Sorry, but being able to study only what really interests you is actually proof that you're a bad student. It's not an insult, I am one as well. The main problem with today's education is that society expects everyone to be a good student (impossible), while we should just focus on employing good TEACHERS, the ones that can make any subject interesting and can adapt to a bad student by finding a way to make them learn. It's not your fault that you're a bad student (even though you should finds a way on your own to be interested in school subjects), but it's society's fault that we don't have enough good teachers.
10:20 professor i'm worried what my Gardevoir would do to me if she read my mind during the act and saw me thinkin about driving her like a land speeder. This is some next level honey pot right here.
This man is asking the real questions. I'm sure other people have said that, but that's because they're right. These questions are just real. You CAN use Mega Gardevoir's chest horns as handles. You, professor, have earned a sub and a bell.
After auditing this class, i’ve made the decision to switch my major to Pokémon Studies. Although it’s a soft science and you need more education for an entry level job, it’s so much more interesting to me than the Weebology/Fembology major my parents are pressuring me to go into.
I'm so engaged that by the time he says "this will be on the test" my brain has already memorized the fact in question. No need to study when you could just understand.
Had a challenge with a friend 8 years ago we had to change our pfp to furry stuff he lost and probably 1 week later he asked me why I still had the picture then I told him I was one for the last 3 years, the pure shock followed by a laugh. He then was angry because he realised he lost from the start and called me a cheater 😂
That’s funny, because I remember one day I forgot to put my fursuit head away when my friends came over, and they were actually like oh shee this is actually cool, since they said about how they’ve never realized how much work goes into one xd
Gardevoir's cores (red crystal) is literally a link to her heart, if it breaks she won't die of course but you can feel their heartbeat through, making it quite the weakpoint and sensible area, which means... One must be careful when touching them. As you don't wanna disturb your partner during the act
Today I've learned that fucking D&D orcs is wrong, because they don't meet the Harkness test requirements (-2 intelligence, so less than humans). Ergo, all half-orcs are a result of bestiality. (or rape committed by orcs, but who cares about that).
@@Tennouseijin i think i remember a discucion about it befre, what is the minimum inteligennce for sapiens, firs edition was like 4, then it got lower to 2-3. So you are fine, also Barbarian with INT s dump stat.
@@ericquiabazza2608 Well, I'm referring to the version of the test I've seen on KnowYourMeme, which in most cases doesn't ask about sapience, but requires intelligence equal or greater than human. This seems quite rough, and what about below average humans? Are we comparing against average human intelligence? If we compare against lowest human intelligence, I believe naturally it would be 3 in most editions (3d6 stats), however humans with lower intelligence may exist as a result of stat draining effects etc. I know this should be irrelevant and testing for sapience makes a lot more sense... but hey, we're talking D&D here, it's all about rules lawyering and crunching numbers :P (also, those lucky druid zoophiles... they can just cast awaken and voila, problem solved)
That Meowth is different from the rest, you can see him interacting with other members of his species and all other don't talk like him, that's probably why he's a good translator in the series
Yes, but he was explicitly stated to be an average specimen for his evolution line. He learned human speech through hard work and dedication, without help or interference from any other more powerful Pokémon. I mean, he only did it because he was a simp for some random Persian, and he sacrificed all his combat potential for it, but the skill remains useful.
@@mrboerger1620 I've made a mistake; he actually knows a standard 4-set of moves and has improvised some others: He knows Fury Swipes, Scratch, Bite and he states in one episode that he can also use Night Slash. Additionally, he can achieve Gigantamax form; only in this form can he perform his line's signature move. His improvised moves consist of Tickle (before it was an official move) and a variant of Fury Swipes called 'Fury Swipes of Love'.
5:57 Ima be honest: 1. Is basically cat girl 2. Is either cat girl or furry depending on how you look at it 3. Furry 4. Either Furry or Humanoid animal 5. Animal.
Absolutely incorrect. "Furries" by definition are anthropomorphic animals. Humanized animals in other words. The fetish, from an artistic standpoint, is defined by taking a human skeleton and progressively tweaking it to have more and more animal features. The critical error in the "Furry Spectrum" graph he displayed was that number 5 is just being into animals. At that point, you're not being a furry, you're a zophile into beastiality. Catgirls? Definitely furry. They are the signature beta category of furries, but still furry. To argue otherwise, you have to argue what the appeal of a catgirl is and how it isn't the explicit addition of animal features onto a human frame. It is the starting point for the furry spectrum for a reason. Now, what about Number 5? If actual animals are not an adequite spot, what is? Simple. Monster Girls. Once again, if you think you're not furry for liking monster girls, I got some bad news for you: Not only are you furry, but you are MORE furry than most other furries. See, remember the explanation of the skeleton that I gave? Your common anthropomorphic tweaks it; most have basically a human body but the face is more akin to an animal's with an added tail and altered hands and feet. On a whole, it's mostly humanoid. The average monster girl is different, they are literally HALF ANIMAL and where it matters most. Say you like Miia from Monster Musume; ahe may be (mostly) human from the waist up, but she is literally all snake from the waist down. She verges on being 50-55% animal given some of her upper body features combined with her inherent snake like qualities in her traits and personality. When you fuck Miia, you are fucking some snake pussy. "Snussu", if you will. Now, compare that to Polt from the same source material. Yes, she is covered in fur and her skull has alterations made to pronounce her snout and ears in a dog-like way, but you don't have to do the holey pokey when having sex. Her body is basically a humans to the point where she literally has to make zero wardrobe changes. She wears sneakers, shorts, shirts, wristbands, headbands, you name it. She has to make zero physiological alterations to her attire as opposed to Miia who needs custom made clothing. Now circling back to beta furries with catgirls, where Polt stands, you could artistically remove the fur and she'd basically be the same damn thing. If she didn't have the fur there would be nothing separating her from the average fox girl. This discrepency is so bad in most cases that the only thing separating a character like Liru from being a furry (at least to furries in denial) is literally just tinting her skin yellow to resemble her ear and tail fur. That is my lecture for today. Hope you enjoyed it.
@@ImpalingthornI’m pretty sure I can just counteract your essay by suggesting: Wouldn’t cat girls be animalized humans not humanized animals because they are more human than animal? Wouldn’t monster girls still be equal in furry level because they’re still just 50% human, 50% monster where it’s 100% in some parts but 100% animal in other parts where as with what people consider furries it’s just 50% human, 50% animal all around? If 5 is a straight animal, Wouldn’t technically the graph start from 0 being humans based on the fact it’s the change between humans and animals?
Since when is teaching religion controversial at the university? Traditionally religion and science went hand in hand, temples and monasteries used to be places of higher education since ancient times, the division of the two is a fairly recent development. Ancient Greeks already taught religion at their academies, Christianity has been taught at universities for centuries as well. Only butthurt modern atheists think of that as particularly controversial if they conflate it with creationism and such, at least as far as Abrahamic religions are concerned. There's a fair amount that can be studied in a scientific way, such as languages, historical accounts and so on.
@@IchCharacter Not anymore though. The moment you mention God anywhere college people feel the need to try and convince you there is no God. My philosophy 101 class was literally all about disproving God. Religion to these snowflakes now is the equivalent of insulting their mother or something. And it’s not even like they want to have a meaningful conversation, they just want to insult those who think differently than they do. Despite claiming that religion is intolerant they’re quite intolerant themselves.
Man am I glad I found this channel. This is literally the stuff I've been hoping to find. People who can openly talk about degenerate/or uncomfortable subjects like it's just another day in the life.
If you really stop to think about it, the "mon" in pokémon stands for Monster. So technically, Poképhelia is just a mix of furry and monster creatures.
@@yosianderson4828 i mean, its 50/50 correct and incorrect?, since there are some pokemon that look kinda anthro (not the same as a human figure but similar enought to be considered), so it really just depends.
Excuse me Professor, I have a question to ask. Why is the majority of popular anime women in the younger spectrum? Is it because most people think that the younger the girl, the better?
Nope. They are just cheaper models. As in: They will stay inmobile on ANY position (while he artist draws them) for little ammount of money. Also, they are less likely to develop "bad back" or other work_related injuries.
Japan has some odd notions about age. There's this idea that a woman is past her "expiration date" once she's 26. The "christmas cake" analogy. So when an anime guy says he's into "older women" he will usually mean 23~25. And there's also an odd perception of men in their 30s of being "old", like their life is basically over at this point.
1 is Ichigo Momomiya from Tokyo Mew Mew 2 is Cheadle Yorkshire from Hunter X Hunter 3 is Isabelle from Animal Crossing 4 is Tsukino from Monster Hunter Stories 2 5 is Luna from Sailor Moon
Subscribed (I for once, thanks The Almighty -YHWH- _Algorithm_ for this! ). The ammount of pause/unpauses required to keep up with the "live chat" is hurting my keyboard!
On the topic of the title, i used to date a furry. She was completely normal, she was very emotional/could switch emotion quickly because of a medical condition but was not the creepy intrusive stereotype. Weird furrys are like assholes, there really arent a whole lot of them but they are spread out well enough that they are the only ones you encounter. To a lot of furrys their fursona is no different than a dnd players character
@@dor748 i think holding furry conventions makes it not fine because they're openly advocating for people to choose that lifestyle, not just for them to gather.
The Furry Scale: 0: human, not furry at all 1: human with minor animal parts (for example a catgirl is just a chick with cat ears, or batman just wears a bat costume) isnt considered furry 2: the fursuit type of furry, which is just someone in a fursuit (most of the time is based off of a level 3 furry) 3: the furry type of furry, which is the anthropomorphized animal (or animal with human body parts and characteristics) 4: the feral type of furry, which mostly has the physical form of regular animal but social and mental capabilities of a level 3 furry (for example, pokemon) 5: animal, in physical form and social/mental capabilities not furry: 0 and 1 furry: 2, 3, and 4 zoophile: 5 what have we learned: if ranked 0 or 1, it is not furry material. if ranked 2, 3, or 4, it is furry material. if ranked 5, it is on the beastiality scale, which is NOT OKAY. YOU WILL BE PUNISHED IF YOU ARE INTO THIS TYPE OF STUFF. anything lower than 5 you're fine.
Nah 1 is definitely furry. You might say that they have more human features but you’d have to ask yourself why are you choosing cat girls over human girls. The answer likely is that the animal features enhance the attraction which is the same case for all furries it’s just different intensity. That’s another thing, how is level 2 furry and not 1? Level 2 is 1 but with more fur. It’s still more human.
That's not necessarily true. There's definitely characters that fit your description of 1 that are often considered that. One of the most recent examples is Michiru from Brand New Animal who looks more like a human but with a black nose at the tip. On the most extreme end you have lamias and centaurs who despite being literal half animals often don't count. It's not really about appearance all the time but what the perception is.
@@moisesflores5405 maybe i should be more precise. level 1 are just humans with animal body parts. they arent really furries because at the core they are human. a fursuiter is level two because they are portraying something from level 3, which is more like an animal with human body parts, which is the opposite from level 1 but similar results.
@@zebuez level two is a fursuitter which is portraying level 3. level 1 doesnt portray anything else, and by the core it is human. thats why level 1 is not furry.
@@mimszanadunstedt441 furries are everything between 3 and 4, maybe 4.3 or 4.4. Like he said, 4 is physically identical to 5 but clearly conscious and intelligent, that means that 3 is anthro furry stuff, like your typical furry art
I think I accidentally walked into thr wrong classroom, but thank you for letting me sit in Professor. I've always wanted a convenient graph for the furry scale, as its difficult to explain where my line has been to people.
3 or maybe 3.5-ish. To me the characters in Zootopia kinda edge a little towards 4. Like when I look at Judy I just see a rabbit on hind legs wearing a cop uniform that just so happens to speak. When I see someone into Judy it also makes me think they're probably into Haru from beastars and characters in beastars are sometimes drawn so animalistic in certain panels. Which is why I lean more towards a 3.5 with Judy.
"I've watched a lot of hentai...I mean I've done a lot of research on people who have watched hentai" Yes, I too have done my fair share of research. I think that's why I have the pre-reqs for this course.
Just to interject. Furry here. And furry is an interest in anthropomorphic animal characters. Ur scale is backwards. Technically lucario is mega furry. Is very humanlike. The little animal u drew was not humanlike at all. Us humans call that beastiality. Not furry. Though, is ok. Non furries always get it wrong.
When you say "And furry is an interest in anthropomorphic animal characters." Do you mean physically or how it feels? Anthropomorphic defines an attribution to humans characteristic, emotions and behaviours towards an animal or non-human being. So if Lucario look more like a dog but has an emotion or intelligence of a human, wouldn't that still count as a furry?
@@lostcrusader8053 You're right, it would still fall within the purview of furry. Anthropomorphic intelligence and such. I had a few friends who have fursonas like that.
Poor mortal, constained by such enfeebling mental limitations. Let go of your constraints and repeat the following mantra to start on the road to true enlightenment; "Every hole is a goal"
@@adolfodef True enlightenment is reached when you realise that there is no boundary between you and the hole you are demolishing. Or your hole and whomever is demolishing you. Demolisher and demolished are but one and the same, and the perception that you are separate is falsehood that keeps us bound to the Samsara.
I really like what he said about Pokemon vs Dogs. Pokemon know exactly what's going on & can consent or say no. Animals don't really know what's going on.
However things can get complicated based on the species and age of a pokemon so... idk.. but their Fictional creatures... But then again, you can create your own pkm oc and age them to 18 or above to use it for your own sussy drawings of them either from gardeivor to lucario or to sylveon (2, 3, or 4)... But again, defending or liking this type of detergency can cause some unnecessary problems because of some people in the internet thinking it's controversial to like or make pokemon sus and it could start a reply section war full of users saying that your a pee duu or zoo if you like or make pokemon sus so idk, you do you I guess as long as you don't go to 5 or commit actual nanking grape to an animal OR ELSE YOUR AN ACTUAL PAKING DETERGENATE....
