@@alyssanastazio5323 Well, where are the real historical documents corresponding to this statement? I didn't find anything on the Internet, it sounds like stupid nonsense. The Soviet army was absolutely not ready even to defend itself, and you claim that after a few months (opinions differ, for some reason someone thinks that he was going to attack in 1942, and someone thinks that already in July 1941) he was going to attack this huge death machine?
Hitler had three possibilities: a) Allying the USA and UK and going against the soviets. This implied accepting anglo dominance in the world, and reducing Germany to a mere anglo puppet (something like modern Germany) which he would never accept b) Allying the USSR and going against the western allies. He explicitly said why he didn't want this in Mein Kampf: he considered the soviet soldiers as inferior to every other european army, and he thought they would be a burden for Germany, rather than a competent ally (kinda like what ended up happening with Italy) c) Fighting everyone at the same time and losing like an idiot He chose option c)
@@Nxst-i5l but he was willing to allign Germany with the British Empire, even renouncing to Alsace-Lorraine in exchange for a free hand conquering "Lebensraum" against the USSR
@@juanmasingh He never intended to resign autonomy to the point to which England would have accepted him as an ally. He was probably lowkey hoping for the "aryan brothers" to rule the world together But english leaders didn't care about race as much as he did, and they certainly didn't want to share Europe with another strong nation like Germany. Historically, England has mostly allied weakish countries with stronger neighbors that completely depend on them (like Poland or Portugal)
In the video Stalin: "applied the axis" Hitler: "accepts stalin" Hitler: welcome to the axis Stalin: thank you for this wonderfull interview now when can I start? In reality Stalin: "applied the axis" Hitler: "did not respond" Stalin: what do you mean he did not respond!!?? (Yooo 48 likes and 2 replies lets gooo btw love your vids) (Yooo 110 likes and 2 replies also steiners counter attack will defintely succedd in 70 years😅😅) (120 likes/10 replies thats good I also have a comment in another channel tho its a joke that has so many likes (not a like beggar) the joke is really famous in that channel its called albert can cook tyle pinnaple volcano)
The US wouldn't declare war on a ussr-axis alliance without first being attacked. The axis would've had no issue with invading India through Afghanistan.
@@andreycz535 the outcome could result in the war ending by 1 year, given that the Pacific theatre looked more difficult with the island hopping campaign. the nuclear bombs likely wouldn't be used on Japan, rather than an actual land invasion could've happened.
Not to quibble but I don't see a large invasion of the Britain like the one portrayed. The German Navy was very weak compared to the Royal Navy, and the addition of Italian and Soviet units would not make much difference. Also, the Axis did not have a means to land troops and tanks quickly on the British coast. I also don't see the Japanese being able to stall the American offensive in the Pacific for very long. It is somewhat likely that the Axis would dominate Eurasia and North Africa while "Oceania" (The western Hemisphere, the UK, Australia, New Zealand, and Southern Africa would be protected by geography (African jungles and deserts) and the combined US and Royal Navies.
To destroy England's defense and survival capacity it was enough to isolate it from the rest of the world, and that could be done by achieving air supremacy, without fuel or food they would not have resisted much, if the axis only destroyed their ports I think England would surrender otherwise millions would die of hunger. Even on their own the German submarine attacks were already a headache for the English.
@@Mrmhmd1993 Very true, and Britain in World War 2 was a massive, unsinkable aircraft carrier. However, you still need surface naval units to conduct a landing in that time period, and the Kriegsmarine did not have what it took for that, not to mention the lack of landing craft, and the fact that the Calais to Dover passage had the cliffs of Dover to deal with. Once the Germans would have solved those technical challenges they would have been dealing with an atom bomb armed allies. Maybe they could get the bomb too, at which point it would be a stalemate, unless once side decided an atomic war was winnable.
@@richardthomas5362 naturally you would be correct, but considering the scenario in this video (assuming mustache man isn’t plotting against the soviets), the combined axis airforce would decimate British cities, ports, airports and industrial capabilities. In this scenario, Germany would not be bombed and would retain its massive industrial capacity, and when combined with the soviet side, it’s game over for the UK. Sure, American industry would ramp up and maybe even come close to the axis production, but by that point Britain’s infrastructure and airports would be rubble, and they’d probably surrender. If this scenario happened I think the US would sign a white peace.
Even though the Axis at this point in the war is insanely powerful, there's just no way for them to cross the Atlantic and attack the United States. Germany in our timeline barely had supply lines stretching across the Soviet Union during Barbarossa. Does anyone seriously think they can manage logistics across the gigantic Atlantic, let alone against a hostile NAVAL power that can rival the British and Japanese SIMULTANEOUSLY?
i dont think so, if we think about finnish soviet war, the battle of iran should be similar disaster and that means middle east will be same as real life, also i think hitler will be still betray soviet union even if it joins to axis good video btw
Finland had one of the most prepared armies of the world while Iran didnt even have a proper one which was the reason they got occupied so easily here and in real life
Russia would not have been in a state to be much of a power until at least 1943. No way would they be running rough shod over half the world until then, Germany may have allied with them but they sure as hell wouldn't have the production capacity to provide weapons and vehicles to the Soviets.
@user-wj6dt5bq3w Their tanks in 1941 were absolute dogshit for the most part. American Lend Lease kept them alive until they could put out their own stuff. Without the lend lease they were barely out of the the 1920's technology wise.
@@counterfeit1148 Япония перестала сражаться из-за потери Манчжурии. Хиросима и Нагасаки - это ядерный терроризм. США хотели запугать СССР новым оружием.
I’d say that the combined German-Soviet navel and air afford would eventually make such an invasion possible. (1945-1946) But it definitely wouldn’t go that smoothly.
Italian Mapper! Problem of this version of WW2 is that if the USSR join to the Axis, then Germany would not solve own problem with oil fields. Why? That is very important for German war machine. Germany had about 200 million barrels, what is not enough for continuing the war. Soviets got 800 million to 1 billion barrels. So, if they join to the Axis powers, than they would get it more, if they occupied ( the USSR ) even the Middle East ( +560 millions new barrels of oil ). Then, Germany must take African oil from the British Empire in Nigeria. The second problem for the Axis is, if the USSR join them, that the USSR will split China and India with Japan Empire. And, Japanese guys wouldn't like this. In that case is possible a war, between that two countries or Japan would leave the Axis powers. So, these are the answers too why in real timeline the USSR never join to the Axis powers. Because, if that ever happened, Stalin would ask from Hitler not just influence and occupation in Iran, Afghanistan and India, then also in Turkey and major part of the Middle East. And, that is a problem of Mussolini too, because he want Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. PS: My opinion about this video is that it looks impressive, but in reality it would never happened. Real the Axis powers, like Italy, Germany and Japan are more realistic than Germany, Italy, the USSR or all 4 together, or all 3 without Italy. Be saluted and I hope you would me understand enough well!
Why didn’t the USSR attack Germany in such conditions? When the best part of the Wehrmacht is occupied by a sea lion and all the aviation is there. I think it would be an interesting plot twist for west auditory.
"Eh, twenty years later, after a good war, come out and look at the Soviet Union - some thirty or forty republics. The devil knows how well!" -film "Great Citizen", 1937-38. - local rofl in our history
I think you missed the million man volunteer army the Indians put up during World War II. The Indians were also would’ve been highly motivated to defend their home. Also, Europe, missing the red armies problems with logistics would’ve never allowed them to go farther than Iran without serious help, and finally where is the US industry and manpower we were able to field almost 5,000,000 people in that war on both fronts and fight a war. If we were already focused in the European theater like this video says we would’ve been pretty very well prepared to fight Japan. other than those three things the video is awesome actually
@@justacat2 True but don't the Indians have more men? And most of Indian terrain isn't suitable for tanks. They would need lighter tanks. And trucks to carry the men and equipment on. Most of the trucks the Soviets used in the war were provided by the Americans. I think anyway. I mean, If the soviets can get to India, then they probably will win. But they would have to 1: get there, 2: stay there 3:have to ditch their tanks. If they can do that then your probably right.
@@eancloud3529 that's true a large portion of equipment was given to the soviets to hold the german advances, but in this scenario the reich did not obliterate the red army
@@justacat2 Its my understanding that the Soviets still didn't have much of a logistics even before the invasion. Hence the Germans able to envelope them easily. (Also, most of the German motorized infantry in 1940 was actually stolen from the French, meaning they would be able to help the Soviets much) Also they still got wooped by Finland. I think the scenario would have led to a stalemate in Egypt and Pakistan. There is still no mention of American Industry.
Main benefits of the USSR joining is that the axis would have had not to worry about oil or natural resources, and the soviets were in a prime position to threaten the middle eastern oil fields
can you do what if soviet Union attack europe in 1942? but to make it fair -europe is united under one military aliance -invasion of Poland and the great purge never happened
Question: Why did Japan attack pearl harbor? If it was in the axis with the USSR, then oil would have went to Japan and fuel its navy, army, and air craft.
Can you make this a video? This was originally from an answer to a question on Quora. I just copied and pasted it. If the Italians had been as formidable as the Germans, they would have likely driven the British out of the Mediterranean and taken Greece without German help. Once Egypt had fallen, Italian subs and commercial raiders could sail into the Indian ocean and complicate, if not cut, supply lines from the far east and India to the UK. Italian tank divisions would then drive into the middle east and seize those oil fields. Germany would be flushed with oil for their war against the Soviet Union thanks to the newly formidable Italians. Without having to help the Italians in Greece, the Germans invade the Soviet Union several weeks earlier. Italy forces the Turks to allow them to transit the Dardanelles into the Black Sea. The Italian navy turns the Black Sea into an Axis lake. The Italian fleet and marines capture the Crimea in 1941, and launch operations into the Caucasus a year earlier than the Germans were able to. A million Italian troops outflanks Soviet troops in the south and an Italian army drives towards Stalingrad while the Soviets are desperately defending Moscow. Stalingrad falls before winter. The Soviets desperate winter offensive saves Moscow but the Italians continue driving toward Baku and the all important oil fields. While the Germans and Soviets trade blows further north, the Italians capture those oil fields. Stalins armies are starved for oil as the Germans launch their spring offensives. Moscow is captured in the summer of 1942 as the Germans have ample reserves and troops to commit to the offensive. Italian troops comprise most of the troops in Army Group South and those German troops are used for the offensive. Stalin shoots himself in the ruins of Moscow and Soviet resistance begins to crumble. Beria seizes power and signs a humiliating peace treaty with the seemingly invincible Axis. Moscow and everything west is handed over to Hitler. As a reward for Italy's help in Russia, Hilter forces France to transfer Algeria and Tunisa to Italy. Turkey is promised to the Italians after the war as the final piece of their new Roman Empire. It's late 1942, and the US is still fighting the battle of the Atlantic. The Axis gives Franco one last to get with the program or it's time for a new head of state in Spain. Franco joins the Axis and declares war on the allies. Gibraltar is besieged and a combined US and British Army lands in Iberia. The Italian, German, and Spanish forces meet them and a bloody stalemate ensues. With the full focus of both the German and Italian armies, the allies are likely driven off the continent. 937 views View 10 upvotes View 1 share 1 of 1 answer Upvote 10 2 1  Kelly show Sponsored The American Idol released her new no exercise pill. The US today says this is “the skinniest she’s ever been”. Learn More Upvote 1K  Colin Thompson · Follow Studied Actuarial Science · Mar 14
With the german soviet submarine warfare and all the resources of the ussr, also britain had lost their most important colonies such as egypt and india so they lacked resources
@Italian_Mapper The German Navy/Soviet Navy still wouldn't be enough to stop the British Navy, which at the time of Operation Sealion in this vid was the second largest Navy. Combined with the American navy, the Germans couldn't have gotten their superiority
i highly doubt the combined British-American fleets and air forces would lose so miserably to the comparably insignificant Axis navies... also, anti-sub warfare was improving around this time. i just don't see how submarines alone are going to cut it... plus, as far as i know, the Germans just did not have the capacity to transport millions of troops to Great Britain... the USSR is incredibly powerful but its navy is far from its greatest asset, and any "alliance" between the two would almost definitely end in war between Germany and the USSR sooner or later
@@Italian_Mapper Well Germany since Weimar republic invest into china and even trained their soldiers and give them weapons when nazis come to power they even increased cooperation with them. Even when german goverment began leaning noticeably closer to Japan advisors and many members of german army wanted stronger Sino-German relationship. So there was really chance that germany will ally with china instead of japan.
WW1 Schiefflen Plan, instead of heading straight towards Paris, German made encirclement against Entante. The question is, would it gave German better chances in winning?
What if Germany managed to build an atomic bomb faster than the United States? Or what would have happened if the USSR had decided not to attack Poland on September 17, 1939?
Its not canon for germany to build nuclear weapons as they considered that jewish science and the best scientists also left germany when the austrian painter took over. If the USSR didnt attack Poland it means the molotov ribbentrop pact wasn't signed as well but it could have many reasons
Yea,I know, but yugoslavia Will get a piece of greece or even better for Yugoslavia, they will united with bulgaria and presure turkey to join the AXIS
It was not possible, you can find anti communist and anti Bolshevik statements of Nazis, starts from 1933. You can also find USSR's negative statements about Nazi government in Germany.
Non so chi sia stato più stupido tra le potenze dell'asse considerando queste 3 scelte: 1) la Germania che decide di attaccare l'unione sovietica senza avere la garanzia che il suo alleato orientale potesse attaccare la Manciuria 2) l'Italia che con la sua mossa geniale ha fatto posticipare di un paio di mesi l'operazione Barbarossa alla Germania 3) il Giappone che si mette ad attaccare gli Stati Uniti per l'embargo anziché organizzarsi con la Germania per, appunto, attaccare l'URSS e prendere territori con giacimenti a quest'ultima anziché fare il dispettino agli USA.
semplicemente perchè 1) l'unica ragione di guerra per la germania era occupare l'urss quindi non aveva senso fare guerra se non per fare ciò 2) si è scoperto che l'invasione della grecia è stata una mossa stupida ma non ha svantaggiato di molto l'asse nell'invasione dell'unione sovietica, dato che se l'avessero iniziata prima sarebbe stato anzi controproducente dato il terreno e il brutto tempo 3) l'unico modo per il giappone di continuare il loro impero era occupare le colonie europee e americane nel pacifico con risorse che i territori dell'urss in siberia non avevano
