короче тянуть должно сильнее, чем толкать, тогда естественным образом магнит улетая далеко будет притягиваться сильнее, чем отталкиваться, но при этом учитывая, что при отталкивании он устремляется от электромагнита, а при притягивании к нему, то подлетев достаточно близко, когда разница в расстоянии на этих двух этапах станет существенной, он остановится, так как в среднем начнёт отталкиваться сильнее, чем притягиваться (именно за счёт того, что отталкивание и притягивание происходит на разных расстояниях, потому что оттолкнувшись он потом притягивается с дальшего расстояния, а притянувшись снова отталкивается с более короткого)

It should work but one could also make it out of multiple electromagnets simulating the rotating effect more precisely, or even simulating the 7 degree offset by varying the field strength. ?

@@pinocleen why tho?

@@vladyslavkryvoruchko Just a thought experiment, and in case if what we are suggesting doesn't work.

Same

it increases. There is no difference from holding the magnets in place in any other way (by a thread or a stick). If the magnets lose its weight something has to get extra weight of the same amount.

I made this and have this device. Floating magnets pull on motor, which pulls on stand, which earth holds against gravity. They weigh the same, i think unless i broke physics? I could test but weighing moving magnets is difficult, they are attracted to the scale, hence why James put a box in between

I'd hazard she's more into hairstyling and singing videos, perhaps comedy, but she's German!

Never after this video :) James crossed the territory of physicists despite he repeatedly saying it is an analogy.

His field is closely tied to physics because he is not a pure chemist, but a PhD in chemical engineering. The physics is hiding in the engineering part.

if you look up Gogo from big hero 6 i think you could see the application for spinning magnets like this with her science project.

@@florntlaze810 Oh, of course... Some genius kid already thought of something useful to use this for, lol! I should've known.

Not in general for various reasons, but tilting the magnet is the most reliable and resource efficient way to do so.

I doubt if rotating the field it is going to work - because rotating cannot simulate the the 7 degree angle which appears to be important

no need to turn the coils, just oscillate the current

In my opinion, you do not need many coils - you can have just one. You can switch magnetic poles by switching + and - when you run electricity through the coil. I am not sure if it will work that way, because it switches poles instantly, and it probably with just fling the magnet into space

@@cliffmathew isn't incline just makes one pole stronger than another relatively to other magnet? I'm pretty shure it's not hard to recreate.

@@Max_Jacoby I am not clear what effect the inclined mounting produces. I am waiting for someone else who might know this to clarify.

yes! It's physics, not magic :)

School?

@@girenloland not really. But I only have school education. :) so, yep, sort of...

Are you ready to have your kidneys consumed?

For me it says this video was uploaded 12 minutes ago, yet your comment was posted 15 minutes ago 😂 The laws of logic apparently don't apply on RU-vid 😂

RU-vid commenters be like 1 braincell 0 awareness

‮It is very normal on youtube man fr

@@theonlyreal615 big fan of Crowley, eh?

@@Aerox90 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

O.A. Barut had proposed that strong force has magnetic origin. More... follow this avatar.