Тёмный

What is a Monte Carlo and What Does it Have to Do With Your Retirement? 

Sensible Money, LLC
Подписаться 6 тыс.
Просмотров 4,4 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

18 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 9   
@cliffluxion7019
@cliffluxion7019 2 года назад
Thank you so very much for this valuable and insightful video.
@bobtackleberry9861
@bobtackleberry9861 2 года назад
Your volume level keeps going up & down on RU-vid.
@josephj7991
@josephj7991 2 года назад
Just as I reach retirement age we are sliding into a Recession? Doh! Shud I wait a few more years?
@toreckman8899
@toreckman8899 2 года назад
You’re smokin hot and financially savvy. Monte Carlo can’t be proven or disproven. What I find cute is all the models have us living until 95. One would think Monte Carlo could factor that in its algorithm.
@ralphparker
@ralphparker 2 года назад
I think monte carlo's use an annual average and annual standard deviation. But due to the stock market's reversion to the mean principle, the annual std dev will predict vast larger variations than the actual market will produce in extended analysis. Try it. Take and average growth rate and std deviation of a fund and predict the variation of a 20 year run and compare it to a running average growth and std deviation of the 20 year period. The average growth rate will be close, but the predicted std dev will be significantly larger that the actual 20 year std dev.
@whatsup3270
@whatsup3270 Год назад
I dont think you can do returns as they have a moving base, you have to do price. Something has to be frozen (like cpi) a basket of equities or index of stocks (fixed base). The Monte Carlo randomly(requires independence) throws returns at them but those returns have to be correctly distributed and thus the problem. So in 2029 the test might throw a -40% at the price however the z-score of that -40% has to be correct and what is that number? ( 0.000005% or 0.0001, who knows?) and there is another problem the year 2030 isn't independent of 2029 the chance of a large positive in 2030 is very high because 2030 is just correcting the over correction from 2029
@ralphparker
@ralphparker Год назад
@@whatsup3270 That is both the problem and the benefit of monte carlo. After all, the future will never really look like the past. We hope that the past has some representation of the future, else we have no hope of developing a planning scenario.
@PH-dm8ew
@PH-dm8ew Год назад
Per Ben Felix( PWL Capital)we really need to look at a 2.7 % withdrawal instead of the 4% in the bill Bergen approach. Does using Monte Carlo mediate or account for percent that can be safely drawn from a portfolio?
@whatsup3270
@whatsup3270 Год назад
basically yes, it when setup correctly (there is your problem) produces a probability of success over thousands of foreseeable futures. So if you ask will the IRA last if the IRA is in the S&P 500 index and the start amount is $300,000 and the withdraw amount is $23,000/yr(7.7%) and the period is 25years? Well that will probably is low and Monte Carlo gives you that number ( which is going to need a bull run early ) However you can lower the $23k and look at the new success rate. The difference is the Monte Carlo counts the paths of failure verses the paths of success.
Далее
Retirement Readiness
21:36
Просмотров 9 тыс.
Какой звук фальшивый?
00:32
Просмотров 956 тыс.
Is an annuity right for you
15:25
Просмотров 6 тыс.
Roth Conversions   When is Enough Enough
15:46
Просмотров 107 тыс.
How to Stress Test Your Retirement Plan
49:47
Просмотров 18 тыс.
Monte Carlo Simulation   Retirement Withdrawals
18:34
Просмотров 12 тыс.
How to Prepare Mentally and Emotionally for Retirement
41:34
Какой звук фальшивый?
00:32
Просмотров 956 тыс.