Тёмный

What Happened to Russia's Doomsday Submarine? 

Task & Purpose
Подписаться 1,7 млн
Просмотров 1,2 млн
50% 1

THIS IS YOUR LAST CHANCE TO WIN!
go.getenteredt...
DEADLINE to ENTER is TONIGHT12/10/23 @ 11:59pm (PST)
This is Russia’s brand new 5th generation submarine the Belgorod it’s the world’s largest sub in active use today. But is more bigger, really more better? You might have heard it referred to by its menacing nickname, “Moscow's Doomsday sub” because of its main weapon, the Poseidon intercontinental nuclear torpedo that Russia claims can trigger a tsunami to destroy entire coastal cities. Sounds like a Tom Clancy novel I would read. This new weapon comes at a time when Russia has withdrawn from a global treaty that banned nuclear weapon testing, and made numerous threats of nuclear retaliation. So Is the Belgorod really some new kind of superweapon? Or is it all just russian propaganda to scare you into locking your door and never going outside again. Jokes on them I do that anyway.
Written by: Chris Cappy & Justin Taylor
Edited by: Savvy Studios
Let's put our existential dread about nuclear armageddon aside for just a second so we can look at its unique strategy. I like to think of the Belgorod sub as an underwater mothership. Because While most submarines serve as a launching platform for direct attacks, the Belgorod launches other independent crafts as well. These include their Artificial Intelligence assisted nuclear torpedos, underwater recon drones, and even other smaller submarines. It’s the world's most dangerous underwater Russian nesting doll. All of these systems are launched from the Belgorod, and either return to it once their mission is complete, or are recovered later by separate vessels operated by the 110 crew onboard the sub.
If you’re looking for underwater cryptids like the Megladon this would be a very useful tool. But While all of these are significant capabilities, there’s one problem for Russia. For context the United States Navy has 18 of their Ohio Class submarines. Meanwhile Russia only has one of these Belgorod bad boys. Russia historically is very conservative with its deployment of their latest generation tech like the SU57 jet or T14 tank, and the utilization of them is generally a big deal. That said, because there is only one Belgorod, anytime we observe it making any movement whatsoever this could be an indication of a massive military move on Russia’s part. That’s why when the submarine simply leaves its normal port, we see it making news headlines around the world. It’s the taylor swift of military world unable to get any moment of privacy.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @taskandpurpose
Task & Purpose is a military news and culture oriented channel. We want to foster discussion about the defense industry.
Email capelluto@taskandpurpose.com for inquires.

Опубликовано:

 

26 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 3,2 тыс.   
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 9 месяцев назад
THIS IS YOUR LAST CHANCE TO WIN! go.getenteredtowin.com/taskandpurpose DEADLINE to ENTER is TONIGHT12/10/23 @ 11:59pm (PST)
@markwilkinson475
@markwilkinson475 9 месяцев назад
Keep it up Cappy.
@9o6h24
@9o6h24 9 месяцев назад
you state that russia just left the nuclear treaty yet it was the USA who did it first and then Russia followed. its like bioweapons the USA funded sars2 and then it gets released during the world mil peace games in wuhan in oct 2019.
@9o6h24
@9o6h24 9 месяцев назад
The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) is a multilateral treaty adopted to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons in all its aspects. ▫ The main instrument for stopping nuclear weapons tests is the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 10 September 1996.
@9o6h24
@9o6h24 9 месяцев назад
The Treaty was opened for signature in New York (USA) on 24 September 1996. To date, 187 states have signed the Treaty and 178 countries have ratified it. The Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation was established in New York on 19 November 1996 at the first Meeting of States Signatories to the Treaty for the purpose of carrying out the necessary preparations for the effective implementation of the Treaty, in particular to monitor and verify compliance with and detect the proliferation of nuclear weapons. ▫ In 1997, the Provisional Technical Secretariat (PTS) was formed. The CTBT has been ratified by 76 States, including three nuclear-weapon States: Russia, the United Kingdom, and France. Of the remaining eight countries, three have not signed the Treaty: India, the DPRK, and Pakistan; five have signed but not ratified: the United States, China, Egypt, Israel, and Iran. ▫ On 2 November 2023, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law according to which the Russian Federation withdraws its ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. ▫ The International Monitoring System is an integral part of the Treaty. This is a unique global network, which, when completed, will consist of 321 monitoring stations and 16 laboratories located in 89 countries. In 1997, work on the establishment of the monitoring network commenced. Presently, approximately 90% of these 337 facilities are operational and offer a continuous stream of real-time data. The Russian segment of the IMS consists of 32 facilities.
@ghostfaction45
@ghostfaction45 9 месяцев назад
To bad i warned them of the development over 10 years ago. Its the only thing i know Russia has that works... 2050 they use it in a massive hurricane and level the south east of America but you don't believe in reality so as your friends would say think about it...
@schrodingersmechanic7622
@schrodingersmechanic7622 9 месяцев назад
The last time we took Russia's word on a weapon systems capability, it resulted in the F-15 which actually surpassed Russia's greatly exaggerated claims.
@vos2693
@vos2693 9 месяцев назад
As long as average NATO trooper fears the war, this weapon is working perfectly as intended.
@yspear_
@yspear_ 9 месяцев назад
You can say that but Russian submarines are no joke they have been proven to be very deadly, an Indian kilo sub has taken out a US nuclear sub in a n exercise
@skramy1517
@skramy1517 9 месяцев назад
@@yspear_ so what? a british sub took part in a Soviet exercise without them even knowing and took pictures of their "new carriers" propellers from underneath. Russia tech is decades behind.
@Rozarez213
@Rozarez213 9 месяцев назад
thats not the last time lol, you exaggerated it
@schrodingersmechanic7622
@schrodingersmechanic7622 9 месяцев назад
@yspear_ Some would argue that there is greater training value in losing and that the US deliberately does so during war games. As a former Boomer sailor, I can say they must not be underestimated, but in my time, most of their sub tech was based on stolen US tech. Stuff we already had. Considering the conflict in Ukraine with their mixed bag establishing technological supremacy, their best bet is their typical "smother the enemy in bodies" tactics. In this case, it will be UAV's, but it remains that precision and finesse have never been their strong points. Modern Aegis systems might have something to say about this, too
@archiepilcher6727
@archiepilcher6727 9 месяцев назад
"Sounds like a Tom Clancy novel I would read half of" 😂😂😂😂😂
@Sajin688
@Sajin688 9 месяцев назад
Adhd in one sentence
@GeneralJackRipper
@GeneralJackRipper 9 месяцев назад
If you know where a submarine is, then it's not doing it's job.
@ahrhebbx2239
@ahrhebbx2239 7 дней назад
It probably wants you to know it’s there
@annonymat
@annonymat 9 месяцев назад
Super cavitation is really loud, so it wouldn’t go undetected. You basically boil the water infront of you to create a bubble of steam, witch gives you much less drag than water. Behind you, the steam cools down and turns into water, collapsing the bubble. Steam has a much bigger volume than water, so the expansion creates a shockwave infront of you and the collapse behind you creates another. That’s loud unless you find a way of having the two waves canceling out.
@John-hu9qg
@John-hu9qg 9 месяцев назад
It's not supercavatating at all, that's a different Russian weapon. The Poseidon drone has a near silent pump jet, nuclear powered with unlimited range.
@kevint1911
@kevint1911 9 месяцев назад
@@John-hu9qgOr, so they say. Showing a diagram of a torpedo on TV is not even close to the same as fielding a functional weapon.
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 9 месяцев назад
crazy I wish I had dived deeper into super cavitation at first I thought it was just a pocked of air bubbles around the torpedo . what you're describing sounds nuts
@jurajsintaj6644
@jurajsintaj6644 9 месяцев назад
@@Taskandpurpose Its mostly just meant to make the torpedo go really fast.
@TKUA11
@TKUA11 9 месяцев назад
You better watch out man, those Russian bots are going to seethe and grumble. Might even throw In some whataboutisms and the west this America that
@allanlees299
@allanlees299 9 месяцев назад
No doubt this mammoth submarine has been built and is operating according to the highest Russian standards. Just like the Moskva and the Admiral Kuznetzov. I'm sure it's a hugely dangerous vessel - to its own crew.
@longjidalu3845
@longjidalu3845 9 месяцев назад
😂😂
@longjidalu3845
@longjidalu3845 9 месяцев назад
@ibrahimmoncada2710 😂😂 We all know you love Hamas submarines.
@TKUA11
@TKUA11 9 месяцев назад
Don’t forget the Kursk submarine. As Putin answered “it sank” 😏 with a smirk
@TKUA11
@TKUA11 9 месяцев назад
@ibrahimmoncada2710you seem to have a history of pushing Russian propaganda. Are you the Ibrahim that Ukrainians are warning about? The one who’s going to take all the married Russian women while their men are away at war? 🤣
@torrencel.2662
@torrencel.2662 9 месяцев назад
🤣😂🤣
@quinnhasse9170
@quinnhasse9170 9 месяцев назад
haha,, you know your number three piston is knocking right?" - the habital line crosser
@mortoopz
@mortoopz 9 месяцев назад
5:07 "Just north of Moscow".... you know that's 600 miles, right?
@jesusmaryandjoseph6
@jesusmaryandjoseph6 9 месяцев назад
Considering how big Russia is 600 miles isn't too far
@dersaegefisch
@dersaegefisch 9 месяцев назад
Yeah, when he mentioned it in the video I was confused for a second and thought: "Just north of Moscow? Wouldn't it be an absolute nightmare to get large ships and submarines constructed there to the sea? Why would they have their shipyard there, that's so dump."
@zuephillips3450
@zuephillips3450 8 дней назад
@@jesusmaryandjoseph6 considering how big America is 600 isnt to far.
@cedhome7945
@cedhome7945 9 месяцев назад
My wife worked with the millitary and she visited a base in Scotland just after the kursk was lost and she was surprised that they had a model of the sub with a small memorial next to it she asked about it and the sgt said we feel sorry because they where sailor's and they were just doing there job .....we used to followed them everywhere.! Not so secretive as they think 🤔
@manicansale
@manicansale 9 месяцев назад
I am going to assume there Submarine is junk just like all their other Technology. If you Learned anything from ukraine. Russia's military is nowhere near on par with the united states. I'll give him their jamming technology. It works so good they jam their own military into being totally ineffective lmao.
@theemissary1313
@theemissary1313 9 месяцев назад
Yup. No matter the sides, there's a lot of camaraderie that transcends borders. Also, i sometimes wonder if all nuclear subs operate in a giant conga line in the oceans, all sneakily following and spying on the one in front... 😂😂😂
@jed-henrywitkowski6470
@jed-henrywitkowski6470 9 месяцев назад
​@@theemissary1313Russki season. Neit! Yankee season.
@jamesgornall5731
@jamesgornall5731 9 месяцев назад
Both sides had nuclear submarine tragedies. Its not something that sailors are ever happy at hearing about.
@manhoosnick
@manhoosnick 9 месяцев назад
​@@jamesgornall5731 majority os there for the pay cheque, none of us wants to fight, ok maybe on play station online but thats it.
@WorldTravelerCooking
@WorldTravelerCooking 8 месяцев назад
Regarding the tsunami claim, it's worth remembering that the Halifax Tsunami of 1917 was caused by 2.9 kilotons of munitions going off accidentally in the Halifax harbor after a munitions ship collided with a relief ship. The tsunami was 18 meters above the high water mark. A nuclear torpedo absolutely could cause such a tsunami, though it would likely not be as massive as claimed.
@NoNameForNone
@NoNameForNone 8 месяцев назад
As with that explosion (the 18m part was nearest to shore), you'd have to do it in shallow water, at which point the blast itself far outreaches any tsunami you can create since there is insufficient water available to matter (and most of it is vaporized). Remember that it takes about a 10-100 gigatons (3 to 4 order of magnitude more) to create any decent tsunami event in deep water, aka a massive earthquake.
@timothyhosek3551
@timothyhosek3551 6 месяцев назад
Well if they were to launch a tsunami, they would be hit by it as well they have alot of coastline right there too. Soo there that...
@spicesmuggler2452
@spicesmuggler2452 4 месяца назад
​@@timothyhosek3551 Thats false
@T8OOM1O9
@T8OOM1O9 3 месяца назад
Sadly most people have no real idea how nuclear explosion work and also have understanding problem of simple description. There is claim about making nuclear tsunami. So the water waves would be high for sure taking under consideration how big this torpedo is. But mostly it would generate huge shockwave that certainly would waste costal cities and naval bases without issue. And since it would be fired from huge distance then no ,sub itself wouldn't be damaged.
@Prepper_Raider
@Prepper_Raider Месяц назад
You need to consider some basic math here... The 'Tsar Bomba' that was detonated by Russia in 1961 was 50mt. Let us say for a moment that a Russia is only using a 50mt nuke and detonated it underwater at a depth of 600-800 meters. Do you not think that's not going to create a massive tsunami? That would push 'at least' 350 billion metric tons of water skyward. So yes, that would 100% absolutely produce a very large tsunami and furthermore, it would be moving at a much greater speed than a normal tsunami.
@AdamosDad
@AdamosDad 9 месяцев назад
“Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.”
@PabloP169
@PabloP169 9 месяцев назад
One thing that immediately come to mind, is the Poseidon torpedo is able to operate in such an independent mode, then they could operate from ANY ship or from a shore base and the massive Belgorod mother ship would not be required or even desired.
@Daokl
@Daokl 9 месяцев назад
It gives uncertainty. Sure you can put it on ship or in building, but one can closely monitor said ship or building 24/7 and know how many torpedoes are there and if one was launched. With mothership - it would go underwater and maybe drop some during it's long patrol. So preemptive or false flag strike on ship or building could end such threat, but strike on mothership open you to the possibility that some nukes chilling near ocean floor would activate at unknown time and attack unknown target. But Russia certainly has at least one regular ship capable of launching and recovering Poseidon.
@mattmatt6572
@mattmatt6572 9 месяцев назад
America could see everything in the ocean during the cold War using elf/ extreme low frequency I would sure imagine by now they have more advanced systems to watch the ocen by means of satellites. This guy has no clue saying we don't know where this stuff is America knows all!
@Oktokolo
@Oktokolo 9 месяцев назад
The sub offers second strike capability. That is very important for a country which has a second strike doctrine and therefore is unlikely to fire its nukes first. And it's multipurpose. it will likely never be used in an actual nucular war. But it will surely be used for some spying and maybe even the classic special military operation (no, not that one). Today's Russia isn't the Soviet Union. Today everything is multipurpose. Just carrying nukes for a war that is unlikely to actually happen doesn't cut it anymore. Whether the sub itself is actually operational though... who knows. It's still one of the most corrupt countries on earth.
@nvelsen1975
@nvelsen1975 9 месяцев назад
At the same time Russia claims it uses Glonass to navigate that mode..... Yeah, Glonass, their dollar store GPS immitation that's inaccurate, near-useless in the southern hemisphere, doesn't work deep underwater and makes anything using it on the surface or shallowly, fairly easy to track and even easier to disrupt. Not to mention slapping a couple satelites out the sky would cripple the Poseidon immediatly in that case.
@Heisenberg2A
@Heisenberg2A 9 месяцев назад
​@@nvelsen1975you don't need to be very accurate for a nuclear attack.
@motorbikemadness5773
@motorbikemadness5773 9 месяцев назад
"It's laying off the coast of one of our largest cities and listening to our rock n roll, while it conducts missile drills, and when it is finished the only sound we will hear is their laughter. After this they sail to Havana where the weather is warm and so is the comradeship."
@phantomechelon3628
@phantomechelon3628 2 месяца назад
They'll probably make sure they don't appoint a renegade Lithuanian captain (especially if he has a Scottish accent)!
@drgonzo305
@drgonzo305 9 месяцев назад
The idea that a nuke can create a meaningful tsunami is ridiculous. It might make a decent sized wave but it’s going to instantly vaporize far more water than it will push + a nuclear blast is omnidirectional meaning it will push as much water away from its target and into the air and the sea floor. The U.S. tested this concept in the 50’s, you can watch the video on RU-vid. It would be way more effective against a carrier strike group but way less effective than an air burst. I think like the Su-57 or T-14, this weapon’s main use is propaganda
@piotrd.4850
@piotrd.4850 9 месяцев назад
On it self - no. But if it triggers massive landslide.... in any case: Belograd is apparently successor of specialized submarines for reserch, espionage and similar tasks.
@tarilya
@tarilya 9 месяцев назад
Су-57 лучший боевой самолёт
@Rake3577
@Rake3577 9 месяцев назад
The Su 57 has taken out Ukrainian Mig 29s and Su 27s from over 200km with the R37M all the way from Russian airspace too, the F22 so far has killed a balloon….
@drgonzo305
@drgonzo305 9 месяцев назад
@@Rake3577 taking out a mig-29 or a su-27 is nothing to brag about. That was also in the open days of the war, since then the Ukrainians have learned to easily dodge those missiles and Russia won’t even get close to Ukrainian airspace with the su-57 now because American awacs can see them from Poland. It’s a pretty capable 4+ gen fighter and it’s very good at airshows
@jakemocci3953
@jakemocci3953 9 месяцев назад
I think the couple kilometer wide void suddenly appearing in the water column is what is supposed to make the tsunami. These things are made to blow in deep water.
@houssamaamoum8232
@houssamaamoum8232 9 месяцев назад
He said "I can only imagine this is where the catchy song Baby Shark came from which a weapon of mass destruction on its own" while keeping a poker face.
@gdutfulkbhh7537
@gdutfulkbhh7537 9 месяцев назад
Russia’s largest submarine is the Moskva, surely?
@dzhellek
@dzhellek 9 месяцев назад
I can see it now....... A russian built, three decade old, nuclear powered, nuclear armed submarine operated by conscripts from a nearby prison. What could possibly go wrong?
@AlexanderTch
@AlexanderTch 9 месяцев назад
YOu lie, pichka. It's not 3 decades old. Its the most modern sub on earth. And RUssian submarines never use conscripts. only professional contractors. IF you want it can checked on your country.
@SpinoDude88
@SpinoDude88 9 месяцев назад
They don't use conscripts for stuff like this, only infantry.
@dzhellek
@dzhellek 9 месяцев назад
@@SpinoDude88 Yes, and their nuclear safety record is perfect. Just ask them.
@ZeroOne-mp1qe
@ZeroOne-mp1qe 9 месяцев назад
​@@AlexanderTch someone angered the vatnik bots lmao
@shkoddi
@shkoddi 9 месяцев назад
Oh. I forgot, the idiots from which country lost atomic bombs during a normal flight in their country? I think it's the USA?
@MisterWileyOne
@MisterWileyOne 9 месяцев назад
Captain Ramius: Hey, Ryan, be careful what you shoot at. Most things in here don't react too well to bullets.
@Hybris51129
@Hybris51129 9 месяцев назад
"I have to be careful at what **I** shoot at?!"
@mickmccrory8534
@mickmccrory8534 8 месяцев назад
Where is the sub...? It's hiding in a river, in Maine.
@macharper8214
@macharper8214 9 месяцев назад
Russia ALWAYS exaggerates about its military capabilities.
@wayausofbounds9255
@wayausofbounds9255 9 месяцев назад
This torpedo should be called the Tolstoy, because it's a complete work of fiction presented as fact.
@dakwaktongnan7618
@dakwaktongnan7618 8 месяцев назад
Well if Physics is fiction then yeah
@stickiedmin6508
@stickiedmin6508 7 месяцев назад
@@dakwaktongnan7618 No, not physics, just the torpedo. It doesn't exist.
@hardcaselj111
@hardcaselj111 5 месяцев назад
You can tell a russian is lying by the fact that they are talking
@tonnywildweasel8138
@tonnywildweasel8138 9 месяцев назад
I like the concept of a sub mothership though.
@pierredelecto7069
@pierredelecto7069 9 месяцев назад
We got one too for a seal team. A modified torpedo tube launches a submersible that can tamper with undersea cables and can also be used to put seals behind enemy lines.
@thecircusfreak5364
@thecircusfreak5364 9 месяцев назад
@@pierredelecto7069or plant demo charges on pipelines where the president totally doesn’t brag about it months before it blows.
@jamesocker5235
@jamesocker5235 9 месяцев назад
We already have one
@damirculic9352
@damirculic9352 3 месяца назад
Never underestimate your enemy !
@xyanide1986
@xyanide1986 9 месяцев назад
From what i've been seeing, most of these high-tech showcases are too difficult and expensive to manage multiples of. Their damn black sea flagship had its defense system partially stripped for parts and most of its defenses couldn't be turned on at the same time. There's a lot of keeping up appearances involved.
@danieln6700
@danieln6700 9 месяцев назад
Don't have enough to do to much with them.
@matthewnovak3095
@matthewnovak3095 9 месяцев назад
Yeah the Moskva had the issue where when the radar was on you couldn’t use your radio, so you had to choose between comms and knowing if there was missiles coming at you. And only one of its CIWS was working
@mrvwbug4423
@mrvwbug4423 9 месяцев назад
Moskva was also a relic of the 70s, it was built as a cheaper alternative to the ultra expensive and highly problematic Kirov battlecruiser. The Kirovs have spent more time in port being fixed than actually underway and they were built in the late 70s/early 80s, and have the laughable distinction of being a nuclear powered cruiser that has such a weak reactor that it has gas turbine engines to provide additional power and can only manage 15kts under nuclear power and 30kts under both nuclear and gas turbine power, while burning fuel at an insane rate and creating a distinctive black smoke cloud it's the "nuclear ship that smokes"
@BL-yj2wp
@BL-yj2wp 2 месяца назад
@@mrvwbug4423 Moskwa entered service in 1982 and was comprehensively modernised just two years before it was sunk. The thing was a pile of junk despite the Russian gouvernment spending a ton of money on it - that only ever made it to summer houses and luxury cars.
@Rudizel
@Rudizel 9 месяцев назад
This thing has been tinkered on so many times by so many contractors that i would seriously question its safety.
@AlexanderTch
@AlexanderTch 9 месяцев назад
It's just your dream. You hate Russia and it makes your soul sick. So, you try to tell bad things about Russia and its weapons . So, it makes you calm. But your country is going down. YOu'll see.
@NJbldragon
@NJbldragon 9 месяцев назад
I'm wondering if they still have the same type of torpedoes on it that exploded and made the Kursk sink itself
@AlexanderTch
@AlexanderTch 9 месяцев назад
@@NJbldragon We have different types of torpedoes, dont' worry. And types are different from that that sank US Submarine Scorpion some time ago.
@JoshJones-37334
@JoshJones-37334 9 месяцев назад
@@AlexanderTch”some time ago”, lol!! You think? That was in 1968: ten years before I was born and my kid just finished law school.
@lubodishlqnov9454
@lubodishlqnov9454 9 месяцев назад
UK use glue to fix subs!!!And u say this????
@KC-rt4hp
@KC-rt4hp 8 месяцев назад
Russia: Let's build one really big sub that could be taken out by a single torpedo or self-inflicted accident instead of 3-4 smaller specialized subs that are harder to track. Great idea!
@rjhick1
@rjhick1 9 месяцев назад
I just love how you title everything coming Russia as "Way worse than you think" 😂
@_Coffee4Closers
@_Coffee4Closers 9 месяцев назад
Well, sometimes facts are a stingy thing.
@echeogo3928
@echeogo3928 9 месяцев назад
It's one of the main reasons I come to the comments section of RU-vid. To listen to hilarious arrogant ignorance spewing from the mouths of these worshippers of Western military tech. Obviously no military machine built outside the West ever works.
@tomcharter4127
@tomcharter4127 9 месяцев назад
Dude your graphics are my favorite reminds me of want me and my some of my class mates used to do for our journalism class. Deliver serious info in the corniest way possible. Hilarious thanks for the videos. Somehow your humor tamps down my ex”T”istential doom fear. Thank you for your work good stuff.
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 9 месяцев назад
my wording is very difficult haha thank you for the kind words man I really appreciate it !
@enshk79
@enshk79 9 месяцев назад
@@Taskandpurposedon’t compliment the beta male crappy, please 🙄
@brotherwulfgar
@brotherwulfgar 9 месяцев назад
“Each the size of a school bus” My brain: wow that’s a lot of children…
@iielysiumx5811
@iielysiumx5811 9 месяцев назад
If russias “5th gen fighters” are anything to go by (they don’t actually exist) then I doubt this exists or ever will
@nicholascecil6733
@nicholascecil6733 9 месяцев назад
Cappy churning out the content, lovin the pace
@paulheydarian1281
@paulheydarian1281 9 месяцев назад
As long as he's not churning out crappy propaganda, he's doing fine.😮
@turtle1723
@turtle1723 9 месяцев назад
​@@paulheydarian1281or stealing other RU-vid scripts word for word
@madhatter2465
@madhatter2465 8 месяцев назад
That torpedo sounds like a wet dream just like they are the best army in the world.
@iankuah8606
@iankuah8606 6 месяцев назад
Second best army in Ukraine!😂😂
@JonathanDickson-w2g
@JonathanDickson-w2g 3 месяца назад
O those aircraft carrier s r sitting ducks were Gona lose allthem
@Prepper_Raider
@Prepper_Raider Месяц назад
Torpedo's* more than 1. Named Poseidon and last I checked, Russia produced a rather powerful 'bomba' in 1961. I would have to assume they can still produce this size of a bomb.
@T33Inside
@T33Inside 9 месяцев назад
3:11 Crimea was annexed from Ukraine, it is not a part of russia!
@tarilya
@tarilya 9 месяцев назад
Сколько ни говори халва, во рту от этого слаще не станет
@FatMaul
@FatMaul 9 месяцев назад
While unfortunate, until the Ukraine take it back, it’s part of Russia now.
@trikyy7238
@trikyy7238 9 месяцев назад
I stole your car, it's mine now.
@KekusMagnus
@KekusMagnus 9 месяцев назад
cope
@theblackspark2644
@theblackspark2644 9 месяцев назад
Sounds like business as usual for European countries, constant at war.
@jmpattillo
@jmpattillo 9 месяцев назад
The Poseidon is also supposed to use a cobalt salted nuke, essentially acting as a radiological second-strike to render port cities uninhabitable to 100 years or so.
@dananorth895
@dananorth895 9 месяцев назад
As well as everything/everyone downwind. Putie bird obviously thinks he's safe in his underground bunker "cage".
@jmpattillo
@jmpattillo 9 месяцев назад
@@dananorth895 What especially f-d up is the nuclear powered cruise missile they are supposedly trying to develop. How irresponsible to you have to be to design a flying nuclear reactor. The US played around with the idea in the 50s and realized how insane it was.
@spencerstevens2175
@spencerstevens2175 9 месяцев назад
I heard it's cobalt thorium g
@frutt5k
@frutt5k 9 месяцев назад
@@spencerstevens2175 you definitely learned to love the bomb.
@steveb890
@steveb890 9 месяцев назад
TASS even said it was a regular 2MT device .... totally impossible to create a 500mt tidal wave !
@hanovergreen4091
@hanovergreen4091 9 месяцев назад
I see two guys in Moscow, smoking a doobie, saying "Yeah! That's cool man. But what if it could do x? Oh man! That would be sooo sweet.Let's say that!".
@thor3279
@thor3279 5 месяцев назад
Or involving Homer Simpson in the design
@collinmanning8334
@collinmanning8334 9 месяцев назад
Seeing something that big go 37mph would be nutty lol
@tackyinbention6248
@tackyinbention6248 9 месяцев назад
Wait, wouldnt the poseidon's high speed cavitation thingy contradict its slow movement stealth abilities
@usonumabeach300
@usonumabeach300 9 месяцев назад
Depends on how fast they decide to move it
@christopherconard2831
@christopherconard2831 9 месяцев назад
Use the high speed setting for a final run. Slow speed to creep towards the target area.
@hanswust6972
@hanswust6972 9 месяцев назад
​@@christopherconard2831: You do know what you speak about!
@ensporium8857
@ensporium8857 9 месяцев назад
How big - YES Stealth - Whats That
@SpiritofEasternAirLines
@SpiritofEasternAirLines 9 месяцев назад
This may have been said… Why do you need a sub when the Poseidon can travel 10k miles. Especially, if the torpedo can be recalled and return on its own. Why not just drop the sub in the water and let it go.
@AldoSchmedack
@AldoSchmedack 9 месяцев назад
Maybe the whole project and capabilities are thus exagerated or even false...
@sadus5415
@sadus5415 9 месяцев назад
i think its interesting Russia never covered up the propeller for the Belgorod like other navies do for the newest subs, i wonder why that was?
@SlinkyTWF
@SlinkyTWF 9 месяцев назад
Poor OPSEC.
@OmniaQuaeVidemus
@OmniaQuaeVidemus 9 месяцев назад
Because it's not a newest sub. It's a refitted older sub.
@Riceball01
@Riceball01 9 месяцев назад
Very interesting video and great delivery. You've come a long way and I like that you're not using any odd inflections in this vidoe, like you have in many previous videos. Keep up the good wrok and do more videos like this where you speak in a normal conversational tone without any odd inflections in your voice.
@williamjenman6902
@williamjenman6902 9 месяцев назад
You're using a map that shows Crimea as part of Russia. Maybe the Donbass too? Please check and amend.
@АлексейФадеев-у2д
@АлексейФадеев-у2д 9 месяцев назад
У нас говорят ; Поздно пить касторку , если пациент умер
@tarilya
@tarilya 9 месяцев назад
Запорожье и Херсон ещё Россия
@Amradar123
@Amradar123 9 месяцев назад
​@tarasenkoilya Kherson? Hmmm, the russian invaders left the city and they have a hard time defending the south bank ATM.
@jw325
@jw325 9 месяцев назад
As we have all seen in Ukraine with Russian military kit, it's good on paper but in the real world it never lives up. I'm starting to think that 90% of the Russians nukes wont even make it out of their silos or subs if they were launched
@natteft6593
@natteft6593 9 месяцев назад
Have you changed your diaper?
@jw325
@jw325 9 месяцев назад
@@natteft6593 many what's your point? Your comment seems to have nothing to do with my original comment. Are you hinting that the Russian military needs their diapers changed?
@nolongerblocked6210
@nolongerblocked6210 9 месяцев назад
🎯🎯💯 bingo!! Nukes especially 30-50yr old ones need upkeep/maintenance to make sure they're still ready for use & any financing set aside for maintenance in Russia would be the first thing the oligarchs would embezzle... as evidenced by the Moskva, the Kuznetsov & all of Russia's navy. I've kinda thought this was the case since the early 2000s when all the oligarchs & their yachts started becoming noticeable... the Ukraine war has undoubtedly confirmed it
@truth2774
@truth2774 9 месяцев назад
Their own testing backs this up in the last 4 years. Rather likely.
@natteft6593
@natteft6593 9 месяцев назад
@@jw325 I insist you change your diaper. It smells
@jblob5764
@jblob5764 9 месяцев назад
"Imitates the sound of civilian ships" aka couldn't afford to engineer it to be quiet
@mandrac2
@mandrac2 4 месяца назад
Isn't Impersonating civilian ship a war crime btw?
@pldvs
@pldvs 9 месяцев назад
I thought Poseidon, detonated off the coast underwater, was their 'secret' weapon?
@macmcleod1188
@macmcleod1188 9 месяцев назад
Poseidon was vranyo. That is the Russian word for when Russians tell you a lie and they know that you know they're lying. It's kind of like Eskimos having multiple words for snow.
@TKUA11
@TKUA11 9 месяцев назад
@@macmcleod1188agreed. Russians are having an egg shortage, how do they expect to build high tech weapons when they can’t even figure out how to source chicken feed?
@hieronymusbutts7349
@hieronymusbutts7349 9 месяцев назад
​​​@@macmcleod1188 it's "vranyo," and while you're not wrong, it's an incomplete definition. Vranyo is: I'm lying, you know it, I know you know it, we both know this is bullshit *but you will* engage with it and nod along as if it is for real. Edit: a more succinct definition is "mutually cooperative horseshit" - it requires both parties to genuinely engage in the same fairy tale, both knowing it is nonsense.
@macmcleod1188
@macmcleod1188 9 месяцев назад
@@TKUA11 the egg Market is really weird right now. We found that the major Western egg companies were colluding on prices and ripping us off the tune of 25% higher prices and claiming it was inflation when it was just excess profits.
@AlexanderTch
@AlexanderTch 9 месяцев назад
It's not secret. Who said it was secret. Putin announced it for entire globe. But of course technical details are secret and not many people know it.
@Joey_Liu
@Joey_Liu 9 месяцев назад
I am getting Hunt for Red October 2 Vibes right now! Submarine warfare is fascinating to study. Whether or not Russia has this capability, it's just fun to study and talk about it. Thanks for another educational video Capy!
@nexpro6118
@nexpro6118 9 месяцев назад
Thank you for being, 1 of just 6 people who have common sense and doesn't just throw out his or her personal opinions as if they are facts....I love you lol
@R.Sole88109
@R.Sole88109 9 месяцев назад
I'm getting Kursk sub vibes from it.
@KonradvonHotzendorf
@KonradvonHotzendorf 9 месяцев назад
That was a horrible PC game
@suki4410
@suki4410 9 месяцев назад
I have just spilled my tea for you, on the floor,comrade Joey.
@miroslavstafi
@miroslavstafi 4 месяца назад
What Happened to Russia's Doomsday Submarine? - She's been subjacked
@Chiller11
@Chiller11 9 месяцев назад
The Russian decisions are reminiscent of Nazi Germany’s fixation with super weapons late in WW2. The hope was that these weapons would be so devastating that they would force their enemies to sue for peace. They made some ground breaking advancements with V2 rockets, jet aircraft etc but the weapons were too late and too few in number to have an impact.
@modarkthemauler
@modarkthemauler 9 месяцев назад
Only russia is not nearly as technologically advanced as the no no germans were at the time compared to their adversaries.
@tarilya
@tarilya 9 месяцев назад
Ага, только у России больше всего ядерного оружия и пипец приходит Украине. A США проигрывают стратегическую гонку Китаю. А так всё хорошо, прекрасная Маркиза
@donohirst
@donohirst 9 месяцев назад
​@@tarilyaone could have the most Kalashnikovs as well, but with no firing pins, they're useless! Tritium needs regular replacement, solid fuel has a shelf life, all things that require funding, and then oversight to see that funding goes where it's supposed to, corruption is the first enemy Russia needs to defeat before it has a chance anywhere else lol
@derdude9654
@derdude9654 9 месяцев назад
​@@tarilyafirst of all, Russia lost any race anyway, it will be dominated by China. If China will be the world dominating power? We will see, doubt it so.
@MaziarYousefi
@MaziarYousefi 9 месяцев назад
Well Germany actually built some of those weapons, V-1, V-2, Me-262,... These three weapons became three different powerful branches, Cruise missiles, Ballistic missiles and Jet Fighters.
@anotherbacklog
@anotherbacklog 9 месяцев назад
We are one step closer to the Outer Haven. Nuclear armed bipedal tanks must be a matter of time.
@Kilo3Cav19K
@Kilo3Cav19K 6 месяцев назад
Yooo Metal Gear reference lets goooo
@antonnurwald5700
@antonnurwald5700 Месяц назад
Cappy saying "T-14" and showing T-34 and T-72 is its own kind of trolling.
@watchthe1369
@watchthe1369 9 месяцев назад
LoL, What coastal city could we live without? San Francisco? New York? That might actually be helpful....
@messagesystem333
@messagesystem333 9 месяцев назад
Washington District of Criminals.
@user-McGiver
@user-McGiver 9 месяцев назад
S.F
@matthewnovak3095
@matthewnovak3095 9 месяцев назад
Los Angeles
@Matt-xc6sp
@Matt-xc6sp 9 месяцев назад
That’s an expensive looking future coral reef
@killman369547
@killman369547 9 месяцев назад
Except this thing can basically kill you from beyond the grave if it gets one of those nuclear torpedoes away.
@Matt-xc6sp
@Matt-xc6sp 9 месяцев назад
@@killman369547 we know exactly where this sub is and what it is doing at all times. We have defense systems that can handle hundreds of such warheads launched at once. This isn’t insurgents in a cave. This is exactly what we’re prepared to deal with.
@Suckmabalzz
@Suckmabalzz 9 месяцев назад
@@Matt-xc6sp remember when the soviets manage to take a picture of the liberty statue from their sub in the cold war?, i dont think you are safe from the nuke chief
@Matt-xc6sp
@Matt-xc6sp 9 месяцев назад
@@Suckmabalzz “the liberty statute” Condolences on you not being American lol Also fat lot of good it did them. Really gave the soviets a leg up and helped them win the Cold War. Wait. We won that one.
@speedstick-q3o
@speedstick-q3o 9 месяцев назад
the UK know's where every sub in the world is 24-7 seen from space,,, under ice,,,,, deep in the water,,,,, and in rough seas ... every sub everywhere all the time
@joshmangan4468
@joshmangan4468 9 месяцев назад
Russias new submarine is the first new Russian vessel that actually is supposed to be underwater
@mattwoodard2535
@mattwoodard2535 9 месяцев назад
Super cavitation torpedoes make a hell of a lot of noise and will very easy to pick up. Also all the noise blinds the torpedo so it can't target anything. sm
@JoseJBronze
@JoseJBronze 9 месяцев назад
Just imagine none of the Russian engineers thought of that... and you'll even have to completely avoid listening carefully to this video to come to your conclusion too. Good job!
@Zacho5
@Zacho5 9 месяцев назад
They dont have homing heads, or at least the verson the soviets used. It just went out a set range and set its nuke off. Newer ones Russia and Germany use have homing, but the torpedo has to slow down to get a fix and then speed back up for the attack run.
@GianmarioScotti
@GianmarioScotti 9 месяцев назад
I, too, am usually left submarineless.
@I-rizzWristWash
@I-rizzWristWash 9 месяцев назад
I nominate L.A.
@leunammanuel6295
@leunammanuel6295 9 месяцев назад
Ok ok, im confuse now Cappy, for Poseidon's warhead, is it 100 KILOTONS??? (which is highly probable to fit on the small, nuke powered uuv) or 100 MEGATONS (designed power of TSAR BOMBA)
@jettrd_utilitychnl4230
@jettrd_utilitychnl4230 9 месяцев назад
it is M. 100 Megatons of course
@claycollins8973
@claycollins8973 9 месяцев назад
Mega
@piotrd.4850
@piotrd.4850 9 месяцев назад
Belograd has been in construction since 90s - same class as Kursk. It had gone through numerous redesgins to 949AM variant and now is rough analogue of US SSN-23 Jimmy Carter :specialized boat built on regular design of combat vessel. PS: on thumbnail there's 941 - Typhoon.
@AlexanderTch
@AlexanderTch 9 месяцев назад
You lie. USA does not have anything similar to Oskar-II Russian subs. Belgorod just looks similar but some is compleltely new , even nuclear reactor is different.
@leojohn1615
@leojohn1615 9 месяцев назад
@@AlexanderTch the ohio class SSGN does the exact same thing as the belgorod was designed to before the collapse of the soviet union as for after its redesign all it really does is be a mothership for smaller subs/torps something the jimmy carter is also able to do though on a smaller scale. The reality is the west has no need of that kind of capability because unlike Russia we rule the worlds oceans with surface fleets and have large enough fleets of boomers to have a continuous SSBN deterrent.
@AlexanderTch
@AlexanderTch 9 месяцев назад
@@leojohn1615 You lie, or you don't know simple things. Ohio class is strategic intercontinental ballsistic missiles carrier. It's counterpart of Russian Delta-IV and Delta-III subs. Ohio are not intentended to do anti -ship strikes. Belgorod is Oskar-II class sub. It does not carry any strategic missiles. It carried 24 ! long range heavy anti ship missiles. So, they are supposed to destroy american ships, first of all aicrfaft-carrying groups. So, it was intended for naval battles, not for nuclear strikes. Ohio class was designed in 70s, ancient sub, and due to lack of finances and engineers to build something new, Americans try to update to for other tasks, with no big success. Don't worry, Russia also has subs that are mother ships for tiny submarines. Programs are very classified like those about subs with very deep diving abilities.
@leojohn1615
@leojohn1615 9 месяцев назад
@@AlexanderTch while yes the Ohio class were originally designed as SSBNs to carry nuclear missiles the first four were refitted to carry tomahawk cruise missiles. While tomahawks are mostly designed to hit land based targets the block Va version is capable of anti ship targeting. Not to mention the Virginia class subs which all carry VLS tubes fitted with tomahawk missiles. As for the age of the Ohio class subs they may be old but they are still substantially quieter than most boats.
@charlescarmichael1124
@charlescarmichael1124 9 месяцев назад
@@leojohn1615. For perspective... the ohio class subs are so quiet, they are literally a hole in the water. They are quieter than the ambient noise around them. They can literally cruise off the side of the best Russian sub and they would never know they were there. Been done. They are the Raptor of the water. No one, NO other sub even comes close.
@travisedmonds4214
@travisedmonds4214 9 месяцев назад
If the torpedo is nuclear powered with 7 months endurance and uses AI, why does it need to be launched from a submarine at all? Couldn't they just treat it as an unmanned submersible in its own right and just lauch it from a shipyard? Then size wouldn't be an issue and only having 1 sub that can launch them wouldnt be either. It seems more kamikaze unmanned sub than torpedo anyway.
@isavana33
@isavana33 9 месяцев назад
This is very good, and most importantly, it is important that Westerners think what a bad weapon Russia has! It's not in Iraq to "fight" with a bunch of people with machine guns :) Keep up the good work :)
@hivelx
@hivelx 9 месяцев назад
Good to see so many nuclear defense experts in the comments section
@yurkofess3825
@yurkofess3825 9 месяцев назад
Yep. Braggin about russian search-and-rescue special purpose sub ability to stand against 18 US Ohio's
@highrx
@highrx 9 месяцев назад
The best part is, all the jobs that are building and maintaining all of the projects to beat the other projects. We can’t beat Cancer, ALS, or Dementia, but we can make a lot stuff that ends up in a desert in 30 years.
@hawlitakerful
@hawlitakerful 9 месяцев назад
It's the worst feeling in the world to be heartbroken but being heartbroken and submarineless is a horrible fate
@MrTangolizard
@MrTangolizard 9 месяцев назад
I once spoke to an engineer who worked on subs and he said on day one the Russian nuclear subs are very good but by year 2 there as noisy as a bag of spanner’s in a tumble dryer
@MostlyPennyCat
@MostlyPennyCat 9 месяцев назад
Exactly, it might be good new but they can't/won't maintain it. Too busy underfunding the next white elephant
@keefymckeefface8330
@keefymckeefface8330 9 месяцев назад
@@hhkk6155 You showing you know nothing nice and plain- DE subs van be the quietest of all- they font need reactor coolant pumps running all the time, amongst other things. And tankers dont make noise 500 feet down.
@MrTangolizard
@MrTangolizard 9 месяцев назад
@@hhkk6155 there is but subs are detected by the noise they make the idea is to make your sub as quiet as possible the problem Russia has is maintenance they do very little this causes them to be noisy
@-Katastrophe
@-Katastrophe 9 месяцев назад
Russia should be careful about lying.
@patverum9051
@patverum9051 9 месяцев назад
Why? Everyone knows lying is natural for them, the truth doesn't even EXIST in russia.
@Крайвус
@Крайвус 9 месяцев назад
Don't you worry, all the lying was reserved by the White House, Pentagon and Brussels a hundred years in advance.
@glennpettersson9002
@glennpettersson9002 9 месяцев назад
"Sounds like a Tom Clancy novel I would read half of" 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@howardmallisonii503
@howardmallisonii503 9 месяцев назад
About 12:23: Russian tech is usually less precise than other tech. I'd be VERY leery of letting that torpedo loiter for 7ish months and then calling it home for refurbishment. What if it gets its wires crossed and thinks the home port is supposed to be the target? Oops...
@tylercochell2253
@tylercochell2253 Месяц назад
The good news is that if we develop ASW methods capable of countering that nuclear torpedo they would also be a terror for enemy submarines.
@williamgrand9724
@williamgrand9724 8 месяцев назад
"For producing their latest military technologies at the highest absolute quality" **shows the Kuznetsov**
@tomandtinadixon
@tomandtinadixon 9 месяцев назад
My concern is that with the sorts of range the Poseidon has, is a submarine deployment platform strictly necessary? Think modified cargo ships and tankers. A straight down dive prior to engaging propulsion systems is a disturbing concept, and very possible. Kind of like spawning salmon that return home from where ever. Soooo, where are they now?
@usonumabeach300
@usonumabeach300 9 месяцев назад
Nuclear weapons launched from submarines give effectively zero warning or time to respond or defend. If a nuke is launched at DC from 200 miles offshore, they have literal seconds. This is why they're a part of the US nuclear triad (land launched ICBMs, nuclear submarines, and bombers). Russia and China have a 4th method: truck launched systems.
@daniel_dumile
@daniel_dumile 9 месяцев назад
You have to justify your massive expensive military projects by shoehorning new capabilities There also might be political issues hiding nuclear weapons in civilian ships
@jakemocci3953
@jakemocci3953 9 месяцев назад
Buddy, they could roll it off a Murmansk beach, it has years of loitering time.
@nexpro6118
@nexpro6118 9 месяцев назад
​@@daniel_dumile​ Russia only has 1 of these is because, Russia can't even afford to have 1 of these lol. Let alone afford to properly maintain just 1. Haha. Also...Russian subs are notoriously dangerous because Russia doesn't not properly maintain their military equipment...as we're seeing now with with Russian equipment in Ukraine. Blows my mind how some people claim that Russian military equipment is so great when Russia can't even defeat Ukraine lol.Yes, Ukraine is getting military equipment from NATO, but....Russia has their equipment that they have that was intended to defeat NATO/US military equipment....and Russia has failed on a MASSIVE level.
@DZ-zc3gi
@DZ-zc3gi 9 месяцев назад
@@nexpro6118 dude, Russia has been financially crippled and controlled by IMF (aka USA) since 2000 so it didn't have any resources to spend on the modern weaponry. It's a miracle they saved nukes and even produced several hypersonic solutions. Now, thanks to the sanctions, Russia broke out of the cage. You can see it even in Ukraine when Russia started very poorly because of the above mentioned reasons but now it dominates the field draining out NATO's resources and capabilities. I do not know what's going to happen but the next several years are going to be very interesting to watch Russia's development.
@Cahigginbotham
@Cahigginbotham 9 месяцев назад
A 100 Megaton Blast is twice as big as the 'tsar bomba'. That explosion was absolutely massive. It would make a huge wave if it was close to shore. It is terrifying, and they absolutely could make a bomb that big. They have been making nukes for almost 80 years.
@manuwilson4695
@manuwilson4695 9 месяцев назад
Even America or any other technologically advanced Western country would have trouble making a weapon like Poseidon reliable enough to be effective. Does anyone out there REALLY believe those Vodka swilling potato munchers could possibly achieve such a feat? 🙄
@strokyuriy1246
@strokyuriy1246 9 месяцев назад
You don't know much about engineering schools in the USSR and Russia. In the 90s, Intel hired many processor development specialists from the USSR. Only after that, Intel was able to create a reliable multi-core processor at home. But similar processors were previously installed on Soviet aircraft in the 80s.
@manuwilson4695
@manuwilson4695 9 месяцев назад
@strokyuriy1246 In the West these things are much more organised, and a greater variety of ideas and people skills are used in developing technology. This is a direct result of greater freedom in Western society. Do you really think the Russians are so clever that the West have to rely on them for brain power?...If that was the case Russia would be ahead in EVERY field of technology. As you well know they are not. Careful what you believe. 🤷‍♂️
@rorynesta7766
@rorynesta7766 9 месяцев назад
there was a western documentary on russian rocket engines,the design of which the USA had tried to make it work but couldnt.But the russians had made it work,think it was a closed loop system and russian scientists/engineers had built the engine for a later US rocket that was sent to space.
@John-hu9qg
@John-hu9qg 9 месяцев назад
Are you taking the piss? 10 years or so after the KGB stole the A-bomb plans from the US the Russians were ahead, working on and detonated a deployable 50MT+ triple stage hydrogen bomb.
@manuwilson4695
@manuwilson4695 9 месяцев назад
@rorynesta7766 Look at the Saturn rockets developed for the Apollo moon missions. Their giant F-1 engines took alot of time and testing to get right. To this day it remains the largest and most reliable liquid propellant, combustion chamber rocket engine ever! The Russians at the time were desperately trying to get their ridiculous multi engined N1 moon rocket going, having nothing but failures. Some of the resulting explosions during testing were the largest conventional (non nuclear) ones in history!
@nexpro6118
@nexpro6118 9 месяцев назад
Russia only has 1 of these is because, Russia can't even afford to have 1 of these lol. Let alone afford to properly maintain just 1. Haha.
@reggierico
@reggierico 9 месяцев назад
"We cannot allow a Poseidon Torpedo Gap!"
@Appachoppa112
@Appachoppa112 9 месяцев назад
China worried bout japanese fish yet their closest ally trynna release literal swimming nukes 😂
@profdc9501
@profdc9501 9 месяцев назад
A weapon that is only useful for attacking soft targets, and not to prevent retaliation, is largely only going to work as a first strike weapon. While it can have a deterrent role, it has no defensive justification and therefore exists only to threaten others, and further destabilizes a retaliatory stance based on launch-on-warning.
@Swingmesideways
@Swingmesideways 9 месяцев назад
And thats what russia want just chaos and death
@fowlerfreak7420
@fowlerfreak7420 9 месяцев назад
Would the ability to nuke major ports with no prior warning not be a defensive justification? I would imagine that capability alone could cripple certain fleets, provided all of the details are true of course.
@profdc9501
@profdc9501 9 месяцев назад
@@fowlerfreak7420 If one uses a nuclear weapon defensively, and has a no first-use policy, then one should use one's nuclear weapons to prevent retaliation, for example, to take out deployed nuclear submarines or ICBM silos. Poseidon can not reach inland targets like ICBMs, and such a weapon like Poseidon is not needed to destroy the submarines in a port, and could not reach a port in time to prevent submarines from departing anyways. It's only purpose is for saber-rattling and threatening a first-strike. Such a large yield weapon is of limited use because while it is very destructive, it is not nearly as destructive as multiple small warheads, and if it was ever actually used, it would not prevent total retaliation from a largely intact nuclear triad. It has no strategic or tactical value, only destabilizes mutually assured destruction, and probably solely exists to convince Russia's people that they have some of the residual military might that has been waning since the fall of the Soviet Union.
@jeffhall3525
@jeffhall3525 8 месяцев назад
Not Worried. Remember Russia's Unstoppable Hypersonic Missile? It was Stopped by our Patriot Missile System. A weapon System Created in the 1980's. The war with the Ukraine has shown Russian Weapon systems are Lacking.
@magnem1043
@magnem1043 9 месяцев назад
Its a carrier just underwater, which is useful against an air superiority focused enemy
@SlinkyTWF
@SlinkyTWF 9 месяцев назад
Until the first P8 arrives on scene.
@Uhtred-the-bold
@Uhtred-the-bold 9 месяцев назад
I love how Russia acts like they’ve just come up with these great ideas like a nuclear powered torpedo or cruise missile. The tech is like 70 years old
@shkoddi
@shkoddi 9 месяцев назад
Cool fact, that USA nuclear tehnology, by comparsion with Russian counterparts - still in 1950.
@Suckmabalzz
@Suckmabalzz 9 месяцев назад
and yet your so called more nuclear advanced country are still relying on russia for its uranium lmao, look at rusatom and see why the west are not putting a ban on russian uranium.
@JoshJones-37334
@JoshJones-37334 9 месяцев назад
@@shkoddisure thing, FSB boy
@John-hu9qg
@John-hu9qg 9 месяцев назад
It is...but getting it to work is not! and the Russians are making serious gains in this area.
@JoshJones-37334
@JoshJones-37334 9 месяцев назад
@@John-hu9qg Lol, are they though? They can’t afford to keep tires on their jets or trucks, or buy body armor for their soldiers. I seriously doubt their shipyards and sub pens are in any better shape than the rest of their military. We’ve all seen that they aren’t even a paper tiger. They are more like a kitten made of dust bunnies.
@tebelel7150
@tebelel7150 8 месяцев назад
Glad to know I’m not the only person who’s only read half of Tom Clancy books 💀 I just never finish them
@MTerrance
@MTerrance 9 месяцев назад
Given the Russian's penchant for grossly overstating their weapons capabilities, I would not be surprised if the nuclear torpedo would end up being a coal-fired tugboat with a max speed of about 10 knots towing a barge with a nuclear warhead duct-taped to it.
@frankrenda2519
@frankrenda2519 9 месяцев назад
i think its the other way around after seeing how bad western weapons were in ukraine i wouldnt talk
@fowlerfreak7420
@fowlerfreak7420 9 месяцев назад
Do you believe everything you read on Reddit? I hear it makes you more smarter.
@leper2698
@leper2698 9 месяцев назад
преувеличивать любите вы и тратить миллиарды напечатанных денег на тупой проект Ф35
@glanguish9390
@glanguish9390 9 месяцев назад
You mean the Russian aircraft carrier "Admiral Kuznetsov" right?!
@nedmerrill
@nedmerrill 9 месяцев назад
16:16 crazy thing about the sinking of losharik sub was that out of 14 crew members 7 were captain first rank one was lt. colonel and all others were at least captain. Like what kind of crew is that 100% top rank officers, not a single seaman. Also losharik doesn't mean small shark, it's a reference to a soviet cartoon about a horse made of balloons. Sharik means balloon and this sub was a bunch of steel spheres daisy-chained together.
@JoseJBronze
@JoseJBronze 9 месяцев назад
... but the rest of the video was accurate, right?... RIGHT?!? LMAO.
@jloiben12
@jloiben12 9 месяцев назад
(1) Is it actually a fifth gen sub? (2) Don’t worry. America knows exactly where that thing is
@what5772
@what5772 9 месяцев назад
The term "Doomsday Submarine" typically refers to Russia's special purpose nuclear-powered submarines known as the Typhoon-class submarines, which were built during the Cold War era. These submarines were designed for strategic deterrence and could carry multiple intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) armed with nuclear warheads. Each Typhoon-class submarine was massive in size, one of the largest submarines ever built, and had the capability to cause catastrophic destruction with its payload of nuclear missiles. However, it's important to note that information and perceptions surrounding these submarines might vary, and the term "Doomsday Submarine" can sometimes be sensationalized in media reports. While these submarines were indeed formidable in terms of their nuclear capabilities, specific details about their current operational status, capabilities, and their exact role in Russia's current naval strategy might not be consistently available or accurately portrayed.
@asatechnics8363
@asatechnics8363 9 месяцев назад
belgorod is a ''borey class sub'' and not ''typhoon class ,just like the new Emperor Alexander III and Krasnoyarsk subs that enterd service YESTERDAY..... just saying
@bluedistortions
@bluedistortions 9 месяцев назад
Exactly. As impressive as their theoretical, day one abilities may (MAY) have been, we know with Russia, the longer they have a system, the more its going to be neglected, and more a danger to their crew and military budget than to anyone else.
@mrvwbug4423
@mrvwbug4423 9 месяцев назад
The last Typhoon was decommissioned earlier this year, and it had been the only one operating since the late 90s. It's a huge boat and is probably the best sub the Russians ever built, but actually carried less missiles than the Ohio class (21 vs 24). Their newest SSBN is the Borei class which went into service in 2016, they're a quick & dirty modification of an Akula class and share the Akula's pathetically low top speed and very dated performance, they also only carry 16 missiles, they'd be sitting ducks for any US attack sub, and they'd be hard pressed to even detect a Seawolf or Virginia.
@mrvwbug4423
@mrvwbug4423 9 месяцев назад
@@asatechnics8363 Incorrect, the Belgorad is a heavily modified Oscar II class. The Borei is a SSBN that is a heavily modified Akula class. The Belgorad and Oscar IIs run circles around the Boreis.
@rickgesell9468
@rickgesell9468 9 месяцев назад
Super-cavitating torpedoes would be very difficult to develop for most applications because the high speed does not allow for any sonar guidance, until and unless it slows down. The assumed application would be nuclear warhead, ie precision not required.
@BlackPill-pu4vi
@BlackPill-pu4vi 9 месяцев назад
The U.S. Mark 48 torpedo is given initial course and speed of a target but, periodically slows to do a search and confirm the original data. If it finds the target far off the predicted position, it commences to do an active search and recalculate a new predicted position. Eventually, it gets close enough to the target hull that its active sonar will get solid returns at high speed. Then it goes in for the kill.
@tallyho8284
@tallyho8284 9 месяцев назад
We’re also going to ignore that super cavitations torpedos work by forming a bubble around the torpedo meaning virtually no guidance. Super fast but short range and for why? A a 50 knot torpedo that can chase down a vessel for 30-40 minutes is just much more useful. As for nuclear delivery, we have SLBMS for that. The only useful nuclear torpedo is the Poseidon.
@1228carlito
@1228carlito 9 месяцев назад
Russia: We have this extremely deadly new weapon that can take out anything!!! Me, very unimpressed after hearing about Russian "Wonder Weapons" that aren't since the 80's: Cool.......so you want to hang out and get lunch today? We could get shawarma.
@StretchMedia
@StretchMedia 9 месяцев назад
Well, i think a torpedo has limited range no matter how big it is. Once a super sized nuclear torpedo was launched and denotated, wouldn't that submarine be affected by the blast/percussive effects/waves etc and most likely overcome by it thus ending its career as a submarine, transitioning into a new coral reef?
@ctuna2011
@ctuna2011 9 месяцев назад
Size = Range I thought they were saying they could use it as and independent weapons platform meaning a launch for just about anywhere.
@AlexanderTch
@AlexanderTch 9 месяцев назад
Lol. It's nuclear powered and can have limit of range. Submarine - carrier will be hundreds and thousands miles away from blast.
@StretchMedia
@StretchMedia 9 месяцев назад
@hhkk6155 Sunflowers for you Ivan!!! I'm convinced nothing Russia has works likes it's supposed to😂
@AlexanderTch
@AlexanderTch 9 месяцев назад
@@StretchMedia Cactuses for you John!!! You can be convinced in anything, including any anti-Russian sick Gobels fantasies that has no connection to reality.
@asatechnics8363
@asatechnics8363 9 месяцев назад
dude ... the poseidon is nuclear powerd ''small nuclear reactor'' .... so it has a REALLY difrent range then a regular torpedo ..... can you research before you speculate ? you liberals tend to speculate a LOT about what you know nothing about .-. i guess that your internet only has the youtube comment section ....
@TheCrazyChet
@TheCrazyChet 9 месяцев назад
Thank you for your work! Now let's get down to the comments and get expert opinions on submarines and battle torpedoes. It's amazing how many of them there are!
@JoseJBronze
@JoseJBronze 9 месяцев назад
LMAO
@GhettoUprising
@GhettoUprising 9 месяцев назад
Finally first
@gabriels6795
@gabriels6795 9 месяцев назад
Who here is team Russia?
@gregb5683
@gregb5683 5 месяцев назад
😂
@samareck2885
@samareck2885 9 месяцев назад
Tom Clancy in here catching strays, lmao
@pRaX85815
@pRaX85815 9 месяцев назад
The Belgorod is also able to babysit your kids, wash dishes, cure cancer, fly and do back flips.
@davefroman4700
@davefroman4700 22 дня назад
Russia has never walked out on ANY of the nuclear treaties. It is the US that has walked away from ALL of them over the last 30 years.
@jwalter81
@jwalter81 9 месяцев назад
An explosion occurred at Nenoska roughly 10 years ago testing that torpedo
@unfilteredwithgallen
@unfilteredwithgallen 9 месяцев назад
From my experience, Russia doesn't "leak" anything unintentionally. Putin was KGB and then FSB, so I will always stand by that we only know what Russia allows us to know about their military capabilities.
@chavdarnaidenov2661
@chavdarnaidenov2661 9 месяцев назад
If you underestimate your enemy, you lose the war. If you overestimate an enemy, you win peace.
@MontegaB
@MontegaB 9 месяцев назад
Russia saying it's "AI-enhanced" is hilarious lol. The belgorod sounds more dangerous to it's crew than to adversaries.
@SevericK_BooM
@SevericK_BooM 9 месяцев назад
I have a hard time believing a country that can’t keep a single aircraft carrier running can do all of that
@thomasjamison2050
@thomasjamison2050 9 месяцев назад
'I never drink water. Fish f*ck in it." - W. C. Fields
@nwmacguy
@nwmacguy 9 месяцев назад
"Andrei, you've lost another submarine?"
Далее
Su-57 - Russia's 5th Gen Fighter
17:53
Просмотров 199 тыс.
Why America’s New Submarine is their Secret Weapon
20:52
Why China Uses this Massive Sniper Grenade Launcher
15:21
What Happened To The Nautilus?
16:57
Просмотров 11 млн
Can the US Navy Rebuild their Fleet?
21:09
Просмотров 1,1 млн
America’s New Doomsday Weapon is Unstoppable
19:03
Просмотров 963 тыс.
Ranking Every Submarine on Earth (that we know about)
14:41
What Happened to China's "Apache Attack Helicopter" ?
21:52
Where is America's Stealth Destroyer?
22:45
Просмотров 1 млн
The Soviet Obsession With Venus Revealed
16:15
Просмотров 2,2 млн