What Frame Rate Should You Be Filming In? 

Subtitles for english content are automatic i think! You should find more and more in the months to come.

Patate2019202 auto cc is definitely a thing but it’s a hit or miss, especially when using special terminology. When you watch enough YT videos, you know how to tell the difference between auto cc and actual cc.

sorry man, hope you find happiness in life

same here, totally get ya

Same here! I just appreciate captions because it shows that the creator cares so much about his viewers. It raises the overall experience so much! Another great example is Tom Scott, who posts similarly excellent videos and has said before that he almost felt like it should be a RU-vidr's responsibility to take care of his disabled viewers, aka deaf viewers. For the same reason, my own videos have captions!

Idk. I feel like this video topic has be talked about endlessly by other youtubers and hollywood film makers. Why does there need to be another one? What does this offer that those other videos don't?

60fps is life

@@AndrewTimosca the graphic and explanation of how it changes from camera to timeline is pretty good

@@AndrewTimosca The others were faster too...

Andrew Timosca So by that logic every news agency shouldn't cover a story because someone else already has? or a new tech product comes out and only one tech channel talks about it? I think it's quite the opposite...a channel about making films needs to cover this despite the information being elsewhere available.

Aside from the first 5 minutes

Nice job, comfortable in his skin, very useful thanks 🙏

They did the same trick in this music video, must have been a PITA to lip sync: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dGR65RWwzg8.html

any idea how fast the song must be to lip sync?

@@drawkfilms if you want to slow the playback by 20% the song should be 20% faster

​@@drawkfilms x1.25 of the original speed. To get right speeds, divide the frame rates with each other to find out the multiplication needed. (so conversions in 30 to/from 24fps is x0.80 and x1.25.) Might want to fiddle with shutter times if you really want to sell it as something shot in 24fps as well. (slightly longer exposure when shooting in 30fps.. 225? degrees to get the 180 degree in 24fps, if my rusty math is correct..)

Much better example than Avril Lavigne (and probably at least ten years before) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ru3gH27Fn6E.html

same LMAOOO

That would only make sense if you're watching the video on mute.

I always enjoyed making short films. But I was unaware how much I real wanted to make engaging shorts. I am learning and enjoying the Process. Namaste Dave Ross

Bros gon unlock every camera out there💀💀

hahaha same

Yes it’s true ! What frame do you usually go for?

@@jv8studios 23.97fps

@@milestailsprower4555 what do you usually shoot ?

@@jv8studios 29.97 is greater than 23.97 because 30.00 is greater than 24.00

Kudos for the video content! Apologies for the intrusion, I would appreciate your initial thoughts. Have you researched - Riddleagan handling camera Remedy (do a search on google)? It is a good exclusive product for making sales videos super fast and make money minus the normal expense. Ive heard some incredible things about it and my cooworker at last got great success with it.

Stills guy?

@@jamman7344 aka Photographer

Rhyan De Guzman you should get one of those heart like things

Eli Wesley lol sure hahaha

Right! 240 FPS Aka the “drool on my screen” frame rate

Do you get any issues with out of sync voice?

@@AmuthanVethanayagam You would use it for more b roll right then dub audio ontop ie music right?

@@MitchFPT That's right! Thank you for all the videos. Very inspiring!

Question from a newbie: If you shoot at 30 with the intent to slow it down, what should the project settings be in an editor like Resolve? Should the project be set to 24, or 30? Do you set it to 30 and then slow it down, or set it to 24 and then click "no" when it asks to change the frame rate?

@@mbrauwolf same question

Most monitors have some kind of motion smoothing feature, so that's not really an issue

Is it ever possible to get smooth pans with 24fps?

@@wolfeadventures - Sure, just pan slower ;)

yeah exactly, that's what i was thinking. i also don't get why european cameras default to the pal standart. so you have the choice of shooting in 25 or 50 fps. but screens are at 60hz. you can change it to ntsc, but then you have to re-format your sd-card which is weird 🤔

@@wolfeadventures Yes, make sure you are setting your display to 24p. It's common for theaters to switch to native frame rate of the content, no so much for phones or PCs.

naaa people still like that cinematic 24 look. Plus the rest of the world shoots 25 so if anything it will go to 25 or 50 for slowmo. I'm in film school and the 24/25 look is nailed into you. trust me it's not going anywhere.

^

I think there’s a lot of 30 FPS out there now, but it really gives “TV” vibe to me. I prefer 24 whenever possible. Plus it makes my 60 footage just a touch slower. 👍🏻😉

@@MichaelJLong yeah, the slowmo thing is a good point :)

Rajdeep Borgohain yes please

That's so true!

Lol!

You just made my day. So good! 😂

50 percent is even funnier

Thank you so much for this comment. I'm rewatching it in drunk mode now and it's simply hilarious.

Hey, you're in which school?

@@zahitemremetin606 Giresun university

@@alanbak.r Why did you choose that school?

@@zahitemremetin606 it was the only opprotunity to me because i came to Turkey as refugee but now im very happy "making films" like dream to me because my dad he was an director in syria before the war ..

And old TV's is also where 30fps came from, the american elecric grid runs at 60Hz, so it was way simpler to time the frames of the video on that. as for why it's 30 and not 60, it's due to a bandwidth limitation, so broadcasting companies used a trick called "interlaced video" to give the illusion of higher resolution and framerate. Basically, they sent to the tv a single 240p image every 60th of a second, but the images were really half of a single 480p image, do it fast enough and you've got the illusion of a 480p image at 60fps. You can also use this trick to get higher resolution on old CRT monitors, set it to interlaced video and suddenly your framerate is doubbled, for instance, a CRT that might do 1920x1440p@45Hz is now 1920x1440i@90Hz with next to no extra bandwidth required.

@@user-le8ul4nr5t Yes, the 30 fps was based on the 60hz power frequency. This is also why for example, old school UK TV used 25fps. Their AC power is at 50hz.

NTSC was never 30fps, it was 60Hz like the power grid but it ran interlaced instead of progressive. That's how they solved the bandwith issue. Likewise, PAL and SECAM ran 50Hz, not 25fps and also interlaced. PAL and SECAM compensated for the lower rate with offering a higher resolution instead. PAL offered a better overall picture quality thanks to better colors and a sharper picture, however an American used to the 60Hz of NTSC might notice the 50Hz of PAL flickering a bit. Most Europeans never noticed this as they were completely used to this.

@@notsorandumusername And that's why all cameras was running 50 or 60 Hz and is still the defactor standard. You can film everything at 60 fps but 30 fps is not suitable for example in sports like ice hockey. The pipe line showed in the video was not complete. In the exampole video is shot at 24 fps, edited in 24 fps and published at 24 fps but after that it's played at 60 fps. This won't play smoothly. 30 fps will play smoothly.

Yes 30 is perfect

Or things like sports or gaming video where the higher frame rate is certainly better!