What Happens When Disney Runs Out of Remakes 

Love your content

I did watched Across the Spider-Verse. It was amazing literally. They surpassed my expectations. I think you’re gonna like it.

What Happens When Disney Runs Out of Remakes? simple, they will make remakes of the direct DVD sequels, personally (this just my opinion) but i dont mind see a remake of little mermaid 2

Saw it Friday. An incredibly Spider-Man movie, and addition to this franchise. Miles is slowly becoming one of my favourite hero’s, and the story unfolding there is truly exciting. Then of course, the animation was next to none. Stylistic, Imaginative, and so so captivating.

It was so good it kind of put me off replaying the game. The game is great but the story is ATSV is just so top tier.

this is the only thing that keeps running through my head. I thought it was like a fanmade trailer or something.. shameless with it

The Rock is pushing it because of the failure of black adam

They're approaching the singularity of remakes. Like the old Saturday night live sketch where 'remember the [decade]' caught up to the present time and collapsed in on itself.

That one could be on the Rock though, after flopping the DCU his ego needs a win.

It also made me lose any sense of respect I try to have for The Rock. He literally gave a lecture at the Oscars on why animation deserves to be respected, especially how the three actresses, playing live-action Disney Princesses, had the nerve to say that it was "for kids". So to see him a few weeks later after the Oscars announce that he's starting as Maui again in a live-action remake of Moana, really pissed me off.

Justin Y. told me to tell you to stay out of his territory

Dude you're on every comment section.

How did you post before the video came out?! Says on my end that it was posted 32 mins ago and you posted 35? He’s not only everywhere but he’s also commenting before it goes live 😂

@@DoctorCyan hasn't that guy retired pretty much?

Jeremy:Irony

Live-er action remakes

4th dimension remakes

anddd what happens if they ran out of remakes remakes?

​@@Tukoendogan animated remake remake

Maybe 3D glasses experience and vr smh

I agree. Also, the sequels just wanted to continue the originals (even if most of them didn’t do a very good job of it) while the remakes present themselves as “better” than the originals, which doesn’t sit well with me. On top of that, I’ve never seen anyone get bullied or insulted or labeled a racist or sexist for not liking the sequels the way they are for not liking the remakes. Even if some of their detractors are actual bigots, that doesn’t sit well with me either because it takes away attention from legitimate criticism.

Couldn’t agree more. If it wasn’t for the sequel era, we wouldn’t get Cinderella 3 and The Lion King 1/2.

​@@coltonm.strawn1771 clear difference is Colton that Eisner pushed out the direct to video sequels in the 90s and early 2000s! At those times, Disney didnt bother with politics

@@onepresence9460 Cinderella 3 is amazing, they made the prince who wasn’t that much of a eye catching character into one of the best characters of the trilogy.

Nailed it!! Give me these 'remakes' straight to streaming and stop trying to replace the far superior original, and I'll be interested!!

To be fair... a new Atlantis would work *great* with that format.

Considering Disney started and got big by pillaging the public domain?

So, lion king 1.5?

@@borandolph1267 That one too!

They'll Remake the Sequels!😱

Still makes them billions though

@@danielnizberg1754thankfully, recently, all their new live action remakes have underperformed drastically. A big part of it is that a lot of the live action remakes are *incredibly* bland. The lion king was tragically gray, despite how flourishing the original movie was; The new little mermaid missed a great opportunity to include a metric fuckton of colour and vibrancy to complement the dark skin of the actress and make her glow. Everything is just. So. Damn. Washed out and bland af these days, it’s tragic 💀

@@meat3958 a part of me enjoys hearing about the flops but sadly I'm rather sure it won't stop disney from churning out gray goo. best that could happen is the vast audiences realizing it's lifeless trash, which you are pointing at. the trend in hollywood is in general quite depressing, but I'm happy we get stuff like puss in boots and spiderverse every now and then

​​@@meat3958eah the little mermaid live action looks horrible to look at compared to something like avatar 2. My guess ILM is being lazy with their vfx or they're not as great as they once was. Weta digital (avatar) is starting to break new ground with realistic looking vfx. Avatar 2 still used ILM for some of their shots but only for machines and man made objects like the ships or robots. The rest like organics are weta digital. Disney and marvel vfx in general look horrible and cheap cuz of their rushed business model.

@@anthonyt219 The avatar movies are just incredible, I’m really glad James waited until the water tech was ready to start the second film, I have such high hopes for The Seed Barerer already

Did disney really say that?

“Well, I don’t know about the rest of you guys, but *I* spotted several big mistakes”

But they still won't touch Treasure Planet with a ten foot pole :')

​@@qrowing or Atlantis

It's crazy how old Disney unintentionally satires new Dosney

Yes! They're going to make trillions on forgotten mediocre movies that nobody cares about oh wait

"Largely forgotten" means they can't cash in on nostalgia. Then it becomes a risky operation. And the corporate suits don't want risk. They want safe bets.

​@@Golemoid😂😂theses movie suck big time!

That would be interesting, though most of Disney's old live-action movies, especially the ones from the late '60s and the '70s aren't well remembered. I can't imagine modern Disney announcing remakes of The Happiest Millionare, The Million Dollar Duck, The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes, Bedknobs and Broomsticks, etc.

No instead their gonna do animated remakes of the live action remakes. Then live action remakes of the animated remakes of the live action remakes. Then...

Encanto, Soul, Luca, Elemental, Onward and Turning Red (imo it wasn't terrible nor great) aren't bad though

@@stinkymrsnow.............. all of those bar encanto are pixar, which despite being owned by Disney kind of work differently to them

🙄Oh, stop that. They have NOT! Disney is NOT going to be that way anymore!

or disney channel original movies

Except they're being theatrically released.

​@@EpikStorm101 And yet they are still awful.

Hence every garbage Marvel tv show in the last 3 years. All awful. Every single one.

@@shinyrayquaza9 Disney Channel Original Movies are at least “original”. Not all of them are particularly good but at least they came from a human with a real imagination, not an AI

Did you think it wouldn't? It is Spiderman.

@@edwardjones282 Good point. It still makes me happy to see that people support great art.

Super satisfying indeed. And what’s ironic it’s that Spider-Verse is animated, a medium that Disney was known to be the best studio utilizing it and they simply don’t care anymore.

I agree. As a fan of the original little mermaid I was not impressed with the remake. They obviously wanted to make it into woke agenda like everything they do nowadays. I think eventually now that it flopped we might see a decline in live action remakes hopefully

@NervyGamer do you mind on expanding on your thoughts about the new little mermaid being woke? I'm also surprised to hear it's already considered a flop, seeing as it's been out for less than a month.

I don’t know if that holds water. Sonic’s animated movie from the 90’s I feel isn’t well remembered and the TMNT live action movie was fantastic

Cuz they didn’t make Mario black. Could you imagine the uproar? I mean, I guess you can

meh

​@firefly44220 That's not the reason why Disney's live action remakes are bad, if you try to replicate a classic movie with one that lacks the soul and creativity that the original had, ofc it's going to flop.

Perhaps its more the fact that it is also one of the biggest IPs and brands in existence?

Oh man Aquaman is so amazing.

DC had a reputation of being dark, but at least you can see how grand Atlantis is

films are so obsessed with being dark these days! why is wrong to want to see whats happening on the screen

Yeah but little mermaid black. That’s all you need 🤔

@@janaekelis they don't want you to see how dogshit the visual is, or they know their audience who never leave their home and constantly sit in the dark and love everything that Disney shits out. Or maybe both

Both criminally underrated.

While I feel like that's probably a good idea, I can't help but feel like they would ruin those as well. Then again, if that does happen and it does suck, at least it will give more attention to the originals, lol

I am waiting for that Black Cauldron remake.

​@@user-cv8qe9ru8c CRIMINALLY

But then they'd have to actually make a good movie, instead of counting on empty nostalgia to do all the work

Emperor's New Groove is the absolute best.

@@tiph3802criminally underrated movie

And Brother Bear. Probably the most complex story in terms of who’s the villain.

I Fucking LOVE treasure plant god damn

Atlantis and Treasure Planet both lost insane amounts of money

Lindsay 😍😍😍

Great to see you here!

Oh wow, it's the real one

Lindsay, the myth, the legend

I love that song LOL

And they'll make them animated and act like the fact they were "live action" alone was what the problem was. "See, we listen to our fans!"

Let's see how that works out for Avatar The Last Airbender in 2024.

At least he is getting paid

​@@andrecarpenter2432 it's disney so his pay is the same pay as freeza pays to his soldiers: he allows them to live

Barry Jenkins is such a weird choice to direct Mufasa tho. His background is mostly indie drama like Moonlight or If Beale Street Could Talk, suddenly he directs a big heavy CGI movie??

@@K0m30ng I mean Sam Raimi and Peter Jackson started out as low budget horror directors. Though I have no confidence because the director of Selma directed A Wrinkle in Time and that sucked.

@@chrisschirripa5917 That's true, i just think it's weird considering how the filming process of the first movie can only be handled by certain people like Favreau. I was legit shocked when Jenkins was announced

That actually sounds interesting

The ultimate show of no confidence in their Live Action Remakes is that they're too afraid to cash in on a limited run of the original during the lead up to their LAR of the same film. If they truly thought they were making a worthy product, they would not fear people seeing the original and take the money on the table.

They're not gonna do it. Too "problematic" (read "fun")

Re-releasing the classics into theatres would be an excuse to print money for Disney, yet they won't for no good reason.

Right??!? How did anyone at the company think they should ever stop that practice of re-releasing classic Disney movies.

I hope that happens

A 3D animated Snow White would at least be more interesting

Because the lion king remake was just so good.

@@DangStank lion king is photo realistic animation not 3d animation

@@Wurmze Do you think that photo-real and 3D are mutually exclusive? Because they are very much not

Yeah but this time in uncanny realistic animations

😠NOT gonna happen!

The mindset behind Wish. :D

i agree! i would love a revival of the type of animation from Robinhood, or Sword in the Stone

HA!😂 Yeah, keep dreaming… Just kidding, I WISH and long for it to make a comeback one day.🤧

I'll bring the 2-D animated style movies from Disney once again sometime in the future and stop all this ridiculous madness in today's world.

I agree (☝️).

I guess that could be considered a reason, but I doubt it would stand up in court the way they think. I'm not a lawyer, but pretty sure a remake won't extend the copyright. So yeah, this NEW version would be copyrighted still (whenever that long off future date is thanks to Disney buying Congress in the 90s to extend it excessively) but the original will enter the public domain. And if I understand copyright rules correctly, this strategy would actually backfire as a the person "violating" the copyright could point to the animated version as the source and there would be nothing Disney could argue to show that the person was actually infringing the live-action shot-for-shot remake version! I'd think these remakes would have FEWER protections because of how they were designed and marketed.

@@commentinglife6175 interesting points. I had no clue Disney actually bought Congress. Are there any additional perks to the acquisition aside from the ones you just mentioned?

@@commentinglife6175 watch them modify the way copyright laws work so it benefits them once again

I'm not a fancy big city lawyer, but I'm not sure how that'd work, since being live action, these are completely different designs from the original animated characters. Just having the name, and Disney, wouldn't put them under the same copyright. Pretty sure they'd be considered new characters.

​@@bobodo45 You can thank Sonny Bono for the 90s extension. (It's a shame that tree didn't take him out sooner.) Most of these stories were already in the public domain, though. (Lion King was a rip off of Osamu Tezuka's Jungle Emperor / Kimba the White Lion.) You couldn't use any of the characters that Disney created themselves, but you could make your own Little Mermaid movie right now if you wanted to.

Disney chose that path when they started buying IPs instead of creating them.

I still do not know how Disney could think that they could make a puppy murd3r3r sympathetic

they're only picking movies that are marketable and profitable

Cruella was actually the best live action thing they’ve done which is hilarious

Have you even seen Cruella? That wasn’t a remake, it used a character that was a clear sell-out cheap marketing trick, yet weirdly enough it did something interesting with the character and the film was pretty decent. People have the same dismissive reaction when they heard Andor, and yet look how that turned out. Look, wouldn’t you rather have an original movie based on an existing character than a remake that does nothing new and only ruins the original???? I dont understand your logic to dismiss a movie with an original script

Agreed!! If you haven’t seen Chuck Jones’ outstanding animation of THE PHANTOM TOLLBOOTH, you absolutely gotta! That’s a great movie that I remember from getting on VHS 📼 from the library 😊

nooooo don't let them use the system to control more public domain property

​@@shinyrayquaza9 Exactly this

​@@shinyrayquaza9 Exactly this

i'd kill for a ramona remake

It's funny, as someone who loves fantasy, I tend to prefer when the whimsy to be firmly rooted in the real, stuff like Lord of the ring's practical effects and sets really make me believe in magic for the duration of the story... but making it work requires delicateness and subtlety. Those disney live action remakes however, look like the thinnest coating of the originals, inflated with disturbingly high budgets and rushed onto the screens, where they blow up and are forgotten like so many soap bubbles. On the flip side animation is still having a hard time being respected as the medium of perfectly controlled creation, where everything is possible provided you have the vision, talent and time, so the projects that get to expand what's achievable with it are few and far between.

You should definitely not read the original fairy tales Disney based those classic animations on. You won't find much whimsy in many of them.

@@chalk-one they were dark, extremely so in some cases, but there is tons of whimsy and inventivity in those fairy tales.

@maximeteppe7627 very true. A slightly different form of whimsy than the disney variety however.

@@chalk-one I’ve read most all of them, my mum has a literature degree. That’s a moot point. It’s not about how faithful of an adaptation it is, it’s about whether it’s good or not, whether it’s fun and inspiring to watch. I know you think you just said something so smart but you’ve actually missed the point completely

It’s an easy way to hide flaws in animation/cgi and make it more “realistic” at the cost of interesting lighting

@@yurplethepurple2064 le sigh

Yep. Shadows everywhere and really desaturated colour. Look at how the colours pop in classic Disney. Look how RED Sebastian is in The Little Mermaid, even brighter than Ariels' hair. Then look how dark and washed out all the remakes are. They're perfectly miserable to look at, joyless, lifeless, anti-magic.

Thank you!!! I could never figure out why i hated the look of these movies so much! They're fantasy fairytales, so the dark, bleak, and gritty-looking colors make it feel off and depressing.

It’s a reflection of how dark Disney is

Yeah but that’s because of the rock.

@@alexanderguerrero347 If that movie is a success, they’ll definitely make more remakes of the modern films, get ready for live action Wreck-It-Ralph with Jack Black and Jim Carrey making cameos

@@IcyDiamond Just like I said, "Eventually Disney will make animated adaptations of their live-action adaptations of their animated classics. It'll happen, I guaran-fucking-tee ya".

@@IcyDiamondDon't forget they gotta race swap everyone for diversity. What's next, Terry Crews starring as Elsa in live action Frozen

​@@sofia_a7they're not gonna do that. He's muscular. They need someone who's "body positive" wink wink.

Don’t give Disney ideas right now.

when they ran out of remakes, dont worry, eventually will happen

And then they'll be race swapping the cast

I'm sure they're planning to do it but I think they'll announced it once they finish off the rest of the remakes that are in development

I mean they’re gonna remake every princess movie whether they bomb or not, so yea live action Frozen is gonna happen.

👍😂😂😂

Remakeception

And chose a different race to portray the characters

@@benburke3015 👍👍👍👍

BRUH! Can't wait for the animated adaptation of The Little Mermaid (2023)

Meh, by retconning what happened in the original. I still get irked when they changed Maleficent's line from "She will prick her finger on the spindle of a spinning wheel and DIE" to "She will fall into a sleep like death." 🙄 Fuck, Disney, for a supposed villain protagonist, she sure isn't acting villainous. Same thing in Cruella and Artemis Fowl. Disney watering down villains is a huge disappointment for me. How the hell do you take Cruella, whose entire thing is wanting to make a fur coat out of puppies, and make her sympathetic? By giving her a sad backstory where dogs killed her mom and just... not showing her torturing puppies.

I doubt they'd do it justice and it's not like necessary eitherway, I'm tired of this trend of reboots, remasters and remakes; never different enough from the original to be uniquely appreciated, always only similar enough for their changes to be a downgrade and the film/game to be inferior to the original by comparison.

The only one I actually want.

Why don't you just make a Faithful Prydain Chronicles adaptation at that point?!

@@Lofirainbows all of the remakes are unnecessary, but if they're doing them regardless, they may as well be cool.

@@itsaUSBline Agreed, but they don't take many chances

Disney will always find a way.

😂😂😂

I like Black Cauldron godamnit 😭

One of the few Disney movies I actually want remade, because it's based on an excellent book that the movie didn't do justice to at all and which could actually be a really great live action fantasy if done right

Those books are so good though

I refuse to believe Frozen came out 10 years ago thats just..... impossible 😭

I can think of dozens of fairy tales they haven't done yet either. I don't get it.

Disney has discovered that basically anything they do will still rake in the cash, so there's no need to take any risks. New is risky, so they don't do new.

Yeah until they started using episodes of the cartoons to make the sequels. That was kind of lazy. Tarzan and Jane did that, so did Hercules Zero to Hero. Atlantis Milo's Return was interesting because the episodes they edited together were going to be for an actual tv series that got cancelled along with the real sequel.

I've seen your comments before on Ryan Kinel's videos multiple times. I don't watch RK Outpost anymore, FYI.

Lion king 2 and Aladdin 2 and 3 are better than the remakes LMAOO

@@QueenAvacado Well, that’s debatable.

I had always thought Lion King 2 actually added more to the originals and the universe. Solid gold movie.

Lion King 2, despite the animation budget obviously not being on par with Lion King, is a really good movie and, in my opinion, one of the very few happy accidents to come out from the direct to dvd sequel era.

I really liked the Aladdin animated sequels.

Lion King 1½ is unironically really good

I know some disagree on some of them majorly while some are talked about more, like Cinderella III. A film that both respected the original, actually expanded upon the prince's character, naturally redeemed (as opposed to the forced nonsense the modern age always has) and in the end there's a call-back to the only good thing to come out of 2, the story with her and the baker. Lion King 2 is actually my favorite by far but I also really enjoyed Aladdin and the King Of Thieves. Others that people either say they hate but don't, guilty pleasure, etc, well I'd say a good deal of them still had heart and soul in them. Something the live-action remakes have literally none of. Maybe Maleficent despite being an odd choice to give the "Wicked" treatment, though it obviously worked way better than Joker-lite/Two-Face "Cruella."

Don't think Disney will dare to remake Pocahontas. The Emperor's New Groove has some similar issued, though the movie is pretty well liked in Peru. Honestly I would rather watch an adaption of Emperor's original script, Kingdom of The Sun, but only if they make in 2D

ngl a live action Atlantis might be good

@@KaylaPearlCPNinja They don't even care about backlash. Just look at The Little Mermaid - it got ratioed to death and got trashed by criticism, yet they're still going.

@@KaylaPearlCPNinja They'd probably make her hispanic or some shit anyway.

Ngl, I would be super interested to see a live action Emperor’s New Groove.

Imagine how horrifying live action Toy Story or Cars would be

Do a live-action Black Cauldron and actually adapt the source material right this time

Imagine Denis Villeneue makes a live action Atlantis

@@LordMangudai Live action Black Cauldron would go nuts. The idea makes me wanna watch Dark Crystal.

If they even DARE to make live-action remake of any Pixar movie...

Why would they? From their perspective those were failures. So why would they waste money on something that was a failure that no one cared about to begin with. Remember, Disney is a soulless corporation. It is devoid of creativity or good will.

Exactly, they should remake films with solid concepts which weren't executed that well, as opposed to those that are basically already perfect

Well technically they don't do the movies themselves right? They only buy the rights or something (indirectly produce them or whatever, I read it somewhere). Anyway I still know what you mean. But also I guess a "Everything everywhere all at once" only happens once in a lifetime

@@moongirl8807 A24 used to only buy the rights, but they've moved into production as well! :D EEAAO was great, absolutely phenomenal, but there's in general a very specific vibe/magic that experimental small productions have that, to me, gets lost when movies are made with the express purpose of appealing to as many people as possible. It restraints creative freedom and the willingness to take creative risks. I would just love it if some of the profit that the next Marvel blockbuster makes could be reinvested in some risky & small-scale projects that may never find similar success on a wider scale but could intimately affect the select few who do resonate with the material.

@@moongirl8807 Gosh my previous comment was already far longer than I anticipated but you got my thoughts running amok 😂 Take A24's recent release "Beau is Afraid". I don't think people who aren't familiar with social anxiety in some way (be it personal or through acquaintances, academia) will be able to fully appreciate what it has to say. It's niche. It therefore probably won't recreate EEAAO's success. But to people who can relate to Beau, it could very well surpass EEAAO in terms of personal impact. In the way the movie makes them feel seen. You can't quantify personal impact as easily as ticket sales, but to me, it's what art is really all about.

@undercoverduck ah interesting. Yeah I mean not everything has to be a smash hit to be a success, although companies want to see the money. I agree, they got way too comfortable and I think that's maybe bc of the pandemic: they were afraid of trying something new but at the same time put millions into old stuff. Also they realized they don't need that many people, and with the rise of AI and the writer's strike I fear that they wanna make humans as replacable as possible (see Drew Gooden's recent video for this topic). I just watched the Space Ninja video about franchises and I might wanna add that these weird and bad remakes were mostly financial successes. That's why Disney keeps making the live action movies, this video makes it sound like they were all flops but they actually brought in so much money at the box office. What confuses me the most is this absolute abnormal behaviour of greenlighting something great every few years, seeing that the fans love it but then still canceling it. Like why? Maybe it's bc fan favourites often don't make the money that the loyal fans think they do, but the platforms need these shows to keep costumers. I mean it's the same with Netflix, they make a fantastic show every few years and then suddenly cancel it after 2 seasons. But they don't get that in that case, money probably isn't everything. Or they don't care bc their trash stuff always goes viral and keeps them afloat regardless. No artistic integrity in any case. In conclusion: it's always about the money. And if something actually great happens, that's just the magic of Hollywood, right😂

Financially these remakes are highly profitable.

@@CptApplestrudl some are for sure. Lion king, aladan, and jungle book were profitable but pinochio, Peter Pan are among the losers. Disneys other assets depend on the success of the movies and so movie failures resonate throughout the company are are needed to generate the cash to cover Disneys huge debt. That debt was generated by Iger who borrowed and bought assets instead of developing them himself.

@@RossM3838 Disney narratives towards children do not make parents happy now. See new bud light year film. It bombed. Disney are groomers now

Agreed! Heck they could even do an original story involving a ghost deer and a little girl. Play on the words "Dearly Departed" but changed to "Deerly Departed". Have the drama occur when the mother of the girl begins to date a guy, the very guy who killed the deer, who has ulterior EVIL motives towards the girl AND the mother.

​@@RossM3838then why hore him as ceo if he couldn't manage the currency right?

The problem is: They're unable to do that. Their current company culture created a lack of leadership and vision and that won't change for a long time. And even if they magically got their act together and were able to create new original stories, half the country would probably hate them anyway, because they would get accused of either being too bigoted or too woke...

Atlantis was more or less Stargate minus the portal. Lilo and Stich was original. Unless you compare it to E.T.

I mean being inspired by those stories is a recipe for timeless tales, a lot of Shakespeare's library is inspired by mythology. Romeo and Juliet is a babylonian folk tale (and as much as romeo and juliet is one of his weaker works, it's still timeless), Midsummer Night's Dream is set in Athens under Theseus and Hippolyta's reign, Troilus and Cressida is just straight up a myth, Venus and Adonis, Lucrece, etc. all are based on myths and they're some of the greatest works ever. Disney does that again, 400 years later, and once again, makes timeless works of art that are beloved by many decades later

I did hear they were making a Princess & the Pea film. There are so many fairy tales they could turn into movies such as; Rumpelstiltksin Little Red Riding Hood Hansel & Gretel

You and me both. I still haven’t, and will neeeever forgive them for what they did with the Lion King live action, but if they do it for the god-tier sequel too? I’ll bury them alive. :)

third one was a good comedy twist as well

But it feels like the writers of these remakes don't understand the core concepts and messages of the originals. I am convinced the writers of the new Peter Pan are simpletons.

There's already a movie on that and no one cared

The little mermaid 2 is that. And it's definitely a movie! theres also little mermaid 3 which is a prequel, pretty bad

Sure, but it’ll be a bit weird to keep Bailey as adult Ariel with a 15(?) yo kid?

guys I realize they already used this concept and it wasn't good that time, I'm saying there's untapped potential there. you can have multiple movies with a similar setup and have them be different, this should not be a novel concept.

You know that will never happen mate. It's fun to dream but reality is reality.

'It has a trans'... Lol.

Disney weaponized nostalgia harder than Hollywood ever could've imagined.

not strong for me, as I passed on almost all, and went back to watch the original

Nah. that would imply they were giving us what we want.

At the same time I'd prefer a remake with a new animation style or even a live action TV show that expands the concept rather than regurgitates it. Anything that breaks from these shot-for-shot live action remakes.

Why exactly would anyone want to see live action remakes of those two films specifically? Because you loved them as a kid?😂is that the litmus test now for what should get remade?

@@vincehenriquez680 You are being unnecessarily cynical about someone talking about what they personally want to see. Please take a step back and analyze why such a benign comment prompted such a response from you.

Nah, those movies are awesome. Them being live action won’t make them more awesome. Maybe if it’s really really well done it’ll be just as awesome as the originals, but then what’s the point? I’ll just watch the originals. If it ain’t broken, don’t fix it. Or remake it.

A live action treasure planet done right would be amazing. The world is so awesome!

CGI today does not look realistic at all. Maybe some day in the future

@@supremelordoftheuniverse5449District 9:

@@thedemolitionsexpertsledge5552 ok you got a point.

@@supremelordoftheuniverse5449 tbh I was expecting you to argue but I’m glad you didn’t, District 9 genuinely has some of the most realistic CGI I’ve ever seen

@@thedemolitionsexpertsledge5552 yeah absolutely. I was thinking about the Sonic stuff in the op comment or even Avatar 2 which is considered the pinnacle of CGI but to me still looks as a glorified videogame cut scene, but you got me with District 9, had forgotten about that masterpiece for a moment. Btw just saw a video the other day about how they did it. Look it up, if you haven’t yet. Instead of throwing money at it they used creativity, passion and a lot of sweat and tears

Let’s hope not

@TheGlassesPro Thank you very much

@Lily777 thank you very much as well

Agreed, but even if he has a little bit of influence, that could make all the difference. Lion King 2019 director Jon Favreau was adamant that the characters should not have facial expressions. If Jenkins disagrees, Mufasa might end up being much better. Completely unnecessary, but better. Who knows, it could happen

Lol that reminds me of Taika Waititi. Thor Ragnarok was a really solid movie, but he used his Disney paycheck to make the amazing Jojo Rabbit 😆

If it were a different time, a remake of Treasure Planet, Atlantis, Emperor's New Groove, etc would be a wonderful idea...but not now

@@lordhellstrande2763 Nah, leave Emperor's New Groove alone. That was lightning in a bottle that should not be opened.

Treasure planet and Atlantis were so goood!!!!!! If things were different. I'd love remake of them

I would unironically love that so much, it’s always been my favourite Disney film

@@ezrastardust3124 Disney bought the rights to the whole series of books a few years ago. I think it would make a really good Disney+ series.

@@adamslater7486 agreed 👍

Would be funny to see Gurgi in live action though

Totally agree, instead of a shot for shot remake do more justice to the book series that it’s based on.

The Heat Death of the Universe

That seems unlikely to ever happen or at least anytime soon. At this point they just own so much.

Don't hold your breath. Not hitting their projections isn't the same thing as being on the verge of bankruptcy.

​@Aersla the bigger they are, the harder they fall, especially when you factor the parks and all the Florida kerfuffle into it. They poured millions into Galactic Starcruiser and it barely lasted a year. Merchandise sales are probably the only area where Disney is seeing a profit these days.

@@CinnamonGrrlErin1 They are so far from bankruptcy that even having a conversation about it is laughable.

Would you prefer a slightly different plot too, or do we mean "shot for shot, just with better graphics"?

@@seanlehning1542 bruh what part of remastered don't u understand? I guess your not a pro gamer 😎😎

They can do that in 2025 for Toy Story’s 30th anniversary

why though

​@@PasserMontanus I think it's because the original Toy Story, despite being a groundbreaking movie, has aged pretty poorly in terms of animation quality. Don't get me wrong, I love the movie and the animation does not bother me, but I always wonder what if they remade the movie with updated visuals, just like some modern video games remakes, I'm talking about 8K, ray-tracing, all of that stuff, to make it look more like TS3 and 4. Pixar wouldn't even need to record new dialog, just pay the original actors for the royalties and

It is pretty surprising that Condorman hasn't been remade, given the current fad for superhero movies.

@@CinnamonGrrlErin1 I would actually go to see that :)

The only remake of a 70s Disney movie was Pete's Dragon, which I actually enjoyed a lot but it was a failure at the box office. Can't imagine Disney remaking movies like The Million Dollar Duck or The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes Come to think about it, I think the movie Flubber was a remake of The Abstent Minded Professor

@@pablocasas5906 Oh my god I totally forgot about Pete’s Dragon! You do make a fair point, there’s definitely some weird ones but part of me wonders if they could make those movies better if they remade them

20,000 leagues under the sea would be cool to see if they haven't already done that.

Where's the flops though

I feel like that's a massive exaggeration, I hate a lot of what Disney is doing but you can't say they haven't been financially successful

@@notsamhoward They haven’t been financially successful in years. Some economists say Disney only has around $200mil left of spending money. That may sound like a lot but considering most of their movies cost around $200mil-$500mil to make, it’s not even one Marvel movie’s budget they got left. Especially considering Indiana Jones only made 1/3 of their projections for opening weekend. And don’t forget they may actually have to start paying taxes in Disney World, something they’ve never had to do due to negotiations Walt Disney made when purchasing the land in Florida

If Disney isn’t gonna be financially surviving, then no studio is gonna survive either.

⁠@@CaptainPikeachuisney has the highest revenue but definitely not among the highest return from their investments. And I don’t cry about it they are the one that put us into this situation even through (allegedly but I believe to be true) financially or otherwise incentivize their business partners to make those who launch near their slot to flop. I remembered when early movie review would go 100% positive for mediocre disney movies and solid movies like Alita would have 25% positive reviews at most at launch. Only later on when things don’t really matter financially reviews start to become normal.

I’d love to see the scene where Kida in her bikini in live action

That one's scheduled for release next year. Notably it's "Snow White", not "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs", seemingly after Peter Dinklage took offence to the likely depiction of the dwarves.

@@takatamiyagawa5688wow im surprised they changed that but kept it “snow white”, knowing Disney