What is 5G? | CNBC Explains 

alvin trieu It indeed does not go very much into the technical details of 5G.

seriously, I left more confused than when I entered.

lol "What is 5g?"

alvin trieu I agree. I tried understanding what he was saying and I’m pretty tech savvy, but he kept using marketing buzzwords like “the cloud” and “infrastructure” that doesn’t really mean anything. He basically spent 5 minute trying to say 5G will have lower latency and faster speed.

Yeah, explained almost nothing. What 5g is to do is also greatly increase the number of devices reached within an area, such as a city block. To do that you have many more transmitters on a single tower. However they have to use frequencies that are somewhat weaker but that have a capacity to split up to carry many more devices. Because of their weakness the towers must be closer to you to get to you and/or travel through walls. Basically each device will have its own personal tower. This will allow you to wirelessly comunicate with tons more devices. Smart thermastates, watches, phones, cars, coffee makers, VR headsets, etc. Called The internet of things. Current towers and frequecies used simply can't handle such loads. That is my understanding of it.

Clay Lu basically every RU-vid video

5Star Genocide

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LvAsHTn3pbM.html

Nor do they explain anything else without a healthy dose of shiny vagueness. Precisely what the stupids want. Cheetos Taco Bell for everyone!

Wait...you are right!!! I didn't notice that!!! 😶

Yesssssss even u just found out Yh This is bad news

Wait till it's ramped up in gz

THEY ALREADY HAVE THEM UP - THAT IS WHAT IS KILLING PEOPLE.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-JIkQ5S9Y0k8.html&feature=emb_logo

Yes they are not trying to save us but to kill of as many people.

Bad news indeed

Already available on Saturdays and Sundays in Starhub Singapore. No mobile bandwidth or Data limits on weekends. 😁😁😁

123rockstar2010 yeh mate, we're talking about the whole week "😁😁😁"

Already using unlimited data on mobile in Malaysia with Digi infinite plan hhahaha

I've had unlimited internet on my phone for years now in the U.S

Ram Anand how much u pay. The only unlimited internet i know is webe

Ashley Booth The negative effects? You need new antennas and hardware, also new towers may be needed as 5G relies on short transmission distances.

So do you want to know of the cost of the new iPhone which utilizes 5G? I don't see other negatives..

Kill grid going to be installed 5g 60 ghz is frequency chosen by globalist because it is frequency the air molecules we breath is being vibrated So now your brain has metals in it and in blood stream which means they can send a charge through this frequency and cause metals in your brain to create mini electric arc causing brain injury. I will post video link here where I found this info

5G will allow hackers or the government to clone your computer or smartphone entire worth of data in seconds.

It's insane they can just force this on us. Our health in exchange for quicker downloads. I've been fighting cancer since June and would give up internet in a second. I'm only 40 and I'm covered in cancer. This seems to be the norm now. I've worked out since I was 18. This actually pisses me off.

And who won't love having 5G sensors in everything you buy even you clothing and underwear. and the microwave smog is really something to look forward to with a sandwich of frequencies bombarding us from every conceivable angle as they already are but 5G is a much higher frequency, next they will tell us exrays and plutonium are safe too

Maybe you should go to school again and get a few physics classes.

Name NotAvailable MAYBE YOU SHOULD STFU BECAUSE 5G IS THE END OF THE FREE WORLD.

@@namenotavailable9989 maybe you should of attended school,your english is poor and your knowledge of 5G is zero.

@@namenotavailable9989 What will you say when people start dropping like flies?

I got more info from the comments on this video.

Wow. I have no idea that people can be this stupid.

@@endeliggnist5066 why stupid? Pls explain ur words. Why are they stupid, when they know 5G is going to kill us.

It's an unspoken tool of big global government to come. It will be used to agitate human brains until they become aggravated aggressive zombies. ☠️

@@luigiweyrauch84 can you tell me 5g how to kill us？

Your a anti vax

Come to India....we've the cheapest 4G network in the world. Soon we're going to make 5G with the collaboration of jio

Ikr, it gives me time to make nachos and pour a drink 🤷🏻‍♂️.

No! 😡

MARTIN WOOLDRIDGE You don’t need to; you’ll be getting cooked by the towers regardless. Your animals, too.

You won't have a choice something which they are not saying

your getting it like it or not...we all are..Its a little piece of tyranny for all

Ditch all Smartphones and Tablets! Ban 5G towers at all cost!

The towers will go up everywhere they’re wave weapons that are going to destroy everything.

DJ M.I.A. Me too! :P

Those thumbs up have so been manipulated , just read the reply's . WE DON'T WANT IT!

Me too.

DJ M.I.A. Me too

Humanity is still not over how I see.It's a good sign that people still use their brains

@MrSecuredParty *politicians

It isn't harmful though and it has been proven it's not harmful it's basically like saying if a Corona cure is made and safety tested after the 18 mounth trials! Some people start going "ITS NOT SAFE OMG TEST IT MORE LET US CHOSE WEATHER OR NOT TO HAVE IT" and than the whole world goes on to get the virus

Just try it

Yes, 4g is perfect, 5g is just blowing smoke up one's ass

It's true. Who the hell needs 5G? If you are at work you don't need streaming on facebook or to watch movie, you should be working. If something isnwork related, record and and share via PC. Stupid humans!

@@Robertsson I don't think 5G would/should be deployed for mobiles but to bring true wireless communication to home. You need not be connected to a fixed line but the connection to your home become wireless as 5G can easily bring in 1Gbps(at the moment) without any issues

5G is ment for Depopulation! WIFI is cooking people to death and they don't even know it

@@ibetternotseeyousimp556 but you do

Android Arkitecht should not voted for trump

5G Zombies

Prepare to live in the field, prepare your bunker, and learn how to build an orgonite (a device that transforms dangerous 5G electromagnetic radiation into electric charges and positive energy!)

@@crystallizationofthesoul7095 " _Prepare to live in the field, prepare your bunker, and learn how to build an orgonite (a device that transforms dangerous 5G electromagnetic radiation into electric charges and positive energy_ " < Observations like these need to be brought up at hearings to show how dumb conspiracy wieners really are.

@@crystallizationofthesoul7095 orgonites are not real

nah

Yes PREACH

OK boomer

OK then time for famine, lower life spans, higher death tolls and a less intelligent society. Do you really want to leave?

Nearly everything positive thing in humanity has been the result of advancements in Technology and thats just facts.

starlink: human right

@Matt your brain cells: turtle

Then just use less of it.

moveaxebx Just don't use it the internet. It's not using you. You have a choice. Kick the habit. You have no control of the internet only of yourself.

@Karl Pilkington Ikr, Gandhi is so woke, people like you can't comprehend it.

You’re using the internet right now🤦‍♀️

@@miyatenmeiritsu1810 You can't if it's being beamed in to your body by towers.

A

Thats the plan

Yes, it'll weed out misinformation. Religious insanety, atempts to isolate folks into complience... With, wait for it... KNOWKEDHE AND INFORMATION!!!

might be dooms day

@@ermacro1987 It's allredy to late for Christianity. If the "word" isn't spread to the next generation. Or there's no new converts. The religion will die as it hinges on brain washing and indoctrination to survive. The exact thing the Internet's braking. So it might be? But for the rest of us it'll be just another normal day... "The truth will set you free" Ironic that truth is the very thing killing this religion...

Apparently, it's possible to post links here in the comment section! Link to the full document: docs.google.com/document/d/1L9jEFSIUW5S-bsgtFkVaOtOFA-QJSE8x57H8ABkPtNo/edit?usp=sharing Link to the document without introduction and final words (only the list of 16 areas of concern): docs.google.com/document/d/1SNwE8aNbhtIZvsZuWSF_w9UfEXwFGL2vxlnNbr-Al6g/edit?usp=sharing Below you can find the beginning of the document which includes links to 8 compilations and reviews of peer-reviewed studies (each one referencing between 500-3000 studies) showing harmful biological effects from non-ionizing RF-radiation. It's not only about power. There are multiple potential mechanisms of harm. While non-ionizing radiation isn’t strong enough to break chemical bonds, it is proven that low-intensity non-ionizing RF-radiation results in other harmful effects on biological systems. I'm not saying it will kill us all, or something like that, of course not. But it's a slow burn and we should all be mindful of our exposure, just like we should be mindful with too much sugar, carbs, alcohol, PUFAs etc. Stating that it's perfectly safe to expose oneself 24/7 is not very responsible. Also parts of the population seem to be MUCH more sensitive to the frequencies (EHS). We need to balance our time indoors and our use of technology with being in nature, in the sun and walking barefoot / grounding to discharge. Much more in the full document, which can be found in the description of the video on my channel. 1. Health Effects of 5G The health effects of 5G have not been studied enough. Actually, they have barely been studied at all and the studies that have been done are far from reassuring. No large-scale studies have taken place before the rollout of the technology. This in itself, is of course completely outrageous. At the very least, it violates basic human rights against mass population experimentation. www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/at-senate-commerce-hearing-blumenthal-raises-concerns-on-5g-wireless-technologys-potential-health-risks Review some of the studies that has been done on milli-meter waves (the coming frequencies that will be used for 5G) - These preliminary studies show clear adverse health effects: “Preliminary observations showed that MMW increase skin temperature, alter gene expression, promote cellular proliferation and synthesis of proteins linked with oxidative stress, inflammatory and metabolic processes, could generate ocular damages, affect neuro-muscular dynamics.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29402696/ 2. Studies on different wireless technologies 2G, 3G, Wi-fi and the radiation from current cell towers etc. have been studied to different extents (see point 3 below) with very mixed results. There is currently no clear scientific consensus as claimed by certain regulatory bodies. As with scientific research on other environmental pollutants, EMF research is complex and contains inconsistencies; some studies show very significant negative effects while others are showing no effects, depending on what kind effects were being studied. 4G on the other hand hasn’t been studied very much at all (!) and with 5G “we are flying blind”. Excerpt from Scientific American, “we have no reason to believe 5G is safe”: “Since 5G is a new technology, there is no research on health effects, so we are “flying blind” to quote a U.S. senator. However, we have considerable evidence about the harmful effects of 2G and 3G. Little is known of the effects of exposure to 4G, a 10-year-old technology, because governments have been remiss in funding this research.” blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/ 3. Thermal Effects vs Non-Thermal Effects - Studies on EMF-effects on humans, insects, plants and larger animals The claim that there are only thermal effects from non-ionizing radiation is simply put, not true at all. Despite what some say, there are in fact at least a couple of thousands peer-reviewed studies from credible sources showing significant negative biological effects of non-ionizing RF-radiation. On this website you can find a very good summary of much of the research that has been done, I highly recommend checking it out: ehtrust.org/science/research-on-wireless-health-effects/ ehtrust.org/scientific-research-on-5g-and-health/ One of the best papers written arguing against 5G, by ORSAA - Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association (ORSAA): ORSAA submission to ICNIRP - “Inquiry into 5G mobile telephony” www.orsaa.org/uploads/6/7/7/9/67791943/orsaa_submission_to_5g_inquiry_oct__2019_final_v2.pdf ORSAA database with more than 3000 studies: n431.fmphost.com/fmi/webd#Research_Review_V4 Link to more than 500 peer-reviewed studies showing harmful health effects and biological effects: drive.google.com/file/d/19CbWmdGTnnW1iZ9pxlxq1ssAdYl3Eur3/view An evaluation of 2266 studies from one of the world’s oldest and most well-known general science journals showed that 68,2% of the studies demonstrated significant biological or health effects: “A recent evaluation of 2266 studies (including in-vitro and in-vivo studies in human, animal, and plant experimental systems and population studies) found that most studies (n=1546, 68·2%) have demonstrated significant biological or health effects associated with exposure to anthropogenic electromagnetic fields." www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext Appeal to stop 5G on earth and in space, with links to a couple of thousands of studies on health effects and effects on insects, plants and animals: www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal#fn10b New Hampshire Report (Nov. 1 2020) - Documents Scientific Evidence That Questions the Safety of 5G “President of the Senate Donna Soucy summarizing its findings that safety assurances for 5G have “come into question because of the thousands of peer-reviewed studies documenting deleterious health effects associated with cellphone radiation exposure.” “The report referred to the FCC as a “captured agency with undue industry influence,” citing the Harvard Press Book “Captured Agency: How the Federal Communications Commission is Dominated by the Industries it Presumably Regulates,” which compares the wireless industry to the tobacco industry.” “The FCC and FDA did not respond to the Commission’s request for testimony, and the FDA did not fully answer the Commission’s questions. The National Cancer Institute response to the Commission was that NCI does not make safety recommendations or issue guidelines and is not aware of any federal agency mandated to ensure wireless signals are safe for trees, plants, insects or birds. The New Hampshire 5G Report contains an extensive list of research studies, medical organizations and scientists in support of calling for a halt to 5G. “ www.gencourt.state.nh.us/statstudcomm/committees/1474/reports/5G%20final%20report.pdf Dr. Martin Pall’s (Professor of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences - Washington State University) - Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them www.radiationresearch.org/research/dr-martin-palls-latest-compilation-of-emf-medical-research-literature/ Prof. Martin Pall - Cellular Effects of Wi-fi and 5G (feb. 2019) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-bsaB7ewFsN0.html&feature=emb_title Dr. Devra Davis - 5G, Wireless Radiation and Health: A Scientific and Policy Update (feb. 2020) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE--AeSoC6la9c.html

Hey everyone! We got a wacko here! (Buddy, if you're concerned about radiation in the frequency of 5G, you better do something about that gigantic ball of plasma in the sky. It keeps emitting radiation throughout the spectrum and in much higher levels!)

@@JonathanLit Did you even read anything I posted? If all non-ionizing radiation just passes through the body without any impact at all except heating, can you please explain to me where the negative effects of non-ionizing radiation come from? Is this fake? An evaluation of 2266 studies from one of the world’s oldest and most well-known general science journals showed that 68,2% of the studies demonstrated significant biological or health effects: “A recent evaluation of 2266 studies (including in-vitro and in-vivo studies in human, animal, and plant experimental systems and population studies) found that most studies (n=1546, 68·2%) have demonstrated significant biological or health effects associated with exposure to anthropogenic electromagnetic fields." www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext and this? One of the best papers written arguing against 5G, by ORSAA - Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association (ORSAA): ORSAA submission to ICNIRP - “Inquiry into 5G mobile telephony” www.orsaa.org/uploads/6/7/7/9/67791943/orsaa_submission_to_5g_inquiry_oct__2019_final_v2.pdf ORSAA database with more than 3000 studies: n431.fmphost.com/fmi/webd#Research_Review_V4 and this? ehtrust.org/science/research-on-wireless-health-effects/ ehtrust.org/scientific-research-on-5g-and-health/ Are the TWO BIGGEST STUDIES EVER DONE fake? “I would argue that the NTP warning was the most important RF-health development not only of 2018, but of the decade and most likely of the new millennium. Yet the expert panel chose to ignore it.” “There is a discussion of the NTP findings in last year’s Swedish (ICNIOR) update. But that was based on an earlier NTP draft where the staff had opted for a weaker designation, “some evidence” of cancer. Later, after an in-depth public peer review, the NTP strengthened the conclusion to “clear evidence” of cancer. That was the headline news of 2018. “Clear evidence” was a game changer; leaving it out of the annual update is a sure sign of bias. The NTP conclusion was now qualitatively different from the earlier draft -it could well have been the title of the panel’s 2018 update. But van Rongen, Röösli and the others ignored it.” ehtrust.org/science/myth-vs-fact-national-toxicology-program-cell-phone-cancer-study/ No matter the mechanisms (more about the potential mechanisms later in this comment), the number studies that show biological effects is increasing week by week, month by month. The question is not if it has an effect, the question is how much of an effect. Comparing visible light with man-made EMFs only in terms of wave-length (the visible light from the sun vs non-ionizing radiation) shows a complete lack of understanding of physics and its relation to biochemistry and quantum biology. We evolved under sunlight under millions of years. Our bodies, all animals and all plants are adapted to those frequencies. In fact, they are key to our very existence. The sun is healthy and are key to an array of biochemical and hormonal processes in the body. If you want to dive deep into the science of sunlight and quantum biology, I recommend you to check out neurosurgeon and quantum biologist Jack Kruse: ru-vid.com?search_query=jack+kruse The two main suggested mechanisms that non-ionizing radiation affects biological systems are through oxidative stress “A 2019 literature review “Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation” found that 93 of the 100 peer-reviewed studies dealing with oxidative effects of low-intensity RFR, confirmed that RFR induces oxidative effects in biological systems. “ ehtrust.org/science/research-on-wireless-health-effects/ “We have published our preliminary data on radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation, which shows that 89% (216 of 242) of experimental studies that investigated oxidative stress endpoints showed significant effects.” www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext and through influencing the bodies natural EMF fields - impacting quantum biological processes in the cells. Quote: “If you change the electromagnetic field you change the coherence of the system of life. Present-day Electromagnetic fields disrupt quantum signaling of coherence, non-locality, and electron tunneling by altering time in our cells. “ You can read more about this here: jackkruse.com/emf-5-what-are-the-biologic-effects-of-emf/

@@JonathanLit Let’s trust the experts, shall we? Are these EMF-scientists who has published more than 2000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals also fake? Just sharing unfounded conspiracy theories? More than 250 EMF-scientists have signed an appeal and sent it to the UN calling for, among other things, a revision of the current international guidelines regarding EMFs. “The International EMF Scientist Appeal serves as a credible and influential voice from EMF (electromagnetic field) scientists who are urgently calling upon the United Nations and its sub-organizations, the WHO and UNEP, and all U.N. Member States, for greater health protection on EMF exposure.” www.emfscientist.org/ “The scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals.” blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/ And not the 15 or so who are interwoven with industry right… that would be kinda stupid… Below you can find point 7 from my document about industry influence, conflicts of interests and other major issues within the agencies that advise us about the standards. (especially check out the 98-page report from EU parliament members Klaus Buchner and Michèle Rivasi) The scientists within the organizations that inform the current standards, argue that they are enough and say that there is no reason to believe 5G causes any harm (without pointing to any studies to back it up) are in comparison very few. What is called “global consensus” is in fact only “ICNIRP-consensus”. “ICNIRP is a German-registered association which, soon after its inception in 1992, became the actual standard-setter of radiation limits. Most European governments - and WHO, the World Health Organization - refer to ICNIRP’s guidelines in their national radiation exposure limits.” There are some very significant issues within these organizations: • The members of these organizations are a very close-knit group as can be seen here: www.kumu.io/Investigate-Europe/the-scientists-and-the-organisations#conflict-of-interest • There is no representation of any scientists that raise concerns about EMFs: • All of them are appointed internally “ICNIRP is not open to any professional interested. Members of its scientific committee are appointed. None who claims there is sufficient scientific material to lower safety standards are represented.” • There seems to be a conflict of interest among some of its members: 98-page report from two members of the European Parliament, Klaus Buchner and Michèle Rivasi: “The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: Conflicts of interest ,corporate capture and the push for 5G” klaus-buchner.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ICNIRP-report-FINAL-19-JUNE-2020.pdf “This report deals with an issue of which the importance cannot be overrated: the possible health effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (RfR) or electro magnetic fields (EMF); It deals more specifically with how the scientific debate has been hijacked by corporate interests from the Telecom industry.” Dariusz Leszczynski, PHD, DSC writes: “In my two blog posts, ‘ICNIRP did it again…’ and ‘Mike Repacholi responds to ICNIRP did it again…’, I presented several reasons why the current modus operandi of ICNIRP is prone to provide unreliable and skewed evaluation of the scientific evidence on EMF and health. I was strongly opposed by Mike Repacholi, Chairman Emeritus of the ICNIRP, scientist who is responsible for the “birth” of this organization. In my opinion the major problems of ICNIRP are: • it is a “private club” where members elect new members without need to justify selection • lack of accountability before anyone • lack of transparency of their activities • complete lack of supervision of its activities • skewed science evaluation because of the close similarity of the opinions of all members of the Main Commission and all of the other scientists selected as advisors to the Main Commission.” betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2016/04/08/is-icnirp-reliable-enough-to-dictate-meaning-of-science-to-the-governmental-risk-regulators/ Recent article by Darius Leszczynski, from September 2020: betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2020/09/08/leszczynski-there-is-something-utterly-wrong-with-the-icnirp-membership/ The organization that the US FCC base their recommendations on: “The IEEE-ICES is a slam-dunk case for the conflict-of-interest.” “The safety limits developed by IEEE-ICES are designed by engineers working for the wireless telecommunications industry. Voting in this group on proposed safety limits is just a sham because telecom engineers vote on proposal prepared by the same telecom engineers. The telecom engineers always have the majority within IEEE-ICES. So, how trustworthy are these safety limits? In summary, IEEE-ICES safety guidelines are prepared by industry engineers and approved by industry engineers who later implement them in their own industries as reliable and solely science-based and industry-independent safety guidelines.” betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2020/04/08/pall-firstenberg-and-the-silent-enablers-are-responsible-for-the-current-5g-storm/ More resources about how industry funding influence research on RF-radiation and concerns about ICNIRP, FCC and the FDA: “Scientific analyses show industry funding can and does influence research on radiofrequency radiation. Please take the time to review these studies and to review the documentation provided by experts. This webpage has published citations on the influence of industry and vested interests.”: ehtrust.org/science/research-industry-influence-emfs/ “Some researchers have tried to study how conclusions on EMF radiation and health correspond with source of funding. In at least three such exercises by different people, in 2006, 2007 and 2017, the pattern was the same: The likelihood that industry-funded studies would find cause for concern, was dramatically smaller than in studies that were not industry-funded.” www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1797826/ www.seattlemag.com/article/uw-scientist-henry-lai-makes-waves-cell-phone-industry www.orsaa.org/latest-news/is-icnirp-a-closed-club ”Doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the “body of fact” that exists in the minds of the general public. It is also the means of establishing a controversy.” Tobacco executive (22) in Doubt is Our Product by David Michaels” mdsafetech.org/problems/industry-influence-in-science/ I suggest that you read some of what’s been referenced above and decide for yourself if the whole world should trust these people blindly without question and base their decisions about such an important issue based solely on their recommendations.

Daam

Actually, you're a half wit.

If you want a wireless surveillance system just look at phones and computers, and if they wanted to kill us all they could just shoot us or poison the water supply, either one would be ten times more effective

It’s fucking network

It's because 4G is 4 ghz 5G is 125ghz.... their just calling it 5G

Jason The Gamer 3G =3ghz 4G=4ghz....been linked to cancer.... 5G=125ghz.... they just call it 5G if 4ghz is giving people cancer....what do you think 125 is going to do when its pumped out across the city....

Everything has a link to cancer, better just stay inside with the power switched off then.

Ash Bethel um , no there isn't but I see your pessimistic attitude will except anything you're told... sitting in the house with the "power off" isnt going to help you....

Born Again HARD!! Pretty sure nobody is going to *accept** anything you're saying. You don't even know the difference between except and accept.

good, because this will probably be very expensive for quite a long time

@@briandiehl9257 not really

AFG647 OG. MY OG was better and Gave me true info. Not a death sentence. I miss him

I'm happy with the KJV!

ummmmm they will probably get rid of 4g lte by the end of the decade

Same

@@Gufcnjhhhgfdyy There are many people who hate 5G, environmentalists and scientists hate it too. Many you should stop believing the government media.

@@insectbite1714 sick tinfoil hat who needs to find the Karen when the Karen comes to you

@@Deathgaze1 lol

Femto91 / フェムト haha

Juan Lopez go home nerd

WINGGAM so what do u think about 5G. I don't think you realise that it's not made for your best interest.

@@FRJacs says nerd with a video game icon, lol yeah ur cool big man.

U think 5g himself is huawei skynet aka artificial intelligence? 😲😲🤔 Tq info

vinayak d with the amount of idiots in this comment section that believe it's doom, you'd be rich.

Justin Noker you will regret saying it when the hour is too late. you will wish you tried stopping it when all your loved ones start getting fried from inside out. i hope you wake up, best wishes.

It is very good idea you would be rich with rich

That's what is called startup!! Solution instead of complaining like rest of commentators.

@@u9477 fried i think not but it increase chance of getting cancer

This will cook entire bodies as it will be deployed all around peoples homes and jobs ..

Risk has to be taken for better future

It will cook nothing, since these are weak radio waves and not strong micro waves

@@lukasmihara anything in the GHZ range is microwave..

@@ryanrodrigues6127 Are you serious?

to much movie eh. also movies have alot of hidden messages. when one dont ingest colgate flouride toothpaste everyday. one will be able to see through the veil.

That's funny but... www.5gspaceappeal.org/ www.stopbitburning.com/ Stop Agenda 21 everyone!

Mmm suspicious how we invented cellphones in the 2000’s and 911 happened in the 2000’s... idk something just doesn’t seem right Now that I think about it, planes were invented in the 1900’s and the Spanish flu happened in the 1900’s! This goes deep. And we invented the printing press in the 15th century, and Byzantine fell in the 15th century! How long have we been falling prey to the evil sinister alien snake lord governments that pray on us with their dastardly gizmos!!!!!! AHHHH!!

@@lmanproductions8680 you are a pogmaster

World Organization you are getting woke- 👁

Dave Christensen sunlight is more radio active

Agree.

@Alle Trolls, better twats like you deserved to be punched straight into the face!

@@alle7540 Really? Explain this please

True, we need 5G even less than other systems, Wireless is no necessity.

It's the only way now my dear

@@gabiousgabby4720 no it's not

ok hood videos 100

Go run into the woods and wipe your ass with leaves and sticks

Imagine how people will Drive! Yikes! ! ! !

What will the difference be?

Daniel Ruppmann how?

voice to skull tech , mircrowave energy weapons. all tried and tested by the intellegence agencies. a good way to get away with murdering disidents and wistleblowers

TheWarsuron nah, the tried and true method of "suiciding" works best. Just look at how quickly news stopped reporting about the murdered CDC whistleblower who they claimed died of suicide

true, but it will be much easier and with hightech equipment.

Here is solution for the phone radiation ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IAQH0KdqPt8.html

Where's the social responsibility if money will always be the means to an end? If ever, sustainability of humans and the planet will always be in danger because of the rich people whose games are to always win in their industry.. The movie CAGE BIRD of Sandra Bullock seemed not too far fetch from reality. I guess only God knows where will it all end. 🙄🙁😭

Your comment speaks volumes; in fact, it says it all! Sinister technology!

Which could be as a result of anything else...

chancy319 No the birds biological clock started misfunctioning while testing the 5G.

😂😂😂

Welcome to the club. I will be very busy in a near future i suspect. I wont stand by and allow this shit to happen.

Do not hate us in general, there are many of us that do not support this and are fighting against it :)

I'm also fighting against the abuse of farmaceutical industries and enviromental problems, and abuse of animals for "the human consumption of their products" - yes you guessed right I'm going to be an activist a vegan one! Well I'm already vegan and yeah we should fight against this shit zombie technology!!

Social anxiety - your screen name speaks volumes.

Wrong i use to use my nokia to play snake, shut up boomer

Total collapse ?

Ok boomer

There are plenty of movies, plenty being an underestimate

The sun litteraly creates more radiation

@@johnmadden52 there dumbass dont worry I'm sure with that logic they will just walk of a cliff

@ but the sun is a star its more larger than a tower ._.

Yajson my area is doesn't have fiber after three years and still noting

I don't have proper 4g.. but government provided fibre optics in my village which is in hilly area.... FKK..

I’m going overseas in a couple months where internet is almost non existing. Don’t know how I’m going to survive the 6 months.

Adam which country?

Neeraj Singh Yemen

It's not a coincidence. Learn about "placebo effect"

i think the phone is sentient and doesn't like you so it's trying to kill you. have you been looking at facebook conspiracies recently? that might be why your phone hates you

There is one on my electric meter and the water meter where I live. I didn't have a say in the matter; the companies just did it.

Actually smart meters only take a reading once every month on the last day and they use any WAN (wireless area network) so that means the levels of radiation would literally be that the same of a mobile phone.

Kyle Rowe. Smart Meters are constantly sending information, they send info back to a central meter. They never stop sending information 24/7.

@@blackjackson21 Yeah that's correct but also you have the choice to choose when the readings are sent across. It's a Data protection law that customer data is handled within the customers data consent. Customers have the right to choose how frequent readings are sent half hourly, daily or monthly.

Within the last year in my part of Florida, our electric utility company installed smart meters. I told them NO WAY, and they sent me the opt-out form in the mail... which I completed and returned. And, oh yes, it costs. There was an initial charge of about $90, followed by a monthly fee of about $20. Sux, but it is what it is!

The average microwave oven outputs about 900W. Now, with a bit of modification I might be able to get my phone to do that too, but it'll only do that once, and very very shortly.

If 5G is like a microwave, then global warming will be amplified by 5G. Life is a joke.

We’re all dead

@@oMehrcy well said

@@emilylikesadvocados7878 the sun blast 1000x more radiation on your skin yet keeps you alive and can kill you while 5g outputs less than 10 volts of radiation and is in no way like a microwave

Bilal Kedir meeee

thats the plan though

Seems like humans are not doing any good job either. So it's fine.

Dear Global Friends, If humans are a burden to the societies of the world, with its population decreasing at a tremendous rate similarly with artificial intelligence gadgets increasing, then many artificial intelligence gadgets will be at a standstill. Inflation begins with the imbalance of yin and yang, demand and supply not good in purchasing power.

Ok

REBRAND PT really fast faster speeds than ever before! Unfortunately but all of the zombies will love it and rot in their Blissful ignorance

REBRAND PT well, the resounding number seems to be 400.

Just make sure you don't go out into the sunlight without protection because it has a better chance of giving you cancer than 5g

You need somewhere about 432 years to get letal dose of radiation

Gideon Heydemann but cancer was a thing before we discovered electricity.

Manuel Gomez none. It's still not strong enough or at a high enough frequency to damage the human body

Justin Noker-You do not know what you are talking about. Check out the Fullerton Informer and wise up.

Don't listen to the video. Actually look up 5g. They are putting towers everywhere. Even ones that look like trees. This shit destroys human cell. Cell towers. Hmm. But hey, facebook will be faster. That's all most idiots care about!

Here is solution for the phone radiation ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IAQH0KdqPt8.html

Those thumbs up have so been manipulated , just read the reply's . WE DON'T WANT IT!

@dean morris Can't agree with you more.

It is happening Right now

@@wefdrft sure is we are in big trouble

محمد الاسدي Mohammed Alasadee yeah

There some uses that I will be happy with.

why hasnt it killed us already, its been out of a year

ItchyPit LOl where? There still rolling them out. Dumbass

frostek “make stuff up” did cnn tell you that it’s ok?

@@kifter4254 you can't call someone a dumbass when you think that some towers will burn us all to death

Luke Wakeford lmfao I’ve been reading the comment section and laughing my fucking head off these people are crazy

Yeh we have seen this kind off analogy when first mobile towers ware being established.India will do 5g in its own time

In India birth control failed so they will introduce 5g.

What a farce. 5g, is just as safe as 4g.

"They will permeate the Blood Brain Barrier, disrupt cell metabolism, rupture DNA strands, cause oxidative damage etc." Couldn't be more wrong. Radio and microwave are not ionizing radiations, so all you said doesn't happen... Stop believing the fear mongers that spread fake news.

Blogging site hai kya ye 😂😂

A 5G antenna at the high frequency side will use lower than 1 W of power. Of course there will be much more of them but the overall radiation will be similar to 4G. So no, the radiation omitted by these devices is not ridiculous.

5g is radio waves, we have been studying radio waves for over a century, we know what the effects are and we know that harm isn't one of them, 5g is harmless

@@thecommunistowl811 not every independent specialist will agree with you

@@F4LL7K not every independent specialist knows how electromagnetic radiation works apparently

Prophet then they’re idiots

@Los Angeles Man What effects? It's basically 4g but a lot faster. Literally just radio waves lol.

Daniel Jean-Baptiste m still using 2g

Rush to die😃😃

Life nver promise when its last..so we need to rushing like china 😂🤣

4G is fast enough for consumers like us who use RU-vid and basic smart phone apps. If we want a future of self-driving cars, smart machines and robots which can work efficiently then 5G is necessary.

Human eye can only see 8gb ram

Funny how you'd claim that something that still doesn't basically exist and isn't put into practice instead the cancer rates. Also funny how you'd claim that for something you know absolutely nothing about and don't understand on even the most basic level. Keep your stupidity to yourself.

@@lordoa Like Cell phones not causing cancers,(False)

Watch a Indian sci fi movie robo 2.0 you will get detailed explanation

Cool We don’t need more dumb humans on this planet

Do you even Science, fool.

Nah, it's just a faster way to send and recieve data. Nothing cancerous about it, and if it was we'd be dropping like flies from the lightbulbs in our houses. Visible light is many times more powerful than radio waves after all.

He says.. Whilst connected to the internet, on a mobile device or computer, which is slowly killing him anyway..... :)

only Frequency of UV-Light and higher can cause Cancer. And that is far away from 5G

Yeah, we should inform them about all the many scientific studies proving wireless tech radiation is biologically harmful. Here are seventeen links: pongcase.com/blog/cell-phone-radiation-causing-oxidative-cell-damages/ www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025786/ www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/26371078/ link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-3-642-30018-9_210 www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118300355 www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/07/130729133531.htm www.researchgate.net/publication/278697870_Effects_of_Cellular_Phone-_and_Wi-Fi-Induced_Electromagnetic_Radiation_on_Oxidative_Stress_and_Molecular_Pathways_in_Brain ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7520958029.pdf www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701402/#!po=0.427350 www.jrseco.com/eu-reflex-study-shows-dna-damage-caused-by-radiation-from-wireless-devices-and-mobile-phones/ olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2019R1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/174947 rbej.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1477-7827-7-114 www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00223/full www.hindawi.com/journals/omcl/2018/5076271/ www.hindawi.com/journals/ijcb/2012/683897/ blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/ Here is a link to the biggest petition against 5G: www.5gspaceappeal.org

Harmless to the idiots and scary to the knowledgable.

Very informative and well explained, thank you

Just for faster downloads pretty much. Also helpful for big businesses that have a lot of workers at a time all on one network.

Natural Honey we don't , stay away from it

@@sytyanna 5G seems like a good deal for me.

@@sytyanna but why, we could have self driving cars and remote healthcare

@Asyam Abyan ight

amezing WeedeR IKR! He probably meant 2.5G but didn't know it.

Probably a 2 hour 4K movie. 3G speeds are super slow. Speaking from a person who uses 4G+ (600Mbps)

amezing WeedeR 3 is more than enough

Graham Thomas true but rich business men will be gunning for 5G to make the highest profit out it.

3G sucks though... 4G LTE all the way Cant wait for 5G

It always been like that man.

All this technology and the best they can do is a nylon strap to "keep you safe" in a car wreck.

Sinister well, if it ain't broke why fix it? And you also can't forget all the other tech, such as reinforced pillars to help the car hold it's shape, improved crumple zones, and more air bags in combination with that "nylon strap"

Justin Noker seriously.... a nylon strap... uncomfortable and lame.

Rajat Roy FUCKKER...🖕

Satellites you mean

Far Cry in real life.

Well, you enjoy prison while I enjoy 5G o/

Tbh we don't really need them but it's not a big deal We already have fg wtf

Great idea. I’ll bring my torch and pitchfork.

Andrew Hanson sunlight is more radioactive

Alle Moron

Andrew Hanson trust me those who are at the top know how to produce free energy for the entire planet, and could feed every single person right now if they wanted to, it’s always been about enslaving us to work and killing us

​@@alle7540 So why don't you connect yourself to it?

@Gregory Kemi well it’s kind of hard to avoid sunlight completely, unless you’re a shut in.

People said the same about 1G and Wi-Fi. We're still here.

Really awesome more death!

@@olican101 lets see dude the 5g is gonna cook you alive

No it won’t

No and stop with the emojis

I hope 5G will reduce bandwidth pressure.