Тёмный

What should we do with the Marshlink Railway Line? - The often neglected link across the marsh 

Jezz's Transport
Подписаться 199
Просмотров 1,6 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

14 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 26   
@GTRRailwaysTrainspotter
@GTRRailwaysTrainspotter 9 месяцев назад
Great video, thank you for giving credit in my videos! Nice overview too
@JezzTransport
@JezzTransport 9 месяцев назад
Thanks again! If you ever want to use my videos you can! Just ask.
@RUOKH
@RUOKH 2 месяца назад
As a local to Doleham I would LOVE the possibility of an hourly 'stop-on-request' service! Although I think that much of this presentation is 'wishful thinking' it does have creditable suggestions and the first implemented should be the reinstatement of the Ashford-Rye shuttle. Thanks for the ideas.
@JezzTransport
@JezzTransport Месяц назад
Oh yes, do not dispute the fact it is ambitious but if it happened it would be worth it!
@Cowman9791
@Cowman9791 9 дней назад
1:42 - With such an idea, you would need significantly more capacity on trains, because one of the reasons that the service was withdrawn in the first place is because the trains in 2018 consisted of 2-car diesel trains, and this lead to overcrowding leading into Brighton. Therefore, you would either need longer trains (requiring more class 171s, as they are shared with the Uckfield branch of the Oxted line, which often runs coupled services at peak times), or maybe modifiy the class 171s so they can work with Class 377s in service, so you could do a 'detach and terminate at Hastings' move with the electric unit going into a siding before reaching the diesel line, and that way you would provide more capacity on the busiest section of the line into Brighton. Obviously though, this would only be a problem for as long as the line is a diesel line however. 2:11 - While that would be a good idea, it would cost a heck of a lot of money, given land acquisation would need to be done a lot, as quite a bit of that allignment has now been lifted I think and no longer in Network rail ownership, therefore maybe a little bit too ambitious of a scheme that is, at least at this point in time. They would also need a ridiculously good business case, but that would end up going up against other schemes in the country, many of which would cost less because of trackbeds being there already, and likely would deliver greater benefits to more people in the 21st century. That currently seems dead in the water after Rachel Reeves however. 2:50 - That would really not be much of an issue, because all Class 377 and Class 375 trains have the capability to be retrofitted as dual voltage units cabable of also taking power from overhead. Therefore, if you went with overhead, all that would need to be done is an agreed number of either of the aforementioned electrostar trains would simply need to have a pantagraph fitted, and they could work on the Marshlink line no problem, and the neccessity could be countered further, as many already have the capability fitted currently, and with southern's service being to Milton Keynes being cut back to terminate at Watford Junction, that is plenty of Class 377/2 or Class 377/7 units they could use, or they could lease in some Class 375/6 from Southeastern (maybe in exchange for some class 377 to cover losses) if needed. 4:59 - I would maybe include Winchelsea in that as well, given the passenger numbers are quite similar to those of Three Oaks. Ultimately, I like that idea though, as that would in turn encourage more people to use Doleham station particularly, as having 3 trains northbound and 5 trains southbound means most people in that hamlet I would suspect just drive, either to Three Oaks or Winchelsea, but more likely the whole way. The only thing I would say before demoting some stops to being on request though is whether the new hourly services at both Three Oaks and Winchelsea affect passenger numbers enough to the point that nearly all trains would have to stop at those stations anyway, which defeats the point of making them request stops in the first place, and just gives justification to book all services to stop there in the first place. In addition, the only station on the Marshlink which really does have a limited service really is just Doleham, all other stations now have hourly services all day. 5:50 - I don't really think that there is any urgent need to replace class 171s, as Ashford to Eastbourne is ultimately a regional express, and the majority of the route since the Brighton service ended is now unelectrified track. 06:27 - I don't think they [Southern] would order anything brand new for the electrification of the Marshlink line. If the line was electrified, by far the most likely replacement would likely just be electrostar trains from Southern's existing fleet (probably the 3-car 377/3s). They would simply need a few extra to cover the slightly increased demand, but that seems to be coming in the form of extra Class 387s thanks to Great Northern getting Class 379s, and even then if that failed, that would be such a small increase that ordering a small number of newly built electrostars (fully capable of working with existing ones) would very minimal in benefits. That would in turn mean the class 171s would probably end up increasing services on the Uckfield line until that too was electrified, but that is another story in its own right. To be fair though, much of this video is kinda wishful thinking, but they are quite good ideas
@davepoole9520
@davepoole9520 7 дней назад
I've seen Electrostar trains going through Hampden Park equipped with pantographs recently whereas they previously just had the space to put them in. I like the idea of reopening the Dungeness Line. With the fact that Lydd Airport now somewhat risibly calls itself London Ashford Airport, there'd be a good case for getting funding for the line from the owner of the Airport for future scheduled flights from this base. Careful investment could result in an express train to Lydd Town and then possibly going on to Dungeness - maybe just at weekends in this case. A possible compromise could be to just have a passing loop installed around Winchelsea. I think electrification is a must and although I'd prefer a third rail system, we have to consider future-proofing investment to allow for high speed trains. Having been through Hastings in a car recently I've noticed that although a lot of investment has been made in the town centre, the suburban areas are looking very neglected with a huge amount of uninhabitable buildings and so the extra link would be essential to the future of Hastings.
@MarkWaller2
@MarkWaller2 9 месяцев назад
I think that's a pretty ambitious upgrade programme, but it's good to aim high. Electrification seems like the most obvious infrastructure upgrade - this would provide greater capacity on Marshlink, and make through running beyond Ashford and Hastings a lot easier. There would also be the benefit of newer trains for Marshlink, and releasing the 171s for use elsewhere in the country.
@JezzTransport
@JezzTransport 9 месяцев назад
Shoot for mars and get to the moon, shoot for the moon and you don't get anywhere. Its good to aim high. Tbh the minimum that should be done is the introduction of Bi-Modes and increase in services. Everything else is a great thing that should be done but isn't essential
@JayJay-nc7pr
@JayJay-nc7pr 7 дней назад
Marshlink like the Tonbridge/Redhill line, is a missed opportunity, I agree with reinstating the Ashford to Brighton service, i also think there could be a London Victoria to Rye service, yes it’ll be diesel for the moment, but you could have a service calling at Clapham Jnc, East Croydon, Redhill, Edenbridge Town, Tonbridge, Ashford Intl, Ham Street, Appledore and Rye, reconfiguring HS1 at Ashford is very expensive so this would be a good alternative plus you’ll be linking Rye with London directly
@AnthonyFurnival
@AnthonyFurnival 9 месяцев назад
Very insightful- it’s one of the few lines I’ve yet to travel on - you came up with some good options!
@JezzTransport
@JezzTransport 9 месяцев назад
You should definitely ride it
@AnthonyFurnival
@AnthonyFurnival 9 месяцев назад
@@JezzTransport I’d like to sometime, it’s not that local to me but I’ll definitely do it at some stage
@JezzTransport
@JezzTransport 9 месяцев назад
Thats understandable, it is a very nice line and you should defiantly try
@AnthonyFurnival
@AnthonyFurnival 9 месяцев назад
@@JezzTransport I will at some stage - I get around a fair bit 🙂
@tsungiraichiramba
@tsungiraichiramba 9 месяцев назад
Really good video, went on it just after lockdown in 2020 and it felt so isolated icl
@geraiswaiya2347
@geraiswaiya2347 9 месяцев назад
I would suggest a combination of - New 155 mph+ HS1 stock - Skip Stratford International and/or Ebbsfleet - Split trains at Ashford to maximise path utilisation - Upgrade to Hastings as recommended. By skipping Stratford International and flying through at 100 mph you could probably get to Ashford in ~25 mins. Bringing many places to London in 1hr.
@JezzTransport
@JezzTransport 8 месяцев назад
The thing is that idk if splitting trains (I assume on HS1) is necessary, I'd rather the extra frequency as HS1 is underutilised
@geraiswaiya2347
@geraiswaiya2347 8 месяцев назад
@@JezzTransport Splitting trains would go hand in hand with increased frequency. Rather than sending a single six car Javelin, or sending a 12 car pair to a single destination, send a 12 car pair and split for eg Hastings/Dover, Hastings/Margate, etc. Efficient use of train paths, which will also be necessary if continental services pick up with eg Deutsche Bahn
@JezzTransport
@JezzTransport 8 месяцев назад
why not just send two 6 coach sets down individually, then you get increased frequency on HS1 and on the branches, rather than just the branches@@geraiswaiya2347
@johnstedman5054
@johnstedman5054 2 месяца назад
Have you seen how many people use Stratford - either as a (very useful) interchange, or for Westfield shopping centre......
@Cowman9791
@Cowman9791 9 дней назад
@@johnstedman5054 To be fair, the case for skipping it is minimal, because as it stands now, 4 tph in each direction is already pretty poor for a station in zone 2/3, so there is a bigger case for increasing its frequency, not skipping it. On top of that, HS1 isn't really that underutilsed, as there are many trains which branch of the line at Ebsfleet, and it has to share the whole line with Eurostar, so splitting at Ashford may ultimately be a requirement. Looking at Realtime trains, there are currently 7 tph from St Pancras at peak time, so that really isn't that much more space for trains bound for Hastings and Eastbourne to run on their own.
@TransportGeekery
@TransportGeekery 5 дней назад
The Javelins have third rail shoes so third rail DC electrification is fine. Just need to overturn the stupid ban which has led to the idiocy of the unreliable battery hybrid trains on Miseryrail, sorry Merseyrail.
@AllensTrains
@AllensTrains 6 месяцев назад
You make some good points, but you have overlooked what research has shown. There are very few through passengers from Ashford to Brighton. The most popular destination is Eastbourne. There is not much of a case for re-opening the line to Dungeness as there would be too few passengers. As regards the Javelin, under all the rules and regulation of transport, the railways are not allowed to deliberately take passengers the long way around for the purpose of charging more. That means the fare on the Javelin Train from Hastings via Ashford to St Pancras could not cost more than to Victoria or Charing X. There is a safety restriction on the installation of new 3rd rail electrification, so it would have to be catenary which is more expensive and cannot be funded. Thanks for uploading.
@JezzTransport
@JezzTransport 6 месяцев назад
Maybe more people would use the train along the south coast if service was better designed to do this. Same thing for reopening the dungeness line, If we build some well designed and thoughtful TOD around the station then it will make the reopening worth it. With regards to the HS1 surcharge I would say that the price should not be any more than going the legacy route and the Surcharge should be abolished and service should be brought up to meet demand rather than reducing demand to meet service, especially when HS1 is underutilised with a lot of room for more services to run (currently HS1 has 5 trains an hour when it was designed to handle 16)
@AllensTrains
@AllensTrains 6 месяцев назад
@@JezzTransport We have been all around this issue with the government. We can't run a Javelin train on the Marsh link line in the foreseeable future. Firstly, the line would need to be electrified with catenary, and secondly a new track formation would have to be constructed at Ashford to allow trains from Hastings to cross to the HS1.
@johnstedman5054
@johnstedman5054 2 месяца назад
The problem with running through to Brighton is the congestion in the Brighton area which can affect reliability of the entire service - not a great idea if you have substantial lengths of single line operation. The Brighton service was very very popular, but mainly for the reason that in order to operate the service with the limited number of trains available, 2 car 171s were employed on the fast coast service - Hastings, SLWSq, Bexhill, Eastbourne, Polegate, Lewes and Brighton. The service was packed solid at the Brighton end as it was the "fast" train - but very few passengers travelled East of Eastbourne/Hastings. What did emerge though was a new market at the Eastern end of the route connecting with the HS! services at Ashford, which led to overcrowding both in the peaks and many days in the summer with trippers to Rye and Camber. By reducing the through service to effectively all stations between Ashford and Eastbourne, and standardising on 3 car formations on all trains, much of this peaking of demand has now been smoothed. Electrification by third rail infill would revolutionise the operation of the line - it was originally to be included in the Hastings - Tonbridge scheme of 1986 which left it as an island of diesel operation. 25Kv is unlikely I would suggest due to planning concerns of this sensitive area, and that all surrounding services are operated by trains capable of running on 750v DC third rail. I would suggest that there would be little demand for returning the Dungeness (truncated) branch to passenger use, and the cost of upgrading this stretch for passenger use would be very high - I wouldn't put any money on the development of Lydd airport into anything sufficiently significant in the foreseeable future.
Далее
A Brilliant Weekend On The Far North Line!
17:16
Просмотров 4,8 тыс.
The Tragic Fall of Britain's Once Great Railways
23:08
The South Western Train that runs on The District Line
10:40
Ashford to Hastings 1970
6:00
Просмотров 4,9 тыс.
The Railway's Darkest Hour - Railtrack (Reworked)
19:00