What If Io And Ceres Switched Places? 

It would probably clear much of it, but not all of it. Maybe it would split the asteroid belt into 2 thin ones. It might also attract quite a few tiny asteroid moons similar to the ones Mars has.

Ceres is a very small dwarf planet with only 2.9% earth gravity

Io would be the 5th planet from the sun then not Jupiter anymore because it would be the next body after mars

Maybe co2 would freeze out. A

The moon is not allowing it🎯

Good way of understanding how each moon has their properties

True

With a brightness magnitude of 3.7 do you mean it will be barely visible or clearly visible?

@Ram-yn3b clearly visible

IO would cool down while the moon heats up and generates a magnetic field

The big problem with Io is that it is in the intense radiation belt around Jupiter, caused by Jupiter's strong magnetic field catching ionised particles from the solar wind (the same happens on Earth with the Van Allen belts). Modelling studies have shown that the radiation is so intense that an astronaut with an Apollo space suit would be dead within 15 minutes.

@@malcolmabram2957 hey that’s longer then if I were to stand on Venus lol

IAM WITH YOU PRO

I think Pluto and Neptune would be interesting.

@@dicerosautismambient4894 yes

A series

A Ceres lol

A major moon could have helped prolong the life of Mars magnetic field to this day.

Oh hi SomeAt-At. I’ve also thought about this exact scenario.

@@xenonmax Woah hey xeno!

If there was a large Martian moon, I can imagine many of Earth's cultures independently developing heliocentrism, leaving to numerous scientific revolutions around the planet.

@@xenonmax I agree but the moon would also probably be between the sizes of Ceres and Makemake. Any bigger and massive and i pretty sure it would be a binary planet system. Could you imagine a Mars moon being a similar size to ours? Hell even Mercury? Sense Mars is so tiny I do wonder.

Given its real theoretic location, I think Earth would be more in the danger zone. Jupiter protects us from a lot of huge rocks. Putting a much bigger Io within Earth's immediate proximity probably does have a higher ability to hurl bigger rocks our way.

How?

@@Ram-yn3b How? Io's gravity should be enough. It won't throw meteoroids at 50km/s but maybe it will do 1.7km/s? Maybe.

True, considering Io's gravity is 1.76 meters\second squared while Ceres gravity is 0.27 meters a second squared. That's 0.183 G for Io and 0.029 G for Ceres.

You do know for the asteroid belt the rocks I spread apart like thousands of miles spread apart

1. That new research doesn't change the conclusion of the video at all as there isn't a single conclusion to the video, for Ceres I consider both the possibility that it does and does not develop an ocean. 2. Overall there wasn't even a claim in the video that Mimas certainly doesn't have an ocean, I also considered the possibility that it does despite the *comparatively* weak evidence. I clearly state at 7:11 "Mimas might still have an ocean, it's just that there is something causing for the indications of it to not show up on the surface", that statement is made with Enceladus in mind which has many surface indications of a subsurface ocean unlike Mimas. 3. Although it's fun to look at things in retrospect and see how some things are rendered obsolete your comment doesn't show how the video is rendered obsolete through the new research proposing that Mimas does have an ocean.

@@Drekslerr Yeah fair enough. I think I worded what I mean to get at wrongly, apologies for that. I think I was more referring to the structure of the writing, not really about the informational content. Looking forward to watching more of your stuff, I recently discovered your channel and it’s great!

🌍☄️

🍆🚴‍♂️