What's inside of the Lunar Module? 

Jared Owen awesome video man

I love space too

Did you get permission from NASA to monetize their works?

As always..... Your animation is great.. Easy to understand. Thanks jared...

You should look at the bfr

dont forget about SFS

@@exus1ai wow that game has branched out a lot

@@Sednas but still yeah

XDDDD

Lumineo dude same

Yes. Not sure if you’ve ever read Tom Kelly’s book? He did a fantastic job describing all the hurdles they had to overcome.

You know what cold is? The vacuum of space at -380C. You know what hot is? The thermosphere, which at about 100Km up reaches 2000+C. Guess what all satellites and the silly module were/are made of? Aluminum which has a melting point of 800C covered in mylar sheets that melt at 300C.

@@williamthepleaser1 Quit being silly. I don't see any point you're trying to make. You don't seem to understand what temperatures mean in space, anyway. You think those involved in those missions haven't thought of all that stuff? Quit wasting our time. BTW there is NO SUCH THING as minus 380 C.

Hi did a good job 👍

its an old one that has no sponsored ba

I'm afraid, my friend, it's not the video but YOU who have been "Dumbed Down" if you believe Man flew to the Moon in a cardboard box held together with gaffer tape

Pretty easy to find video of it being packed and then unpacked on the moon.

Same here- mine born in 1886, I was 13. she was 17 when Wright Bros. did their thing and died after the third shuttle flight.

@@yafuker6046 When you think about it, that's pretty amazing. To be 17 in 1903, having teenage dreams about life. Who could honestly imagine all those things? The first airplanes, electricity, electric lighting, electric trains, and also Titanic, WW1, radio stations, the Roaring Twenties, depression, WW2, television, commercial flight, colour television, space flight, satellite television,.....moonlandings(!), open heart surgery, personal computers. Not to mention theme parks, SUV's, frozen pizza's, and three coloured toothpaste.

@Xx Bylizzy xX so she was born in about 1904?

Except for what your grandmother saw, the horse and cart, was real, but what you saw....was faked.

@@neilarmstrongsson795 ??

The Volkswagen was invented by the same country who developed the A4/V2 rocket motor (head designer = Korolev). It's telling that the F-1 main engines in the SaturnV were of considerably inferior design to the V2 rocket motor. The Germans used a double walled chamber like all rockets do today while Rocketdyne were still brazing thousands of tiny tubes together. Nothing about the SaturnV was particular advanced which is why NASA scrapped it as soon as the Apollo series of novels were finished.

Dude. Made me snort milk outta my nose. Thanks for that XD

Graham NASA wouldn’t want to use a German engine. In the Cold War the United States would probably want to build their own engine to show the Soviets their capabilities.

@@owensharp4891 Yet NASA were quite happy putting Von Braun - a well known and not particularly nice nazi in charge. Also the F-1 showed no capabilities, it was a dreadful design last proposed in 1962 and never used again. Ever.

Von Braun was the best rocket scientist NASA had at the time. I’m not saying he was a good person, just saying he was the best at designing rockets at the time.

Please pay attention....! The MIT quote is dated 1966. I very clearly pointed out that the name " LEM " was dropped NASA in 1967, although some sources say that the notice to change the name went out in June 1966...

You should be proud. It might have been the most challenging of all the many design challenges Apollo had to overcome. A manned spacecraft that would takeoff and land only in the vacuum of space, a pure SPACE craft, had never been built and has never been built since. It required a completely unique approach. And the minuscule weight budget they were given made it all the more difficult. But they pulled it off and it landed 6 times and saved the Apollo 13 crew. It was Grumman’s finest engineering achievement.

....nah just takes 5 years and bingo first try!

Dem sun.

@Jared Owen Pin this comment it's a very interesting info tho

bahahaha thinking that this tin foil paper machet consturct did anything at all. hilarious

@@thevlaka what?

The Lunar Module actually played a very very very important role in Nasa's FAKED moon landing. We never went bro.

I watched them live.

What was it like?

Ken Jackson...lucky you Ken...that would be a most treasured memory.

@@guywithahoodie7859 I watched them live too. I was 10 years old. My father took me outside to look at the moon and said: "son think about it, two men touched the surface an hour ago, you'll remember this day, and this conversation and tell your grandchildren about this moment". In my mind I was thinking my 47 year old father was really old. I'm 61 now, and it seems like yesterday. He's left this world 10 years ago... God rest his soul. Life moves on moments are fleeting...

@@invent5540 thank you for sharing that with us, made me happy !

ascend this!

Wow. Didn't know that. Might build that into a later book if I get the chance.

yes and they think they may of found it not long ago.

Scott L yes your tight. It landed in my neighbor’s yard about 4 years ago

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Ra0GAhvp2-g.html

👍

👍👍👍

👍

I’m getting hyped about the moooooon

I'm really exited for the new Artemis program and Musks plans with the starships. I think that Nasa, Space x and other international space agencies can achieve great Milestones like apollo and soyuz did during the space race

Wow. Must have been quite a sight!

The LM flew in space three times on Apollo 5, 9 and 10 before its first landing on the Moon.

Correct, apollo5 (LM2), had no legs or life support systems, was used only to test decent, ascent, and reaction rockets. Also the test of inertial guidance. LM3 was tested in earth orbit by 2 astronauts. Tested all systems and maneuvering and docking with the Apollo9 capsule. It was not light enough to take the astronauts off the moon. LM4 was light enough to bring the astronauts off the moon but was used in lunar orbit to test the navigation equipment as well as inertial guidance in low gravity.

my Dad work on it too. I ended up working there when we built the wings for the shuttle.

By the time you were there, my dad was working at Calverton.

I know this one That's why they went white

Fun fact. It was made in China.

@@SnoopyDoofie China at that is actually Taiwan.

It was also an add on that wasn't originally supposed to go on the mission. That's why they had to mount it outside on the ladder as the LM had already been closed up and loaded into the Saturn V.

Andre hope your not lying because I'll believe that till I hear different now.

I watched another documentary on the LEM. In a nutshell shell, it looks the way it does because they had to keep reworking it bit by bit to get the weight down, leaving just enough to have a functional machine. It didn’t need to look pretty or like something from Buck Rogers, it had to work. So many intelligent hard working people put their soul into the Apollo program, what a great achievement.

@@mplsmark222your description is accurate. The LEM is a shell within a nutshell! Like those Russian dolls that have many layers

It really does look crude close up because the covers over the various tanks are all wrinkly because they are paper thin, basically there to keep dust put and nothing more (not part of the pressure vessel) and weight was their constant enemy.

they lied and took an oath of secrecy . taking minds off the vietnam atrocities of stealing gold and oil van allen radiation belts keep space travel impossible .you tube 4409 did we go to the moon in a soup can .ΑΩ

everyone involved was very well aware of just how dangerous the mission was. In preparing for a disaster president Nixon had a speech ready that thankfully was not needed. here's a video someone made using the speech ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LWLadJFI8Pk.html

They didn't... I'm sorry.

@@ranchdressing1037 Yes. They did.

@@ranchdressing1037 hey we not only took on the gargantuan challenge of developing this massive rocket and successfully launched it, should we go on and land on the moon? naaaa /s

I also saw one at the MIT museum. My wife thought it was an attraction park kind of thing, and a very fragile one.

A key, unsung, aspect of Apollo's success was NASA's management. They had incredibly competent administrators, James Webb (the recent telescope namesake) is just one example.

Rock and roll buddy! Me too, it was my birthday, turned 10, Olympia WA. Shaped my entire life. I even named my dog Apollo.

@@scottl5000 liar. Mr NASA fúckstick talking shit again using Another of his multitude of aliases

Liar. Mr NASA fúckstick talking shit again using Another of his multitude of aliases he uses to write his many troll posts on every fe video he can find and every other video exposing the lies and telling us the truth

Boomer report !!

@@stevewittwer7444 HOLY SHIT thats boomer as FUCK

Huh, that's neat!

LOL! Sure they did Frenchie Boy. Go kiss your hero Miss Trudeau!

There were quite a few things in the American Space Program going to the Moon that were from Canada.

and the mirrors (reflectors), left on the Moon, were French ! Salut, les gars !

Also one of the main engineers was a Canadian . He had the design back in the days of the AVRO ARROW.

Slide rule…Slide rule… 8 digit transistor calculator by Sony was all the rage then… Damn Bob Lazar for bringing element 115 into Molder and Scully’s X-Files…

@@aemrt5745 HAL-9000... HAL-9000... Bill Gate's soon come out with Windows followed in a close second with Close Encounters of the 3rd kind all the while the Lone Ranger and his deputy Tonto was still Hi O'Silvering it out on America's living room in fuzzy black and white coming in from antennas mounted on a rooftop. Capitano Kirk soon come along to with colour TV that weight as much as the USS Starship Enterprise... I too was sold then...

They never on planned that these phoney props would be found in 2022 which were the mission control instruments for their international fiction production ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9TQk77U7JAY.html

@@edisonone ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9TQk77U7JAY.html

@@edisonone ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9TQk77U7JAY.html

TELLING YOU WHAT YOU WANTED TO HEAR EH? HOW NICE.

@@MrDaiseymay don’t be an idiot.

That's awesome! Seeing it IRL gives a real appreciation of the machines size. I need to visit Long Island someday!

I’m heading your way! I’m in Connecticut and see you’re close on the map. 7:05 I’ve seen Jared’s videos multiple times; they’re so good it’s worth multiple re-watches.

The SaturnV never worked properly: There's a good reason why the design of the F-1 rocket motor was never used again.

I’m pretty sure if something can take you to the moon, it’s good

@@owensharp4891 True, so their immediate scrapping of the F-1 shows us again that it didn't take them to the moon. In the 1980s NASA finished the Shuttle SRB, a far far better engine, just three SRBs give 9m lbf, 20% more than claimed for the F-1 based Saturn V first stage.

Graham I understand that, but that is 20 years later! In the 60’s they had the V-1 and in the 80’s they engineered the solid rocket boosters.

@@owensharp4891 V-1? You mean the F-1, a 1962 design that NASA ditched as soon as possible. If it was good why did they ditch it? Look at the tubular design, it was always rubbish - they ditched it because it didn't work very well. The point about the SRBs is that in the 1980s NASA again had all the equipment they needed to visit the moon with ease. I.e. they lost nothing but their excuses for never 'returning'.

They achieved NOTHING! Artemis is first time an earth craft went to moon. Technology in 69 couldn't do it.

@@charleswest6372 ok buddy. There literally hundreds of thousands of people who worked on it and explanations that make sense for how every bit of it worked. If you don’t want to believe that’s up to you but you got the idea it’s fake from something silly but you ignore every bit of proof there is because it’s what you choose to do. Whatever.

@@charleswest6372 🧠n't?

@@charleswest6372 not according to photographs from the Chinese, Japanese and Indian space agencies, and no, they aren't NASA.

​@@tarrantwolf "but but but muh conspiracy it's all fake" It's incredible how moon-landing deniers are dense.

4 years to be precise

Abhay Yadav yes

@@Bob-yt9fo The movie is already made....; shot in secret location (and studio) somewhere in a deserted desert...! Besides, NASA has their own computer graphics specialists.

"Artemis", the Greek Goddess of the hunt, wilderness, wild animals, the moon and chastity.....! Ever wondered why space craft, rockets and missions are given mythological names of Roman or Greek gods like Mercury, Apollo, Saturn, Artemis, Dragon etc. etc etc....? What does "Dragon" infer..the "Dragon from the Book of Revelations....???? Ever wondered why planets and celestial bodies are given names like Mercury, Venus, Mars, Saturn, Neptune, Jupiter and Pluto etc. Even the new discoveries like "Ceres" and the moons of planets like Ganymede, Titan, Europa, Oberon, Miranda etc. Even names of demons like Phobos and Deimos and the names of asteroids like Apophis....!? Why do they give names of mythological gods to things which God has created.....; even names of demons..!? Why do the glorify human endeavors and achievements with names of gods and demons...? What are we getting into when we get into "space travel" and believe in "moon landings"...? What are we worshipping when we glorify "space travel" ...? Why "Artemis"...; was it inspired by the movie (or book) "Artemis Fowl" at all...? What are the goals of scientist really with "space travel" and "studying the origins and composition of the universe...? What are they really looking for and what are they really trying to achieve...(Besides "dispelling the myth of God")?? What are they really up to at Cern with their "particle accelerator" (besides looking for the "god particle"..).???? Are they really trying to open a portal to another dimension,(maybe a spiritual one) and making contact with "creatures" from beyond..? What will happen if they succeed in their scientific endeavor....; will they unleash the "Dragon" from the underworld that we read of in the Book of Revelations...?

@@danielcoetzee5793 I don't know what the hell you're on about but I get the feeling it may be drug induced

You're likely going to find that being "conservative" and studying science are incompatible.

@@lancer525 not true at all.

Teen Conservative Good for you, don't let anyone stop you, my uncle worked for Boeing at the Cape and when I was a kid in the 70's he was like a rock star to me.

@@lancer525 I've been an engineer for over 30 years, and had to study a lot of science to do so. I've been conservative even longer than that. Your assumptions are incorrect.

@OldPlaces Gee, what a nice guy you are...NOT!

Bcs space isn't real so nothing can go wrong Sheeple

@@davidsheckler4450 "Bcs space isn't real so nothing can go wrong Sheeple" Evidence to follow in 3, 2, 1...

@@maxfan1591 You can't prove space

@@davidsheckler4450 "You can't prove space" Directly, perhaps not. But I know how big the Earth is, I know the distance to the Moon, and I know the Earth's atmosphere has a pressure gradient. Put those together, and indirectly I know space is a Thing.

@@maxfan1591 Ok...by all means show you went into fake space & took measurements...words mean nothing

Yes, excellent work. There’s also this video by Kevin Hughes that focuses on the docking probe. He has another that does an excellent job of detailing the issues with it during the docking attempts with Apollo 14. m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-4drYZcMY9jU.html

Apollo was bogus. Never went to the moon in that aluminum crockpot

Teaching you how easy it is to fool the world with CGI and green screens. Never heard of the freedom of information act what it says about our planet? You're too easily led, is the trouble.

Insane is what it is, and insanity what it represents.

@Terry Winter Do flat earthers like you really exist? We are not riding on the back of a giant turtle. You can buy a $50 telescope and see the equipment we left on the moon. Wait, maybe they painted that equipment on the end of the telescope.

@Bilal Khalid stfu ignorant muslim

@Terry Winter Sure, if the letters are a 2-3 feet tall and the plate is affixed to the roof! "but so far nothing, so why is that ?" literally 10 seconds later with Google: "Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera wiki entry LROC has flown several times over the historic Apollo lunar landing sites at 50 km (31 mi) altitude; with the camera's high resolution, the Lunar Roving Vehicles and Lunar Module descent stages and their respective shadows are clearly visible, along with other equipment previously left on the Moon. It is expected that this photography will boost public acknowledgement of the validity of the landings, and further discredit Apollo conspiracy theories." Typical lazy conspiratards expect everyone else to do the work for them.

@Terry Winter Well you obviously didn't understand your own link! It was pretty clear in my reply that at least I know what the Nyquist limit is (evidently it went over your head, literally :)

@Terry Winter I thought the anti-vaxxers like you stopped taking their meds :)

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Ra0GAhvp2-g.html

where does that link go...

Compared to an elementary school recital set?

Have you seen the actual images of the supposed 'lunar' lander? It looks like it was made in a highschool art project. The fact is the apollo missions never went to the moon, the evidence proving this is beyond doubt and the official story and pseudo science of it is laughable.

@@EricBlair-jg2ux *where brain*

My hometown, Alameda California is where the USS Hornet is permanently berthed as a museum. It is well maintained and served by very knowledgeable docents and is well worth a visit!

Relax Doug, we never landed on the moon. NASA FAKED the whole thing

@@123davepreston Moon landing were real. Stop with the conspiracies. All of them are already debunked anyway.

Amazing what did he do?

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xNSrdTtOf4I.htmlsi=2T_v0DIzz_lnw0Pj

Yes I've always wondered that myself!

Eugenio M. Alonso González was that in the ORIGINAL LM plans though?

Same here

I have known it all the time. It was described back Then.

You are fucking stupid to believe that crap. Guliable fool.

Yeah, I am also very intrigued by it. How did they get that picture? By that probe that the apollo 12 landed close to?

That got to me too. I was about to say maybe it was cgi or something, but it looks too good. And they could very well have taken it with the remote camera on the rover.

@@shehzadamurthy1983 It's from the camera on the rover.

That's just a photo of the lunar lander taken on the moon when the astronauts were there, and then later photoshopped with the ascent stage removed to show what it looks like today. Just look at the shadow behind it and you can still see the ascent stage

@@MichaelCasey1988 I believe it's a real image, they did set up the camera on the rover to record the ascent stage, perhaps it was one of those? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9HQfauGJaTs.html I can't find any information on which mission this was, I'll have to do some more digging.

Yeah , they just used computer graphics !

🧡💘

WAR CHILDREN !

"minimalist" engineering. lol. but excellent point! MORE creation should take note.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Ra0GAhvp2-g.html

The function of the ANIMATION ? Deception.

@@cocoweepah function of the animation. To show how the lunar module worked.

and gold mylar foil to ...stop..the .. landing pads getting hot...or something

?!

Yeah and Star Wars, Star Trek and the MC universe are what's real. You're a smuck

Most spacecraft with the exception of space stations don't, they depressurise the whole ship.

@@dubsy1026 Not quite true. The Space Shuttle and all the various space stations have been fitted with airlocks. The main reason airlocks are used is when the atmosphere in the spacecraft is an air mix (oxygen and nitrogen). Space suits use oxygen only so it is safer when performing an EVA for the astronaut to spend time in an airlock acclimatising his/her body to pure oxygen before venturing outside. Otherwise, they could get "the bends".The Gemini and Apollo spacecraft used oxygen only atmsopheres when in space, so no acclimatisation was required before an EVA.

Hard to believe 2 guys crammed into a box habitat trying to sleep upright and get on all fours to crawl into and out of it as that. Before I saw this I imagined it all more elaborate and technical that this. Todays generation of ships needs a couch to recline on and plenty of snack foods.

@@dennis9707 They had hammocks they could sling across the inside which helped things a little bit. The main problem was trying to sleep whilst still wearing the EVA moonsuit. The suit had metal rings around the collar and cuffs and quite strong elastic bungees inside the arms which made them very hard and painfull to wear. Eventually, NASA gave the crews permission to take off the suits and try to sleep just wearing their undergarments. Another issue was internal noise. There were buzzes, hisses, creaks and groans all the time as the radio and instruments were left on and the cabin flexed and moved as it reacted to the heat of the sun.

@Bilal Khalid funny that on videos which explain that LM wasn't just foil and tape there is so much less idiots like you;)

Since the moon has no atmosphere, how can sound be carried? Guess I need to do sone homework.

@@johntechwriter The sound traveled through the moon. Rock does transmit sound.

It's all BS. Please wake up.

Praising yourself fúckstick. Cannot find any real people to support you so you invent aliases to praise you.

@Limey Lemon The fact that someone "believes" something doesn't make it true. You are fucking stupid. A belief is only a guess, not a fact. Where is your spinning Ballshit model evidence.. You don't have any, you don't have any. Hardy Hardy har har.. We get to laugh at you and mock you.. Bwaahhaahhhaahhaa..

@Limey Lemon It isn't what we want dipstick, it is reality. Something you are shit scared of so you live in a fantasy world where you think that you live on a spinning ball in the middle of space. Hahahaa. And you also believe in that big bang bullshit. The day when for no reason, nothing decided to explode in the middle of nothing and put of nothing everything just magically appeared.. Bwaahhaahhhaahhaa.

@Limey Lemon when more people believe in THE FLAT EARTH, than the spinning Ballshit model, will it then be correct,simply because more people believe in it?

That's so cool! I'm so glad these videos can help your passion. Thank you for watching!

Yes, his work is amazing. There’s another guy by the name of Kevin Hughes who did 2 fantastic videos about the probe and drogue system used for docking. Highly recommended.

Armstrong would have agreed 100% with you. He was never comfortable getting the bulk of the attention. Even more so being described as a hero when at the time he had friends and former squadron mates risking their lives over Vietnam.

Well everyone knows Buzz Aldrin. It’s really only Michael Collins who was criminally underrated.

I had the same experience as kid and built a model LEM. Then around 1979 there was a video game with a black and white screen. The name of the game was Lunar Lander and the object of the the game was to land a LEM On the moon with a set amount of fuel. I would enjoy playing it today.

@@marcgoff7881 I remember that game. I'd play it at the arcade. It was fun because you had to think strategically while looking for a place to put down you also had to pay attention to fuel consumption and speed or the little lander would break up. I enjoyed that game and asteroids. That's where all my quarters went. Lol

@@johnnie2638as I recall you had to use thrust all the way to landing unlike the real LEM that could hover 10 feet above the lunar surface and had it ran out of fuel it still would landed safely and softly. Matter of fact Neil Armstrong would have preferred to cut the engine higher than the 5 feet as planned. They were not sure how far they would sink into the lunar soil and were concerned that if the landing legs pads sank to far in the lunar surface while the engine was running the engine might have contacted the surface and exploded. Everything however worked as designed and the 5 foot long Lunar Surface Sensing Probes alerted the crew with Armstrong announcing “Contact light, Engine stop”. One of the things the Hoax nuts like to point out is there is little blast disturbance in the lunar soil under the engine bell. I had an opportunity to meet Buzz Aldrin and asked asked about it and he said that they were hovering at around 10’ feet and reduced power to basically idle and just settled down on the surface .

@@luznoceda5322 direct ascent or rendezvous?

I’d love to be in one of those. I’m a young space nerd who can only fly simulators, but it’d be amazing being in one of those

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9TQk77U7JAY.html

The ones that hit the surface of the moon were intentionally crashed into it for seismic tests.

@@dukecraig2402 That is correct...however, that doesn't make my post any less accurate.

@@samsignorelli I didn't say it was, I was just pointing that out.

@@dukecraig2402 I thought it was because of orbital decay?

@@jeffvader811 No, they intentionally crashed them onto the surface for seismic tests, although orbital decay might have been part of the plan they wanted them to impact the surface for the tests, kind of a "calibration" for the equipment left behind I guess you could call it.

It really was an incredible engineering design, especially considering the short timeframe.

Good thing he’s immortal

Camera man is guarding the off roader waiting for someone to come by with a can of gas.... Couldn't see the compartment where off roader fitted Maybe they had to land it first then pump up tyres.

But they never went to the moon

@Andre 9 times: Apollo 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 Apollo 9 was the first crewed test flight of the LM in low Earth orbit.

Of course you were..

@@nigelwilliams9307 meaning?

@@nigelwilliams9307 Right! he probably watched the launch on lsd and thought he was an astronaut 😂

Couldn't agree more! It was great!

Pranav Desai lunar*

Wow... Pranav Desai And when you were a little boy Regarding astronauts, did your mom make you a pretend space suite, and a cardboard luner lander, did you pretend to be on the moon too? Did she get any pictures to prove that you were pretending to be on the moon, like nasa presented to the world nearly fifty years ago? Have you got any jokes about pigs flying over white houses? #WWJD #usaFAGGOTS #ENDOFDAYS #nasaFAGS

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HDJBZENPKKc.html

@Adi Adiani Troll and troll and troll. You’ve impressed no one.

@Cam hahahagahahahahahsggafywua Hilarious. You don’t sound like a deranged lunatic. Find yourself a hole in the ground and don’t resurface.

Wie sicher bin ich, dass noch nie ein Mensch die Mondoberfläche betreten hat? 100%. Mit damaligen Stand der Technik ausgeschlossen. Unternehmungen der USA sollen sechsmal hintereinander ohne einen einzigen desaströsen Fehlschlag gelungen sein? No way.

@PAID IN FULL All of the proof that space and the moon landings are real is literally so easy to find that even a 5 year old can make a reasonable conclusion that they are real.

It was never used because it can't be used. Just like all the other fakes.

You are an idiot!

@PAID IN FULL Garbage? Y'mean, like the Bible?

You're fucking stupid.

Yes, except for the little pause the laser (in the animation) does when it hits the moon.

Unfortunately due to budget constraints the money used for the ALSEP’s program was cutoff in 1977.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HDJBZENPKKc.html

jake glenn. Again... your mom wants her phone back little man. Play time is over.

Yep people more interested in watching ego inflating fantasy superhero movies and fictional drama movies than real engineering. Cant blame them though it's much easier that having to think and work out real stuff and it can be inspiring. But imagine what really cool new technology we may have if more money was spent on engineering instead of so much making movies and if people were more industrious.

Such a shame we rather participated in war. USA is like the bipolar child of Britain

*cough* Artemis *cough*

@@thesauciestboss4039 Cept the US is making an actual moonbase and does 90% of space shit compared to britain who had to beg to buy out an American satellite corporation because they cant use EU ones, despite the corporation employing americans only.

If only Apollo continued, if only the full STS got approved, if only RL-10s were cheaper...

@@honkhonk8009 The UK cancelled our space programme one day after achieving orbit with a British rocket. Michael Hessltine wreaked it for us all.

nop, kapton has nothing to do with gold. Actually, this protection multi-layer cover was made from aluminized mylar (which looks like clear metallic foil), sometimes aluminized kapton (this one looks like gold foil), sometimes nickel and nickel-chrome alloy woven sheets for most tough parts.

Damn! I was about to type that.

Right and wrong. Mylar is boPET and kapton is polyimide, two different polymers so none of them is made from the other. And it's aluminum instead of gold. The blankets on Apollo was probably aluminized mylar but aluminized kapton has been used on other space hardware. I say probably mylar because googling it gives references for both mylar and kapton on the LM descent stage. Since the lead designer of the LM, Tom Kelly at Grumman wrote in his book "Moon lander, how we developed the Apollo lunar module" that it was mylar, I it really was mylar. (See page 174, the section "Where the action is".) Oh shit, even in this document written by Grumman and published by NASA, they seem to confuse mylar and kapton: www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/LM04_Lunar_Module_ppLV1-17.pdf It says "polyimid (mylar)" but polyimide is not mylar but kapton. Then I don't know whom to believe anymore. They talk about some "H-film" as a more heat tolerant alternative to mylar that was also used. I wonder if H-film was kapton. Then I think they used both mylar and kapton and only used the kapton for the hottest places.

@@invisiblekincajou 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Yes, sometimes titanium vapor oxidine woven with cadmium powder cloroquine alloy mixed with cotton dioxide hemp which looks like the one in Stanley Kubrick's movie.

@@skunkjobb Yes, that's the one.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Ra0GAhvp2-g.html

Fun fact: the LM descent stage turned up on one last mission--the telescope mount on Skylab!

@@natureandphysics403 I thought that looked familiar!

IIRC, the lunar module weighed 30,000 pounds when began its descent to the lunar surface.

Ugh, deleting my reply, because I confused 2nd stage with 1st stage. My bad.

@@aemrt5745 Wow!you get to work on all my favorite things!! I was machinist for 23 years specializing in wire EDM, so I used to use an early version of cad/cam to create geometry for whatever shape I had to cut. But anyway, talking about how big Saturn Rocket is when you see it in person, I forgot to say how big the Lunar rover is in person also, and it folds up into a small shape that fits in the Lunar Landers only available space on the decent stage. They land, go outside to the back of the L.E.M. open a outer door, pull on a rope that's inside, and the Lunar rover pops out and unfolds itself into a pretty good sized car or dune buggy with 4 wheel steering and 4 wheel drive and it was a great machine to get around on. I think the last mission they drove around over 75 miles during a 3 day mission, in 1972!!!, we had the coolest space ships, moon buggys and a reliable system to get large payloads to the moon to build a moon base, which was a original mission goal. They already paid for the research and production of this incredible machine so the rocket got alot cheaper because now they just had to build them, design and testing is over and we have 3 fully completed Saturn Rockets ready to go! All we had to do was figure out what we wanted to put on them and go to the moon. That's why it doesn't surprise me our smart government used the excuse that it was getting to expensive to keep launching and building Saturn Rockets when it was to the point where everything had been perfected, all they had to do is build them, and we could do that pretty fast now, we already built around 20 or more and 3 completed, ready to go!! But this amazing thing we actually pulled off, very successfully doing this in the 60s, dune buggys on the moon and all !!! Ya know, let's cancel it and not take advantage of this incredible,reliable machine we managed to build and build an even more expensive space shuttle, and we can reuse the shuttle but after a space flight it has to be overhauled, which was way more expensive than the Apollo Saturn mission single use ships, can't leave orbit or go anywhere like the moon, but it looks and lands like an airplane. And managed to kill a decent amount of astronauts. It just eats me up inside!! That's why Vonbraun quit being the head of NASA. They lied to him, they said get us to moon and we will build bases so we could build a space ship as big as we want and travel our solar system. He saw what was happening moving to the space shuttle that can't go anywhere. He quit NASA and was dead 2 to 3 years after the last visit to the moon.

Some additional details: They could land on automatic. When it got to about 500 feet, the computer flipped itself into P65 mode, which is an automatic landing. The commander actually needed to tell the computer to go into P66 mode (semi-automatic, semi-manual). Or, the commander could put it into P67 mode, which is manual. No commander ever used P65 for more than a few seconds before flipping it into P66 mode. And, no commander ever used P67. Of course, there's the famous case of Armstrong going to P66 before the computer ever even got to P65 on its own. But, yeah, all other missions went to P65 in the natural way, then the commanders quickly flipped to P66 to take over pitch/yaw/roll. They all let the computer control the throttle in "rate of descent" mode. This basically means that the commander used a toggle switch to set the desired rate of descent (in feet per second), and the computer controlled the throttle to make that happen. That's the primary sub-mode of P66. There were other P66 sub-modes also, but, none were used. Anyway, if you ask the commanders why none ever used P65 (full automatic), they'd probably tell you that there was only one time in their lives that they'd ever get to do this, and they weren't going to let a computer do it for them. Also, computers weren't really all that common back then, so, nobody completely trusted them. But, it's rumored that Lovell would have allowed the computer to land on Apollo 13. I keep forgetting to ask him, though, and it's been a bunch of years since I last saw him. But, next time I do, I intend to ask him (if I can remember to do so) whether he would really have let the computer land the thing, or if it was just a silly rumor.

They used the first ever integrated circuits. Obviously stone age stuff compared to the microscopic IC chips in modern gadgets, but hey, someone had to do it first. Completely sci-fi technology for the time, even the SR-71 used old school direct cable and rod connections and hydraulics between cockpit controls and the engines and flight control surfaces. On the Apollo missions, the computer flew the spacecraft 100% of the time, manual mode was connecting a joystick to the computer to tell it directly what you wanted it to do.

Looks good in animation form. But let's not forget Neil Armstrong never flew it on earth! As it crashed and exploded. What does that tell you?

@Michael Lyne You're right - he didn't fly the LM on earth...because it wasn't designed to operate in earth's dense atmosphere. You're referring to the LLRV (lunar landing research vehicle) that he practiced for the lunar landing in and had to abort from during an incident where the attitude thrusters ran out of fuel.

You have got to be kidding...do people believe cartoons are real? If it was reality they would show reality,not cartoons...people are so gullible..

best video ever hahahahahahah what a loser you are

Not one mention at all about the Oxygen the guys have to breath, but we all know they were never there so it was unnecessary to equip. they just sent equipment up with no men inside.

@@tonymiller6890 So you didn't watch the video at all before posting.

@@Pygar2why yes I did .?

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HDJBZENPKKc.html

jake glenn. Your mom is waiting to beat you bad if you don't give her phone back.

Nice 🔨 hammer

the whole time nasa show anything it is computer animation

​@@questioneverything8301 nope

@@questioneverything8301 Take. Head. Out. Of. Ass

"Failure is not an option!" 😀

@@aemrt5745 - He definitely is. It's so apparent when you meet the guy. One of the questions I had for him was regarding the speech he gave his flight team just before Apollo 11 began it's descent to the moon. (If you're not familiar look it up). I asked if he planned that amazing speech ahead of time or if he just winged it ... "just winged it" he said. I asked one of his flight controllers (Jerry Bostick) who was there that day about it, and he said it was the perfect words and was exactly what they needed. One of the most historic moments in NASA history and he just winged it. And nailed it. That's a badass dude!

I couldn't agree more!

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HDJBZENPKKc.html

jake glenn. Your mom wants her phone back little man.

@@christsrevenge8030 LOL. There's just no helping these idiots.

your daddy a fool, earth is flat

bee zap why should I listen to a ghetto baby whose grammar sucks. Get an education.

Too bad there's no falsifiable evidences of your claim. Your father too? ROFL

@@scottmerrow7617 What an asshole!! I am totally anonymous. No one knows who I am. What good will lying or bragging do? I was just trying to share something. What a f'ing jerk. Sounds like some jealousy there. Is that the problem?

@@beezap8892 any evidence of the earth being flat?

Bravo that man/men - and all the women !

@ G H That's awesome. It must really bother you when you hear somebody you say that the moon landing was faked.

Thanks Mike

Not doubting your fathers achievement, but curious which part. It is kinda cool to know a RU-vidr's relative made this or that for the space missions.

a Johnson rod.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HDJBZENPKKc.html

jake glenn. Game over little man. Give your mommy her phone back

@@christsrevenge8030 👍👍👍

Thanks Nick!

You’ve been brainwashed by cold war propaganda. No one ever went to the moon