What Is Cell? I Cell as the Basic Unit of Life In Stunning 3D Animation 4K 

I agree. I am back in college at 43, and this is amazing!!

Thank you for your thoughtful feedback on the video! I'm glad to hear that you found it excellent. Your suggestion to divide the content into more manageable parts with slower pacing and explanations in simpler language is a valuable one. This approach would indeed help in ensuring that audience can better absorb and retain the information presented. It's great to know that you already have a background in this subject, and your input will certainly contribute to enhancing the learning experience for others as well. The video's potential to serve as a strong foundation is promising, and incorporating your ideas could make it even more accessible and effective for a wider audience.

You have heard of the pause button? You can also use the controls to slow the video down to even half speed. I usually use it to speed the video up. I digest information easily.

​@painmt651 Cool. I guess your cells are smarter than most others.

I wish I had chloroplasts! lol!

Great suggestion!

Glad it was helpful!

Thanks for visiting

Glad you liked it

Much appreciated

@@ScoreBoosterAcademy ❤️

😁

Reminded me of an amphiteater.

@@oirampeceda2409 I couldn't think of the word. Exactly lol

Great suggestion!

Glad you liked it!

Glad it was helpful!

You're welcome 😊

Glad it was helpful!

The DNA.

@@nsbd90now lol! And the information in books came from the printing machines! Brilliant!

@@jIMwILLIAMS-im7kk Um, no. The information in books comes from the people who wrote the book. Printing machines just make copies of it. Yikes! That's not chemical, molecular interactions developing over billions of years. Work on your metaphors. That's a bad one.

@@nsbd90now wow!?!? Apparently I wasn't being sarcastic enough??? That's wild anyone would not realize I simply was showing the absolute absurdity of saying dna created the information which operates living cells It's primafatia absurdity.. ! Dna is simply the printer ( or even less the paper) and no one in their right mind claims the information which dna facilitates created said information by sheer unquantifiable random cycling through of code. The question of where this information came from is unknown . Hello!?!?! Thanks for the input anyways..

Certainly! Viruses present a fascinating conundrum in the realm of life sciences. They exhibit characteristics of life by carrying genetic information, yet they lack the essential cellular machinery for independent metabolic activities. Viruses essentially rely on infecting host cells to replicate and propagate. This intricate interdependence challenges the conventional boundaries that define living organisms. While they possess some life-like qualities, viruses fall short of being fully self-sustaining entities, prompting us to reconsider the traditional definitions of life in the context of these complex molecular structures.

Our life is a demonstration/externalization of the Activity of Our Consciousness!!!

Mitochondria

Amen❤!

Praise godgod for creating god.

It's fascinating to explore the intersection of physics and consciousness. While the idea of consciousness being fundamental and matter arising from it is a thought-provoking concept, it's important to note that this perspective is still a subject of debate and exploration within the scientific and philosophical communities. Max Planck's quote certainly adds weight to the discussion. It's a reminder that the universe is full of mysteries waiting to be unraveled, and our role in this grand cosmic drama is to engage with curiosity and make the most of the infinite possibilities that surround us, creating an interesting and meaningful journey through our finite moments.

Billions of years and small chemical reactions can very much lead to incredible complexity. We can calculate and explain it mathematically, even simulate the process via computation and see how this could have occurred. A divine creator is not necessary to explain it at all.

Agreed. I just can't see how an intelligent creator could have come into existence by itself. Obviously there is an even bigger god, called godgod that must have created it.

@GuardianSoulkeeper "I just can't see how an intelligent creator could have come into existence by itself" I agree. God did not come into existence, he always was, is and will be. Besides that, you may have heard about the problems with an infinite regression. Naturalism cannot answer the question "why is there anything and not nothing", making you very yealous of Theists who actually have a really good answer.

@user-nq3ml1xm9z "We can calculate and explain it mathematically, even simulate the process via computation" - Please provide some references for this extraordinary claim!

@@joa43211 How do you know your god was here forever? Bold assumption. Let's see if you have evidence to back it up.

Go to a respectable school and learn about it.

@@nsbd90now So you have all the answers, you have solid proof that there is nothing beyond the material universe, nothing metaphysical?

@@BangMaster96 The response of a childish, unserious brat who doesn't do well in school because of intellectual laziness. Well done. Typical.

You think this level of complexity does not require a designer? It has incredibly complex purposefully ordered information way beyond human capabilities, observation for thousands of years has always determined information necessitates intelligent input, you have NEVER observed an exception to this in your whole life. DNA has code that is read in multiple directions, has encryption, and the death knell for fools who subscribe to immense complexity creates itself, error correction which makes zero sense for a mechanism that relies on mutations. So, which came first 'DNA' or 'protein'? Tricky that one isn't it? Evolution did not happen, God made all life forms intact with the necessary information to self replicate and adapt - chicken and egg question answered, which science can never answer.

You worship what is in your heart, 'evolution' is your false idol.

The journey from a single cell to a fully functioning human body is a testament to the complexity of biology, driven by intricate genetic information and precise cellular interactions. While the idea of cloning is intriguing, it involves a far more complicated process than simply inserting a strand of DNA into a cell. Even if successful, a clone would share genetic material but might still develop differently due to environmental factors. The immense amount of information stored within our DNA, with each gene encoding specific functions, underscores the ongoing wonder and mystery of life, reminding us that there is much more to learn and discover in the realm of genetics and biology.

There are 6 feet of DNA in each somatic human cell, and the total length if stitched end to end would reach to the Sun and back 30 times. Each nanometer is either open to be read or interacted with, or closed. Coding segments contain base 4 encoded digital information with a density 2 to 4 times vs binary computer data. The gene does not specify what the protein it codes for. The gene only specifies the amino acid sequence and then the protein takes on a life of its own. The non-coding sequences serve as multiple massively parallel operating systems which turn genes on and off and comprise the digital equivalent of AND, OR, and NOR logic gates. S. Cervisiae ( beer yeast) regulates ribosome production with over 50 quality control checkpoints where one which is not forming normally is marked to be destroyed. Many multi-subunit proteins must cooperate to function. DNA gyrase, the 2 different replication systems, kinesins, flagellar motors of 2 different types, ATP synthase , and pyruvate decarboxylase complex exist in code, but had to be present as well. To honestly believe random processes can generate all thisxfrom prebiotic chemicals defies logic. Life is data driven, and the data is digital. Let's all stop dancing around the elephant in the room: you can't get there from here.

@@glenliesegang233 ; irreducible complexity. There is only one conclusion🙏👍

@@glenliesegang233 A biased worldview can make even a genius blind to Gods miracle of life. Excellent comment.

@@spamm0145the same could be said of someone biased toward a religious philosophy being blind to the true beauty of how such incredible complexity can truly come about from small building blocks spontaneously with no divine intervention at all.

Glad you put the two together: God is science. God is life.

All In One Life 🧬 And Has given us the Abundant Life 🧬

It is evolution baby!

But Macro Biological Evolution goes against the laws of physics and chemistry . As time goes on things break down to it's simplest form not build up. All life needs DNA to now how to build and function on. DNA is a program on how to operate. Which is a design. There are many systems with in the body that depends on each other to function. One can not function first with out the other. That goes against Macro evolution. Which say's that one existed before the other. Macro evolution say's things become in order (DNA and complex systems are things that demand order or they do not work). As time goes on (millions of years) things break down and become more disordered. Macro (which don't get it confused with micro ) evolution goes against the laws of nature. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LAwwsewPxUs.html @@jamesjasso6002

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ysEc8SdDLAs.html @@jamesjasso6002

Glad you liked it!

The narration hinders understanding.

It’s original content. Check for credibility before commenting

Read about RNA.

No evidence for a creator. Lots of evidence of natural evolution. Cultists just have to cult. Get out while you still can.

This comment is confusing to me, borderline insulting to all the knowledge we currently have about this. Inorganic molecules didn’t just fall together one day to create reproducing organism. Inorganic molecules reacted to form organic molecules via catalysis by (mostly) ultraviolet radiation and those molecules grew in complexity over billions of years. Eventually, through calculable reductions in enthalpy and increases in entropy, cyclic chemical processes began to take place. Then, over billions more years, entities we might call “organisms” formed and eventually began reproducing.

@user-nq3ml1xm9z Oh suuuure. That's why inorganic molecules can create life. But modern man cannot create life with intelligent manipulation and technology. You think all your fast talking will absolve you of your sin? You will stand before a holy God and YOU WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE.

@user-nq3ml1xm9z that's great story, sounds like you were there in the beginning.

Clown

Lol

Keep your ignorance to yourself

Take thar ridiculous cult nonsense elsewhere 😂🤡. Nobody cares about that imaginary fairytale character.

Bible thumper, evolution is understood. It needs not repeating in every lecture.

This video if what's said here is true makes Darwin's theory garbage.

​@@mobbydyskDarwin's theory is not a theory it is fact... braindead f***!!

@@mobbydysk Nope, guess again. Religion can’t be proven or disproven, it’s about beliefs. Science is about learning, knowledge and questioning.

Evolution of life could not begin until a fully formed, self supporting, self replicating living cell has already been created. Evolution could not possibly be responsible for the beginning of Life. For the beginning of life you must have creation. Evolutionists must believe that everything in this video happened by accident, for no purpose. They must believe that dead things started doing this for no reason.

😂🤡. literally zero evidence of your imaginary fairytale character, and yet this video somehow validates your ridiculous cult beliefs 😂.

So who's a god creator?

Who created your god? Such intelligence cannot have come about by itself and therefore must have been created by godgod.

Something from nothing...Hey, kinda like God, kids! Oh wait, he was always there... which makes waaaay more sense!

Mutation has been observed sweetie.

@@GuardianSoulkeeper ah, yes, another idiot not even considering the mathematical probability of even a single protein, let alone an entire cell happening by pure chance. You haven’t a leg to stand on sweetie, but keep trying.

How did you come to that conclusion?

@@ladiesweb4769 Darwin said that in the past lightning struck some pond of water and in that way created first living organism the first cell. I think it's very implausible so if his base theory is very weak the same is with rest of it

@@mobbydysk Dude you have no idea what you are talking about. Go back to school