💥Join the Community & Improve your editing skills with my masterclass and fortnightly editing sessions - Join The Photographers Clubhouse - www.iworthphotos.com/clubhouse-sign-up
I use micro four thirds. As a disabled photographer the weight and size is great. But the Olympus lenses are superb and the extra reach with long lenses is a no brainer.
I feel that the terms "overpriced" and "overrated" are being thrown around too much lately. I have a weird suggestion - how about we stop hating on eachother's systems 😎 They all have their pros and cons, and you can only get to know them after extensive use in various conditions. FYI - before you think I'm a Fuji fanboy defending the system, I am an exclusively m43 shooter (10+ years at this point)
@@JezdziecBezNicka MY sentiment, exactly. My daughter owns an Olympus M4/3. I love the little powerhouse, but can't get her to use it b/c it's "only 10 Mp!" Her IPhone gets way more use. Such a pity, right?
X-H2S and X-S20 in my bag these days. I have used Sony, Canon, and Panasonic. I like to try new systems now and then. Main reason I like Fuji is the quality of the image, size, weight of body and lenses. They are also great looking cameras and inspire me when I pick them up. The X-S20 with a small fujinon f/2 prime or f/1.4 prime is just fun to use!
I'm probably a unique Fuji user, as a portrait photographer, I use the X100 VI in the studio, and for mobile studio.. why, I photograph action (dance, gymnastics etc) and having a leaf shutter on a reasonable wide angle lens allows me to capture full body shots and freeze the action with flash at 1/2000 Being able to use any flash and not requiring expensive HSS solutions (that are not always portable) helps. I also use the X-T3, and X-T5 for normal portraiture too
I have the X-T1 and 2. The 1 has the 27mm f2.8 on it and now resides in my work bag in the car, which means I have a camera with me where ever I go. The 2 is my main camera and I love it. I don’t do video so didn’t see the point in going for the X-T3 at the time. I’m just an amateur and do most styles of photography.
Hi Ian, am really enjoying the tutorial package and fortnightly developing sessions. I had been a Canon user for years and was very happy with wildlife and landscape images. I made the very big (financial) decision to move over from Canon to Fuji XT2 8 years ago largely for the same reason as you, to lighten the load. Also I wanted to return to my early 1960’s camera experience and have mechanical control over my aperture, speed and ISO. I have not regretted this decision and really enjoy the very real hands on experience of creating images.
Do enjoy your work, Ian. And your attitude - your enthusiasm, love - for the environment you inhabit, and capture so eloquently. So that we on the other side of place can smell those rocks; the wild flowers and grasses. Fine stuff.
Just started using the fuji xe1 again. Forgot how good it is, especially with the xf18mm f1.4. The raw files processed in dxo pure raw 4 look great. I think the Ricoh gr3 and gr3x are my two go to cameras, they are incredibly good.
I have owned APS-C and full-frame Nikon, Canon, and Fuji and at the time loved them all. I now shoot with a Fuji GFX 100s and enjoy the quality of images, color, and dynamic range, to name a few.
I have the Sony A74 ,Fujifilm XT5 and X100VI. I really enjoy the benefits of the Fujifilm system. Image quality, lenses, the feel of the cameras and the weight. The older I get the less weight I am prepared to carry. What stops me selling my Sony gear is the autofocus. If I am in a fast moving environment where focus is critical then I grab the Sony.
What a beautiful place you found to enjoy your photography! And your Fuji camera is sweet! I've always liked the way Fuji cameras look and I might just get one someday. Currently shooting with an Olympus Em5 Miii with some nice glass. Plenty enough camera for me and seems to be holding strong so I'm set for awhile. Thanks for your wonderful videos!
Ian, there's ALWAYS reason for another visit! Your photographic skills are inspiring, even to this 72-year-old amateur. Started my journey with an Argus 126, I believe. Even at 11 years of age, I envisioned myself to be as good as the World's BEST photographer: my dad! My first 35mm film camera was the Canon AE-1. Naturally, I progressed to DSLR, then Mirrorless. Although I've remained loyal to Canon (R6 is my go-to), I entered the Fuji world with an EXCELLENT X-T3, including a few lenses. Of course, I'll not part with any of it, in hopes to pass something worthwhile down to my 4 Grandchildren! Keep up the good work. We all look forward to your inspiration!
I used an X-T1 since 2020 and absolutely loved it. Earlier this year I picked up an X-T3, and it's everything I already loved and more. I actually mostly shoot film, but I always get a kick out of using my Fuji gear.
For important photos, for landscape in dull or dimmed light I am very happy with my Fuji XT3 (I shoot no vids at all). But for hiking, which is often in harsh light about middle of the day, I prefer to shoot film, on my very very old OM-1 analog lady. The weight and size of an OM-1 analog camera is only a fraction of an XT camera, the glass is really tiny compared to modern lenses (even the f1.2 lenses) and top notch quality. To get pleasing shots in harsh light is a lot more easy on film than on iso - invariant sensors, like Fuji and Sony are using them. As always, this is a very personal judgement, not scientific at all. The best advice is always, do not care about specs or trends. Buy the equipment that you enjoy most while USING it. Enjoying the process of taking pictures is what keeps you going out and shooting. Which is all, that counts.
Great video, Ian - I also shoot with Fuji. I've always loved the colors and the overall image/build quality. For me, this system offers one of the best price-to-performance ratios. I really enjoy working with them. What I don't like at the moment are the latest firmware updates for the T5/H2/H2s; the tracking really needs to be stickier... But otherwise, these cameras are packed with features that you'd see in higher-end cameras, and sometimes not even there. The DR of the RAW´s or F-Log2 is insane - Love the Fuji vibes ;)
@@ian_worth sure no problem - after this experience, I will definitely wait a bit longer before installing the next firmware 😆. They fixed some issues with the latest one but there is room for improvements. Have a nice day ✌
It’s good to learn about your equipment and application. I am Sony myself but your discussion is applicable in my processes. I understand you better knowing these details.
I agree with your APS-C points. I shoot Sony, primarily full frame A7RV, and there are many times I wish Sony would make a high resolution APS-C camera like the Fujifilm xt5, both for larger depth of field for landscapes and for longer reach with lighter lenses. Even better if they made a stacked APS-C sensor. Don’t get me wrong, my A7RV is phenomenal, and I can, and do, shoot in APS-C mode at 26 megapixel from time to time. It is a landscape beast but, of course, there are some things I wish Sony had implemented better (ability to use BULB mode with the built-in intervalometer for astro on a tracker, faster frame rate for focus stacking, and more than 6-10 fps for wildlife). I can also agree it is nice to have so many choices for glass. While most of my gas is Sony, the Tamron 28-200 is one of my favorites because of it good quality, light weight, small size, and amazing versatility.
Hi Mr Worth, since you ask what it is I am using, here it is : Sony A7IV with Sigma 28-70 2,8 lens, sigma 100-400 5,6 and Tamron 17-24 2,8, K&F Tripod + ball head and geared head, Godoy flash and distance flash shutter, filters of all kind, and rings (collars) to transform my lenses in macro lenses. Why all that you might ask ? Since I am not really in only one activity I did not took any chances, but now I believe I am more and more into landscaping photography, Thanks to you !!!! Have a great day ! 14:00
Hi Ian, Another great video. Thanks for sharing. I've just recently started dipping my toes into the Fujifilm pool with a near mint X-T1. Wow! A Canon APS-C has been my workhorse for sometime but I wants to experience the manual control provided by the xt1. I just love this little beast. Sure there are some draw backs, but, I think this is a Hall of Fame camera. Fantastic picture quality. Cheers.🙏
The last spot would be great with wide fisheye lens 😊 I'm currently in the Faroe Islands, and I love my new fisheye from high altitudes and make the earth round 😉
Hi Ian, relatively new to photography so picked up a Nikon 5600 body (24MP), a Tokina f/2.8 11-16mm, Nikon f/2.8-4 16-80mm & a Nikon f/4.5-6.3 70-300mm, all second hand. Added a good tripod, some decent filters and a bag. Got everything for £1350 and I’m enjoying my learning journey without breaking the bank. Having decent glass in front of an ordinary body was a lesson I learned quickly, but I want to improve my skills before shelling out more cash on better equipment. When that does happen, I’d prioritise weather-proofing and IBIS before sensor size, so Fujifilm would be a consideration.
Yet another fantastic video Ian, thanks for your content and your thoughts. I'm a Fuji fan of sorts. My first mirrorless experience was with them and I really liked their system. I've had multiple cameras from them (xt3, xt30, xe3, xe2, x100t) and a fair amount of lenses (16, 23, 27 35, 35, 56, 10-24, 18-55, 55-200)... . I used this for landscape, wedding, and video for a few of years. Today, I still have the xe2 and the 27mm and I love it for fun shooting. I bought into Sony for wedding photo/videography, and I didn't think it was reasonable to have two different set-ups for so I sold most of my Fuji gear. I feel that the modern Sony's are better for work, but I miss the film sims and pleasure of the Fuji cameras. Fujis are just fun to shoot. The Sony is just a (great) tool. I would add, in particular to landscapes, I find that there are more (and better ?) lenses for Sony landscape than for Fuji. However, they're heavier, as you mentioned. My current setup is a74 + 20-70 + 50-400. It's fantastic to have that range with two lenses, but the kit is heavy... Thanks again for your content, Ian, look forward to your next vid. Cheers
I chose APS-C format for all of the reasons you outlined, Ian... I'm a Sony user (but not tribally so!) and have the ZV-E10 and A6700, they work nicely for this hobby photographer (ZV-E10 gets a lot of gimbal use) Enjoyed your 5 points, thanks.
Cameras are a very personal decision in many ways as all the major manufacturers have similar enough models that technical differences are fairly minor. It comes down to what suits each person. No one is going to care when they see the photos framed and hanging in on a wall what camera and lens were used to take the photo. I shoot with the Nikon Zfc, I like APS-C for nature photography myself.
Hi Ian, I did exactly the same, moved from Nikon to Fuji and although my old D700 is a classic, I didn’t look back. Chose the XT3 to start, recently moved to XT5 and it does everything I need. Although the weight saving was my primary reason the beautiful images, great colour and black and white rendering, (the film simulations are a joy) and ease of use make Fuji a real contender against any other make, full frame or not. Thanks for the videos. Baz
Opinions are like noses - everyone has one, they are all different and people like different ones for different reasons! I shoot Canon and Fuji and love them both for different reasons. For me, what matters is whether I am happy with the photos - and when I look at other people’s photos the last thing on my mind is “what sort of camera did they shoot this on?” I love your photographs and that may be partly attributable to the Fuji “look,” but I doubt it - I suspect that what I see is your “look” and if you used different equipment you would edit to achieve that look regardless. When I look at the gear used by the photographers whose work I admire the most, the one common factor is that they cover every major manufacturer - great photography comes from HOW the gear is used to realize a vision, not WHAT gear is used.
I totally get the weight thing. I can't yet afford a mirrorles but when I upgraded my canon 760D to a 7Dmkii I didn't go for a 5D because I realised most of the weight and bulk comes from full frame lenses. Even now I know an R5 would be amazing, but nothing would replace the flexibility of the 10-18 and 18-135 flexibility and simplicity. DXO and Topaz more than takes care of any lens defects. Love the practicality of you videos Ian.
Hello Ian, I totally agree with your 5 points. Two years ago I sold my Canon equipment (6D mark II and 5 D mark IV and all lenses) and move to a Fudji XT4 used and a brand new XH2 and I love this equipment so much. I don’t regret my decision.
Hi, I recently transitioned from an old Nikon D5600 with various prime's and a Tamron 70-300 zoom. I'm now learning my new XH2 paired with a Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 and the Fuji 70-300. Still finding my feet with the xh2 and all it's capabilities. The 17-70 is stunningly sharp I'm really pleased. Only just acquired the 70-300 but I'm pleased so far.
Certainly a great time to be a photographer with so many amazing camera options. I have shoot the XT5 but also picked up the Nikon Zf. Both amazing cameras but the Zf has seen more use recently.
I started using Fujifilm about six years ago for similar reasons and I first found your channel when you were demonstrating focus stacking with the XT2. My only real wishes would be to up the weather resistance to Olympus levels and to have a screen that closes against the camera body for better protection, but I know others prefer the screen set up on the XT5 as it is. Otherwise, I am completely happy. Thanks for another thoughtful video.
Cool location Ian. Been following your channel for a while and always enjoy your relaxed but professional manner. Fuji shooter also myself, X-E1, X-T2 and the gorgeous little X10. Landscapes mostly just for fun.
This will upset the online rage brigade Ian… it’s apparently impossible to use Fujifilm professionally. A working wedding photographer saying otherwise will be too much for their fragile egos. Always appreciate your thoughts on these videos.
Professionally? Impossible? Wow. I think you have to consider that not all “working professionals” are shooting weddings. I shoot commercial food, products, interiors and real estate and portraits (fashion and editorials), and I’ve used Fujifilm since 2015. So maybe what I am doing is not professional at all?
Hi Ian I was also a Nikon user but have just changed to Fuji have purchased a xt5 with a 16-80 lens and the 70-300 is on order Really enjoy the Fuji as a novice I find the Fuji easier to use Also just wanted to say how much I enjoy your videos thank you mick
Hi Ian I shoot with the Nikon Z system. Specifically the Z9 and Zf. I tried Sony for mirrorless in my first go around. I ended up going back to Nikon because I like how they feel in my hand. I feel more comfortable with some ‘heft’ to the camera. And I don’t mind the added Pounds.
Hi Ian - I shoot with the X-H2 - Lenses 16-55mm f2.8 + 27mm Viltrox F1.2 + 90mm f2 also GFX 50 SII and the 32-64mm f4 all of which are fabulous for my type of photography. I have not intention of changing kit anytime soon. I output on a Canon Prograf 1000 onto Canson Baryta Photographic II Infinity Prestige and Canson Platine Fibre Rag (For Monochrome) - All round a winning combination.
First digital camera I bought (in 2002 ) was a Fuji S602 3.1Mpixel ~ I recently re-edited some of my photos in the latest PS/Lightroom and got some reasonable images from them When I went to DSLR, there wasn't a Fuji, so went down the Nikon route
I did switch from my Canon 90D to the X-H2 as well and for the same initial reasons you stated, weight. Now that I have been using it for almost a year an agree with your experiences. In my case I bought the system with a 56 mm 1.4 and 80 mm 2.8 macro because I was focusing on using it for commercial work ( I am still learning) but, now that my trip to Santa Marta, Colombia is approaching I have been looking for a wider lens and based on my research I will be going with the 16-55 mm 2.8 I am sure I will enjoy it.
Fuji works fine for me, and of course there are better camera’s out there. And I’am not running after better ones because a RU-vidr has an opinion. Moreover my money and my choice.
I switched to Panasonic because I was sick of the games Canon plays aggressively segmenting their products so you need to get a pro camera and lens to have basic features like weather sealing. I'm all for redistribution of customer base away from canon and Sony because it forces brands to be more competitive with their offerings.
I shot with Nikon for 25 years before switching to Fujifilm. When I was doing commercial work and needed a certain degree of perfection and consistency across focal ranges, my D850 and holy trinity of fast glass was worth every cent. But that kit also weighed around 10kg, not counting filters, batteries, tripod and other accessories. As I age, every kilo matters. Now I shoot for myself on my terms. Can my Fujifilm cameras match my old kit in technical image perfection? No. Pretty close, but no. But is that important? No. My philosophy is that people judge the photos you take, not the photos you don't. No one looks at my photos and imagines what they would be if only I'd shot with a different camera or lens. The image should speak for itself, and if a viewer is more concerned with the bokeh or corner sharpness than the story I am trying to tell, then they're probably not my audience anyway, and that's OK. The thing is, it's about being creative, about getting out and finding stories to tell. The camera that allows you to do that is the right camera.
Excellent comment. I use Fujifilm cameras and lenses. Good quality paper and printer and as far as I’m concerned, the results are stunning. I’m not bothered what other people think as I’m not a professional photographer. I just love the whole experience and I don’t see my gear as having any significant limitations. I just concentrate on my subject. That’s the point of it all.
@@tonygarrett7214 Totally with you. For professionals with specific needs and exacting client briefs, an argument can be made for getting specific high end gear. Been there, I get it. When the pandemic dried up my business, I actually saw it as an opportunity to do more of what I wanted rather than what clients wanted. And that meant going lighter, being more agile. Turns out some of the work I used to do came back, because it was never about the gear in the first place and my Fuji kit was more than capable. Beyond that, just being able to go lighter has changed the way I seek subjects and approach the process in many ways, which has made me a better photographer as a whole.
My comment ~ I’m an ex NIKON user and never had any problems; changed to X-T5 for exactly the reasons you have mentioned (weight etc). I’m focussed these days on landscapes and pano’s and not been disappointed. Thanks for your discussion on Fujifilm…
Hey Ian. So I recently upgraded to a Nikon Z5 from a Canon 5d Mark ii. I still love my 5d but it's a no frills camera lol. The Z5 gives me the little extras that now suits my photography much better. A fully working auto ISO, faster focus, IBS to name a few.
Similar story to yours, I changed from full frame Nikon to Fuji system because of weight. (Not mine, the camera's.) 80 my next birthday and the weight became an issue. Full disclosure, I worked for Fuji for 30 years in the U.S. and I did get a good guy deal on the gear. I bought my gear prior to my finding your channel and I opted for the XH2, 16-55 2.8, 70-300 and I also bought a Viltrox 13mm. Sound familiar? I guess great minds think alike. While I'm happy with my decision to go back to Fuji, it's always nice getting reinforcement from someone you admire. Thanks for the great videos.
I just go the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 to replace the Fujifilm 18-55. The Sigma is MUCH better in every way with it's constant 2.8 from 18-50 and it is much sharper with very reliable focus.
Agree with all the points here. I too switched from Nikon to Fuji in 2016 because I wanted a smaller camera (mirrorless) without sacrificing IQ. Like you quite rightly stated, Nikon did not have any mirrorless cameras beck then, and I don't regret my decision. Carrying less weight cannot be underestimated. I love the design of Fuji cameras, they just seem so clinical and well executed compared to Canon and Sony. The quality lenses, SOOC JPEGs, film simulations, Fuji's gorgeous colour science, and competitive price all make it a great brand for my needs.
I have an X-H2s. I totally agree with your views on Viltrox lenses. I have only recently become a fan of primes . I shoot historic buildings which are ofeten very dark inside. I first bought the 56mm and was so pleased with the results that I got I bought the 23mm In the last couple of days I got the 75mm with which I am more than pleased, especially as I can crop right in without loss of final picture quality.
Just traded my X-T3 for a Sony A7iv. I am quite surprised how much I like the Sony. It’s substantial without being heavy, and it’s fast and responsive. I shoot street and travel and the selection of compact primes with aperture rings is amazing. My X-T3 with a Fuji 1.4 prime is no lighter than the Sony with a small Sigma I series or a Sony G 2.5 lens. Nothing against Fuji, but I’m finding I prefer full frame right now.
This is another inspiring video. I shoot most wildlife and sports, but I always enjoy watching them. I switched to Fuji about five years ago for the same reasons you mentioned. I am shooting with the H2s and have added the X-T50 for a lighter walkaround camera. I had the 100 series camera, but the one-lens setup was too limiting. I find the new 50 with the new 16-50 very sharp. I might even start shooting more landscapes. Thanks again.
Great insight on landscape photography , choosing the right gear is one thing but being fit is another :) I'm about to ascend on mount Sugarloaf in Ireland with Fujifilm XT5 and 50 -140 mm and 56 mm WR 1.2
Really like my XH2. Flag ship camera. But the thing I most like is just using straight out camera jpegs. Although I shoot in raw too, I just don’t find my self editing photos like a use to on my Canon cameras. Film simulations are just plain fun and more importantly look good right out of camera. The amount of tweaking you can do with the film simulations is just amazing. I came from the world of 35mm film all the way from late 80’s and I guess that has a lot to do with it.
I use a Nikon Z7. Having used different brands, I love the ergonomics and menu of Nikon. I prefer the size of this camera to crop sensor or MFT and no intentions of upgrading. The biggest limitation of this camera is me.
I subbed to your channel :).. I currently shoot mostly film when I do my landscapes.. Its just a silly hobby but I love the process.. If I find stuff I really like I sometimes go back and take my GFX System with me for digital keepers :). I have a friend that shoots fuji crop sensor cameras and I always loved how small his kit is and the photos he gets with them :).. I have been debating on buying a old XT-1 in great shape. You can pretty much take shots with one and upload them directly to social media and stuff as the files are much smaller.. The Fuji cameras I like are the models with dials :). I shoot them in manual mode and they give me the same feel as shooting with my old film cameras . Also the Fuji line of cameras I have used have been built like tanks unlike my cheap plastic feeling Canon camera I have.. I look forward to watching more videos of you going out and shooting landscape work.
Hi Ian, i shoot nikon 750 and Z6 ii, with a mixture of sigmas and tamron lenes. both ive had experiences with no issues over a number of years. I also Shoot 35mm B&W film and develop the film. an enjoyable experience
I’m shooting the XH2 with the 16-80mm and just picked up the Sigma 100-400mm! I’m having a problem getting my focus dialed in, not sure what I’m doing wrong! Great video Ian!
Nice video again Ian. Your hard work is appreciated. I use canon R7 and R8 for wildlife and family and landscape respectively. Love the quality but always unsure if R5 with more mega pixels is a better option for both.
All in with Fujifilm for all kinds of different types of photography like landscapes, astro, wildlife, macro. :-) X-H2S, X-T4, X-T2, X-T1, X-E1, GFX 50R
Thank you! I have the XH2 and the XH2s, came from the Canon 90d. The EF glass was a bit too heavy, the RF not a real option because of the lack of 3rd party glass and the weight and the price. I like just about everything on my Fujis except the autofocus, which is very hard to grasp. Most of the time I get great results, and suddenly really a lot of shots out of focus. I do mostly landscape, cityscape, portraits, wildlife. A bit disappointed in the wildlife area, but just because of the focus issues. Love the pre capture, the stacked sensor on the XH2s, etc That said… great to hold in your hand, nice to operate, reasonably lightweight, great image quality, great JPGs, even though I often use RAW anyway. Great video, love your style.
Great video. As the owner of a GFX system, I can confirm that it's a pain for landscape for DOF reasons, and I barely ever use it. Difficult to pull the additional IQ into real world benefit, even printing big.
I went from full frame Sony to a GFX 50Sii. It's a nice camera, and the GF 20-35 is pretty ideal for landscape, but a Sony a7Cr might still be in my future 😁
Hi Ian, Another great video as usual. That location is definitely worth another visit. Great image's as usual. I use the Nikon D750 with Tamron 17-35mm and the Nikon 28-300mm, but i must admit it's heavy and i will stick with it as i can't afford mirrorless and i happy with the image quality. Look forward to the next one mate
Hi Ian, I enjoy your videos. I have been with the xt system for several years. Xt2, xt4, and currently xt5. I don’t do any video and just do photography for fun. Love the xt5. I used to shoot Canon, but weight was an issue. I’m 76 now and weight is even more important now. My wife shoots with the Canon R5 and the image quality is slightly better than the xt5, but not much. We mainly do Landscape photography.
I was shooting Canon and it became clear that they were late to the party with affordable mirrorless. And for that matter of late with opening the RF mount to 3rd parties. I tried Fuji and loved it but was drawn to Sony FF A7RIV. Having strayed from the path in the end for reasons of size and weight and just because I love the cameras and the way they feel and operate I am now all in on Fuji with an X-T5 and an X-E4. Very happy and not changing again.
I had a few Fuji cameras and there is something about them that I always loved and one reason I sort of have a soft spot for the Fuji cameras particularly the APSC ones (never really looked too much into their MF cameras). I think the image quality and shooting experience (manual aperture ring for example, along with some of the manual controls) are what sold me on the system. Unfortunately I did sell my Fuji gear years ago when Nikon released their Z system (I always had a Nikon DSLR system so this was the most logical step for me, as the Fujis were mostly for travel because they were smaller than my DSLRs). But if I was to go back and get an APSC camera, I might pick up another Fuji camera (maybe the XT30 before it gets discontinued). Too bad many of the Fuji APSC cameras are on backorder now due to supply constraints Plus the nice thing now is that it seems Fuji has opened up the X-mount to third parties, which is a huge plus (Nikon has done the same, and so has Canon, to an extent). So that too might get me to pick up another XT30, at least knowing i don't have to buy into Fuji lenses and can use some third party options now (which was not an option when I had the XT2 and XT30 originally).
Great vid! Still have and love the X-E1 & X-T1. Sold the H1, T2, & T4 because I also shoot sports and tracking AF is so much easier with other brands. Interestingly, I got better tracking AF performance with the X-H1 vs the newer X-T4 when using Fuji red badge zooms.
I’ve been using Fuji since the X-T1. Now it’s the T4. 23 and 50 f2’s. 70-300 + converter and the ever reliable 18-55. Everything I need for a bit of wild life and street stuff. But mostly it’s great for my annual visit to Womad music festival. Thinking of adding the X-T50 🤔 or erm, don’t know yet 😊. Love your videos and your enthusiasm.
Pentax K3, Nikon D700 and Fuji XF10 and XE2. The two Fujis are great for traveling and doing after dark cityscapes, can get away with 1/10 sec if I'm careful. The Pentax and Nikon are mainly landscape but often it is just what I feel like picking up on the day. The K3 is the best ergonomically (for me anyway) and I love the "clunk" of the D700 shutter.
I switched from a Canon full-frame DSLR to Fujifilm after a fantastic year or so with a little X100V. I’ve now got an X-T5 and am out and about with it more than I ever was with the Canon. TBH, I’m struggling a bit with the 40Mp sensor (probably me, and a soft-ish 16-80 lens). I hope to explore some of the 3rd party glass options soon. I still waver occasionally, and look longingly towards a full-frame beast, but the cost and weight of those lenses would, for me at least, lead to fewer days out, and fewer photos.
Hi Ian. Very interesting video with some great images as usual. I had thought you were using a medium format Fuji. I have a Sony a7ii and an a6500, both older models bought lightly used. I like the value for money, especially the cheaper 3rd party lenses. I have 4 FE lenses that I can use on both cameras, with the a6500 giving me more reach. I also have a modest collection of vintage glass that I enjoy using on both cameras. I think Fuji’s are probably a great option, especially if taking advantage of the film like profiles.
I am a Sony man and always had Sony cameras, and Minolta before Sony. I have a Sony A7Rii full frame camera which I love using. I have my goto lens which is the Sony FE 4/24-105, wide angle lens Sony FE 4/16-35 and my long lens is the Sony FE 4.5-4.6/100-400GM OSS Sony lenses. I also have a Samyang 1.4 manual focus for astrophotography. I stick to Sony as I am used to the brand and it works week for me..
I shot either the xt1,2,3,4,5 then went to the Nikon Z7 and Z8. The weight the complicated menu etc was to much so I sold up and went back to the x-h2. I’m glad I went back to the old faithful system. Never again will I make that mistake ( I hope 😊).
I used to shoot Fuji but I found that the x-trans sensor struggles with details when green and browns are in frame. They seem to get muddied. That was the biggest reason why I switched back to Sony FF. Huge difference with Sony, in my experience.
I started with XT2, then 3 now 4. then I jumped into GFX as the results I kept seeing from watching YT were phenomenal. Inve since realised that the GFX system isn't for me as it is VERY heavy and the lenses are as heavy if not heavier than the body. Lugging huge amounts of weight around on hikes is not my idea of a good day out so I've sent my GFX kit off to either replace with an XT5 or XT50 - or neither as I may just stick with the XT4. Btw great images Ian!
There’s certainly some compelling reasons to choose the x series. I’m currently shooting on the GFX system and Canon with the 5dsr & R5 for all hybrid and video production for my videos. While I love the canons, I could see going with just the GFX and the xh2s. My concern has always been AF speed and accuracy with the x series, which is what the R5 excels at. That, and my bag actually isn’t that much heavier with the canon system since the r5 uses all the same lenses as the 5dsr
I have the XH1 and find after four years of using this camera as someone who only uses manual mode and mainly vintage lenses the camera really is completely over the top as far as features go, I just don't need any of them also I don't need video so I think my next camera will either be a dedicated camera for stills without video or I might even go back to my old film camera. I just wish Fuji would make a digital all manual camera without the bells and whistles.
X-T5, Sony A7r V and GFX 100 II. I use the X-T5 for music, festival and pub pics. The GFX for landscape and portraits. I love the Sony but the very fast lenses are so huge they scare the life out of anyone you point them at. The fantastic Viltrox 75mm 1.2 Pro on the X-T5 is incredibly light and small compared to 115mm or 135mm lenses with similar apertures on the Sony. So the Sony and big bag of lenses get little use at the moment except when I don't want to lug the GFX out for landscapes.
Landscape with APSC - impressive. I use MFT for street and portrait and have never considered using it for landscape, but you might have changed my mind. Is there a size limit to the prints you make if you do make prints?
Can you re-program basically every single button in the camera? And can it provide 200-800mm fullframe setup for under 2kg weight? 🤔 Does it have 50 fps wildlife shots? Digital shutter. I don't do mechanical, to save the camera life 😊
If you’re shooting still life and landscapes sure it’s fine but I wouldn’t rely on it for wildlife or sports…unless you want a lot of out of focus shots. I do love the way the camera felt in my hands but the inconsistent tracking and eye auto focus when shooting sports made me return it 😢. Maybe XH-3 will be the one. Hopefully 🤞 it’s coming soon.
interesting, I haven't found this to be a problem with my copy, but I have had to change some of my autofocus settings to really get it working as I want 👍
In all honesty it really depends what you're shooting lanscpaes as long as you have enough MP's you can use any camera made in the last 10 years, flip it to manual focus done . I use to own 2 xh2s's, meant to be best with honours sir, with what I was photographing they were pretty much next to useless, false positives, tracking would focus on anything other than what you wanted. I shot a wedding a few weeks back and that was the last straw It missed far too many "easy" shots important shots. The worst shots are when its focused in seemingly nothing not even back focused and its not motion blur . If you use single point and single shot, they work as well as any other camera (well kind of), but I didn't buy and Xh2s to use single point. I loved the fuji look but whats the point when nothing Is in focus or can't use the tool the way it was intended and designed. Quite frankly its the most expensive mistake I ever made I just about made the transition to a new system viable but still had to money towards it. My old d500 runs circles round these camera's more rugged to. But body alone it really really heavy but you could knock nails in with it. Just my 2 cents but as it stands I wouldn't wast money on fuji at this point in time.
As an amateur/enthusiast photographer, I bought a barely used X-T3 with the 18-55 because of one of the points you made...the performance for the price. Turns out that the X-T3 also was great to take out hiking, but also worked great for sports and portraits. I was also able to get two additional lenses in barely used condition at great prices by being a patient shopper! I have the old XF56 and the XF90. They really are fun lenses. I'd like one more lens for reach in sports and wildlife. Not sure which yet. I dream about the XF50-140, but it's a bit expensive for me. That XF70-300 just might be the sweet spot. Along with the LM/WR it has OIS which fits my needs as the X-T3 doesn't have IBIS. Question: Have you ever used the 1.4X teleconverter with the 70-300? Thanks for taking us along on this hike. Have a rockin' weekend.
Hi charliejg, i shoot x-t5 and have the 150-600mm and the 70-300mm & the 1.4 teleconverter. Both lenses accept the tele very well, but keep in mind you do lose an f stop. So the f4 at 70mm becomes 5.6 on the 70-300. I hardly give it a thought. I use back button manual focus with auto-assist and focusing is just as fast with or without the tele. I'm happy i have it - it practically lives on the 150-600. Cheers.
I agree with all of your reasons, but I believe you missed one important. At least for me it is. I used in the past many different brands, before settling with Fijifilm, like Canon, Sony and even Minolta digital cameras back in the day. And Fujifilm, along side the Leica Q, gives me the most pleasing colors. For some reason I find editing the photographs taken by Fujifilm and Leica much easier to edit and get to the point that I want. Perhaps this varies from person to person, but there is a difference on my PP workflow. And yes, I shoot RAW.
i am shooting with x-s10, i love the lenses and system - i use 99% af-s / somtimes zone with 70-300 and it is great- but using af-c eye tracking i s usless on this camera less than 50% accuracy, i was about to switch to sony couple of times but i am total amateur and when it comes to output /many fuji wins - when the x-s10 dies i would get x-20 or newer equvalent or mayby x-2h, for fammily and travelingand street it is supperb - very decent
A little late to the game here for my comment, but wanted to add and hope for a reply from anyone. I am currently a Canon RP user, love the camera, probably my all time favorite Canon camera I have ever used. But my needs for what I want have changed and sadly I am not sure Canon is the brand for me any more. I have been debating about switching to Fuji, on paper the X-T5 is what I would like, rather have the 3-way tilt screen and the higher megapixel is also a want for me since I do landscape and some wildlife and do find myself cropping at times. To get the higher MP sensor from Canon, I just do not have the money for an R5 camera, plus I dont need the cutting edge auto focus for the images I take. I'm debating the swtich because of the money I would lose on the glass I have from Canon, I am debating the switch because I wonder if I really need what the X-T5 has that I "think" I want and maybe I just need to either get a used R5 or save up for a very long time to get the newest R5 at that point. I debate because I could just go with the R8 which is the upgraded RP, or maybe go R6 and get something a little better, knowing the R8 & R6 do not offer me what the X-T has. Might be just scared of making the jump since I have used Canon for ages and the thought of something new and strange sort of scares me more than excites me to learn that new thing.
X-T5 here. I have had X-E2, X-T2 and X-T4. I really like the look and feel of X-T5 but I get more out-of-focus photos than with the other mentioned cameras. Probably user error.