What is the nature of the insight you speak about? | J. Krishnamurti 

“Are you following? For God sake, PLEASE, it’s your life!” ~ JK

19:04 I seriously melt at this point ,repeated again and again to see that concerning look , as a mother concern for her child.☺️☺️we will miss you sir .

19:02 "For gods sake, PLEASE, it's your life" That's moving

The greatest.

"Not to go off into scientific investigation like astrophysics " ....fascinating that he sees this outward investigation as an escape ❤️

Choiceless awareness stops thinking - did try it, does work! Love and big thanks to Jiddu Krishnamurti.

Thank you 🙏 to Krishnamurthi Foundation Trust for recording these videos, safeguarding it and sharing Mr. JK’s wisdom to the World.

This is the man who can touch which is unfathomable of other human with his integrity!

this is the only time i need to watch this

Touching the point by words is not easy jk is great being And Thanks you uploaded a great video.

The Greatest of all time.

I love what Krishnamurti wants to do for humanity. He wants us to use our brains to rationally accept that what we accept as rational answers do not continue to suffice when the questions change. Part of the typical response to human problems is the reliance upon ideals. But, as he states, forcing the ideal (the unreal) onto the real does not provide stable solutions. Unfortunately, the ideals that he wants people to give up have become intertwined with our Western cultural DNA and our propensity to believe in things in direct proportion to their unbelievability. In a sense we have not merely to transcend the use of the unreal to determine the real, but even to transcend focusing on the conflict between them. We make the conflict more real by focusing on it as a method of addressing it. The situation is much like that between people in a relationship. If they spend their time talking about the relationship, they're not really having one. We can't really advocate not talking about the conflict, though, becasue a lot of people waiting for justice will never be served. Somehow we have to hold in one hand the fact that ideological differences separate us, while holding in the other the possibility that we can live beyond our individual ideals in relative harmony. We don't have to love each other, or even agree with one another, as long we can be civil and negotiate acceptable standards of justice. Will that ever happen? We have to find ways to build trust between people and cultures first.

8:23 That is what we call uncertainty. Wow, speechless.

This exactly what evolution is . We are evolving within us . We adopt something and we make mistakes . Then we learn from it till we change . It is a gradual process . Problems outside in society, between nations , between two states also follow the same way . We cannot thrust change on people . It will never be accepted. There has to be an inner change . An awareness within why we need to change anything . We as individual can then set an example for others .

Lots of love to you Sir! Timeless....his is where the struggle ends and only serenity prevails! Thank you Sir!

Yes ... Greatest... Bestest...

absolutely brilliant ✨🙏🏽

this is brilliant

18:28 the ideal is the creation of thought

doing great job SIR .our conditioned mind is obsolete in todays world.insight into the nature of ENERGY OF INTELLIGENCE that is the TRUE source of action is the need if the hour. thanks official channel.

❤

Beautiful.

This could be life changing 🌹

understood SIR radical instant change is the answer NOT gradual change.U HAVE SHOWN THE WAY SIR.Thanks K Thanks official channel for uploading.

Wow! Wonderful!

❤❤❤

The master and his limitless compassion. His heart is bleeding for our ignorance

This is amazing! Thank you!

The compassion in you made me cry. I copy what you say and the experience was phenomenally life-transforming.

Thank you sir🙏🙏

Momentum of thought or past well said

💥🧡🌻

I love you sir 🙂🙏

Great way of understanding insight.

breaking away from the pattern is insight

O god this is your life ❤️😌😌😌🙏🙏🙏

now even if you're thinking about certainty and uncertainty if it's required, then also you're OBSERVING

This is an important question *Nuts*

Nature of insight

Non-duality only surfaces in relation to duality. Non-duality is perception, absence of centre, of fragmentation. Duality is thought, complementary opposites: "I am envious, but in time I hope to be non-envious"; "I am more conscious now than I was five years ago, when I was quite unconscious". When duality (thought, time) is perceived, unity emerges. The "conscious self" and the "unconscious self" coexist in the now; their spatio-temporal separation is a construct of thought, a simple neural proposition, which instead of being taken as an approximation, an utilitarian model of limited scope, is considered as a fact (their narrative is considered as a fact, but not their own act of presence, which is not taken into account). So we have three elements: reality, fact and truth. Their reciprocal relationship is as follows: truth emerges when duality (our reality, today, the "matrix", the web of thought) is established as a fact (insight takes place).

🙏

It is made so simple while still being difficult to understand

😍

I get it!

The insight he is talking about is not conditioned so it is the real freedom.

16:03 to 16: 59 No motive other than to just ( for a few moments) experience this state of being without motive without momentum without attending to the whole momentum in that moment whatever form(s) it be.........form(s) momentums of the past present future or presence itself One pointed focus।

Thank you

Mr. k, is talking about "Meditation", just Observing, watching, being attentive, without any mental comment. "Meditation, is all there is. Correct me if I am wrong.

Pl add English subtitles

The question is still unanswered.

15:50

I am not understanding

How is the mind different from the brain? If one does not work how does one survive? How did jk make a living? These are my questions if anyone as good as jk can answer.

Anie Besant was right he is a master. Not to be followed. Do it yourself.

transcript is not accurate. I want to change it but i cant find the way

Well something that proved k could get wrong its still 2022 and more/ less quite habitable creation has no beginning/ end k;)

I felt like he wrote this question to himself to make a teaching point 🤭

He can't be clearer

His voice is quite close to that of Puttaparthi Saibaba....

But, we're in the 2000s!

8:40 "by 2000, the earth will be uninhabitable." that's not true though, it's 2019 now.

19:02 "For gods sake, PLEASE, it's your life" That's moving

❤