What Kind of Anglican Am I? 

I'm an "Orthodox" Anglican as well, and just happened upon your channel. For a "hobby," you know more than most Anglicans, you know why you believe what your believe, and you speak well and have a wonderful gift to make the subject interesting. Looking forward to many more videos!

Another excellent and informative video. My high-church ACNA parish uses the term "Anglo-Catholic" with some frequency but I like your term "Apostolic Anglican" better and it seems more accurate as well.

I'm an old-school complementarian conservative ecumenical Reformed-evangelical Anglican Christian.

I appreciate the overview. This is the niche I found in Anglicanism, which I felt lacked in the other attempts at synthesis (Uniates and Western Rite): Anglicanism is organic synthesis of the first millennium without subjugating the East to the Pope or the West to provincialisms within the East. Anglicans can embrace influences like Patrick, Alban, Columba, Augustine of Canterbury, and Theodore of Tarsus without having to endorse ahistorical medieval practices or ahistorical reformed revisions.

Love your content. Been attending an ACNA church but want to learn more about Anglican history. I grew up Baptist but kinda left the faith for many years. Anglicanism has made me fall in love with the faith again.

I’m an Orthodox Missionary Anglican equal to Deacon River from New Zealand on issues such as women’s ordination to the diaconate priesthood or bishopric. I pray both the 2019 ACNA BCP and the 1662 IE BCP but am nostalgic for the 1928 and 1979 TEC BCP.

Can you do a video on anglo-catholics? I think I might be one, but I'm not sure what they actually believe.

Very interesting and gives me much to research (hadn't heard about Gardiner at all until now). Will research the 6 articles...I mean the 10 articles 😅

I've been so blessed by Sean Luke's work on Protestant epistemology via Sola Apostolica too. Thank you for this thorough work.

I'm fairly new in discovery of this channel, and very grateful for it. You shed a lot of light on my personal pilgrimage from Zwinglian Palatine German Reformed upbringing in western Pennsylvania, through conversation to Anglican semi-high church life via the writings of C.S. Lewis and the Cathedral parish of Saint James in Chicago, to decades of practice within the Episcopal charismatic context, to a sort of detached state of solo discipleship in southwestern Ohio, unable to participate with any nearby ACNA congregation. So, I much appreciate your review, analysis and reflections on the history and practice of Apostolic Anglican Orthodoxy!

can Christianity have a golden age? can Christians do Art Mathematics and medicine?

Interesting. Clarify a lot of things. During the Swedish Reformation we actually had a similar period of "orthodoxy", or whatever you want to call it, under Johan III. John III reigned for 23 years and reintroduced many Roman Catholic customs, defended the monasteries and argued for a reformation on the basis of the church fathers. But he never won the clergy or the people, so after his death things returned to Lutheran orthodoxy, although some things like apostolic succession and some other things were kept, giving the Swedish church a certain distinctiveness in comparison to other Lutheran churches. Calvinism (and the like) had zero influence on the Swedish Reformation, but only came in the 19th century through English and American missionaries - thanks guys ;-)

Young Anglican, have you had a conversation with Fr. James at Barely Protestant? If not, that could be really enjoyable. I’m enjoying your videos; keep up the good work.

Maybe I’m missing something, but I’m pretty sure Anglican theologians like the Caroline Divines have been conceptualizing Anglicanism as more in-line with apostolic/primitive Christianity than Roman Catholicism for a long time. I don’t know if that idea is such a novel concept that it requires a whole new and ahistorical label for your beliefs. Especially since Anglo-Catholic already fills in a lot of the “conservative Reformation” stuff you’re referring to and an emphasis on high church and apostolic Christianity, it doesn’t really track for me.

Based.

Very interesting video. I had no idea about the “types” of Anglicans and their history. Tbh, I didn’t know Anglo-Orthodox was even a thing 😅. I’m glad I learned something new. Even though I’m a reformed Baptist, I always love learning about my Christian brothers and sisters who hold different perspectives than me. May our Lord bless you, my brother in Christ, sir.

Are there any groups within Anglicanism that are "Laudian" today (in support of the views of William Laud, Charles I's Archbishop of Canterbury)? I don't know if you are familiar with him, but his views seem somewhat similar to yours. He was high-church and vehemently pro-bishops, but also very Arminian.

The beard goes hard. The videos stay informative. Keep it up YA 💪

Is one’s religion supposed to be a hobby, like stamp collecting or photography, or a way of life?

Supposedly I am related to Wolsey. It's just hard to make the connection because of who he was.

There are confessional Anglicans who obey their bishop(s) and there new evangelical Anglican transplants who have found a new home to define their own personal religion.

That "Sola Apostolica" idea sounds very similar to how Frs. Stephen De Young and Andrew Stephen Damick (both OCA Eastern Orthodox) frame the reception of the Canon in The Lord of Spirits podcast. Very interesting.

50 minutes and I still don't get if you're more Reformed with Papist theology or Catholicism with reformed theology.

Well done, a good explanation of Anglican doctrine.

I suppose a more truly orthodox example of anglo-orthodoxy would be western rite orthodoxy since it utilises the traditionally British Sarum rite, it takes many of its translated liturgical texts from the anglican traditions, it agrees theologically with the majority of what you said and with the rest of the orthodox church. It is truly orthodox theologically and culturally appealing to an anglican background, since WR Orthodoxy is culturally anglican.

Anglicanism is very appealing to me, but it is just so hard to feel comfortable in an Anglican church given the current state of the church, especially in America. The main body in communion with the See of Canturbury, the Episcopal Church, is all but heretical - I have spent hours trying to find an Episcopal church that even talks about the gospel on the west coast and it is a desert. That really undermines the legitimacy of Anglicanism for me, as most of the historic Anglican institutions and ecumenical efforts are in the official Communion. The ACNA is better, but it is also very divided, divisive, and unstable. I feel the painful anxiety of not even knowing whether I'll be able to raise children in a church that still exists as a church by the time they are adults. And so, while Anglicanism is perhaps the expression of Christianity I find most compelling both spiritually and theologically, I find myself still wondering whether my family ought to consider Orthodoxy just for practical reasons.

We're Broadchurch now!

An interesting video. a Sola Apostólica is something interesting. But how would you (and others) explain the Roman Catholic claims that the Magisterium gathered and compiled the bible? Obs: You should make more videos explaining the Sola Apostólica more.

Who cares

There is no relationship between "more memorial" and "more spiritual" nor is there a difference between "real presence of Christ" and "spiritual presence." Your phrasing was probably not intentional but it can imply these things. Can be confusing for new inquirors.

I promise I am not trying to troll you here. Your vlog has lots of wonderful information. That said, if you eliminated the phrases "I would say" and "we'll talk about that in a minute" the video would be half as long.

It seems that the more I learn about church history and theology the more convoluted it becomes. From the very start, it was flawed. The 12 frequently argued among themselves, and Judas Iscariot was a thief and a traitor. The Corinthians

You seem to be very technical, what's wrong with Anglicanism not having its own identity??? What's wrong with that? We are Christians, there is broadness in the Christian communion, and Anglicanism prevents putting us in a restrictive box like most denominations.

Just a catholic here

Massive L, Aquinas and Augustine both taught the reformed view of predestination. Bishops and presbyters were intended to have equal positions of authority. Cope harder 😂 I’m jk

The 'lord's supper' is the agape meal not the Holy Eucharist. I used to be Anglican, now Orthodox - thanks be to God.

25:27 This is because of how the Catholic Church views the Eucharist. That view is both species become the body, blood, soul, and divinity of Jesus Christ.

What denomination are you?

Just go to your local supermarket and look for the anglican shelf....pick and choose whatever suite you.

But why are you not Catholic like the early Christians?

The (39) Articles of Religion are not binding on Anglicans, clerical and lay. We are supposed to believe the three historic creeds but they are shared with most of orthodox Christendom. So beyond them we are free to believe whatever we want about everything else.

so sectarian that the apostle Paul had to directly address the issue. Converted Jews, probably of the of the Pharisees, insisted that Gentiles must first become Jewish through circumcision and by following other Jewish rituals and practices, departing from the gospel message and creating divisions within the Church. As time passed, it became so entwined with philosophy and politics it became virtually unrecognizable. Today, everyone has their own Bible, and reads it through their own colored lenses, and with their own agendas, and the Church becomes more and more fractured. So, how can Anglicanism (or any other expression of Christianity), being seriously damaged goods, be a beacon of truth for anyone? How can the Church reclaim and adhere to the deposit of faith once and forever delivered to the Apostles?

PLEASE COME HOME ENOUGH YOUR SERVICES ARE NOT VALID YOUR SYMBOL SERVICES ARE NOT VALID NO CATHOLICS CANNOT NEVER RECEIVE A SYMBOL

I mean...don't all modern Christians believe in some form of "predestination", don't we ALL accept the concept of "The Rapture" and the Second Coming of Jesus? That sounds "definite" to me. Beyond that, I would suggest you're more of a "Deist" than a strict Christian if you don't accept that Jesus will return to restore the ENTIRE flock, believers and nonbelievers alike.

these are all just empty and ill-informed opinions. Read the Apostolic Fathers and some church history!

You are morally accountable for teaching falsity. Henry VIII deserved more complete coverage in this presentation. You know EXACTLY what I mean. For your own salvation, get honest.