What Is It Like To Marry Into The British Royal Family? | Fourteen Weddings And A Divorce | Timeline 

That’s food for conspiracy thought 💭 lol 😆

Only because George was so much hated. Caroline was no heroine...

When they make a movie about George Floyd Yall think JUSSIE SMOLLETT Should audition for the role. After he's released from PRISON of course.

Kimberly Ongcal she came from a noble family but she was indeed a commoner.

@dimapez Only one member of any hereditary aristocratic familiy, the actual holder of the title, is considered a noble. In Diana's case, i.e. in the Spencer family, that was her father, Earl Spencer, and after his death, it is now her brother. The principle behind this is called primogeniture. The UK works differently from the European continent in this respect. All other members of the family (Diana's mother, Diana herself and all other members of the family, even her eldest brother while her father was still alive) are commoners, even though they are part of the aristocracy.

@dimapez A commoner is anyone who is not a peer in their own right (ranks of the peerage are duke, marquess, earl, viscount, baron). Members of their families, who are commoners and not peers, are given so called courtesy titles (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtesy_titles_in_the_United_Kingdom) - like Lady Diana, they remain commoners though. So Diana was a commoner, altghough she was from a very old aristocratic family. "Commoner" doesn't mean that she was from a middle or lower class background. Her life and would have been the exact same as that of a peer.

@dimapez when Diana was born her grandfather was still alive. Her father was known as viscount Spencer. Diana was the honourable Diana Spencer. When her father became the earl Spencer. That's when she became lady diana Spencer.

Kimberly Ongcal “The word lady is a term of respect for a girl or woman, the equivalent of gentleman. Once used to describe only women of a high social class or status, the female equivalent of lord, now it may refer to any adult woman. Informal use of this word is sometimes euphemistic ("lady of the night" for a prostitute ) or, in American slang, condescending (equivalent to "mister" or "man"). "Lady" is also a formal title in the United Kingdom. "Lady" is used before the family name of a woman with a title of nobility or honorary title suo jure (in her own right), or the wife of a lord, a baronet, laird, or a knight, and also before the first name of the daughter of a duke, marquess, or earl.” Lords and Ladies are Nobility everywhere I searched it said nothing of Royalty

I know, it seems that everyone has forgotten that he is part of the Royal family.

This documentary was made before the 1997 death of Princess Diana. Edward married Sophie in 1999.

Not if they have any sense!! Diana was a betrayal of her family. Couldn't tell the difference between Royalty and Celebrity.

She was no "royal highness " .

The women whose relationships she wrecked won’t love her that’s for sure.

@@ritahorvath8207 Girl bye with that. So phony.

@@barbaraholmes8647 No more than Charles.

9

only when Diana blood gonna sit on the Throne King William ^_^

Harry is not disrespectful! You are WRONG

its not all that surprising. Both parents IMO spoiled him, like a lot of divorced parents do. And I think that Harry was always flakey but for years, he kept within certain boundaries and the RF covered up some of his wobbly behaviour.. but Meghan encouraged him to burst out of the royal bounds

I don't think he's disrespecting Diana's name or legacy. In what way do you think he has done this?

by making a break from the Royal Family? Ok. Yes.

@@miss.spent-youth1454 seriously? He has written a book attacking his brother, called the RF racist but refused to say who was being racist, claimed that he should have free security, the list is endless

Fergie never insinunated this.. it was she who strayed... once they were divorced he was free to see other women

A commoner means someone who isn't born into royaly, nobility or the aristocracy whereas Diana's family was aristocratic. Therefore I don't understand why she has been labelled as a commoner.

@@miss.spent-youth1454 technically everyone except the sovereign is a commoner.

@@miss.spent-youth1454 because her family are noble - not royal. In noble families( wherein the oldest male carries the title) every one else gets courtesy titles and is considered commoner ( like Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon and Lady Diana Spencer).

They are still commoners if they dont have royal or noble rank. Obviously they are from well off families, as if they werene't they're not likely to have met and socialised with various princes

Everyone except for the monarch is technically a commoner.

Not for nothing but being topless and having your toes sucked ( by someone not your husband) in front of your daughter is not only common but downright vulgar. There is your Fergie. Seems that her growing up on an estate didn't help. Oh and the pictures were published for all to see so there is no two ways about it. That is why the Duke of Edinburgh could not abide her.

@@michaelmulvey6753 no, there are monarchs, royals, peers and commoners. but in the UK only a peer is of noble rank, his children and younger siblings are commoners

When they make a movie about George Floyd Yall think JUSSIE SMOLLETT Should audition for the role 🤔 After he's been released from prison of course.

Begging for privacy . How many times did she ring the paparazzi to tell them where she was. Mixed up girl for sure. Didn't know what she wanted or perhaps she did . Attention admiration celebrity status. Played the cameras and the people. Look up BPD for the Answer..

Charles was having an affair with Camilla Parker Bowels née Shand. Since 1965 before and his marriage and before her marriage to Andrew Parker Bowles. Sidenote Andrew Parker Bowles was said to have been , one of the God children of the Queen Mother , Elizabeth.

@@tammielynne4089 Charles first met Camilla in 1972 not 1965 Charles left to go into the Navy and she married Andrew Parker Bowles in 1973

The relationship with Dale, Lady Tryon, was over before the marriage.

Jem Harper, You are talking about a man who, since the age of 32, has had two women in his life- Diana, and then Camilla. Does that suggest to you that he has put himself at risk?

@@tammielynne4089 1965? Charles was 17 then.. and he didn't meet Camilla till he was in his ealry 20s

Morgan Lowe and Princess Anne

@@narrakasa81194 yes but that was after Margret, before her though it was Henry Tudor . So when they act like it was the only they are out right bold face fibbing.

How did he desert them? Diana was the one who started to look for a divorce... she wanted out of hte marriage, at least in some of her moods. Charles did not desert his sons

@@glen7318 but he did upon making the conscious decision to continue an affair with Camilla Crapper Bowls. His family paid the price for is infidelity.

I can only find that it was released in 97...the same year Diana passed so I presume if it was released in 97 then it took a long time to film, edit and produce etc so its definitely a good bet that it was filmed before her death in Aug 97

so were most royal brides. Camilla is related to Charles as well. And she was not HRH Diana Princess of Wales. When she became Diana POW, she lost her HRH

@@glen7318 but that doesn't make sense. She became POW on her wedding day aswell as HRH

@@miss.spent-youth1454 when she married seh became HRH THE Princess of W. then she los the HRH on hte divorc

I know, but...they had to have some couples who were happy together...right? At least, somewhat.

True but most people to don't have to Murder thier , espouses, in order to remarry.

How very true

@@RikodiusRex Okay . sure .. if you say so

Tammie, That story was put about by Mohammed el Fayed. He didn't want to take responsibility for Diana's death which was caused by 1. Fayed hired a car with problems, and damaged seatbelts. 2. Fayed hired a driver who was not properly licensed, drove dangerously all the time, and was on medication. 3. Fyed hired security who didn't take proper care of Diana, because FAYED was paying him. He SHOULD have said "no, the car is dangerous, the driver is dangerous. there are no seat belts" But Fayed was his Boss, not Diana. The people responsible for Diana's death were the Fayed, who did not take proper care of her.

That's wrong. Charles didn't marry until after the Queens mothers death.

@Jem Harper watch Unlawful Killings: The Murder of Princess Diana. Straight facts - They definitely had her killed.

@Jem Harper The secret service killed Diana.

@@gabriellechanel7076 That film does not explain everything....much more to it.

Not true. Charles was free to remarry once he and Diana were divorced but the odds were that he would wait a few years. And in the end he waited until after the QM died. By then the boys were grown up and the queen was ok wiht it

Hahahah

It's probably because of BBC protecting the crown lol

Did he? I wasn't aware of any even though he would go to The Men's Club where they would watch movies and all sorts of things.

@@montrelouisebohon-harris7023 I dont know if you ever have watched the Crown on Netflix but you should its based on actual events

Monterey Harris yeah he done her sister Margaret as well as many others I’m pretty sure he tried it with Diana as well. He put it about alright. That’s why him and the queen sleep in separate rooms.

@@davidbaker8957 you’re saying prince Philip banged princess Margret?!? Where did you get that information?

Whats' nasty about it?

If you don’t see it then you are part of the the problem 🤷🏻‍♀️

@@zukibetancourt8488 what problem ?

100 % 👍 ♡

More like a colonoscopy with a barbed wire.

strange that when it was known that William was going to St Andrews loads of young girls changed to that university.....

Doris Daumann, Diana was technically a commoner. Her title "Lady" Diana is essentially an honorary one, generally given to the daughters of Dukes, Marquises and Earls, but it does not signify that she, personally, is titled.

@@MandyJMaddison She was an aristocrat with royal blood in her background!

island girl, The fact that her father was an Earl, and she was descended from Stuart kings doesn't make any difference. Technically, in erms of British Royal Marriage, and succession, Diana was a Commoner. The only women who are NOT commoners are women who are Princess of Royal Blood, and a very few few women (about four or five) who have rare titles that pass to the female if there is no male heir.

@@MandyJMaddison Thank you for the clarification.

@@MandyJMaddison she was an aristocrat coming from a longstanding noble family..her family titles are older than the royal family ...she was actually more royal than the royal family...kate is a commoner same with Harry's wife they are not aristocrat or noble they are not minor bluebloods

GIVE US BACK OUR INTEGRITY Hello 👋🏻

RUDEEEEEEEeeee.... Tee hee hee hee ROFLAMOLOL

You are quite right... Lol

Jessica Bostick first off I apologize if you thought my comment was rude. I was just making an observation. I did say that I wasn't meaning to be rude.

Amanda I was just stating my opinion. I apologize if you thought I was rude

Rude . .

Sarah Melbourne

. 🤣

who is Sarah Melbourne?

Which one?

Fast forward to the end and restart. Gets rid of ads

2. my 2nd DaughTerJacqueline TH was noT one Time in UK = no journey and i was 1 TimE in London UK year 1987 OcTober 5

I AM GLAD DIANA IS NOT AWARE OF ALL THE STRESS OF THE ROYAL FAMILY NOW

George V was Charles' great grandfather. George V | George VI | Elizabeth | Charles

Does anybody care?

I don't think she needs anyone to care. She just should not have married into that crazy family with all their issues. She should have known that she would take the fall just like the others.

@@reneedaughter she's done very well out of it, living in a mansion in LA nad having a title and big business deals is a lot better tan beinga C list actress

I don't understand what you mean. How could a pillar/ bridge support be able to fully support the bridge if it were able to slide? Surely the weight bearing down on the support would make it unable to move? Also, if a car did crash into a pillar which was able to move by one or two meters, the pillar would still come to a standstill and be an immovable object causing the sane damage to the car.

👀 I wish I could see it ... 👓

Most of it. They talk about her death at the end.

No your right Charles does have courage to Murder someone , but Camilla Rosemary Shand Parker Bowles, certainly did .

Elizabeth Porter Her brother had his own problems at the time moving back from South Africa going through a divorce and trying to entertain his own children when they weren’t in school. Don’t forget the hordes of paparazzi, press and spies (security) paid by Charles that surrounded Diana all the time. If the royal family and Charles had been more generous they could have let her stay at one of the estates in Scotland which are more secluded than the Spencer estate. Too late and too sad to speculate about...

@@magnacz Diana didn't want to stay on a royal estate, and since she had trashed the RF, so much, it was not likely that anyone in the RF would invite her. And having publicly abused the RF she had less friends among the upper classes who might have offered her holidays so she took the offer from the rich M Al Fayed

@@tammielynne4089 Camilla doesn't have the power to order a hit. But you know who Does? Elizabeth

@@mariahyohannes do you really think that the queen wanted to kill somoene esp the mother of her grandchildren

3 people died because of Dodis' stupidity in using an untrained unlicensed driver and probalby ordering him to speed

More than 3 people have died at the hands of the RF....

@@miss.spent-youth1454 who exactly?

Diana died because she didn't wear a seatbelt that night. Diana thereby broke French law. Her choice, her mistake...

People are extremely superfficial and dont want to accept that Diana however lovely wasnt at all easy to live with and that sehe wasnt the right woman for Charles.. but a rather plain woman was

Furthermore she was still a teenager when they got engaged and not a very mature or stable one at that.

@@glen7318 she'd probably easier to live with if he wasn't cheating on her

@@mariahyohannes and perhaps visa versa

@@shawroberts5149 Itdidn't matter if Diana was cheating. He wanted to be with Camilla and that's who he should have chose first

This does not make sense. Maybe English is not a language you've managed to master or is it due to typo's or autocorrect?

He also demonstrated poor decision-making skills. Why was it that Charles did not marry the love of his life the first time? What kind of man marries knowing he doesn't love the woman who plainly adores him? The crown's decision will indicate if they value this kind of man enough to endow him with the kingdom.

Marie Light HRH Prince of Wales could not marry Camilla prior to their subsequent marriages to others because she was not a virgin, and that fact was widely own in aristocratic circles. He was required by custom to marry a virgin, and I believe Lady Diana Spencer was even subjected to a gynecological exam prior to marriage. Obviously, that requirement is no longer in existence as the current Duke and Duchess of Cambridge loved together for years prior to marrying. Prince Charles had a duty to marry and produce heirs, and at 31 years old had not “fallen in love” like some fairy story plot, and was pressured to agree to a suitable match. The Spencer family was well known to the Royal Family, and Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother concocted a match between Prince Charles and the “suitable” Lady Diana. Obviously, Lady Diana was too young, immature, and psychologically fragile to understand the full extent of what she was stepping into, and Prince Charles was too selfish to completely change his well ingrained habits and personality to try to satisfy her. They actually magnified one another’s faults and made the other worse. And what possible “Crown’s decision” are you talking about? There is no decision to be made. When HM Queen Elizabeth dies, if the Prince of Wales is still alive he becomes King and the Duchess of Cornwall becomes Queen Consort. There is no picking and choosing from the line of succession. The only decision that could be made would be for the Prince of Wales to abdicate, and that will never happen.

@@bdub1863 Oh dear, I normally don't speak on topics I know poorly and was under the fog of a stout flu. I thought it was possible the Duke of Cambridge could be chosen ahead the Prince of Wales. Also, I appreciate the tone of your email reminding me of the importance friendly discourse.

Camilla should not be Queen Consort... She does not deserve that position. She will never be as loved as Princess Diana...

Daniela De Ávila Its not an earned position, nor is it based on public opinion. The sole requirement is that she be married to the King. If HRH the Duchess of Cornwall and HRH the Prince of Wales both survive HM Queen Elizabeth, and they are still legally married, Camilla automatically becomes Queen Consort. Whether she is styled as Princess Consort or some other lesser title to mollify ridiculous public nuisances whinging about their irrelevant disapproval of her, the fact remains she will be Queen Consort.

yes she was a commoner. So was teh Q Mother, So was Fergie or Kate Middleton

Most likely will be Charles stopping Charles. Assuming QE2 doesn't outlive him based on her exceptional good health and long lived genes thanks to Queen Mother

Hope you right Charles needs to walk away but I don’t expect it can only hope Queen outlives him

There is no constitutional mechanism for HM the Queen to stop HRH the Prince of Wales from succeeding her as Monarch. If HM predeceases HRH POW, he becomes King. Only then could he abdicate, which will never happen.

Well at least it will be a short reign, we hope. God save us from a vindictive, narrow minded, petulant and entitled as a birthright, character. He had to keep quiet all his life, officially and had to write letters in secret. He will probably reinstate the Tower of London to lock away anybody that disagrees and chop off a few heads in the name of tradition.

@@magnacz that's absolute nonsense. Charles does not write lettters in secret, he writes to ministers about issues. He has tried ot use his position to do good, and make use of his influence and his weatlth to help people. He cannot reinstate the Tower of London as Im sure you know