Тёмный

What is the Fastest Military Ship?  

Not What You Think
Подписаться 3 млн
Просмотров 8 млн
50% 1

#NotWhatYouThink #NWYT #shorts
What is the fastest military ship? Well it depends on conditions, so lets find out.
Music:
ES_Torpedo - Tigerblood Jewel
Footage:
US Department of Defense
Note: "The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."

Опубликовано:

 

5 дек 2021

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,9 тыс.   
@sfsodz8419
@sfsodz8419 2 года назад
"Size matters, especially when it's rough" Cmon dude
@vanceroday
@vanceroday 2 года назад
i was like come on hey 😭
@sergeirachmaninoff6397
@sergeirachmaninoff6397 2 года назад
*proceeds to show boulbous bow"
@Alrson1
@Alrson1 2 года назад
I just realized
@larry-333
@larry-333 2 года назад
*looks down* Me: Awwww :(
@legoaurum3085
@legoaurum3085 2 года назад
That's what she said
@GreySlasher63
@GreySlasher63 2 года назад
“Size matters, especially when things get rough.” The rock: 🤨
@larry-333
@larry-333 2 года назад
My rock: ERECT'IN A DISPENSER
@ieatyouto4527
@ieatyouto4527 2 года назад
I saw the Rocks face in that emoji 🤣
@angelsanchez9539
@angelsanchez9539 2 года назад
So it’s not all about drive and power?
@ayub_mohamed
@ayub_mohamed 2 года назад
@@angelsanchez9539 😂 lol
@warrenarnold
@warrenarnold 2 года назад
@@angelsanchez9539 is that what you tell yourself to sleep well at night?
@PUNISHERMHS_2021
@PUNISHERMHS_2021 Год назад
The smaller ships aren't small, they're average sized. In fact, some would say they're above average. Bet they have a great personality too😔
@Seadogstudio
@Seadogstudio Год назад
Yeah. Average size ship is plenty to accomplish the mission. Many captain who really know how to use their ship. And they make great breakfast too.😂
@foxicecube
@foxicecube Год назад
nun is n doing a cartwheel
@hunterbidenparmesanimports5633
Sucks they are going to decommission them now , they said they aren’t survivable in the indo-pacific arena , the LCS’s anyways. The one at the start of the video
@ericmatteson9868
@ericmatteson9868 Год назад
Great personalities lol
@jerryalbus1492
@jerryalbus1492 11 месяцев назад
as an Azur Lane player, I agree
@ExpertAssass1n
@ExpertAssass1n 2 года назад
Idc how many times I see an aircraft carrier, I will still always think to myself "how did humans make that??"
@ObservationofLimits
@ObservationofLimits Год назад
Hard-work, ingenuity, a daring spirit. Now take a second to realize the first ones were all designed and drafted out and organized by hand, no computers. THAT is what always impresses me.
@masonfarnsworth1801
@masonfarnsworth1801 Год назад
Money
@daveyjoseph6058
@daveyjoseph6058 Год назад
I dont know how keyed in you are to the existence of halo, but that’s where we’re headed my guy, might just take us a few hundred years
@kairo_9512
@kairo_9512 Год назад
Hard work can accomplish anything!
@angelic_disappointment7889
@angelic_disappointment7889 Год назад
The same way they made a tarmac runway, but on a boat
@walterw8223
@walterw8223 2 года назад
As seen in _Fast and Furious 23: Pacific Drift_
@feliscorax
@feliscorax 2 года назад
Good god no. That shit ain’t funny.
@pogmarine8180
@pogmarine8180 2 года назад
Walter, that was a good one bro.
@vsGoliath96
@vsGoliath96 Год назад
I absolutely demand that Hollywood give Vin Diesel an aircraft carrier this instant!
@ClayFoxx
@ClayFoxx Год назад
Don't give them any ideas
@JonatasAdoM
@JonatasAdoM Год назад
Sadly that can make sense on the screen. I wanna see them drifting the International Space Station.
@WBOMBS1232
@WBOMBS1232 2 года назад
Yo hold up “Size really matters, especially when things get rough, but it’s not what you think” This guy is WILD
@kristen457
@kristen457 2 года назад
It's not what you think
@deadpoolthepsycho_________2428
@deadpoolthepsycho_________2428 2 года назад
It what you think
@sweeptheleg.
@sweeptheleg. Год назад
That's what she said. 😁
@Makeusqueak
@Makeusqueak Год назад
Lame.
@---------c5741
@---------c5741 Год назад
If u watch his other videos, his really wild
@Lovatix
@Lovatix 2 года назад
"They're to small to handle anything bigger, bigger is better" *BRUH💀*
@D-Man_Jam
@D-Man_Jam 2 года назад
_"Size matters, especially when things get rough. It's not what you think."_ Yes, yes it very much is.
@YurinovichDornburg
@YurinovichDornburg 2 года назад
I thought it would be the Iowa class battleships, since they're also huge and can travel at 33 knots
@chiarosuburekeni9325
@chiarosuburekeni9325 2 года назад
Did you watch the short? He said we have knowledge of a non-nuclear carrier that can go 42 knots. That alone smokes the battleships you brought up. The current nuclear ones may have a speed approaching twice that of an iowa class battleship.
@apex_blue
@apex_blue 2 года назад
@@chiarosuburekeni9325 You have to give them respect 33 knots for 57,000 tons is extremely fast , the only other battleship that can challenge in speed was the Bismarck class.
@archise3191
@archise3191 2 года назад
@@apex_blue and also the fact that it was built in the 40s which is pretty impressive
@wheel95
@wheel95 2 года назад
battlecruisers by class should outrun battleships
@apex_blue
@apex_blue 2 года назад
@@wheel95 The fastest battle cruiser was rated for 32 knots while The Iowa’s were rated for 33 knots. USS New Jersey an Iowa class even hit 35.2 knots at one point.
@nesseihtgnay9419
@nesseihtgnay9419 2 года назад
Those super carriers are badass
@wolfbassgames1244
@wolfbassgames1244 Год назад
I once talked with an old veteran who served on USS ENTERPRISE CVN-65. He said she could go up to 60knots and is the only carrier with 17 different records that will never be broken including one where she was the only carrier capable of turning inside her own wake due to her 4 rudders.
@pting66
@pting66 Год назад
A carrier’s top speed constraint is more a function of material strength of the prop shaft. There was a carrier easily capable going 40+ knots that used a screw with more aggressive geometry. They ultimately had to replace it with one less aggressive because it caused significant twisting/distortion of the shaft.
@fintanbochra
@fintanbochra 2 года назад
Another certified hood classic
@fischerdogg
@fischerdogg 2 года назад
just talked about how good this short was, and how fucking scary it would be to see a super carrier hauling ass at you at ≈60 knots in like 20 feet waves, baked asf. that’s how you know it’s a classic.
@lupita3689
@lupita3689 2 года назад
@@fischerdogg I don’t think it can ever achieve that speed in rough sea conditions.
@fischerdogg
@fischerdogg 2 года назад
@@lupita3689 i realize that now, but IMAGINE IF IT COULD
@warrenarnold
@warrenarnold 2 года назад
@Dr. Bright He is evidence that size really matters, i bet he chose a harder bigger more penetrating drug
@fintanbochra
@fintanbochra 2 года назад
Rock with ya boy
@jamesharding3459
@jamesharding3459 2 года назад
It's actually possible that nuclear carriers are no faster than older oil-fired ones. They're still propelled by steam turbines spinning the propellers, they just use angry rocks (Uranium) instead of burning oil to make the steam. Edit: I try to point something about naval engineering and everyone just focuses on a throwaway quip.
@archise3191
@archise3191 2 года назад
Didn't HMS Queen Elizabeth uses a electric to drive the propellers ?
@jacobmccandles1767
@jacobmccandles1767 2 года назад
There is no limit to the power of steam, only a limit on out ability to harness it.
@Mirokuofnite
@Mirokuofnite 2 года назад
All that effort just to be a kettle
@jamesharding3459
@jamesharding3459 2 года назад
@@jacobmccandles1767 ?? I think you don’t understand how physics works.
@jacobmccandles1767
@jacobmccandles1767 2 года назад
@@jamesharding3459 I disagree. I wasn't being completely literal.
@PressTube
@PressTube Год назад
43 knots for a ship that size is seriously impressive !!!!
@operator0
@operator0 Год назад
I have heard from very credible sources that the Nimitz class could go 55MPH, which is about 50 knots. After these high speed runs, the intelligence officer comes by and confiscates all the navigators' charts. The only ships the U.S. Navy ever had that could go faster, in any sea state, were the old Pegasus hydrofoil patrol boats.
@azraelsoreal
@azraelsoreal 2 года назад
“Size matters, bigger is better” 😢
@darkpoliceplayz5199
@darkpoliceplayz5199 Год назад
more cargo the better
@DeWitherWarrior
@DeWitherWarrior 2 года назад
Commander we have to evacuate now! Why? USS Kitty-Hawk is on its way! Dear god!
@JV-bm4dd
@JV-bm4dd 2 года назад
Funniest shit I've seen today🤣🤣
@alanjervis9022
@alanjervis9022 2 года назад
TBH, that's how a lot of us on the Connie felt pierside in Coronado.
@turbostixxx
@turbostixxx 2 года назад
The Shitty Kitty lol
@christopherjuarez6933
@christopherjuarez6933 2 года назад
Aye she's ugly but she's fast captain
@gf1945__
@gf1945__ 2 года назад
@@JV-bm4dd Its actually a real ship. But it is a funny ass name lmao
@leechowning2712
@leechowning2712 2 года назад
The Enterprise class was the fastest we've built so far. The design underestimated the power that could be produced by the reactors and during sea trials she demonstrated significantly more power then had been originally planned for. The later classes had the benefit of her experience.
@ZachCremisiSky
@ZachCremisiSky 2 года назад
I can't wait for the next USS Enterprise to be built. To carry on the legendary name
@shauljonah6955
@shauljonah6955 2 года назад
I had a friend on there. He was a gamer when off duty and he was on the bridge a lot passing notes or letters ✉. I told him what I knew the Enterprise could do and things it had. I could have been in trouble for it because I shouldn't know certain things but it was cool. I hope the next one is greater.
@laramie371
@laramie371 2 года назад
Things that didn't happen.
@nobleactual7616
@nobleactual7616 2 года назад
Ironic since they were also the biggest or at least the longest ever built
@leon_oberti
@leon_oberti 2 года назад
It's funny how you refer to the Enterprise as a she 👀
@henrylarson
@henrylarson 2 года назад
“ Size matters, especially when it gets rough” *opens comments*
@dylanhecker6686
@dylanhecker6686 2 года назад
Imagine a ship so fast that it's illegal to know how fast it goes lol
@Cavemanner
@Cavemanner 2 года назад
Can't the Norwegian Skjold-class make like 60++ kts in calm water and 40+ in conditions up to 5 meter waves? Those things are my pipedream assignment since I'm American lol.
@kusehus4420
@kusehus4420 2 года назад
They are fast. Very fast
@darkice4546
@darkice4546 2 года назад
@@kusehus4420 saw that thing IRL And heard it Thought a couple of Fighter jets where landing in the port
@yingnyang2889
@yingnyang2889 2 года назад
They travel at fwy speeds. I was on an maxed out speed (35 kts)on a LHA and one of the super carriers passed us up in 2 1/2 hrs horizon to horizon
@mathiastwp
@mathiastwp 2 года назад
@@darkice4546 Seen one on its way out of Stavanger.
@darkice4546
@darkice4546 2 года назад
@@mathiastwp fucking water plane Fast af and loud af
@notfriendlyeggwithamustach5948
@notfriendlyeggwithamustach5948 2 года назад
"size matters, especially when things get rough" "bigger is better" out of context feels wrong
@flinstone74
@flinstone74 2 года назад
😂😂
@danieldunlap4077
@danieldunlap4077 2 года назад
I was aboard the USS Kitty Hawk when we were on our way to the Arabian Gulf in 2003. I distinctly remember our speed being over 32 knots from the Sea of Japan all the way till we stopped in the Arabian Gulf. On one of the TV stations on the ship, the speed was displayed.
@markrundquist3348
@markrundquist3348 Год назад
Thank you for your service.
@ekthepro
@ekthepro 2 года назад
He had us in the first half, not gonna lie.
@toddshreve
@toddshreve 2 года назад
I am somewhat confident that the limiting factor on modern carriers during standard operation is shaft torque spec. The throttles are governed (manually) to a maximum torque value.
@alanjervis9022
@alanjervis9022 2 года назад
That has more of an effect on acceleration/deceleration than top speed, but yes, that is a bigger limiting factor than the output of the turbines or the steam generators that feed them.
@goofball3056
@goofball3056 2 года назад
Yeah, I think it’s about 70k hp per shaft?
@cidal_dank1793
@cidal_dank1793 2 года назад
@@goofball3056 pretty sure its 104k HP.
@jdrhc63we67
@jdrhc63we67 Год назад
Thy are limited by personnel to prolonged component life but thy can handle mire torque than the screw can produce in water
@Uhaneole
@Uhaneole 2 года назад
I remember when we escorted a carrier, we were going full tilt and still fell behind her. The reasoning is that in a “windless” environment she has to generate her own headwind to launch planes.
@nahuelleandroarroyo
@nahuelleandroarroyo 2 года назад
Is it still a thing with catapults?
@SgtRudySmithbRet
@SgtRudySmithbRet 2 года назад
We were told that a carrier group could cross the Atlantic in 2 days but weren't allowed because it would be considered an act of war.
@willythemailboy2
@willythemailboy2 2 года назад
@@nahuelleandroarroyo Of course it is. Headwinds and the ship's own speed add onto the catapult's energy, meaning you can get more weight airborne at once. If they had to launch at a dead stop in calm air the planes would have to launch practically empty to get off the deck. The catapult can get your plane from zero to 140ish knots relative to the deck; air flow and headwinds might add another 50 knots to that.
@erikig
@erikig 2 года назад
@@SgtRudySmithbRet that’s one of the most alpha flexes I can think of…
@jamesradford8215
@jamesradford8215 2 года назад
"when the going gets rough, he's super tough. With the Hong Kong Phooey chop!"
@Jake-fy1pn
@Jake-fy1pn Год назад
It’s just amazing that such a large ship moves that fast when conventional wisdom would have led you to believe they’d be outrun by smaller ships
@Voltaic_Fire
@Voltaic_Fire 2 года назад
I doubt we'll see any nuclear aircraft carrier drag races any time soon so I guess we'll never know.
@Bizzon666
@Bizzon666 2 года назад
... shame 😅
@Paladinbr
@Paladinbr 2 года назад
Not officially, no. Unofficially? 😆
@wheels-n-tires1846
@wheels-n-tires1846 2 года назад
Wonder what NHRA class thatd be???
@alanjervis9022
@alanjervis9022 2 года назад
@@wheels-n-tires1846 Over-the-top fuel
@doxx2265
@doxx2265 2 года назад
Join the navy, maybe you’ll get to see one, if they exist 😘
@SpringDivers
@SpringDivers 2 года назад
While aboard Forrestal we did a run for record and clocked 43 knots (nearly 50 mph). Gibraltar to CONUS in three days.
@steadmanuhlich6734
@steadmanuhlich6734 2 года назад
WOW! That is amazing. Thanks for sharing that info. Very impressive!
@jacobmccandles1767
@jacobmccandles1767 2 года назад
@@steadmanuhlich6734 that's bad ass. Columbus would be jealous!
@thorodinson7467
@thorodinson7467 2 года назад
Forrestal 💀. Uh oh 🔥🔥🔥
@tylerburnell7306
@tylerburnell7306 2 года назад
What is CONUS
@markusz4447
@markusz4447 2 года назад
@@tylerburnell7306 continental US i believe
@nickhouck4309
@nickhouck4309 2 года назад
Damn, 30 knot carrier sounds nuts
@randomarcade1550
@randomarcade1550 Год назад
"Size matters, specially when things are rough." But it's not what you think.
@TimeLapseRich
@TimeLapseRich 2 года назад
An aircraft carrier uses a displacement hull design, this determines the maximum speed. There is a limit to how fast it can go regardless of how much thrust can be applied, different displacement hull types, and interface with the water mostly restrict max speed. It's safe to assume that when a military ship is designed like a carrier, maximum speed in all conditions is considered paramount. I'm no ship engineer, I'm sure one could tell us, but i don't think a displacement hull can travel much more that 60 knots without employing some trickery like cavitation bubbles.
@qqqsfdf1232
@qqqsfdf1232 2 года назад
Or aqua planes
@jacobmccandles1767
@jacobmccandles1767 2 года назад
@@qqqsfdf1232 how damn cool would a hydrofoil carrier task force be!?
@smurface549
@smurface549 2 года назад
Nahhh, it's like the sound barrier. The equations tell that there'd be infinite resistance, but the truth is, you can go faster. It just takes a shit load more power instead of a little more power. So it's simply very impractical, but not impossible.
@mattheadplus
@mattheadplus 2 года назад
"I'm no ship engineer" *Writes a thesis paper on hull displacement*
@mattheadplus
@mattheadplus 2 года назад
@Dr. Bright I only meant it as a joke and compliment, clearly the commenter has a huge amount af knowledge on watercraft, I just thought it was kinda funny that in the most informative and well written comment I've read about boats, person says they're no expert.
@thatsthemove8490
@thatsthemove8490 2 года назад
"Size matters especially when things get rough"
@awhitehub955
@awhitehub955 2 года назад
I love how you say “Nu”
@mm3mm3
@mm3mm3 10 месяцев назад
That wave smashed that one dinky boat 😮😮😮
@gavinn.4060
@gavinn.4060 2 года назад
8 feet is definitely not 1.25 meters lol. It’s almost 2.5 meters Edit: just saw that you said you made a typo, Nevermind
@everysubonepushup
@everysubonepushup 2 года назад
Size matters well that’s what she said
@bostonstock3315
@bostonstock3315 2 года назад
Those ships are so god damn beautiful.
@johnnyfawks
@johnnyfawks 2 года назад
I was on the Stennis for four years. I can say that I was impressed with our response time when we left Hawaii and headed to the Alaskan coast.
@markrundquist3348
@markrundquist3348 Год назад
Thank you for your service.
@seangelarden8753
@seangelarden8753 2 года назад
Was on a carrier in the Arctic Circle with waves coming over the bow and the deck going up and down about 60 feet
@danhaywood5696
@danhaywood5696 2 года назад
My berth was all the way aft and at the waterline aboard USS Ranger, CV61. I remember feeling the cavitation of the props. I remember wrestling with shipmates around the spinning drive shaft down in the center of the ship once also. I was up on top of the superstructure a lot as a photographer, and hung out on the Fantail and various sponsons regularly. Working Flightdeck required constant attention to deck activities, when on a lowered elevator, it's a good idea to have awareness if they turn the ship, because it can go under, and you may survive by holding on after quickly strapping everything. I remember us hammering across the globe a lot at around 31 knots probably. I can't remember how I knew the speed, but I remember I felt I could solidly judge it. We'd hold our highest speed for days sometimes, it was an odd feeling and kind of exhilarating at times. I still have vivid dreams of hanging onto the ship as it goes through Island archipelagos at hundreds of miles per hour. I don't believe our ship ever went over 36 Mph or 31 Knots. Man, it was so cool going through the fantastically beautiful Philippine archipelago at medium to slow speed. Remember going by Krakatoa, through the Straights of Sundra. It was unreal looking down into the tiny islands as we went by and seeing the people and their homes. I remember the sunset that evening, and my shopmates and I all standing out in the flight deck catwalk with no operations going on, just experiencing it together. I been aboard the Kitty Hawk in San Diego once. She was her own class of super carrier, but was sequential from Ranger as CV62 from CV61 I believe.
@machinistmikethetinkerer4827
@machinistmikethetinkerer4827 2 года назад
Yeah bro. You brought back some serious memories. My Coop was aft stbd side right next to mess deck. When I could I'd sneak out to the fantail on a high speed run and watch the prop wash turn the water to milk. BZ. HT3 CV61 84-88
@OscarZheng50
@OscarZheng50 Год назад
imagine the nuclear carriers actually go 40 knots while the navy tells us its 33
@mingb_4099
@mingb_4099 Год назад
That’s the point. They do that a hella lot with subs and other military stuff. They make the enemy underestimate them so they don’t know what’s coming.
@saho5309
@saho5309 Год назад
"Size matters ,especially when things gets rough" That's what she said 🥺
@TheKurtkapan34
@TheKurtkapan34 2 года назад
Video doesn't answer the question, as size doesn't matter when you are comparing ships in a trump cards style. Fastest military ship ever would be a hydrofoil like Sparviero or Pegasus class of boats which made over 50 knots.
@Bakotcha
@Bakotcha 2 года назад
You don't have joke in your dictionary or you want it to be installed by me?
@jackfletch2001
@jackfletch2001 2 года назад
The point of the video is average speed, the very point of a hydrofoil would be moot in anything but slight waves where their speed drops below 40 kts.
@apex_blue
@apex_blue 2 года назад
He is talking about open ocean not lakes
@luigivercotti6410
@luigivercotti6410 2 года назад
Well, there's also the ground effect vehicles to consider
@Anthus.
@Anthus. 2 года назад
I was on the USS George Washington CVN73. I remember during the ship's sea trials, as it was a new ship at the time, often the whole ship shuddered for several minutes at a time because we were going so fast. I was told we were testing how fast the GW could go, and we had hit a max speed of around 40-45 knots. It seemed we were going faster than 45 knots. I stood out on the fantail and thought I definitely could water ski behind this big ass aircraft carrier . We were throwing up a huge wake.
@LeftWingNationalist
@LeftWingNationalist 2 года назад
I was 04 to 08 Deck/Reactor Div on the GW.
@Anthus.
@Anthus. 2 года назад
@@LeftWingNationalist That's cool, I was attached to the air wing HS-5 Helicopter anti-submarine Squadron no. five/AZ3 maintenance admin./QA back in 1993-'94.
@Anthus.
@Anthus. 2 года назад
@@LeftWingNationalist They no longer had my old squadron on the GW by 2004 did they? I heard HS-5 and all the antisub/SAR Helicopter squadrons were decommissioned around 1998-2000.
@LeftWingNationalist
@LeftWingNationalist 2 года назад
@@Anthus. I'm unsure. 3 of the 4 years I was attached to the ship we were in drydock. We only had the air wings come on when we did sea trials and when we went on a 6 month deployment.
@TrySomeFentanyl
@TrySomeFentanyl 2 года назад
Nuclear powered carriers traded off acceleration and possibly some speed for blue water capability. Their diesel ancestors were built for acceleration and speed, but had to always get back to port.
@dragonbali6900
@dragonbali6900 2 года назад
I want to see a super carrier drifting like a race car XD
@roetemeteor
@roetemeteor 2 года назад
As somebody who has actually worked on these kind of ships, that carrier easily go about fifty knots. Now here's the kicker to that. It could do that kind of speed, but it won't be comfortable. See, military ships could go a lot faster than anything they've listed, but the maximum speed that's listed is the speed that the ship can do passively. By that, I mean you can go at that speed and not risk anything. It goes way faster than that, but then you're risking things like hull damage, shaft damage, engine damage, and the like. So that carrier to easily hit 50 knots, but no one on that ship is going to like it. And the shaft is going to hate it even worse.
@nahuelleandroarroyo
@nahuelleandroarroyo 2 года назад
Plus the small, squishy things inside, the faster it goes the more you risk for injuries and you cant really be on that state indefinetely, people need to move around the ship, go to the toilet, eat, etc
@Paladinbr
@Paladinbr 2 года назад
@@nahuelleandroarroyo nah. The speed of the ship doesn't really affect that, even at flank speed. Spent 5 years in the belly of one.
@admthrawnuru
@admthrawnuru 2 года назад
@@nahuelleandroarroyo that's more a concern on smaller ships. Supercarriers are so big their inertia severely restricts such dangerous motion. Not to say it can't happen, of course, but it won't be as bad as you are probably imagining.
@roetemeteor
@roetemeteor 2 года назад
@@nahuelleandroarroyo You can do all that when the ship is at maximum throttle even in a smaller ship. It's not like the ship is going to rip apart at the seams. It's just going to be a really, REALLY unpleasant experience. For context, when a ship goes max throttle, it's going usually well over 55 mph... At that speed, water is not quite like concrete, but it's definitely not pleasant to drive through. Fun fact, that's another reason why when they make these ships why they really, REALLY don't wanna push it too fast in accordance to it's scale. I imagine with enough effort, a nuclear turbine, and an eager enough engineer, you could probably design a typical hulled craft that could easily go 78 knots in the water, and it would almost literally be like sailing in an ocean of concrete slamming into the vessel again and again and again. You could design it to hold up to that, but dear god that is going to be a rocky ass boat. Forget sleeping, or any fine work when you're in that if it isn't heavy enough to disperse the impacts... which hey, what do you know, a carrier can. tl;dr Not really, and due to physics, you wouldn't ever see a ship that could risk that anyway.
2 года назад
@@nahuelleandroarroyo poop poop in peace
@ekij133
@ekij133 2 года назад
The interaction between boat length and wave length (distance between two wave peaks) is not as simple as 'bigger is better'. The boat struggles as the boat length approaches the wave length. And that assumes the boat is running into the weather. If the boat is much longer than the wave length it powers through them with little effect. However if the boat is much _smaller_ than the wave length the waves also have little effect on the boat as it travels up and down them like a car driving up and down a hilly road.
@hyliedoobius5114
@hyliedoobius5114 2 года назад
And then there’s the pump law, which is kinda like trying to accelerate to the speed of light…the faster you go, the harder it becomes to go any faster. For ships, the rule is that the square of speed increases as the cube of the required horsepower. And at some point the force of frictional drag will tear the hull apart.
@Chris-ob8ok
@Chris-ob8ok 2 года назад
They are fast enough that people on board can feel it accelerating.
@Astrnauted
@Astrnauted Год назад
Merchant marine ships: *heavy breathing*
@HolySoliDeoGloria
@HolySoliDeoGloria 2 года назад
0:23 8 feet does not equal 1.25 m. 8 ft is about 2.4 m; 1.25 m is about 4 ft. EDIT: I see that at least two other commenters noted this and that you acknowledged the typo. Cheers!
@garyschott9752
@garyschott9752 2 года назад
Ok so I want the only one lol
@vascoapolonio2309
@vascoapolonio2309 2 года назад
Can I see a Carrier taking on a storm, with 10mt high waves? I would love to watch it
@norm4966
@norm4966 2 года назад
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Z0Jzb8dfcC4.html
@vascoapolonio2309
@vascoapolonio2309 2 года назад
@@norm4966 Nice, that's so cool. Thanks, bro. I see a Raptor, and... a helicopter??? Don't answer, I just read the comments right now 😂😂😂😂
@yashkhanchandani4520
@yashkhanchandani4520 2 года назад
“Size matters, especially when it’s rough” Dude you are playing with fire right now
@leftvassis
@leftvassis 2 года назад
This guy knew exactly what he was doing with those jokes
@nyreppin1
@nyreppin1 2 года назад
All's I'm saying is i was on the USS Enterprise and when they got it up to full speed it felt like it was skipping on the water.
@goofball3056
@goofball3056 2 года назад
Yeah. Enterprise was right at the limit for what a 4-prop ship could be. With 280k shp, they’re right on the 70k shp/shaft limit. I have no idea how they got the Ford’s to 350k shp (87.5k shp/shaft) without them tearing themselves apart, but I suspect occult rituals may have been involved.
@geoderegartta8009
@geoderegartta8009 2 года назад
„Size matters, especially when it’s rough“ Me: I know that for a fact- and I‘m male~
@mybro727
@mybro727 2 года назад
This is the type of material I love. Please keep these coming!
@skenzyme81
@skenzyme81 Год назад
Rumor has it the limit on the Nimitz class is at or just over 50 knots. This is based on sightings of one pulling ahead of a Pegasus-class hydrofoil that was traveling at full speed.
@dumcanem1282
@dumcanem1282 2 года назад
“Size matters especially when its rough” “Its not about the size of the boat but the motion of the ocean” Wait a minute
@Sku11Ski11
@Sku11Ski11 2 года назад
8ft=1.25m? There is something wrong with your math. PS. Maybe i heard it wrong?
@NotWhatYouThink
@NotWhatYouThink 2 года назад
we did had a typo, realized it after we published, supposed to be 2.4m
@TheJocke08swe
@TheJocke08swe 2 года назад
I realize that you know this for all those out there that don’t know how to convert, an easy way to remember; (Ft x 3) / 10 = m For example; (8 ft x 3 = 24) / 10 = 2,4 m
@matthewlittle480
@matthewlittle480 2 года назад
I freaking love this shit! Having served as a Marine on board a carrier, it was really awesome!
@rick4electric
@rick4electric Год назад
Think about THIS! A DIGITAL NUCLEAR POWERED AIRCRAFT CARRIER! Now we're talkin'!
@TheLiamster
@TheLiamster 2 года назад
I thought it would have been the “Sea Shadow” which is a stealth prototype ship.
@Furukan455
@Furukan455 2 года назад
"Size matters" Me: **cries**
@JonatasAdoM
@JonatasAdoM Год назад
This was also the case in the past. We tend to think big ships are slow and cumbersome, but they're actually impressive compared to their smaller cousins (and why they were used). Most likely the same principle will apply to starships.
@daslynnter9841
@daslynnter9841 Год назад
Watercraft speeds are related to their size as larger ships will be less effected by internal torque and external conditions like big waves. Spacecraft have no such limiting factor, they are purely thrust to weight. So smaller crafts will accelerate faster. Another thing about spacecraft is they dont behave like water or aircraft, how fast they go is directly proportional to how high they are, and their direction. So if you got into a space dogfight it could leave you stranded cus you spent your energy maneuvering and now need to spend a little more than that energy to revert back to your original orbital path, otherwise you will overshoot or undershoot your destination, the faster you go the less your velocity will be affected by gravity, so youd overshoot, and slower you go the more your velocity will be affected by gravity, and you'll undershoot. Its hard to communicate since its 3 dimensional and at speeds we can't rationalize, but the point is orbits are weird and i dont think anyone knows how space combat would go. But i can say for sure larger crafts accelerate slower in space.
@motoman22atgmail
@motoman22atgmail 2 года назад
Carriers are so fast they have to tie the planes down …headwinds can cause aircraft to float around on deck. It’s unnerving.
@TheMrrbrts
@TheMrrbrts 2 года назад
50kts+. Imagine running operation in a common 30kts tailwind with a 20kt headwind requirement for air ops. So 50kts to outpace the tailwind and generate a 20kt headwind for takeoffs. But…that never happens. Or does it?
@CaptainDayne
@CaptainDayne 2 года назад
Yeah thats what a retired USCG person told me. Said they estimated one at 50k+ whe. They were doing a patrol on their cutter. He was my instructor for my Captains license 20 years ago. He said at the time a carriers speed was classified , and the hull design under the water. Dont know if it is true.
@advorak8529
@advorak8529 2 года назад
That is why carriers turn into the wind. 60 kts (30 wind + 30 ownspeed) is much better than 20 kts.
@brianfox340
@brianfox340 2 года назад
Carriers are limited by the damage that would be done to their hull at high speed, not by power
@Navilicous
@Navilicous Год назад
Tutorial : How to circumvent a question completely so you can talk about aircraft carriers instead.
@Mchacz8008
@Mchacz8008 2 года назад
“Size matters, especially when things get rough.” But it's NOT what you think!
@emmadictator4062
@emmadictator4062 2 года назад
😔"My father is not having any job" "I want to do something for my father" "But youtube is not giving me views" "ya iam worse than other .And I am 14 year old class 9th 🙏😭😭_.,.
@kingdarkmorgan8755
@kingdarkmorgan8755 Год назад
The fastest carrier, traveled 80 knots. Dual nuclear.
@jimrustle643
@jimrustle643 2 года назад
This is the first video where I haven't seen people from other countries bickering and picking arguments about it.
@auusstin8404
@auusstin8404 2 года назад
Jesus Christ. A carrier that can go basically 50MPH on water!?! That’s fast as hell for water and a ship that size!
@finsterclause7184
@finsterclause7184 2 года назад
Imagine the wake left by a US Aircraft Carrier traveling at 40 knots. It would sink or capsize most boats.
@no1bandfan
@no1bandfan 2 года назад
Nuclear power just refers to how they produce electricity on the ship. The how fast the ship can go is dependent on the electric engines that run the propulsion.
@Randomfactsofwar
@Randomfactsofwar Год назад
PT boats: hold my beer (speeds up to over 120 knots)
@Grayden-cb4zm
@Grayden-cb4zm 2 года назад
Bro the damn AIRCRAFT CARRIER was DRIFTING!😎
@marcuspacheco3815
@marcuspacheco3815 2 года назад
Seriously though, that boat pushing through the waves..... That looks super fun an absolutely crazy at the same time.
@chrisjensen8369
@chrisjensen8369 Год назад
I had a buddy stationed on the Forrestal when the Oriskany had her fire in the hanger deck. They were about 50 miles away and wet to flank speed to assist. The Enterprise was about 50 miles further out and also went to flank speed to assist. The 2 carriers arrived at the same time. The Big E's nuclear power allowed her to accelerate faster & reach a much higher top speed.
@quackdealer935
@quackdealer935 2 года назад
When carriers hit about 40kts, the entire ship starts vibrating. The more violent the vibration, the faster you know you're going. When they secure the flight deck in calm weather, you're zooming
@Cal97g
@Cal97g Год назад
For displacement vessels hull length is the limiting factor on speed, the longer the hull the faster they can go
@noahbasara8529
@noahbasara8529 2 года назад
Never realized Carriers were that fast.
@johnmatter1678
@johnmatter1678 Год назад
That super wave eats Corvette 🥶🥶🥶
@futuredeputyanonymous4786
@futuredeputyanonymous4786 2 года назад
The heli mechanics were probably cussing so much when the Helo got covered in salt water...
@JREVY22DECEPTICON416
@JREVY22DECEPTICON416 2 года назад
Ah, the floating basketball court
@beachcomber39553
@beachcomber39553 9 месяцев назад
This is so much better with the sound turned off
@CoolQuizYT
@CoolQuizYT Год назад
Pretty sure small ships have nice personality
@PJMontoya
@PJMontoya 2 года назад
I can’t hear this guy say “it’s not what you think anymore”.
@rubaislam1394
@rubaislam1394 2 года назад
"the worst the weather the most advantage they have" never thought i whould hear that sentence in my life
@clonescope2433
@clonescope2433 Год назад
A freedom class LCS being capable of reaching its Max Speed that is hilarious.
@stevenstoll2016
@stevenstoll2016 Год назад
Friend serving on a Ford class carrier told me that a carrier strike group was going through the Panama Canal, but the carrier had to go around South America due to size. The carrier was on the other side of the canal before the carrier group made it through. Seriously had to be averaging over 60 knots.
@timothythompson4036
@timothythompson4036 2 года назад
I know a guy who was stationed on the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier in the late 70s during the Iranian hostage crisis. He told me they were speeding toward the Persian Gulf crossing the Horn Of Africa. He said no one was allowed on deck because they were doing 70 mph. The US Navy never discusses this.
@droch121
@droch121 2 года назад
In 1994 we were deployed to the med and Persian gulf. The carrier in our battlegroup was called ahead. We tracked a nuke carrier at 50+ knots
@rldabomb33
@rldabomb33 2 года назад
when i was in the kitty hawk 03-05 seems like we were breaking the sound barrier..
@metal_bassist
@metal_bassist Год назад
I heard a story from a buddy where the co of the enterprise was challenged to a race by a new arleigh burke destroyer. The Carrier captain did a "hold my beer" and sent it picking the bow up a bit basically doing the Carrier equivalent of a wheelie. The destroyer learned its lesson to never again challenge a vessel with 8 nuclear reactors.
@gnarghhfps3239
@gnarghhfps3239 2 года назад
The fact they got something that massive to even float is awesome....floats and goes 40mph mindblowing
@Skagzi1la
@Skagzi1la 2 года назад
Aircraft carriers only go as fast as the slowest escort ship
Далее
I Visited The Most *Overpowered US Navy Warship
16:34
What Killed Zumwalt Destroyers?
8:41
Просмотров 4,5 млн
SCRUB: SpaceX Attempt One - Starship Flight Test
9:9:58
Russia's Massive Nuclear-Powered Warship That Smokes
17:03
3 Nights Onboard US Navy's Largest Stealth Ship
19:52
The Fastest Military Boats In The World
9:48
Просмотров 946 тыс.
15 FASTEST Boats Ever Made
20:37
Просмотров 1,4 млн
LARGEST Ships On Earth
26:04
Просмотров 7 млн
The US Military's Aerial Refueling PROBLEM
23:27
Просмотров 292 тыс.
The Neglected Side of The Billion $ Stealth Bomber
17:36