What happens to consciousness when clocks stop? | Bernard Carr & Bernardo Kastrup 

As a 21 year old, I feel very grateful to see the Internet being used for this type of things, seeing professionals and wise people from older generations starting to speak about these issues, even if that many times means they can lose their reputation or even their job. I wish us, the younger generations, can follow your legacy and be the ones to shift the paradigm... I don't think it's impossible, as my generation has overall been raised in a more non-material environment (videos, Internet, videogames, hearing about simulation theories... I'd say we've engaged more with the Internet and information than with the material/physical world). The amount of people my age I've met who think "the material world is just one layer of reality but there's definitely more than just it" is pretty huge I'd say, but not enough. I just wish there were more people from my generation watching this kind of videos.

Bernardo the metaphysical rockstar and Bernard the dark knight of contemporary physics in one room! Long live Essentia Foundation!

This was a fantastic talk. I quit academics because I was hoping for this kind of openness but was met with the exact opposite, unfortunately.

It's all the Bernards in one place! A truly Saintly event!

I just love these philosophical discussions ❤

Absolutely gorgeous Philosophy, physics and Psychology will soon connect with the endeavors in arts. Honoring the lineair worthlessness of words and still searching for the perhaps simplest secrets of our experiences (if we see words as a tool to touch reality with). In the end, transitioning from “either or thinking” I am convinced that the present harnesses every possible concept. Once Consciousness focuses on experiencing time, this allows us to experience potential field energies and particle energy simultaneously, which allows us to transfer idea into matter and vice versa. Fundamentally, conscious experience coinciding with what we call time is flow and timelessness at the same time.

THE BEST CHANNEL I EVER SUBSCRIBED TO!!! This is absolutely mind-blowing! This is a golden moment! It is so great to know that this topic is being acknowledged and actually evolving because as Bernard Carr has stated... Physics need to advance and its almost inevitable that it Will Advance! This episode was priceless. I love your team and I look forward to seeing Even more great discussions. 🙏❤️

I love that Bernard Carr insists on the spiritual aspect in his model. It is consistent with many esoteric traditions. I love the show, I just wish there were fewer interruptions/ads. A great show though. 💝

Note to self. This is not the type of conversation you can listen to- whilst painting a room-and walk away with any degree of understanding. The quality of information is far too dense for casual listening 😅

Just imagine a mountain valley that got completely cut off from the world and has the strange metrological phenomenon of being fully in fog 365 days a year. There are some ‘religions’ in this valley, believing in a blue sky but the philosophers and scientists of this valley are debating and debating, many ‘proofing’ that his blue is just an emerging phenomenon of fog. Then imagine, someone leaning the art of climbing and succeeding to actually see the blue sky. This climber (mystic) would have a very hard time when returning and joining the discussions of the scientific elite of this metaphorical valley. Having experienced blue sky or having NOT experienced blue sky makes a big difference. According to my experience, there comes the point in every journey for understanding reality, where you need to learn how to climb and take the risk to leave the discussion table of reasoning and start your first person experiment.

One of my favourite days of my life was after years of playing guitar, one day i was improvising a guitar solo with a band and i realised i was hearing the music i was going to play before i played it whilst playing in time with the other band members, it was such a cool paradigm shift for my brain.

I've watched this twice, and I'm not ashamed to say I'm not stoned enough to understand this

How you know this is the good kind of debate is because the participants are delighted to hear the reasoning of those who disagree, because everyone wins. Their hope for the discussion is an advancement of knowledge and not an elevation of their ego, or the furthering of a narrative they wish to establish.

This was a GREAT discussion! Thank you all! It's great to see the work progressing into deeper and deeper conversations rather than surface discussions. This is how paradigms are shifted and created!

What a discussion. I truly cannot get enough. Thank you, sincerely!

Thank all of you, gentlemen , for an amazing conversation.. 🙏❤️🌍🌿🕊🎵🎶🎵

Interesting and inspiring. Thank you.

I hope the two of you feel proud for such a wonderful discussion!

Regarding Smolin: as I understand, he thinks reality is truly temporal, so there is real introduction of novelty. The future is open, not already given. The present is special because that's where real dynamics are, where real action is. But it's not a static present, as in certain idealism (which conceives time as illusory and "true reality" as eternal or atemporal hence "static"). It's rather an ever changing present, truly dynamic. So in that regard he's quite close to Bergson’s view, which I summarised in my previous comment.

this conversation is wonderful, thank you very much. looking forward to the video contributions of the conference. thumb up

Pshycdelics taught me, time is infinite and we are all one

To bring up a psychological factor: when somebody experiences dissociation there is an alteration of time and speed. The clock which is ticking objectively can be observed as ticking slower or faster. Combine this with quantum physics and some questions arise if the speed of the ticking clock is objective or an observer is needed to make it objective. So lets say an observer is watching the atomic clock ticking, he can observe the same clock ticking slower or faster.

Fantastic program. Thank you.💝

Great conversation! Glad they can openly disagree with one another and discuss the nuances of their positions.

beautiful, thank you

Thanks to guys like this we are beginning to ask the important questions of life again even in mainstream. Thx chaps

Thank you! I love a good discussion around a big wood table.

Time is what Now, makes for us to play in 😊😊😊

This is extremely deep.

3 great minds taking us to a higher level of thinking. Thanks much 👍

Amazing information. Thank you very much.

Donald Hoffman would have been an awesome addition to this discussion!! ❤️

we are energy trying to see itself❤🙏🙃

A fantastic discussion! Thank you! ❤

Wow- Sunday treat!

Fantastic discussion, thank you!!

Brilliant time experience listening to the discussion!! Thank you!! My little input - ‘there is only consciousness’ all is experienced within it. 😊😊🙏🙏

What great lighting and videography....and content of course but the production is very nice indeed.

I wonder to what extent Bernard Carr has read Henri Bergson. His ideas have some consonance with Bergson's, especially when he talks about different specious presents (Bergson talks about different durations, different "rhythms of time"), however Bergson's view is much better constructed, in my opinion. Bergson's main idea is perhaps the distinction between time as treated in physics (which is in fact spatialised time, time treated as if it was another spatial dimension) and real time, which he calls duration. Spatialised time is purely quantitative (hence measurable and infinitely divisible) and homogeneous (every instant is exactly like every other instant). It's an intellectual abstraction. Duration is qualitative and heterogeneous (it's continuous creation of novelty, of difference: each instant is unique, because it adds novelty to the past) and is a continuous, indivisible whole. You cannot slice it. Duration is truly dynamic, whereas spatialised time is a static "skeleton" drawn out of duration. It's the map not the territory. The whole of reality is a continuous dynamic whole which endures, an indivisible creative process of novelty generation, of innovation (introduction of novelty). Reality as a whole continually changes. It's never the same. It's "qualitative multiplicity", heterogeneity. At its core, reality is essentially dynamism, movement, change. Bergson talk of a "sea of vibrations". But there are two contrasting poles, so to speak: the intensive and the extensive. The extensive is the direction of matter, which has its ideal limit (never actually reached) in geometry, pure space, pure extensiveness. The intensive is the direction of consciousness, of subjective experience. The extensive is characterised by juxtaposition ("things" are laid next to one another, they don't interpenetrate). Instead, the intensive is characterised by interpenetration (think of the Vedic/Buddhist image of Indra's Net: each "part" is interconnected with every other in an interpenetrating whole). Bergson talks of two contrasting tendencies/movements: one of contraction (tension, towards the intensive) and one of relaxation (ex-tension, towards the extensive). On the one end, that of the extensive, there is matter, which corresponds to the most minimal duration, the most minimal scale of time (minimal, but not null). Matter endures only to the point of allowing succession (from instant to instant, so to speak, although we need to think of a continuous indivisible process), but it's "the most expanded degree of duration", as Deleuze writes in "Bergsonism" (expanded, relaxed, ex-tended). Having nearly no contraction, matter is basically in the present only. But living organisms have the capacity to contract multiple instants (roughly speaking this relates to William James's idea of specious present), experiencing them as a "single intuition", so to speak. Therefore they have memory, as they can contract the past, holding it together. But different beings experience different degrees of durations, different "rhythms of time". Bergson writes in "Matter and Memory": "Questions relating to subject and object, to their distinction and their union, should be put in terms of time rather than space”. "In reality there is no one rhythm of duration; it is possible to imagine many different rhythms which, slower or faster, measure the degree of tension or relaxation of different kinds of consciousness, and thereby fix their respective places in the scale of being". So on this scale from the intensive to the extensive you find all living organisms, each experiencing reality at a given "rhythm of time", a different level of contraction, and, at one extremity, you find matter (maximal extension, juxtaposition). You may say the other extremity is pure consciousness, pure mind (maximal contraction, interpenetration), although this is instantiated and individualised in specific living organisms, through the creative process Bergson describes in his "Creative Evolution". Consciousness is instantiated/individualised in matter and through matter (Bergson talks of the resistance of matter against the advance of the élan vital as the process through which life concretizes in specific living organisms through evolution). So, instead of conceiving of different dimensions of space and time, as Bernard Carr does, Bergson conceives of a polarity between the intensive and the extensive and a double movement of contraction/expansion which specifies different degrees of duration, experienced by different living organisms (of course the duration experienced by a given living organism can be altered; e.g. drugs, sickness, states of mind etc...) But reality is one single whole, a dynamic, ever changing whole, a process of creative evolution. For Bergson the past continues to exist (but it ceases to act! Action is only in the present), because memory is stored in time, so to speak, and not in space, not in matter, not in the body. Our body is in the present, but our being is made of matter and memory, so to speak. Our perception, which is "virtual action", action-oriented, in practice always intermingles with memory. So we are our past, which advances pushing the present into the future (Bergson says "gnawing into the future") and the future is open, undetermined, still to be made. This is a crucial point for Bergson. He rejects both physicalist determinism (future already determined, already given) and static idealism (Platonic, you may say, according to which the "really real" is atemporal, eternal, unchanging). For Bergson reality is truly dynamic and truly creative.

Bernard Carr's open mindedness makes him the most evolved of all of them 💯💯

"Respectable speculation," is a concept Bernard brought up. It got me thinking.

This one is to be watched multiple TIMEs. so many theories that are not easy to understand in a dense TIME. Many thanks to EF. I wear the same pair of glasses as Hans does :)

Time is the component of being alive, the only element of the movement of living things, and if time is lost from working, it is like the heart of a creature stops because of its fever.

❤ tyvm!

Thats some really profound critical thinking going on! Some really profound points being made!

I'm pretty sure if I rewatch this and I'll still learn something new.

Beautiful podcast

Thank you.

I can attempt to express the shift from classical, third-person formalisms to quantum, first-person formalisms using the frameworks of logic, mathematics, and physics. This transition represents a profound paradigm shift in our understanding of reality and the nature of scientific inquiry. Logic: In classical logic, we have been operating within the realm of bivalence, where propositions are either true or false, and the principle of non-contradiction holds. However, quantum mechanics has challenged this notion with phenomena such as superposition and entanglement, which defy our classical intuitions. The both/and logic, with its multivalued and paraconsistent structure, provides a framework to model these quantum paradoxes. Let's consider the famous double-slit experiment, where an entity (e.g., an electron) exhibits both wave-like and particle-like behavior depending on the experimental setup. In classical logic, we would have to assign mutually exclusive truth values to the propositions "e is a wave" and "e is a particle." However, the both/and logic allows us to assign graded truth values to these propositions: Truth("e is a wave") = 0.6 Truth("e is a particle") = 0.7 Coherence("e is a wave", "e is a particle") = 0.8 The coherence value reflects the compatibility of these seemingly contradictory properties within the quantum realm. The synthesis operator ⊕ can then represent the integrated quantum phenomenon: "e is a wave" ⊕ "e is a particle" = quantum_behavior(e) Mathematics: Classical mathematics has been heavily influenced by the notion of objectivity and the search for universal, context-independent truths. However, quantum mechanics has revealed the inherent contextuality and observer-dependence of certain phenomena. The monadological framework, with its emphasis on the irreducible perspectives of monads (fundamental psychophysical entities), provides a basis for reconceptualizing mathematics. In classical set theory, an element either belongs to a set or not, adhering to the principle of bivalence. However, in the quantum realm, we encounter situations where an entity can exhibit graded membership in multiple sets simultaneously. The both/and logic allows us to represent this using multivalued set membership: Membership(e, set_A) = 0.7 Membership(e, set_B) = 0.6 Coherence(Membership(e, set_A), Membership(e, set_B)) = 0.5 This captures the idea that an entity can simultaneously belong to different sets to varying degrees, with a coherence value representing the compatibility of these memberships. Physics: Classical physics has been dominated by third-person, objective descriptions of reality, often ignoring the role of the observer. However, quantum mechanics has brought the observer's perspective and the act of measurement to the forefront, challenging our classical notions of objectivity. In classical mechanics, we can describe the state of a system using well-defined variables and deterministic equations of motion. However, in quantum mechanics, the state of a system is described by a wave function, which represents a superposition of multiple potential states. The both/and logic allows us to represent this superposition using graded truth values: Truth("system is in state A") = 0.4 Truth("system is in state B") = 0.6 Coherence("system is in state A", "system is in state B") = 0.8 The coherence value captures the idea that the system can simultaneously exhibit properties of multiple states, with a non-zero coherence reflecting the compatibility of these states within the quantum realm. Furthermore, the act of measurement in quantum mechanics is not merely a passive observation but an active intervention that disturbs the system and collapses the wave function. This challenges the classical notion of an objective, detached observer. The both/and logic, with its emphasis on the integration of subjective and objective aspects, provides a framework to model this observer-system entanglement. Let O represent an observer, and S represent a quantum system: Truth("O observes S in state A") = 0.7 Truth("S is in state A") = 0.5 Coherence("O observes S in state A", "S is in state A") = 0.9 The high coherence value reflects the inseparability of the observer's perspective and the system's state within the quantum realm. The synthesis operator ⊕ can then represent the integrated observer-system reality: "O observes S in state A" ⊕ "S is in state A" = quantum_measurement_event This shift from classical, third-person formalisms to quantum, first-person formalisms challenges our traditional notions of objectivity, detachment, and context-independence. The both/and logic and the monadological framework provide symbolic and conceptual tools to navigate this transition, allowing us to model and reason about the inherent contextuality, observer-dependence, and paradoxical nature of quantum phenomena. By embracing these new formalisms, we can develop a more holistic and integrated understanding of reality, one that acknowledges the irreducible perspectives of observers and the co-constitutive nature of subjective and objective aspects. This paradigm shift has profound implications not only for our scientific worldview but also for our philosophical and metaphysical understanding of the nature of reality, knowledge, and the role of the observer in the pursuit of understanding.

Let us take as a hypothesis that consciousness, which permeates life, is what defines the moment, that is, time. And this moment encompasses all elements endowed with consciousness in space and immediately competent to our metabolic senses. In this case, matrix structures of consciousness are created, in time-space and when within the tendency of these matrices, we randomly change our trajectories, for a fraction of a second we move forward in time and realize what will happen in the future. The perceptions of these accidents would cause the experiences we call premonitions. To keep us within the balance that allows us to interact consistently with the set of elements in the immediate space, we are forced to return to the harmony of the present time, or on the contrary we would get lost in time, distorting our senses. Thus, we force ourselves to share the matrix structure that permeates the existence of each of our lives.

It was crazy and genius at the same time, greeting from Brazil, Kastrup. Please, don't forget your homeland.

Everything that has happened and will happen exists as a whole, in all its possible versions. The universe is an archetypal film projected through light. In our normal state of consciousness we 'navigate' this higher dimensional totality by taking snapshots, points of view that change over time. The (even more) amazing part is that we can also change the timeline and choose to "experience" different versions of ourselves. Because that's what it's all about: consciousness experiencing itself.

Interesting way to look at it. I view it as some sort of cloud of consciousness that we get ideas from when we tune into the right channel. Which is why two can receive the same idea/thought at the same time. I chalk intuition up to it as well. I just need a little information to tune into a channel and I get the entire line of thought in an instant. The brain I think is more of an antenna that receives signals/ideas as opposed to creating them. Which is why dementia patients seem to come back for a moment and then lose the signal and it’s not them anymore. Very interesting perspective here and I’m rethinking my understanding of this. 🥃

Wonderful!

Hello Sirs 💕💞💖 Thank you very very much for your explanation 🤗 discussion and sharing of all your ideas. It was wonderful, ❤ IT ( Was cooking inbetween 🤗) 🕊️

03:46 - Tarcila do Amaral's Operários (1933). Nice!

Quite interesting. I know one can travel to a far future while in out of body state, spend decades but on return, a few minutes have gone by. If anyone can do that(spend decades in far future) from here, imagine what one can do from where we come from(higher dimensions).One can experience several simultaneous physical lives, across dimensions, space, parallel timelines within a fraction of a second. This means one can experience a billion human lives on earth simultaneously. Next time when you interact with your friend, neighbour or relative, interact with them kindly for you may be interacting with yourself. It is nice to hear someone with open mind discussing these topics. We know very little about ourselves and that is why things in earth drama school are so real and convincingly confusing to all those who choose to have human experience.

interesting what he said about precognitive dreams showing something unusual. i had a dream about a very bright rainbow, and then i saw exactly that the next day. it wasnt really a big emotional deal, kind of trivial. but it was something out of the ordinary. its probably still the most striking rainbow i have ever seen and that was many years ago.

1:39:00 - When pondering upon the modi of time.... what about the expierence of space sections, "spaciousness"? I would like to know if you know about the work of Hermann Schmitz, who declared philosophic themes such as Atmospheres, "Leiblichkeit", feelings as half things. He just died in 2021. Thank you for recording this interesting conversation.

This fits the hypothesis of Anthony Peake in which he shows that we are living the same life over and over again. He even uses the tesseract scene in that film to explain it. It is a shame Bernardo never sat down and discussed it with him it would have been a good discussion. Tom Campbell had no such qualms he discussed it with AP.

Fascinating talk, thanks, Essentia Foundation! Can anyone in the know suggest some other physicists like Bernard Carr who are open-minded to the metaphysical nature of life and its influences?

Some of the nomenclature is foreign to me but I am following. I am going to subscribe to this channel but of all videos I have seen on these subjects this is the best. I don’t feel it’s social engineering. Just open minded discussion by great minds. You will find speaking in this format will encourage the public to add, their contributions give a greater pool and fill in the holes in our knowledge. It’s been my experience with the “Field of Divine Consciousness” that there are limits on what an individual user has access to. There is a divine administrator granting access, and intention determines what we are permitted access to. If you are evil you can’t even log in. This is a concern because people with Ill intentions are and have been using people that can access it to develops weapons. They are denied access for good reason.

When clocks stop conscious moments stop. when conscious moments stop clocks stop.

A segment from 'Saved by the Light of the Buddha Within'... My new understandings of what many call 'God -The Holy Spirit' - resulting from some of the extraordinary ongoing after-effects relating to my NDE, when I was struck by lightning during September 1970. Myoho-Renge-Kyo represents the identity of what some scientists are now referring to as the unified field of consciousnesses. In other words, it’s the essence of all existence and non-existence - the ultimate creative force behind planets, stars, nebulae, people, animals, trees, fish, birds, and all phenomena, manifest or latent. All matter and intelligence are simply waves or ripples manifesting to and from this core source. Consciousness (enlightenment) is itself the actual creator of everything that exists now, ever existed in the past, or will exist in the future - right down to the minutest particles of dust - each being an individual ripple or wave. The big difference between chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo and most other conventional prayers is that instead of depending on a ‘middleman’ to connect us to our state of inner enlightenment, we’re able to do it ourselves. That’s because chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo allows us to tap directly into our enlightened state by way of this self-produced sound vibration. ‘Who or What Is God?’ If we compare the concept of God being a separate entity that is forever watching down on us, to the teachings of Nichiren, it makes more sense to me that the true omnipotence, omniscience and omnipresence of what most people perceive to be God, is the fantastic state of enlightenment that exists within each of us. Some say that God is an entity that’s beyond physical matter - I think that the vast amount of information continuously being conveyed via electromagnetic waves in today’s world gives us proof of how an invisible state of God could indeed exist. For example, it’s now widely known that specific data relayed by way of electromagnetic waves has the potential to help bring about extraordinary and powerful effects - including an instant global awareness of something or a mass emotional reaction. It’s also common knowledge that these invisible waves can easily be used to detonate a bomb or to enable NASA to control the movements of a robot as far away as the Moon or Mars - none of which is possible without a receiver to decode the information that’s being transmitted. Without the receiver, the data would remain impotent. In a very similar way, we need to have our own ‘receiver’ switched on so that we can activate a clear and precise understanding of our own life, all other life and what everything else in existence is. Chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo each day helps us to achieve this because it allows us to reach the core of our enlightenment and keep it switched on. That’s because Myoho-Renge-Kyo represents the identity of what scientists now refer to as the unified field of consciousnesses. To break it down - Myoho represents the Law of manifestation and latency (Nature) and consists of two alternating states. For example, the state of Myo is where everything in life that’s not obvious to us exists - including our stored memories when we’re not thinking about them - our hidden potential and inner emotions whenever they’re dormant - our desires, our fears, our wisdom, happiness, karma - and more importantly, our enlightenment. The other state, ho, is where everything in Life exists whenever it becomes evident to us, such as when a thought pops up from within our memory - whenever we experience or express our emotions - or whenever a good or bad cause manifests as an effect from our karma. When anything becomes apparent, it merely means that it’s come out of the state of Myo (dormancy/latency) and into a state of ho (manifestation). It’s the difference between consciousness and unconsciousness, being awake or asleep, or knowing and not knowing. The second law - Renge - Ren meaning cause and ge meaning effect, governs and controls the functions of Myoho - these two laws of Myoho and Renge, not only function together simultaneously but also underlies all spiritual and physical existence. The final and third part of the tri-combination - Kyo, is the Law that allows Myoho to integrate with Renge - or vice versa. It’s the great, invisible thread of energy that fuses and connects all Life and matter - as well as the past, present and future. It’s also sometimes termed the Universal Law of Communication - perhaps it could even be compared with the string theory that many scientists now suspect exists. Just as the cells in our body, our thoughts, feelings and everything else is continually fluctuating within us - all that exists in the world around us and beyond is also in a constant state of flux - constantly controlled by these three fundamental laws. In fact, more things are going back and forth between the two states of Myo and ho in a single moment than it would ever be possible to calculate or describe. And it doesn’t matter how big or small, famous or trivial anything or anyone may appear to be, everything that’s ever existed in the past, exists now or will exist in the future, exists only because of the workings of the Laws ‘Myoho-Renge-Kyo’ - the basis of the four fundamental forces, and if they didn’t function, neither we nor anything else could go on existing. That’s because all forms of existence, including the seasons, day, night, birth, death and so on, are moving forward in an ongoing flow of continuation - rhythmically reverting back and forth between the two fundamental states of Myo and ho in absolute accordance with Renge - and by way of Kyo. Even stars are dying and being reborn under the workings of what the combination ‘Myoho-Renge-Kyo’ represents. Nam, or Namu - which mean the same thing, are vibrational passwords or keys that allow us to reach deep into our life and fuse with or become one with ‘Myoho-Renge-Kyo’. On a more personal level, nothing ever happens by chance or coincidence, it’s the causes that we’ve made in our past, or are presently making, that determine how these laws function uniquely in each of our lives - as well as the environment from moment to moment. By facing east, in harmony with the direction that the Earth is spinning, and chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo for a minimum of, let’s say, ten minutes daily to start with, any of us can experience actual proof of its positive effects in our lives - even if it only makes us feel good on the inside, there will be a definite positive effect. That’s because we’re able to pierce through the thickest layers of our karma and activate our inherent Buddha Nature (our enlightened state). By so doing, we’re then able to bring forth the wisdom and good fortune that we need to challenge, overcome and change our adverse circumstances - turn them into positive ones - or manifest and gain even greater fulfilment in our daily lives from our accumulated good karma. This also allows us to bring forth the wisdom that can free us from the ignorance and stupidity that’s preventing us from accepting and being proud of the person that we indeed are - regardless of our race, colour, gender or sexuality. We’re also able to see and understand our circumstances and the environment far more clearly, as well as attract and connect with any needed external beneficial forces and situations. As I’ve already mentioned, everything is subject to the law of Cause and Effect - the ‘actual-proof-strength’ resulting from chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo always depends on our determination, sincerity and dedication. For example, the levels of difference could be compared to making a sound on a piano, creating a melody, producing a great song, and so on. Something else that’s very important to always respect and acknowledge is that the Law (or if you prefer God) is in everyone and everything. NB: There are frightening and disturbing sounds, and there are tranquil and relaxing sounds. It’s the emotional result of any noise or sound that can trigger off a mood or even instantly change one. When chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo each day, we are producing a sound vibration that’s the password to our true inner-self - this soon becomes apparent when you start reassessing your views on various things - such as your fears and desires etc. The best way to get the desired result when chanting is not to view things conventionally - rather than reaching out to an external source, we need to reach into our own lives and bring our needs and desires to fruition from within - including the good fortune and strength to achieve any help that we may need. Chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo also reaches out externally and draws us towards, or draws towards us, what we need to make us happy from our environment. For example, it helps us to be in the right place at the right time - to make better choices and decisions and so forth. We need to think of it as a seed within us that we’re watering and bringing sunshine to for it to grow, blossom and bring forth fruit or flowers. It’s also important to understand that everything we need in life, including the answer to every question and the potential to achieve every dream, already exists within us.

You guys and girls (I suppose that there are some) are doing a great job !

40:45 This is a great point. I think everyone suffers from this especially me. The Language needs to be parameterized, once that is worked out real work in philosophy can be done, and equations can be formulated.

As an artist I can confirm, that there must be an attractor from the future. How would you explain the passion of an artist, for a breadless Art.

It would be so great, if Bernardo could make a deep-dive into Spinoza. I did my deep-dive and got the impression that Spinoza is brutally misunderstood as Pantheist, but was a fascinating European version of Non-Duality.

Is there a way to contact those researchers? I think it might be of interest to them to also have a look at language and some aspects of Heidegger's understanding of ontology. And the nature of question.

Mind blown 🤯

Where do we find the recordings of the speakers you're conversing about here?

I like how Davis Hawkins put it, in the nonlinear realm, the potentials of ABC don't exist seperately, but the linear mind experiences it as A causes B causes C. From this point of view, strategies like blame and guilt start to lose their feeling if reality-- there was never a cause or effect, a causer or effecter.

Funny thing is, it’s strange. Clocks don’t necessarily stop, but the days of the week can get quite confusing if you don’t stay up on them.

Excellent! Just came upon Bernado Kastrups ideas.. BRILLIANT

I keep getting thoughts of a fractal universe when they are describing their views. Would this be a correct assumption that fits the narrative?

If you wanted to compute every outcome and every possibility, rhen yes, youd need to freeze time. However, we dont need to know to everthing to predict something. We just need to know as much as we can and make better and better outcomes.

From that first visualization of species-moment of 1/10th of a second expanded out to the species-moment of 14.5 billion years, I had an insight into why Krishnamurti says, when we end psychological time, the content of human consciousness, we enter a totally different dimension, this world of creation. The ego is the inner ticking clock that creates a subset of time internally pinched off from timeless eternity. So now I know where I go. This is profound stuff to extrapolate to the ‘evident’ of non volitional extraordinary experiences.

I've been wrestling with a question. Is the temporal context at the heart of experience?

This Universe/Existence/Experience is so profoundly intricate and mysterious that I honestly can't believe it happened by accident from dead atoms and matter. Something this complex has to be the result of intelligence. Something bigger is going on here than just chance. I love hearing these giants talk.

I have some ideas on 3-body problem but can't formulate it in detail. Have u heard of 3 parameter where change in parameter changes the outcome causing chaos. As to how to generalize it I don't know but encoding the parameters in a wave n colliding to get the desired outcome we have to train the A.I. it's like trying to find a specific gradient like A.I does but in a higher space I guess. These are all assumptions as I always do. + Sign wave would define a specific calculation.

look at kastrups cranium, hes got that erathostenes dome! no wonder hes so smart!

Can anyone offer some insight into the relationship between: Precongition and syncronicity.

the way Bernard Carr talk and argument tell me clearly that he never had deep psycadelic journey. Maybe I am wrong but somehow the way some express themselfs in this deep topics show how deep they went unto deep introspection or they just made a lot of thinking and reading. Dont matter how respected he is in the Academic circle, going around the bush as you wish one day you will need to bite the bullet that you had made up everything, even your own birth and the birth of your indentity.

I’m very well aware of this while coding.

Dr carr you rock

Start From Words - This Is a Very Start - To Start ……..🌞

I did large doze DMT and as soon as I exhaled the last hit the time stopped! It literally stopped because I stopped feeling my body, I couldn’t breathe or even try to take a deep breath, I always have noise in my ears and that stopped too. It was so scary I freaked out so bad! I felt like the time in the physical realm stopped by my consciousness was still active, so I couldn’t think clearly and I was freaking out that I will die if I don’t breathe. I was trying to take a breath but then I forgot who I was and I was sucked into a vortex of collapsing dimensions which lasted for so long. I was moving through those dimensions and I had no body , only my mind. At times I was freaking out that I don’t remember the past, and I don’t know who I am and what I’m doing here. I don’t know how long that was going on but I snapped into the body back and it was only 5 minutes passed but to me it felt like so much longer I had a massive panic attack and really hated that trip

I saw it explained elsewhere that conscious beings are like mirrors, reflecting the universe back at itself. What if the distinction between objective/subjective is an illusion?

Hombre que sabe = Bernard and bernardo! Thank you

Also, saying "time is a illusion" bites itself in the a$$ and goes away, because it requires time to even interpolate sequentially to formulate and state such dogma.

if a drone is recording someone chasing someone through ally ways it will record where the person is before and as the person chasing will catch up.. Because its higher and sees more. is that similar?

saying, ‘when the clock stops’ is almost like a euphemism for, ‘When you die’

I haven't even watched 5 minutes yet. But okay sometimes I just know something is going to happen like a result or what someone is going to say or someone will cancel a meeting, etc. I do it on days where everything seems so clear to me. I'm not saying I can see the future or the phenomenon explained here but at least I can try to begin to understand whar is being discussed here.

All Must Start Learning -What Is Language Grammar …..and So Much More - To Under Stand -Stories and Watch The Information Also Around ……..To Interpret In Now - For Use ….. Main Function This Body To Recognize……..🌞

Time dilation is dual to length contraction -- Einstein, special relativity. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. All numbers fall within the complex plane. Real is dual to imaginary -- complex numbers are dual. All numbers are dual. The integers are self dual as they are their own conjugates. Categories (form, syntax, objects) are dual to sets (substance, semantics, subjective) -- category theory. Quantity is dual to quality. The tetrahedron is self dual -- just like the integers. The cube is dual to the octahedron. The dodecahedron is dual to the icosahedron -- the Platonic solids. Messages in a communication system are predicted into existence according to Shannon's information theorem -- a syntropic process, teleological. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Mind (syntropy) is dual to matter (entropy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line. All forms of communication require photons or the probability field of electro-magnetism and photons are dual. Waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality, pure energy is dual. Physical waves (real photons, syntax) are dual to probability (imaginary, semantics). "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

Consciousness is like light, in that sense there's only one big eternal now moment.

Mind, consciousness and thought, the three principles (3P) by Sydney Banks ❤

Some clocks don't stop fast enough. Especially the talking clocks.

What you missed about Interstellar is, it talks about love as one dimension that connects between space and time. The female astronaut said she is feeling her partner, who was lost somewhere in the universe, and she talking about what I said above, and last the father survived and managed to communicate to his daughter, because of love, and of course because he promised to come back. It is not my option at all, I think love is just a function for reproduction and group survival. But beautiful idea...

3:30 jump cut… hire me.😂