Тёмный

What if the Soviets had joined the Axis in the WW2? A detailed alternate timeline! (Part 1 of 3) 

Binkov's Battlegrounds
Подписаться 859 тыс.
Просмотров 727 тыс.
50% 1

This video is sponsored by Call of War, a free to play multiplayer strategy game:
💥 callofwar.onelink.me/q5L6/fd0...
Click here to get an amazing New Player Pack, available for the next 30 days only!
Only newly registered players are eligible for it.
Imagine World War 2 going a different route. Imagine German and Soviet pact of 1939 being just the beginning. There is no Operation Barbarossa. But a true alliance is formed instead, with Soviets joining the Axis forces. Could they change the tide of the war? What would such a conflict look like? due to the complexity, this is just the first part of a 3-part series.
Image elements used in the thumbnail:
T-34 by Topory, CC BY-SA 3.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/b..., via Wikimedia Commons
German plane by Kogo, GFDL www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html, via Wikimedia Commons
B-17 bomber by Airwolfhound, CC BY-SA 2.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/..., via Wikimedia Commons
Music by Matija Malatestinic
www.malatestinic.com
Go to / binkov if you want to help support our channel. And enjoy the perks such as get access to our videos with no ads, participate in monthly polls deciding which topics we'll make into videos and get early access to various content.
Suggest country pairs you'd like to see in future videos over at our website: www.binkov.com
You can also browse for other Binkov T-Shirts or Binkov merch, via the store at our website, binkov.com/
Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos! / binkovsbattlegrounds
Follow Binkov's news on Facebook! / binkovsbattlegrounds
Follow us on Twitter: / commissarbinkov

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

 

22 окт 2020

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 3,1 тыс.   
@Binkov
@Binkov 3 года назад
This video is sponsored by Call of War, a free to play multiplayer strategy game: 💥 callofwar.onelink.me/q5L6/fd069fa6 Click here to get an amazing New Player Pack, available for the next 30 days only!
@atharvakadam35
@atharvakadam35 3 года назад
Please🙏🙏🙏 make video on india and America vs China nad Pakistan
@user-oi8nm1sy1d
@user-oi8nm1sy1d 3 года назад
I'm gonna download it
@garycrasto1310
@garycrasto1310 3 года назад
What if japan was on the allies's side in ww1?
@LittleRamsies
@LittleRamsies 3 года назад
Could Modern South Korea Survive and Win the Korean War??? (1950-1953)
@laikeensin7897
@laikeensin7897 3 года назад
Binkov join the game please I want to play against you
@kaleelbasheer9747
@kaleelbasheer9747 3 года назад
Imagine rommel and zhukov working together
@mabussubam512
@mabussubam512 3 года назад
Haha, the tanks goes BRRRRR and soldiers go URAAAA
@johnl.7754
@johnl.7754 3 года назад
Stalin might not have given Zhukov so much power without Germany threatening Russia’s existence.
@43sumfilmz1
@43sumfilmz1 3 года назад
Luckily we'd still have Patton
@fujiwara4109
@fujiwara4109 3 года назад
The best generals in history
@wartornforester1868
@wartornforester1868 3 года назад
@Morning Star I see what you mean but Patton beat him at his own game in Tunisia with inexperienced soldiers. He was the spearhead of American forces in the center regions and was able to move a few divisions of soldiers 100 miles in 2 days with no modern equipment in the tough Europe winter. Their are many more cases I could research and bring up but I don't have them in my head 😂 But I see what you mean, Rommel is, probably, THE main figure head of tank warfare but don't underestimate Patton. The Germans did and you can research the results yourself.
@ZeppelinAdventures25
@ZeppelinAdventures25 3 года назад
Finally, the perfect ship: the Fatherland and the Motherland.
@Eurasian_
@Eurasian_ 3 года назад
Countryhumans: I am already four parallel universes ahead of you.
@JeanLucCaptain
@JeanLucCaptain 3 года назад
together they created the OH LOOK WE HAD A Baby land!
@commanderdark3399
@commanderdark3399 3 года назад
And Poland the abused child
@JeanLucCaptain
@JeanLucCaptain 3 года назад
@@commanderdark3399 Poland and Russia have a long history of invading each other. The only difference this time is HOW BADLY Poland lost.
@commanderdark3399
@commanderdark3399 3 года назад
@@JeanLucCaptain well yes, obviously. i am not saying it would change anything about poland.
@kozmonauta0515
@kozmonauta0515 3 года назад
"What if the Soviets had joined the Axis in the WW2?" Well... *did you saw the video "Meet the Medic"?*
@mohandasjung
@mohandasjung 3 года назад
Yes, it was beautiful
@sirduckless9202
@sirduckless9202 3 года назад
I am ze Übermensch!
@neo-didact9285
@neo-didact9285 3 года назад
That's a perfect metaphor for this parallel universe.
@akdeleS4
@akdeleS4 2 года назад
I HAVE NO IDEA
@johndickson435
@johndickson435 2 года назад
Dude they were part of the Axis until Germany decided to attack them.
@meowmeowmeow1243
@meowmeowmeow1243 3 года назад
"Stalin looks like a man i could do business with" - famous last words
@Lens15
@Lens15 3 года назад
İmagine living in turkey and sweden in this scenerio
@rodrigonunez9451
@rodrigonunez9451 3 года назад
(chuckles) I'm in danger
@liliyum8315
@liliyum8315 3 года назад
Forgot about Switzerland
@jduff59
@jduff59 3 года назад
I think the Swedes would join the Axis at this point - it would be the smart move.
@darthvader4899
@darthvader4899 3 года назад
@@Lorddonen Nope they would join Axis
@Dreczhar
@Dreczhar 3 года назад
@@darthvader4899 no
@zaho87
@zaho87 3 года назад
The very possibility of the USSR joining the Axis was Churchill's literal worst fear.
@MG.1900
@MG.1900 3 года назад
It would have been more realistic that England would join Germany because Hitler hated the Russians
@deason2365
@deason2365 3 года назад
@@MG.1900 so that's why they invaded Poland together
@deason2365
@deason2365 3 года назад
Churchills worst nightmare, Stalins wet dream
@deason2365
@deason2365 3 года назад
@Kazumaf but Hitler did, he was a Marxist, a racist Marxist but a Marxist none the less
@MG.1900
@MG.1900 3 года назад
Hitler: "In die russischen Städte gehen wir nicht hinein, sie müssen vollständig ersterben" Hitler: "We don't go into the Russian cities, they have to die completely"
@devins2011
@devins2011 3 года назад
"... The US would declared war on Japan, Germany, Soviet, and the rest of the Axis" *Sad italian voice* "Guys, we are one of the main pact of steel member"
@chrischandler889
@chrischandler889 3 года назад
Issa me, Mario. Don't you remember?
@jc.1191
@jc.1191 3 года назад
Ok. We invade for pizza stop on the way to hopeless battle. At least we get the best pizza and spaghetti. 🤷😉
@killian9314
@killian9314 3 года назад
Turkey getting surrounded in all sides by russo-germanic axis powers: _This is Fine_ Switzerland: *First Time?*
@jeegunugger1871
@jeegunugger1871 3 года назад
Und Sverige
@killian9314
@killian9314 3 года назад
@@jeegunugger1871 Ja
@jeegunugger1871
@jeegunugger1871 3 года назад
@@killian9314 ja
@UnexpectedWonder
@UnexpectedWonder 3 года назад
LOL. 😁😁😂😂🤣🤣😋😋
@SarimFaruque
@SarimFaruque 3 года назад
As long as Turkey has a second Ataturk, they'll win for sure
@AnnedolfFrankler911
@AnnedolfFrankler911 3 года назад
You failed to mention the most powerful member nation of this new alliance - *Tannu Tuva*
@theliberionguy5617
@theliberionguy5617 3 года назад
Tannu what?
@AnnedolfFrankler911
@AnnedolfFrankler911 3 года назад
@Вук Тодић Glad you likey
@runi5413
@runi5413 3 года назад
"German Reich is justifying on Tannu Tuva" Stalin: 🥱 It'll be fine... I'm sure this won't have major consequences.
@-Raff-
@-Raff- 3 года назад
Hoi4 player detected lmao
@Jijo2003
@Jijo2003 3 года назад
Tannu what?
@octotitan4574
@octotitan4574 3 года назад
The USSR would give oil to the Japanese , wich in this case , Pearl Harbour doesn't happen
@xavierlauzac5922
@xavierlauzac5922 3 года назад
Japan was expansionist either way, so there would still be an attack on Pearl Harbor.
@burningdesire8597
@burningdesire8597 3 года назад
Japan was expansionist, but their interest laid in China and Asia. Due to US blockade and the lack of oil, Japan decided to invade oil-rich areas like Borneo and Dutch New Guinea. The problem was that their new supply routes would be within striking range from Philippines, which was at that time a colony of United States. Japan viewed US blockade and ultimatum as an indirect declaration of war, and (incorrectly) assumed that US would declare war on them if they invaded these places (Borneo etc) and thus, the Philippines had to be conquered to secure the supply routes. With apparent war inevitable, Yamamoto decided to gain as much of an advantage as he could by destroying most of US navy in the Pacific at the start of the war to allow Japan to conquer and fortify as much as it could. Without the lack of oil, there would be no need to invade these places at this time and Japan could focus on finishing their conquest in China and Asia. Whether they would attack later to get more stable oil supply (not depending on buying from Russia) or not is hard to say, but they could for example afford to wait till US is fully focused on war with Germany+Russia before striking now weakened Pacific Fleet. Also, now with free manpower from China and enough resources to continue building new aircrafts and ships (like Unryu, Taiho and Yamato classes), Japan would be able to engange any new US fleet on equal/nearly equal grounds in numbers and superior in training. Perhaps with better relationship with Axis powers, Japan could even get their hands on better radars, enigma machine, advice on submarine warfare or better pilot training program. No matter what, Japan would be in even more advantageous position at the start of war than it was in real life.
@xavierlauzac5922
@xavierlauzac5922 3 года назад
@@burningdesire8597 as I said, they were still expansionist. They would’ve wanted more even if the Soviets provided them with oil.
@burningdesire8597
@burningdesire8597 3 года назад
@@xavierlauzac5922 Maybe, we can't be sure as it is alternate history. With US first going into war with Germany and Japan being able to finish their conquest of China before starting another war, perhaps the Pearl Harbour raid wouldn't happen as US ships would be in battle-ready condition or some of them would be directly sent into Atlantic to help British. If war started traditonal way and US was beaten in battleship battle/multiple smaller engagements, the outrage would be significantly lower and US may be willing to accept ceasefire/peace treaty to fully focus on Europe.
@xavierlauzac5922
@xavierlauzac5922 3 года назад
@ and it would still be the likely scenario.
@krisfrederick5001
@krisfrederick5001 3 года назад
I love how the Soviets don't even attempt to invade Afghanistan in the alternate Universe.
@salmaaktar2547
@salmaaktar2547 3 года назад
Maybe they learnt their lessons somehow imagining the real one.😂😂
@alkyd85
@alkyd85 3 года назад
@@salmaaktar2547 No, they imagined that Taliban suicide-bombed Aghanistan back to the Medieval Ages.
@mosalah8551
@mosalah8551 3 года назад
Taliban dont have oil
@alkyd85
@alkyd85 3 года назад
@@mosalah8551 Oil wouldn't make them more civilized anyway, they would still prefer to cut heads
@Ribulose15diphosphat
@Ribulose15diphosphat 2 года назад
@@alkyd85 Same can be said about Saudi Arabia.
@henryng914
@henryng914 3 года назад
National Bolshevism may actually be a thing in this universe
@narenpadmanabhan3865
@narenpadmanabhan3865 3 года назад
Dugin?
@febrian0079
@febrian0079 2 года назад
Isn't that also a thing in our universe
@blaine8197
@blaine8197 3 года назад
Was anyone else slightly bugged by the inconsistencies in the maps?
@GulagExpresss
@GulagExpresss 3 года назад
For example, these two islands of Corsica and Sardinia west of Italy should be colored red (Axis)
@Tower_Swagman
@Tower_Swagman 3 года назад
yes
@hnorrstrom
@hnorrstrom 3 года назад
Yeah the baltic states was wrongly marked a few times that sucks...
@blindtherapper2470
@blindtherapper2470 3 года назад
Also yugoslavia stopped de facto existing in 41', being split between croatia and serbia, baltic states were occupied by the ussr.
@ivar1543
@ivar1543 3 года назад
Romania owned Bessarabia and Japan isn't part of the alliance
@Yeeter000
@Yeeter000 3 года назад
Russia and Germany : *Work together* The rest of Europe: *Chuckles* "i am in danger"
@galistoianov
@galistoianov 3 года назад
rest of the world*
@JakubNaceradsky
@JakubNaceradsky 3 года назад
@Tattle Boad But they could fear Japanesse-Soviet cooperation... Main reason slowing Japanesse war machine production was a Oil embargo by US... But there would be no need to buy oil from US, when they could take Soviet Oil... Soviets would have time even for making more own carriers and fleet stuff, and redirect more presence over Pacific for some little territorial gains, and Soviets would want to, because they could use strategic locations for own Fishing industry, Rubber and Sugarcane production (They would like to take Hawai and Midway probably).
@peakynation
@peakynation 3 года назад
@Tattle Boad hahahah USA couldn't beat Germany 1 vs 1 . Soviet won us ww2 and 7 of 10 nazis were killed by Soviet
@Spanishfutbol2010
@Spanishfutbol2010 3 года назад
USA “....we will sit this one out..good luck gentlemen”
@theonewhodoesntcringe4048
@theonewhodoesntcringe4048 3 года назад
@Tattle Boad yeah but America would be a weak country economically in the future because everything would be controlled by Japan, Soviet union, and Germany
@EdricLysharae
@EdricLysharae 3 года назад
This is me and my friends playing a game of modded Crusader Kings 3. "You're getting Iran? Okay, then can I have Yugoslavia? Thanks!"
@markmitchell9872
@markmitchell9872 3 года назад
Hitler would have stabbed Stalin in the back again.
@ralphsaavedra2326
@ralphsaavedra2326 3 года назад
A war like this would've dwarfed WWII in our timeline. It could possibly even last for decades, with generations of people living through and only for the war.
@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714
@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 3 года назад
It would not dwarf it as it would end without either side capitulating as overocien invasions are hard.
@timothybrown8424
@timothybrown8424 3 года назад
I think eventually, there would've been some sort of cease fire. I can't see any country going 7+ years depleting resources and straining their economy for decades. This isn't a small conflict like Vietnam, Falklands, Korea, or Iraq, this is a conflict with all participants shifting their entire industry and economy to support a war.
@freddyd1783
@freddyd1783 3 года назад
At some point someone is getting the A-Bomb and whoever gets it first will probably be able to bring the other side to peace talks.
@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714
@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 3 года назад
@@freddyd1783 Bring to peace talks not enforce their terms. There are way to many strategic sights to nuke enough to bring capitulation.
@freddyd1783
@freddyd1783 3 года назад
@@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 Ik im late but same was true for japan when they got nuked. Japan surrendered bc they thought the US had more bombs when they didnt. Same could apply anyways, even if just 2 are used if the other side thinks theres more theyll be talkin peace imo.
@SuperZombieBros
@SuperZombieBros 3 года назад
I can only imagine the pressure placed on the Manhattan Project in this timeline.
@jc.1191
@jc.1191 3 года назад
Yeah. The only freaking way out.
@aorusaki
@aorusaki 2 года назад
Facts
@amogus2043
@amogus2043 2 года назад
@@jc.1191 nazis built the nuke for allies so....the allies wouldnt have it in this scenario
@newenglandmartialartsathle2343
@newenglandmartialartsathle2343 2 года назад
@@amogus2043 good point!
@Frozo-nt2ky
@Frozo-nt2ky 2 года назад
@@amogus2043 no, they didn’t. The majority of the scientists from Germany were ones that fled to America, do you really think the same country that created internment camps for a few thousand American-Germans trust actual Nazis? Even if for some reason many were nazis, that would just delay the creation a few weeks or months
@markoscream8466
@markoscream8466 3 года назад
THIS IS GONNA BE AN AWESOME SERIES!
@kvarnerinfoTV
@kvarnerinfoTV 3 года назад
I would never say that Germany lost air war over Brittain, Hitler just changed objectives.
@jonathanstempleton7864
@jonathanstempleton7864 4 месяца назад
Because he was losing 🇬🇧
@ImmortalSugimoto792
@ImmortalSugimoto792 3 года назад
Point of note: Rommel was commanding roughly two divisions of _German_ troops. But throughout the entirety of the North African campaign, most Axis troops were Italian. At the Second Battle of El Alamein there were 10 Italian divisions plus independent brigades. The Italian troops in North Africa actually performed very well considering their lack of modern equipment when placed under German command. At the Battle of Gazala, which is considered Rommel's most impressive victory, Italian troops outnumbered their German counterparts 2:1.
@cLaw27
@cLaw27 3 года назад
"The Italian command was, for the most part, not equal to the task of carrying on war in the desert, where the requirement was lightning decision followed by immediate action. The training of the Italian infantryman fell far short of the standard required by modern warfare. Particularly harmful was the all pervading differentiation between officer and man. While the men had to make shift without field-kitchens, the officers, or many of them, refused adamantly to forgo their several course meals. Many officers, again, considered it unnecessary to put in an appearance during battle and thus set the men an example. All in all, therefore, it was small wonder that the Italian soldier, who incidentally was extraordinarily modest in his needs, developed a feeling of inferiority which accounted for his occasional failure and moments of crisis."
@MajinOthinus
@MajinOthinus 3 года назад
True, but more German troops with better equipment and training (especially in terms of experienced officers and field commanders), is still a plus.
@runi5413
@runi5413 3 года назад
You are correct.--I would also add that the main reason why mostly Italian infantry divisions were deployed in N. Africa had a lot more to do with the logistical constraints of the campaign than it did with a scarcity in tanks, troops, or war-materials on the German side. The German OKW actually offered to send several more armored divisions in support of Rommel during the run up to the battle of El Alamein, but Rommel refused, stating that what he _desperately_ needed was more trucks, fuel and supplies; not tanks. The Italian divisions, being relatively light on their feet compared to their German counterparts, put a lot less strain on logistics, as well as being generally less affected by attritional factors like mal-nutrition, heat-stroke and disease. (Despite all their training and combat experience, the Germans hadn't quite figured out the fine art of digging a proper latrine yet. Which lead to Rommel's famous Afrika Korps becoming completely rife with dysenterie as the campaign dragged on). [source: "BATTLESTORM: Operation Crusader"]
@killian9314
@killian9314 3 года назад
Huh, so the spagettis aren't that much of a meme after all. Can't say that for their leadership tho. Lions led by lambs or some shit
@MajinOthinus
@MajinOthinus 3 года назад
@@killian9314 I mean, the battle of Pont Saint Louis still exist, so we can still make fun of it.
@Joker-yw9hl
@Joker-yw9hl 3 года назад
The US would have joined immediately if Russia and Germany united. A massive part of both American and British Grand strategy is to keep Russia and Germany divided
@skalderman
@skalderman 3 года назад
and probably lost on the mark
@komlan391
@komlan391 3 года назад
Yep the US will join right away
@cathalmurphy4584
@cathalmurphy4584 3 года назад
That is what the U.S government wanted but the American public still had no interest in fighting a large foreign war.
@Joker-yw9hl
@Joker-yw9hl 3 года назад
@@cathalmurphy4584 true but if they'd united it would have been too important to stay out (in my opinion). Central to US strategy even today is to prevent a Eurasian hegemon that can challenge US economically and militarily, especially in regards to controlling the sea. Very similar to the British Empire's interests. UK and USA 90% of the time share the same geopolitical interests. Control the sea. Prevent hegemons
@FlakonFraggs
@FlakonFraggs 3 года назад
Germany and Russia uniting would surely terrify the US government, but how could they declare war without infuriating the US public?
@supermemegenerator267
@supermemegenerator267 3 года назад
Best Crossover the world could have seen
@petersmythe6462
@petersmythe6462 3 года назад
TBH this alliance would likely be too unstable. They'd both be completely looking for the right time to take out or annex or coup their ally and bring them under direct control or just win a decisive victory so they can have the upper hand and don't need to worry about the other side doing it.
@Mfields4517
@Mfields4517 11 месяцев назад
Yes theres no way they just share resources and operations like this. Why would soviets help Germans attack Britain? It doesnt help USSR at all
@ericlee3222
@ericlee3222 3 года назад
I don’t know if Japan would declare war on the US, since the reason they did it was the US oil embargo and needing resources in lands belonging to European powers. If the USSR can supply them with enough oil to sustain them, they could just not reach that desperation.
@mint8648
@mint8648 3 года назад
they needed other resources too tho...
@711jastin
@711jastin 3 года назад
The Japanese would have whatever they need to develop new war machines. There were extremely ambitious plan, some more ambitious than the German. One very famous, being the submarine carrier, if they managed to build about a complete fleet or two, there will be virtually no safe coast around the world.
@ekulzonum
@ekulzonum 3 года назад
I'd have to slightly disagree. I dont know the specific oil output of the USSR at this time but I'm skeptical it can supply it, the Germans, the Italians (gotta keep that big ass Italian navy supplied so it can fight the brits), AND the Japanese army and navy (itself also being very damn big) I dont know, seems a stretch, for sure the USSR would want to keep the Japanese navy afloat to fight the U.S. but I doubt it'd be enough to meet Japanese demand. The U.S. embargo would still likely be enough to cause desperation
@limedickandrew6016
@limedickandrew6016 3 года назад
@@ekulzonum USA was by far the biggest producer of oil in 1941. 2nd was USSR and Venezuela - both were joint 2nd. German know how and efficiencies I'm sure would have played a key part in ramping up Soviet production to at least US levels.
@burningdesire8597
@burningdesire8597 3 года назад
@Вук Тодић Japan could exchange carrier designs and doctrine for oil, steel and other materials. Japan had multiple different classes of carriers and even if they only traded older types it would still massively help German and Soviet carrier program. This way they could get more oil that would otherwise go to Italian Navy.
@Holammer
@Holammer 3 года назад
Spoiler for part 3 - "Nukes, oh god, so many nukes!"
@711jastin
@711jastin 3 года назад
yeah, literally, they will nuke every single capital they know, twice.
@apiatkowski7183
@apiatkowski7183 3 года назад
I mean germany still would never have built nukes. Hitler even called atomic science "Jewish science"
@kestrel16c32
@kestrel16c32 3 года назад
Let's be honest here. The only way of deploying nuclear weapons at this time is by plane. This makes them very limited in range and much more vulnerable to interception. On top of that the production of nuclear weapons was very slow at the time. The main reasons the US for example could easily utilize them are because they already had air superiority by then (meaning lower chances of their bombers being intercepted) and they already had bases close to mainland japan. In this scenario the axis forces will be able to maintain air superiority for much longer and the US won't have as many bases close enough to the enemy, making it much harder to deploy these weapons. Sure, they can use Britain (if it hasn't been taken already by that time) to deploy nukes in Germany. But the lack of air superiority will make it much harder for bombers to reach their destination. The allies will probably also hesitate using them at first because if the axis manage to shoot down the bomber carrying them they could find fragments of the bomb and start reverse-engineering it. Planes like the Me163 (if developed) might also be extremely useful nuke-interceptors. On the contrary Germany could also put more into their V2 development and gain a huge advantage in potential nuke deployment if they get their hand on it. Therefore the first country to develope nukes is not going to have as much of an advantage as could be assumed at first.
@prussianboi6381
@prussianboi6381 3 года назад
@@kestrel16c32 someone forgot that the germans, (if they wouldve made it) made a stealth bomber. The horten... hell it literally was called america bomber because it could reach america from axis airbases and that undetected, they didnt need to invest into the V2 programm since they already had the capability to bomb america...
@kestrel16c32
@kestrel16c32 3 года назад
@@prussianboi6381 Wtf. Are you a troll or something? The Horten didn't nearly have enough range, wasn't actually that stealthy (popular misbelief, stealth doesn't make something invisible on the radar. Something with a stealthier design can just get closer to radar sites before being spottet or able to be tracked) and couldn't carry that much payload (To be fair, a V2 can't carry much payload as well but I meant better iterations that could have been made from it.). On top of that a plane is still way inferior for deploying nukes because it's much easier to intercept. The Horten is nothing more than a slightly stealthy, medium range fighter (not bomber).
@disposingbow2274
@disposingbow2274 3 года назад
The US would still hold Midway even if they lost the naval battle, compared to other islands, Japan could not send such a big force to take it considering the distance and the US garrison alone could hold them of
@JStryker7
@JStryker7 2 года назад
Exactly. Plus he said that the US would focus on naval and air power. The US force at Midway wasn’t massive at all so there is no reason to believe that it would be smaller or that real life event would have been any different.
@rokadaprliinnysystemyaczno4761
@rokadaprliinnysystemyaczno4761 3 года назад
Brilliant episode, am looking forward to part 2. Perhaps a sequel to a war in 1956 over Suez with an alternative outcome with the USSR actually declaring war on the UK?
@tudormardare66
@tudormardare66 3 года назад
If the USSR joined the Axis, the Italian navy would have been more active due to a heavier influx of oil. The reason the Italian active wasn't that active is due to the lack of oil. Please mention it at least in the second video, because it is extremely important. With Iran and Iraq conquered, oil would be more than enough. Let's not forget that Romania's oil fields will be pretty much intact, due to no Soviet bombings, and due to Soviet air support. The US and the UK would rather not bomb it as they would believe it wouldn't be worth it due to the distance and the other active oil fields Germany can use as an alternative. When Egypt is conquered, even more oil is available, and the British are pretty much gone from the Mediterranean, which would allow for more action of the Italian fleet in the Atlantic.
@yeetus1398
@yeetus1398 3 года назад
The reason the Italian navy remained in port, was due to the Regia marina naval doctrine. All Italian ships were designed for war in the med, and would require extensive remodeling to serve in the Atlantic and Indian Ocean. The assets that the Italians could bring to the table in an eventual offensive action against Britain would be minuscule in comparison to those necessary.
@Daniel-rh7kh
@Daniel-rh7kh 3 года назад
Don't forget the Caucusus' oil, the axis war machine would be (in theory) very much operational
@MajinOthinus
@MajinOthinus 3 года назад
@@yeetus1398 Most ships in WW2 were steam powered, oil was used to fire the boilers. Even today, the US super carriers are steam powered.
@kestrel16c32
@kestrel16c32 3 года назад
@@MajinOthinus I wouldn't actually call US-Carriers steampowered considering how the heat is being generated but yeah... technically.
@MajinOthinus
@MajinOthinus 3 года назад
@@kestrel16c32 I thrive on technicality. Like how someone who is dying from anything but brain damage technically starves to death, just very quickly.
@blitzkrieg2928
@blitzkrieg2928 3 года назад
Uk: Germany will attack the Soviet Union they will die in the fighting The Soviet Union has joined the Axis *UK sweating*
@dbdb9334
@dbdb9334 3 года назад
1940 Soviet union sweating.
@dennisvisser3910
@dennisvisser3910 3 года назад
Uk sovjet union is our last hope. this timeline. Quess you have to surrender churchil......
@JRyan-lu5im
@JRyan-lu5im 3 года назад
UK: "I didn't expect that reaction, but okay."
@dat581
@dat581 3 года назад
@@dennisvisser3910 Nope. Neither the Germans or the Soviets had an answer to the Royal Navy.
@malikbakt
@malikbakt 3 года назад
@robandcheryls
@robandcheryls 2 года назад
I never thought of this “what if”. Great episode Binkov.
@JuniorAngel8888
@JuniorAngel8888 3 года назад
This video is awesome!
@zaptosmedia4707
@zaptosmedia4707 3 года назад
The map is SO wrong. In 1941 Russia had annexed the Baltic states as well as parts of Romania and Finland.
@danishkfd
@danishkfd 3 года назад
No. This map changes every time you see
@oppaispecialist716
@oppaispecialist716 3 года назад
Yeah he is right
@billsmith8605
@billsmith8605 3 года назад
Ahhhh.... this is a make believe scenario. Why are you trying to use actual history . He is creating his own history. Look at for what it is, and stop being a history professor.
@oppaispecialist716
@oppaispecialist716 3 года назад
@@billsmith8605 yeah man your correct
@sally232
@sally232 3 года назад
You're sort of wrong, in June 1941 Germans have already started Operation Barbarossa, and has reached Estonia, some parts are wrong but still
@looinrims
@looinrims 3 года назад
Everyone: “the war will be over by Christmas” Nazi-Soviet military pact: “are you sure about that?”
@b-92s25
@b-92s25 3 года назад
That was a WW1 expectation, not world war 2
@urielantoniobarcelosavenda780
@urielantoniobarcelosavenda780 2 года назад
I mean, yeah, but...
@mr_babadook_0181
@mr_babadook_0181 3 года назад
Realy good vid
@fireshadow7598
@fireshadow7598 3 года назад
Well they actually did at the beginning of the war, and this caused the fall of France and Poland.
@mohandasjung
@mohandasjung 3 года назад
"Poland was conquered" US: That's sad, anyway...
@Mentol_
@Mentol_ 2 года назад
Ussr was neutral state at this time and trade with germany. His attempt to join axis failed in november 1940.
@lollo2626
@lollo2626 3 года назад
I think this time Spain would join the war, the axis is winning on every front and the axis has the control of the Mediterranean sea. With Spain's help, they could kick out che Americans from Morocco
@greg_mca
@greg_mca 3 года назад
The main reasons for Spain staying neutral were that it was recently crippled by civil war and naturally didn't want any more, and, more crucially, it relied on foreign trade to keep its economy functioning, meaning that Germany and the USSR would have to effectively float the Spanish economy themselves, and with both being poorly run, this may not be seen as worth the effort. The Spanish wouldn't join in without extreme coaxing from outside powers, and given Franco's previous economic demands, Spain would probably be left alone as it was not worth invading or bankrolling.
@TheKarofaar
@TheKarofaar 3 года назад
​@@greg_mca In order to make some sense here, i can tell you that UK gov gifted franco's generals with huge ammounts of bribes to stay neutral. And for sure, making money for nothing is almost the final objective about iberian fascism.
@MajinOthinus
@MajinOthinus 3 года назад
Spain irl already supported the Axis with almost everything they could have wanted, like supplies, volunteer detachments, refueling and anchorages for U-Boats etc. Besides maybe attacking Gibraltar from Spanish territory, there really isn't much the Axis would gain from Spain entering the war.
@Alexwhine11
@Alexwhine11 3 года назад
if spain joined on the axis' side they would likely have been the first nation who had a Nuke dropped on them given their geographical position tbh dont think it would go well given there was 4 years before the soviets had that sort of tech... in 4 years almost every axis city in the world could of been nuked..
@MajinOthinus
@MajinOthinus 3 года назад
@Samuel Brown By freeing up the German Luftwaffe and supplying the Italian fleet with oil.
@seno5530
@seno5530 3 года назад
I find it implausible for Japan to declare war on the US. In reality, they were pressured towards Indonesian oil, which would here be supplied by the Eurasian block.
@kestrel16c32
@kestrel16c32 3 года назад
Good point. However, a war between the axis-forces and the US would still be very likely due to other reasons. It will probably just not happen due to Pearl Harbour tho.
@theasianboy315
@theasianboy315 3 года назад
@@kestrel16c32 Exactly. Because Japan still want to rule China (which is also one of Allies country), either she want to invade SEA or not
@JRyan-lu5im
@JRyan-lu5im 3 года назад
The other problem was that they invaded the Philippines which was a direct territory of the U.S. Obviously they could bypass those islands to swamp the rest of the island chains surrounding it, but I can hardly imagine the U.S. or Japanese being fine with having battlefleets having a standing cold war like that.
@freddyd1783
@freddyd1783 3 года назад
At the time, Japan wanted to be self sufficient from the west and other powers. Historically the West mistreated the East colonially and economically and due to the lack of resources (oil being a big one) to ever say "no" to them. Japan would not rely on trade from the Eurasian block for long, but as a means to an end because if the Eurasian block ever wanted to effectively "black mail" (for lack of a better term) Japan, all they have to do is stop providing oil and Japan is dead meat and will probably become their puppet similar to China after they made contact with the Dutch and British. As a result, they still need to get resources from somewhere and if anything in this scenario, being provided oil even temporarily just allows Japan to more competently do what it did in real life. Japan had to secure its own oil and other resource sites if it ever wanted to be a dominant power. If anyone could just cut off so much as 30% of it's access to oil Japan militarily is just finished which is what happened irl except this time it'd be their over reliance on 'allies' followed by complacency instead of the US forcibly depriving them.
@greghall4836
@greghall4836 3 года назад
The problem is the logistics. There was no practical way of moving Soviet oil in any meaningful amounts from Soviet oil fields to Japan. Most of the Soviet oil production was located in the Caucasus.
@alecsa4568
@alecsa4568 3 года назад
Yeah this is a stretch even for alt-history though, considering even Stalin sought help from the allies before the Germans
@multigameswithryan9215
@multigameswithryan9215 7 месяцев назад
you have to remember, the Soviets were starving, with dwindling supplies, the US sent extreme amounts of goods, I could recommend a documentary that talks all about how US manufacturing kind of saved the war effort
@DrMarioMorales
@DrMarioMorales 3 года назад
This was a very interesting video Binkov! Can’t wait for second part!
@smlfan0072
@smlfan0072 3 года назад
The Berlin-Moscow Axis 👀😳
@andrespuszynszestopalova1268
@andrespuszynszestopalova1268 3 года назад
I like very much the idea of using your war knowledge to explore alternative history, thanks
@Tekisasubakani
@Tekisasubakani 3 года назад
Ah, the classic "Unholy Alliance", always a fun topic!
@antimatter4733
@antimatter4733 3 года назад
If the axis/soviet union wins I expect a lot of salt in the comments
@satnav9699
@satnav9699 3 года назад
Allies nukes go bang
@antimatter4733
@antimatter4733 3 года назад
@John Higgins not really, not as many nazi or soviet union supporters on RU-vid
@antimatter4733
@antimatter4733 3 года назад
@@satnav9699 very possible that Germany and the soviet union working together are able to develope nukes before the allies
@kurousagi8155
@kurousagi8155 3 года назад
ANTIMATTER THE DESTROYER OF WORLDS there are plenty of Wehraboos and Red Army Fan boys on RU-vid.
@antimatter4733
@antimatter4733 3 года назад
@@kurousagi8155 not as many as there are muricans thats for sure
@Marshal_Longarm
@Marshal_Longarm 3 года назад
Italy: Guys! Hey, fellas, listen! Germany just made an agreement with Soviets! Germany: It's more than agreement. We'll share our technologies with each other, get their resources and army. Here, watch this! They even invaded Iran and made Britain defend in Near East! Italy: So, we are fine, as long nobody attack American bases. Japan: Question. Italy: What is your question, Japan? Japan: I attacked American base. Italy: W h a t . Japan: You told me to. Italy: How much? Japan: I did nothing but bombed American bases for three days. Germany: WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN SENDING YOUR BOMBERS?!!
@COILEDfighter
@COILEDfighter 3 года назад
very nice video greetings from Chile bro :D
@kurousagi8155
@kurousagi8155 3 года назад
Germany would not be fighting on two fronts and would have the oil supplies in the Soviet Union secured for its use. Even if the Soviets didn’t fight and stayed neutral, it would have been a very different and darker war for the western allies.
@aluminiumknight4038
@aluminiumknight4038 3 года назад
Yes the allies will most likely win if the USSR is neutral but it would take many more years, many more millions of lives, and many more nukes
@danishkfd
@danishkfd 3 года назад
@@aluminiumknight4038 no. Actually allies would never win. Us and Britian will also be nuked
@tremedar
@tremedar 3 года назад
@@danishkfd Okay here you are again posing this same, wrong, idea that someone in this hypothetical axis had nukes before 1949. So which is it? Wehraboo or slavaboo?
@aluminiumknight4038
@aluminiumknight4038 3 года назад
@@danishkfd laughs in 50k sherman tanks
@aluminiumknight4038
@aluminiumknight4038 3 года назад
@Ani061me15 why are you angry, don't tell me you're taking thus seriously
@ciaran_telfer_18
@ciaran_telfer_18 3 года назад
You need to do more of these. Amazing.
@kingisaacius9712
@kingisaacius9712 3 года назад
Just play HOI4, play as germany, get the Unholy Alliance focus and boom, Berlin-Moscow Axis
@rhozenheyo9045
@rhozenheyo9045 3 года назад
Finally. A proper way to do this alternate timeline of WW2.
@loganagle746
@loganagle746 3 года назад
Binkov, please do more Alternate History content like this. Detailed world-building based on Alternate History scenarios is something sorely lacking on RU-vid. It's a great area of content for you to expand into.
@sonicmeerkat
@sonicmeerkat 3 года назад
it's still crazy to think of how big the british empire is on its own, like one nation holding so many fronts would be unheard of nowadays.
@JinKee
@JinKee Год назад
Tech overmatch can do that, if you maintain surprise. We might see it again in our lifetime if one power gets AI before everyone else.
@jason200912
@jason200912 10 месяцев назад
Yup, the british are a dying old man just as they infamously gave this title to the ottoman empire in ww1.
@eodyn7
@eodyn7 10 месяцев назад
Pretty sure the US could handle that.
@Kupferdrahtful
@Kupferdrahtful 10 месяцев назад
Yeah I also think the us could do it and soon China too
@dominicomucci3014
@dominicomucci3014 9 месяцев назад
​@jason200912 how are they a dying old man. What a stupid dumb comment.
@aleksandrbaevskikh7347
@aleksandrbaevskikh7347 3 года назад
it was an unholy alliance, it just wasn't enough space for 2 mad men
@TheTariqibnziyad
@TheTariqibnziyad 3 года назад
That's a freaking weird friendship, or abusive relationship if i might say
@ZaFrOCDI
@ZaFrOCDI 3 года назад
“We all know our history” - Finland’s borders are off; no connection to arctic sea.
@ThePussukka
@ThePussukka 3 года назад
If you wanna appear smart and use the semi-colon you should also know 'off' is with two fs
@ZaFrOCDI
@ZaFrOCDI 3 года назад
@@ThePussukka yes
@rebalipupu
@rebalipupu 3 года назад
I mean, there is so many things wrong in this video that I don't even know where to start.
@anthonycruz3843
@anthonycruz3843 3 года назад
@@rebalipupu true
@Stanislaw93
@Stanislaw93 3 года назад
Extremely interesting! Regards!
@lvlc6023
@lvlc6023 3 года назад
Me: "I like the concept" Hitler: "Nein"
@pani_3776
@pani_3776 3 года назад
Damn, this is interesting
@rare_kumiko
@rare_kumiko 3 года назад
Interesting video! Some thoughts of mine: so of course this is a pretty wild what-if and I know it could go either way, but I don't think the Japanese can conquer all of those islands in the Pacific, even less for Midway. During the historical battle, the Japanese already had almost no chance of capturing Midway, with their invasion force being OUTNUMBERED by the American defenders, when an amphibious landing essentially requires a large numerical superiority by several times. Even more considering the Americans knew the Japanese were coming. For an extra handicap, there were a lot of reef around the island, which would mean the Japanese troops would leave their barges a couple of hundred metres away from the coast, and would have to wade for several minutes until they reach land, during the which they'd be sitting ducks to the defenders. And all of this is assuming they can even win the battle. The Americans had a complete intelligence advantage which they would maintain here, so they would know how many enemies would come, and they wouldn't fight a battle they can't win (and yes, the Americans had advantage in the real battle and they knew it). Added to this, I don't see a reason the US would send their aircraft carriers into the Atlantic. Unless there's a huge Axis naval victory that tips the scales, the British will still have naval superiority regardless of what the Soviets bring. At best they'll have extra submarines, sure, but you don't use fleet aircraft carriers to hunt submarines (as the British learned the hard way). So they might send more surface combatants to the Atlantic, but the CVs won't be needed at least for several years (until the Axis starts having more capital ships), and by that time the US would already be 3D-printing Essex-class carriers and other warships.
@1IbramGaunt
@1IbramGaunt 3 года назад
Damn right, couldn't agree more for most of that. As for the British and hunting subs with carriers lol the IDEA was that their aircraft and all the assorted escorting destroyers, frigates and corvettes (along with our OWN submarines of course) would do the hunting part haha, the carriers themselves were meant to just hang back, well-protected and out of harm's way while providing air-cover for the rest of the fleet, much like with a modern carrier strike-group in fact; just very sadly didn't really go according to plan in some cases
@Jason-fm4my
@Jason-fm4my 3 года назад
The funny thing about aircraft carriers in WW2 is that they were used by Great Britain in a role similar to cargo ships, specialized for aircraft. British aircraft carriers delivered hurricanes from the British Isles, around South Africa to Egypt, Greece and Malta, to fix the chronic aircraft shortage in those theaters.
@mint8648
@mint8648 3 года назад
Midway was actually very closely fought, though I don’t think the Japanese could permanently occupy the islands
@josh-kg1rb
@josh-kg1rb 3 года назад
@@mint8648 the pacific wouldn't have changed due to the soviets
@mint8648
@mint8648 3 года назад
@@josh-kg1rb soviet on japanese side
@malivev4705
@malivev4705 3 года назад
Interesting video
@TheMighteeOwl
@TheMighteeOwl 3 года назад
Funnily enough, at the signing of the pact of steel Stalin wanted to go, but wasn’t invited
@kameradroti_sobek6312
@kameradroti_sobek6312 3 года назад
AxiSoviet:ha! Ur ground force are no match! Allies:yea... Ur Navy sucks AxiSoviet:we know... So... Allies:yea........
@ecksdee1637
@ecksdee1637 3 года назад
Well its a stalemate, Allies don't have an army to conquer the axis, and Axis doesn't have navy to invade Allies
@markbenjamin1703
@markbenjamin1703 3 года назад
Nazbol gang rise up
@229masterchief
@229masterchief 3 года назад
this is so cool, Alexa, play Fuera Sionista
@01siripongsiripun19
@01siripongsiripun19 3 года назад
GANG!
@PhilipCunningham1788
@PhilipCunningham1788 3 года назад
What's Nazbol?
@oroz9308
@oroz9308 3 года назад
@@PhilipCunningham1788 google help u
@Cherb123456
@Cherb123456 3 года назад
What a crazy Timeline! I can't even imagine what it would be living in it
@kenbowser5622
@kenbowser5622 2 года назад
Ya let me down on this one, Binkov. I listen every day. I've read a ton of books on this war, from all sides.
@SK-le1gm
@SK-le1gm 2 года назад
Toss in Neville Chamberlain and you’ve got the Orwell 1984 scenario. Well done 👍🏾
@Rrgr5
@Rrgr5 3 года назад
Actually, for this to happened just like that the Germans shouldn't be Nazis to begin with, if they stood as they were in the real life and decided to accept the diplomatic approach with the USSR (highly improbable), the USSR would just let them be against the British and would probably just stuck with imports and exports, and probably with both sides just like other neutral countries. But if the Germans were more sympathetic to the USSR, well, would be something like that but, without the Japanese, the Germans weren't so keen about the alliance with the Japanese, even with Italy, is even possible that the Italians would join the allies or even be neutral, the Mediterranean campaign could never happen in this time line, hell, even the Spanish civil war could have taken another turn, even the French government itself could react differently to the German expansion, same with Poland. They were ok with the Nazis because they thought they would just fight the Soviets, most of them didn't expected an invasion, some of them even welcomed one, imagine if the Germans weren't as they were and somehow were sympathetic to the Soviets? Would be a whole lot of a different war.
@pissyourselfandshitncoom2172
@pissyourselfandshitncoom2172 3 года назад
this is the most blessed timeline
@Texgenwayne
@Texgenwayne 3 года назад
I think you completely underestimate the US in the Pacific at that time Midway would still be a u.s. victory because they sent three carriers compared to the Japanese 6
@gamepify2362
@gamepify2362 Год назад
I think soviet will help Japan.
@MovieGuy808
@MovieGuy808 Год назад
@@gamepify2362 Did the Soviets have any carriers? Their Navy was pretty limited.
@steveavecillas1114
@steveavecillas1114 5 месяцев назад
Soviet Union natural resources was more than the USA and had 240 million people compare 160 million USA population .. German technology and Soviet Union natural resources would be unstoppable.
@Sightless111
@Sightless111 10 месяцев назад
Blinkov forgot one very important fact… ussr at the year of 1941 was have BIGGest submarine fleet in world… it was one of biggest mistakes of soviet commandment - in real history it was blocked in baltic and black sea but imagine it unleashed)
@alfijibril611
@alfijibril611 3 года назад
what if the nazis got their hands on the Great Bob Semple Tank
@Duke_of_Lorraine
@Duke_of_Lorraine 3 года назад
September 1st 1939, 8 AM. Reports of German armoured formations triumphally parading in Warsaw, Paris, London, Moscow and Washington D.C., and they even got Mussolini to stop speaking for a while.
@drfin9445
@drfin9445 3 года назад
JagdSemple
@hahapain.4521
@hahapain.4521 3 года назад
it shall be called the "bob elephante"
@imperialguardsman5929
@imperialguardsman5929 3 года назад
They would conquer the Milky Way
@martinmacht3330
@martinmacht3330 3 года назад
German/Soviet allied? gg
@SadisNic
@SadisNic 2 года назад
Moral of the story, England exists because of its allies in war, not because of it's ability to wage war.
@SVGGMNG
@SVGGMNG 3 года назад
I just had a crazy idea, can you do the northern hemisphere vs the Southern Hemisphere? It’s a big list of countries. Pretty much all the countries of the world, I just thought to ask.
@mustang5132
@mustang5132 3 года назад
I gotta say the US losing the battle of Midway seems unlikely. They had intel on the Japanese invasion so they probably would have been as prepared as they needed to be
@thesovietonion7399
@thesovietonion7399 2 года назад
I don’t think Pearl Harbor would not happend
@mustang5132
@mustang5132 2 года назад
@@thesovietonion7399 lmao thanks but who asked about Pearl harbour
@thesovietonion7399
@thesovietonion7399 2 года назад
@@mustang5132 me
@user_____M
@user_____M 3 года назад
There wasn't enough food and oil for both Europe and the USSR, this scenario requires magic to happen.
@tremedar
@tremedar 3 года назад
Oh! I know! The US sells them oil and food! I mean even despite desperately trying to make it not political and possibly literal suicide to join the war on Britain's side.
@staphylococcusaureus4270
@staphylococcusaureus4270 3 года назад
I like this scenario 👍👍👍
@dbdb9334
@dbdb9334 3 года назад
After germanys defeat in the Battle of Britain in 1940 one wonders how smart the naziz was to open another front to fight on when they couldn't ever secure the first one...
@rodrigonunez9451
@rodrigonunez9451 3 года назад
The wet dream of every HOI IV player.
@KnightsWithoutATable
@KnightsWithoutATable 3 года назад
Alternative history like this can be a lot of fun to consider. I would like to see more of these, Commissar.
@hansgunsche2262
@hansgunsche2262 3 года назад
What a beautiful team we should have been friends from the start 🇩🇪 🤝 🇷🇺
@PUARockstar
@PUARockstar 4 месяца назад
Just so you know, that flag on the right was used by russian collaborators, including SS. They fought for reich against soviets.
@guyguy7634
@guyguy7634 3 года назад
You know it’s interesting to look at a possible alliance between Germany and Russia because even Hitler hated the communists and the Soviet Union, many in the high command still saw the practicalities in aligning with the Soviets because for one the soviets after the invasion of Poland still traded with Germany (until Barbarossa) which gave the Germans critical supplies and many many of their foreign policy advisors thought that they could join together and gut the British empire.
@ianalfonzo8226
@ianalfonzo8226 3 года назад
This timeline is looking supsiciously like Orwell's three superstate world of 1984...
@rangarolls6018
@rangarolls6018 3 года назад
In 1984, the “three superpowers” don’t exist, INGSOC only controls England and just lies about the rest of the world.
@lucasterrasemnomezuado3785
@lucasterrasemnomezuado3785 3 года назад
@@rangarolls6018 it isn't confirmed, only hinted
@mint8648
@mint8648 3 года назад
wat
@hobbabobba7912
@hobbabobba7912 3 года назад
@@lucasterrasemnomezuado3785 It is never actually hinted that ingsoc only controls the UK though.
@Ace-rp7vr
@Ace-rp7vr 3 года назад
I think it would be amazing for both sides to have joined the axis, the Russian could provide the man power and resources and they both could combine technology, and Italy could also do better with more resources from the ussr
@peterthores9191
@peterthores9191 2 года назад
Great video, but i spotted one mistake, you talked about how germany would conquer malta with ariborne troops. But after the airborne invasion of greek with heavy casulties, hitler didnt want to do air invasions anymore. So they likely would have used marine troops. still great video
@ger13nunyah56
@ger13nunyah56 2 года назад
Cool
@DansilSchroeder
@DansilSchroeder 3 года назад
And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer.
@sgtspiffywiffy5799
@sgtspiffywiffy5799 3 года назад
I doubt Midway would have been taken, even if the battle at sea is lost it likely would be a pyrrhic victory meaning the navy would not be able to help the army attack, Also those islands were rammed with troops they are not falling any time soon.
@yeskiii1842
@yeskiii1842 3 года назад
Naval bombardment
@alreadyblack3341
@alreadyblack3341 3 года назад
@Вук Тодић Tell that to the Phillipines.
@greghall4836
@greghall4836 3 года назад
In early 1940 the British and French governments requested right of passage through Norway and Sweden to send an army to fight the Soviets during their invasion of Finland. Their requests were refused. If not, Britain and France would have been at war with both Germany and the Soviet Union.
@comradedmitry8269
@comradedmitry8269 2 года назад
Next video: If Germany joins allies and Ussr joins axis
@maviTURK937
@maviTURK937 3 года назад
make egypt vs Turkish state pls
@ahmet-eo1zd
@ahmet-eo1zd 3 года назад
T*rko
@patriotofpersia2238
@patriotofpersia2238 3 года назад
Egypt win
@giorgos.efth43
@giorgos.efth43 3 года назад
ez win for Egypt
@zil1832
@zil1832 3 года назад
Al Misriya for the win!
@ziadhaithemamin1431
@ziadhaithemamin1431 3 года назад
Where the hell would this war be waged libya ? XDDDD
@OtherM112594
@OtherM112594 3 года назад
Major problem with this video: The Japanese never would have struck Pearl Harbor because the decision to do so was reached after the Japanese were crushed at Khalkin Gol by the Soviets. Since I’m out scenario, the Soviets and the Empire of Japan are allies, there would be no need for Japan to redirect its attention to naval supremacy and attack Pearl Harbor. US involvement would likely be a nonfactor in this scenario unless the territorial integrity of the Americas faced imminent threat.
@shauncourtney6103
@shauncourtney6103 3 года назад
agreed, additionally, the main reason the Japanese chose to strike the US was due to the US oil embargo strangling the Japanese economy. If they are able to import oil from the soviets they would see no reason to strike the US. Plus, with extra gains in China and the French ports in Vietnam, they would easily be able to go around the Philippines to take the Dutch East Indies and the Various British holdings in the region.
@ThePussukka
@ThePussukka 3 года назад
Not necessarily. Japan was still looking to expand in South-East-Asia and still saw the US as the biggest threat against them and still would've thought best way to go about with them is to try to paralyze them at their home base so to say before the war even started. Yeah Pearl Harbor might've not happaned at the exact same time but Japan's geopolitic realities were still otherwise the same despite Khalkin Gol not happening.
@eastcorkcheeses6448
@eastcorkcheeses6448 3 года назад
I thought the main reason the Japanese attacked the states was to do with controlling resources in south east asia ( particularly oil fields in the then Dutch east indies ) , and american fuel sanctions as a result ...? So even if they redirected their troops away from russian border ,they still needed naval dominance to ensure fuel supplies to Japanese home islands ..
@zeti4102
@zeti4102 3 года назад
would japan invade philippines without in need of oil? if not they might have remain neutral until usa decide to back up chinese
@Cailus3542
@Cailus3542 3 года назад
If the British were left alone to face the entire Axis plus the Soviets, the Americans would simply have to intervene. Isolationism aside, a German-Soviet alliance after the fall of France was simply far too dangerous for the US. The Axis couldn’t have hoped to invade Britain in the short term, but given 5-10 years with enough resources and gradual attrition of the Royal Navy, a Channel invasion became more and more feasible. That would’ve left the United States very, very alone against two fledgling superpowers. More than that, they depended on the British to help counterbalance the Japanese in the Pacific to defend their own interests. The Americans simply couldn’t afford to ignore the rest of the world.
@Hunter_Bidens_Crackpipe_
@Hunter_Bidens_Crackpipe_ 2 года назад
I wish this was the real history. A much better world.
@AlamoOriginal
@AlamoOriginal Год назад
Wait you supposed to hate the nazis? What happened?
@lukecz2090
@lukecz2090 3 года назад
3:11 the negotiations were short.
@chrisx2953
@chrisx2953 3 года назад
Me: Mom I want to get Hearts of Iron 4. Mom: We have Hearts of Iron 4 at home. (Hearts of Iron 4 at home be like)
@ScamallDorcha
@ScamallDorcha 3 года назад
This was actually more likely than people realize, the allies were planning on bombing the azeri oil fields in '40 so Germany wouldn't continue getting access to the oil by buying it from Soviets. Obviously, this would have been interpreted by Stalin as a DOW and the allies would now be in an offensive war against the USSR. Fortunately, this didn't happen, for the same reason why the allies didn't declare war on the USSR after Stalin invaded Poland, because the allies didn't want to fight both Hitler and Stalin at once.
@stevenmillikin558
@stevenmillikin558 3 года назад
That would have been a formidable if not unbeatable foe.
@arveduilastking546
@arveduilastking546 3 года назад
Its goding to be more bloody that the real timeline.
Далее
NATO vs Warsaw Pact: The Naval War (1989)
13:26
Просмотров 785 тыс.
The Reason Japan Attacked Pearl Harbor, MAPPED
16:27
Просмотров 588 тыс.