What Makes a GOOD Pokémon | ft Truegreen7 

lmaooo

That sounds like so much fun! Filing this idea away in my secret folder for later

Thank you! We are proud of our group!

@@micabryant4513 i have the event 1 from Ultra Moon lol

@@micabryant4513 yeah i dont even remember when the event actually was lol if guess around the release of the movie but not sure

ITS BEEN 3000 YEARS!

​@@micabryant4513 It is not the best but it is definetely is not the worst either.

Good feedback! We will take this into account :) :) :)

But here's the thing though, the Pidgey line appearance wise dont look nearly as bad (especially Pidgeotto that actually looks kinda cool with its pink hair) as the Pawmi line, which all seem awkward as heck. But you're right, they've got some similarities. Even with their names only a few letters were changed, removed or added upon evolution Pawmo➡️ Pawmot Pidgeotto➡️ Pidgeot.

I've always picked Bulbasaur or occasionally Squirtle. I love Charizard, but I don't love it for that region.

Whats your take?

@@HiddenPowerPodcast I don't think that humanoid starters or humanoid Pokemon in general are an issue at all. Monsters come in all shapes in sizes and some of the most common ones we see/knew about WERE humanoid (i.e. Scooby Dool villains, Dracula, Mummy, Werewolf, Frankenstein's Monster, etc.) Hell, even stuff like Predator and Alien have some humanoid aspects, but are still monstrous. So, personally, I don't see the huge fuss. Kanto and Johto are only 2/9 generations where every starter is "non-humanoid" and that's it. I understand that people always praise the "older stuff" anyway, but they can't just ignore the fact that Gen 1 set the foundation of what any and all Pokemon could be. (Humanoid, objects, random combos, regular-lookin stuff, yokai, 'titties' (Jynx, Nidoqueen lol). There's always been leaner and/or more humanoid starters from Gen 3 onwards, starting with Blaziken, then Infernape and Empoleon (literally based on Napoleon), Emboar, an argument can be made since it's based on a certain character, and the rest that people always have issues with. As for design philosphy, yeah. Each generation has its own distinct feel to it, and the artwork plays a huge part in that. You can see the change in each interation. Sugimori stopped being the 'main artist' in Gen 7, and it's been different artists ever since. He's still playing a role, but his artwork isn't the 'standard' anymore, which is why so many people probably feel like newer artwork for certain mons are lackluster or weird. Fakemon wise, I'm of the mind that since they're not allowed to even look at Fakemon designs and our designs will never be in the franchise (unless we somehow get picked up, lol) , we're free to do whatever we want. If you wanna follow the rules they've made, go for it. If you don't, then you don't have to. However, something has to be said regarding the notion that "Fakemon are always better", because we all know that if a Fakemon artist ends up making real designs, they'll be treated like how people treat James Turner (people blame him for all object Pokemon designs and act like he's the reason Pokemon designs suck now, just because he's the only 'non-Japanese' guy who's designed official mons.) All of the "Gamefreak should hire you" posts would turn into "Gamefreak should fire you". And it's something you notice easily because majority of the time, us Fakemon artists make a lot of cool and goofy designs that don't always line up with the philosophy the artists abide by. Ex. If a Fakemon artist made a design based on something weird or outlandish or whatever, they'd get praised, but if it ever becomes official... "They're running out of ideas"

The line is fine but it only needed 1-2 stages. No disrespect to you for liking the mon. We appreciate you watching 😄

@@HiddenPowerPodcast As long as content is being pumped I’ll always keep watching :) just wanted to combat the rhetoric that nobody has ever defended the line