Тёмный

What the HECK is Mass? 

The Science Asylum
Подписаться 677 тыс.
Просмотров 312 тыс.
50% 1

The concept of "mass" shows up a lot of different places: Newton's Laws of Motion, Inertia, Gravity, Einstein's Relativity, Quantum Mechanics. Is it relativistic mass or just rest mass? These confusions are everywhere. Let's clarify.
________________________________
VIDEO ANNOTATIONS/CARDS
What is Inertia?
• What is Inertia?
Why Doesn't Light Have Mass?
• Why Doesn't Light Have...
How Fast Is Light?
• How Fast Is Light?
What is a Quantum Field?!?
• What is a Quantum Fiel...
________________________________
RELATED RU-vid VIDEOS
Veritasium on Mass/Higgs:
• Demystifying Mass ft. ...
• Your Mass is NOT From ...
PBS Space Time on Mass/Higgs:
• The True Nature of Mat...
• The Higgs Mechanism Ex...
________________________________
SUPPORT THE SCIENCE ASYLUM
Patreon:
/ scienceasylum
Advanced Theoretical Physics (eBook):
gumroad.com/l/ubSc
Merchandise:
shop.spreadshirt.com/scienceas...
________________________________
HUGE THANK YOU TO THESE PATRONS
** Einsteinium Level Crazy **
Daniel Bahr, Ilya Yashin, Drake Dragon (TMDrake), Morgan Williams, Rick Finn
** Plutonium Level Crazy **
Anamnesia,
Kevin MacLean
** Platinum Level Crazy **
Timothy Blahout, Mikayla Eckel Cifrese, David Bronakowski, Robert J Zapolis, Evgeny Ivanov
________________________________
OTHER SOURCES
www.preposterousuniverse.com/b...
www.spaceflight.esa.int/impres...
________________________________
LINKS TO COMMENTS
Relativistic Mass:
• Why Doesn't Light Have...
• Why is Light the Faste...
• Video
• What is Quantum Spin?
• Why is Light the Faste...
• Why is Light the Faste...
• Fit a 6 ft Pole in a 5...
• What the HECK is a Pho...
• Why Doesn't Light Have...
Featured Comments:
• Wave-Particle Duality ...
________________________________
IMAGE CREDITS
Fermilab Logo:
www.fnal.gov/faw/designstandar...
img.ru-vid.comLTJauaefTZ...

Опубликовано:

 

15 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 2,1 тыс.   
@Master_Therion
@Master_Therion 5 лет назад
2:15 For most people, in everyday situations, Newtonian mechanics is the best way to look at mass. If we were all forced to use Einstein's equations there would be... mass confusion.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
Ha!
@arborinfelix
@arborinfelix 5 лет назад
Don't mass with us
@tedarcher9120
@tedarcher9120 5 лет назад
Well, in newtonian mechanics mass is defined as a multiplier that turns velocity into momentum. Still applies to relativistic mass, but instead of m we wright jm
@HB-jf6yq
@HB-jf6yq 5 лет назад
Master Therion Mass-t you say this?
@japeking1
@japeking1 5 лет назад
Its taken me nearly 5 minutes seriously thinking about your comment before I recognised your joke. Well done, though I get really grumpy about folk who make me recognise my own dimness.
@itayvandel
@itayvandel 5 лет назад
Also, I'm not fat, I'm energetic :)
@TheCimbrianBull
@TheCimbrianBull 5 лет назад
Etai Vandel LOL! That's a good one, I'll use that! 😀
@mauricemeijers7956
@mauricemeijers7956 5 лет назад
Etai Vandel 😀 just a little bit more rest energy, that’s all
@user-tc9sk4ei9y
@user-tc9sk4ei9y 5 лет назад
Yeah, it will be obvious if you set a fat person and a thin person on fire. A fat person will burn more energetically.
@J.D.Boomhauer
@J.D.Boomhauer 5 лет назад
Well... You're not wrong...
@LuisAldamiz
@LuisAldamiz 5 лет назад
You area almost pure gluon field energy, way to go, Superglue!
@johnbartucci9340
@johnbartucci9340 5 лет назад
As an aging physicist, I applaud your videos. As they say, the half-life of a physicist is 2 years - I’ve forgotten more than I ever knew..
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
I do my best to keep up with things. Making these videos helps :-)
@001firebrand
@001firebrand 2 года назад
@@ScienceAsylum And you succeed in it. Well done!
@aravindakannank.s.
@aravindakannank.s. Год назад
@@ScienceAsylum and you succeeded
@varunahlawat9013
@varunahlawat9013 8 месяцев назад
Oh my goodness! Is the half life of a physicist really just 2 years?!
@charlesbromberick4247
@charlesbromberick4247 8 месяцев назад
I´m with you John.
@davidward5968
@davidward5968 5 лет назад
Finally I understand why speed increases "mass", heard it loads of times, never got why tho, thanx.
@jonyeawright
@jonyeawright 3 года назад
WOW! Thanks for the revelation. Your comment just cleared some muddy water for me.
@zorgius
@zorgius 3 года назад
why?
@vijaysinghchauhan7079
@vijaysinghchauhan7079 2 года назад
Then why is a photon massless?
@davidward5968
@davidward5968 2 года назад
@@vijaysinghchauhan7079 because it's not catholic.
@ann_onn
@ann_onn 2 года назад
@@vijaysinghchauhan7079 It's not. A photon *at rest* would have no mass. But photons are not at rest. They are moving extremely fast. Therefore, they have energy, resulting in mass. That's why light bends around a black hole - it's affected by gravity, due to its mass. Note, it is not moving at the speed of light. It can only move at the speed of light in a vacuum. But there's no such thing as a perfect vacuum.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
Correction: At 6:00 I say "Leptons" when I _should_ have said "Fermions." Spin-half particles are called Fermions. Leptons are a specific kind of Fermion (specifically the 6 on the far left of the chart). Sorry for the mistake. Update: I managed to use the RU-vid video editor to remove that 2 seconds from the video. Mistake fixed!
@canyadigit6274
@canyadigit6274 5 лет назад
The Science Asylum Ok, that makes more sense.
@Bodyknock
@Bodyknock 5 лет назад
You were probably thinking of the particles that steal mass, the Kleptons. :)
@rehaankhan1260
@rehaankhan1260 5 лет назад
Man, just when I thought I was clear about light's "mass" situation, you brought up that it has Kinetic Energy's mass. I'm confused again. Can you please explain?
@crouchingtigerhiddenadam1352
@crouchingtigerhiddenadam1352 5 лет назад
jSoN makkan Using the .clone() function if your name is JSON :)
@nkhls676
@nkhls676 5 лет назад
What is energy???
@cavalen
@cavalen 5 лет назад
Self-esteem Reducer @ 0:17 ... hahaha! Excellent video as usual
@jigo3392
@jigo3392 5 лет назад
jajajajajaj I'd missed that
@josebarria3233
@josebarria3233 3 года назад
Anyone who's ever read Griffiths before know this
@grapy83
@grapy83 5 лет назад
Man this guy is a "Physics" saver. Can't appreciate him enough. Thank you so much for clear, easy and non-depressing explanations. Thumbs up sir.
@r.m.renfield4541
@r.m.renfield4541 5 лет назад
Simply put, this is one of the best channels on youtube. Thanks for making these videos, mate.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
Thanks for watching them :-)
@ericcotter1984
@ericcotter1984 5 лет назад
This man cured my depression
@a.b.h.i.j.i.t.h
@a.b.h.i.j.i.t.h 4 года назад
i totally get you!
@adrianaadnan7704
@adrianaadnan7704 4 года назад
He calls me crazy. N im fine with that n thats progress😁
@sankimalu
@sankimalu 5 лет назад
So, based on your ending we are all suffering from ‘mass’ delusions? Interesting...
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
Ha!
@roccoraptor7523
@roccoraptor7523 5 лет назад
The sun! Does the biggest mass I can see.
@guilhermehx7159
@guilhermehx7159 4 года назад
@@ScienceAsylum Ha ☝🏻🙂
@dumbledoor9293
@dumbledoor9293 4 года назад
Well, not all of us...
@95rav
@95rav 2 года назад
While some have mass delusions, others mass debate!
@Jabrils
@Jabrils 5 лет назад
my favorite type of mechanics is Lucidian mechanics.... Get it? because Nick Lucid?
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
Ha! If only that were a real thing...
@Suryavanshirajput95
@Suryavanshirajput95 3 года назад
@@ScienceAsylum let's call it Nick lucidian mechanics 😂😂
@abhayrajsingh7587
@abhayrajsingh7587 3 года назад
Jabrils!! I love your machine learning videos!!
@guillermoaguilar5738
@guillermoaguilar5738 2 года назад
Is that his real last name?
@javahalva8655
@javahalva8655 2 года назад
@@guillermoaguilar5738 yes.
@AlleyKatt
@AlleyKatt 5 лет назад
You broiled this down to be just a 7+ minute video in which you provided a reasonably clear explanation of what the "stuff" of mass actually is. Very impressive.
@bollamebendrikb1923
@bollamebendrikb1923 5 лет назад
you deserve so much more subs
@tom_something
@tom_something 4 года назад
Subscribers are mostly just gluon field energy.
@EldanSai
@EldanSai 3 года назад
@@tom_something hahahahahahaa
@varunnrao3276
@varunnrao3276 5 лет назад
@0:28 epic Newton rap😂😂
@stardust4001
@stardust4001 5 лет назад
It was perfecttt
@HutcH68
@HutcH68 5 лет назад
I was expecting Rapper Clone, but no. DJ zigzag
@MsSonali1980
@MsSonali1980 5 лет назад
@@HutcH68 he is ziggin he's zaggin :D I was waiting for a clone, too.
@nicholas_eras
@nicholas_eras 4 года назад
Full songs plis
@kquat7899
@kquat7899 4 года назад
How the heck can you fit so much physics into so little time? Excellent job as always.
@carultch
@carultch Год назад
Probably with a lot of planning, a lot of re-writing the first explanation that comes to his mind, and a lot of graphic design to convey his point.
@aytunc5662
@aytunc5662 5 лет назад
Richard Feynman is happy.
@fdavillar
@fdavillar 5 лет назад
What? 1%?? I'm gonna sell all my Higgs Field shares and buy all the gluons I can.
@voszvaivaldtkoszikovokh6418
@voszvaivaldtkoszikovokh6418 4 года назад
That would be stupid since the higgs field aways has a above zero normal its the safest field of investment
@tiredofliars
@tiredofliars 2 года назад
@@voszvaivaldtkoszikovokh6418 Sadly, this is also how many people invest their money! Based on missing the point. Get an extremely sensitive weight scale, get a rubber band powered airplane. Weigh the airplane, then wind the prop as tight as reasonable, and lock it in place. Then weigh the airplane again. The WOUND rubber band weighs considerably MORE now, because you have imparted kinetic energy into the band. The locking in place allows you to weigh that difference in ENERGY. Release the prop, and allow the energy to dissipate and weigh the airplane again. It will now weigh LESS than originally! WHY? Because the rubber band has been damaged in the process and has lost mass. It will eventually if twisted over and over, will weaken and break due to internal stresses and the release of the BINDING energy holding the band together.
@ARAVI3
@ARAVI3 5 лет назад
I mean, just Awesome. Understood every bit of it and the content was Awesome. Love your creativity and craziness. You surely deserve a million subscribers.
@admiralhyperspace0015
@admiralhyperspace0015 5 лет назад
So nicely put into a single video.I see your effort bro.Your videos are getting even better.That bar graph madr sguff so clear.Thanks
@Fkashmhd
@Fkashmhd 5 лет назад
Man, you are really good.. This channel is seriously underrated... Keep going man.. It only needs one good viral video to give the necessary boost to the channel... I have almost watched all videos in last one week's time... Thanks for all the research and the explanation...
@constpegasus
@constpegasus 5 лет назад
Your last two videos have been incredible.
@cleitonoliveira932
@cleitonoliveira932 5 лет назад
Last two? All of them are amazing. None of them fails.
@constpegasus
@constpegasus 5 лет назад
Cleiton Oliveira True. 👍🏻
@Ni999
@Ni999 5 лет назад
I agree. They were incredible in completely opposite ways.
@robinsuj
@robinsuj 5 лет назад
Yay! I appear in a video as an "angry commenter"! :D
@r7diego
@r7diego 4 года назад
Way to go ! we knew you will achieve something someday !
@canyadigit6274
@canyadigit6274 4 года назад
David Lee what he said was fact, not opinion. Nick was wrong, relative mass is not real. It’s very easy to debunk such a concept, and pretty much all physicists agree on this.
@tylerdurden3722
@tylerdurden3722 4 года назад
Lol... You were right though.
@aimxhere
@aimxhere 3 года назад
@@canyadigit6274 How about a claim, give some references to scientific papers and maybe statements, from the apperently overwhelming amount of scientists, disagreeing with the concept of relative mass, which is a CONCEPT. Good luck.
@gokturkbuyuktuna8557
@gokturkbuyuktuna8557 6 месяцев назад
You are incredible! This is the best explanation of mass I've seen
@egiljondal5930
@egiljondal5930 5 лет назад
Great work, great channel! Gives me much inspiration for my own studies. I still have not found anyone else explaining the different subjects nearly as easy as you. Keep on with your awesome work! 😎
@Mathieu_Matheow_Benoit
@Mathieu_Matheow_Benoit 5 лет назад
“Whats the most massive thing youve ever seen?” * insert fat mama jokes here * 😂😂😂
@TheUglyGnome
@TheUglyGnome 5 лет назад
Hey! You stole my comment. Well ... that's the price of being late.
@tarrakis
@tarrakis 4 года назад
Yo mama so fat, she occupies 99% of the Higgs field! 😂😂😂
@91plm
@91plm 4 года назад
Yo momma so fat it bends light around her belly!
@Mathieu_Matheow_Benoit
@Mathieu_Matheow_Benoit 5 лет назад
* Dad jokes clone * This video had a MASSIVE influence on my knowledge 😬
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
Ha!
@LifeHacks-pu3ol
@LifeHacks-pu3ol 5 лет назад
The video transmitted its energy content to me too.
@rkwatchauralnautsjediparty7303
@rkwatchauralnautsjediparty7303 2 года назад
Finally subbed. Because the kinetic energy/relativistic mass explanation actually got me to a new plateau of understanding relativistic concepts. Thank you!
@linosclassics
@linosclassics 5 лет назад
That was a crystal clear explanation on the subject! Your channel is indeed great. I know it already increased quite a bit in popularity but it is not at all as well known as it deserves to be yet...
@da4733
@da4733 5 лет назад
I agree with you he is an awesome explainer
@guillaumeseguin6362
@guillaumeseguin6362 5 лет назад
The best five minutes teacher on the web !! So much good info in such a short time, I defintely raise my thumbs !
@Man_No_Pants
@Man_No_Pants 5 лет назад
Guillaume Seguin uhhhhhh akshully it was 7:39 long u imbecile
@Gryphon1973
@Gryphon1973 5 лет назад
Dude! You just made all that SO CLEAR! THANK YOU!
@brianuljenkins7783
@brianuljenkins7783 3 года назад
ya
@Eyesopen-yk1cb
@Eyesopen-yk1cb 8 месяцев назад
I have watched so many channels of physics but no one explained in depth has you do thanks man really appreciate it
@MrSmokeey
@MrSmokeey 4 года назад
what makes mass interesting are 3 unique properties: 1. it cam move at speeds other than the speed of light 2. it can accelerate 3. it resists acceleration and all those properties derive from mass being a specific meta-construct over different types of energy. PBS SpaceTIme have a very good (imho) video about this where they illustrate matter to be a perfect mirror box, filled with bouncing photons. at rest, the photons apply equal force to all of the box's walls which cancel each other and cause no motion. but while pushed (accelerated), they push back more on the wall being pushed, and thus apply a negative force resisting acceleration. the more mass --> the more photons --> the more resistance.
@markorezic3131
@markorezic3131 5 лет назад
The most massive thing I've ever seen is my... Love for this channel, keep up the good work
@harshshitole6293
@harshshitole6293 5 лет назад
Marko Rezic that true
@cearun957
@cearun957 3 года назад
got scared looking at the first part
@suhasprabhu3898
@suhasprabhu3898 4 года назад
I like the way Nick explains things that are quite difficult to understand. He makes it so interesting and lively. Keep on at it Nick!. I love your videos!
@rockyk6805
@rockyk6805 5 лет назад
Wow, you cleared all my questions I didn't expect you to cover Higgs field in this, but I'm SO glad u did. THANKS!!
@wavenature3180
@wavenature3180 5 лет назад
Excellent explanation of mass. This needs to be watched by so many confused physics professors so they can stop causing mass confusion.
@HarionDafar
@HarionDafar 4 года назад
"Self-esteem reducer" :DDD Set aside the humor, the video is brilliant. Including the humor makes it awesome.
@andrewcampbell8938
@andrewcampbell8938 5 лет назад
Gluon field energy!!!! Wow.
@isaacjacobharris
@isaacjacobharris 5 лет назад
I really enjoyed the illustration at 3:42, you wouldn't believe how unbelievably helpful that was, thank you.
@only1kingz
@only1kingz 5 лет назад
WOW. I literally just described tried to explain this in a comment section on PBS SpaceTime's videos with my untrained, limited understanding, and I can't believe how on the money I was! Seriously, between this channel's undergrad level explanations and PBS SpaceTime's graduate level explanations, I'm getting my existential fill of knowledge!
@christianalmeida1066
@christianalmeida1066 5 лет назад
What I love of your videos is that they allow me to unwind all that flawed knowledge that was fist fed to me as an universal truth when I was in highschool. Hopefully someday kids learn this things from kindergarten. Meanwhile I'm liking your vids a lot!
@girirajdandekar5368
@girirajdandekar5368 5 лет назад
You're videos are perfect blend of humor and knowledge !
@Chiaros
@Chiaros 5 лет назад
Keep improving your content; this channel is going to grow a lot faster in the near future, I wager.
@pierangeloerrico3776
@pierangeloerrico3776 5 лет назад
Thanks for what you do, I love watching your explanations. As a passionated guy in mathematics and physics it’s a pleasure studying with your videos.
@xanokothe
@xanokothe 5 лет назад
Thanks for not using imperial units
@sirmeowthelibrarycat
@sirmeowthelibrarycat 5 лет назад
Xano Trevisan Kothe 😸 Yes, indeed! My thinking precisely!
@xanokothe
@xanokothe 5 лет назад
No, but americans love to use them anyway
@necrophagis9983
@necrophagis9983 5 лет назад
Imperial units? I thought Luke Skywalker defeated them?
@zoltankurti
@zoltankurti 5 лет назад
Well, relativistic mass is the imerial unit system of theoretycal physics. It is just as annoying and outdated.
@poe12
@poe12 4 года назад
For gluon field? Lol
@AironExTv
@AironExTv 4 года назад
First time I‘ve been shown this breakdown of the enrgy content of a Proton. Very enlightning. Thank you.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 4 года назад
You're welcome :-)
@laurel5432
@laurel5432 5 лет назад
I see you're getting close to 100k. Guess it was inevitable after all, your content is great :)
@rhlogic
@rhlogic 3 года назад
Now! This is mind numbing! I’ve never heard an explanation this way about this kind of stuff. That’s what makes me coming back for more. Nice SA!
@marcojimenez2725
@marcojimenez2725 4 года назад
This video + the spacetime channel video about mass= I finally understand what mass is!!!!
@josephholand7748
@josephholand7748 5 лет назад
Thanks once again amazing explanation!
@ObO-sd1xg
@ObO-sd1xg 11 месяцев назад
I get so much info out of your videos. Love them!
@FedericoGalatolo
@FedericoGalatolo 5 лет назад
Dude your explanation was so clear! You definitely nailed it! Bravo!
@rafay8516
@rafay8516 4 года назад
Lmao that shade thrown at Don Lincoln of Fermi lab
@Lucky10279
@Lucky10279 5 лет назад
Whenever someone mentions QM I can't but think how CRAZY but also really cool it is.
@cloudpoint0
@cloudpoint0 5 лет назад
QM is merely the shadow cast by the encompassing theory, QFT. Shadows often make no sense but they work for the purposes of calculations. QFT is more intuitive but still has plenty of strange features.
@isodoubIet
@isodoubIet 5 лет назад
"QM is merely the shadow cast by the encompassing theory, QFT" No, quantum mechanics is a general framework. QFT is a quantum mechanical theory.
@cloudpoint0
@cloudpoint0 5 лет назад
QM is a simplification of QFT that deals with two-particle interactions (or a minimal number) largely ignoring the background field environment and some of the other things that particles can do. QFT is the full working theory. You are correct that QM is a general framework for particle interactions, but particle interactions are a rather small subset of what QFT is about, which explains many interactions somewhat differently anyway. Without the full QFT context, even with, QM is not very intuitive. QFT is what the Standard Model is derived from. QM leads to belief in odd ideas that aren't true, like wave-particle duality.
@isodoubIet
@isodoubIet 5 лет назад
"QM is a simplification of QFT that deals with two-particle interactions" No, that is completely wrong. "Quantum mechanics" refers to the framework in which observables are non-commuting objects -- it says nothing about interactions, that's for the person using the framework to supply. Quantum field theory is a quantum mechanical theory. String theory is a quantum mechanical theory. This is because in both cases the relevant objects are non-commuting generalizations of the classical notions of fields and strings.
@cloudpoint0
@cloudpoint0 5 лет назад
I doubt very much Mikayla had in mind your very technical definition of QM involving non-commuting objects (that probably don't physically exist outside of math) but instead had in mind the crazy notions that QM leads people to believe in about the physical world, things that are sensibly explained by QFT. I said what I know QM "deals with" in practice, what I've read physicists also say, and I did not dispute your framework definition. You're being excessively pedantic for this channel. Know your audience.
@brandongehrke8943
@brandongehrke8943 5 лет назад
I just discovered your channel today and I'm so glad I did! Beyond amazing to watch this as a physics student who ADHD! Kept my attention the entire video! I don't know if you have a video on what I'm about to ask, but I'm asking anyway! Do you think our universe exists within a 4th dimensional singularity? If so, how would it tie in with relativity and quantum mechanics? If you don't believe this, why not? Can't wait to binge watch more videos over the next few weeks!
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
A singularity is just an input for an equation where the output approached infinity. Inside a black hole or near the beginning of the universe, that was density approaching infinity. The universe doesn't really have that problem at the moment.
@seabound1350
@seabound1350 5 лет назад
The best explanation i have seen so far! It finally starts to make sense to me!
@seanreese3314
@seanreese3314 5 лет назад
As one of many, many former students who used Griffith's Intro to Electrodynamics text, it truly it a self-esteem reducer!
@ashwinvenkat1239
@ashwinvenkat1239 4 года назад
Why it is self esteem reducer? Any reason?
@skullgamer_yt193
@skullgamer_yt193 5 лет назад
I just love your explanation 😍😍
@Neceros
@Neceros 5 лет назад
Amazing description of science as always! Thank you. Just thought I'd mention you should turn yourself partway towards the camera when filming side-by-side dialog between two characters because it feels more inviting to the viewer -- as if we're being included. When two characters talk directly towards each other it can seem unnatural or invasive to the viewer.
@bingt2238
@bingt2238 3 года назад
The animations really helped! Thanks!
@coryscamihorn1811
@coryscamihorn1811 5 лет назад
"we'll start with relativity because it's easier," I guess all things are in fact relative if that's the easy part.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
Right. I never said it was "easy" ...just that it was _easier_ than quantum mechanics.
@samdell5593
@samdell5593 5 лет назад
Amazing... Amazing song you did there, lol... No acctually the way u relate things together with this simplicity and clarity is amazing... I wish to know whats your degree
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
I'm a physicist that can't seem to get a full-time job in academia (too many people, not enough jobs)... so I've invested my time here on RU-vid hoping I'd have better luck.
@samdell5593
@samdell5593 5 лет назад
The Science Asylum i sure do wish you best of luck, although we are benefiting from your presence here, its a shame no one hired you to teach upcoming generations. But then again, here you get a wider audience.
@Aaackermann
@Aaackermann 2 года назад
LOVE your content! Crazy stuff, crazy simple explained! Crazy!
@PINEAPPLE-jp2rv
@PINEAPPLE-jp2rv 5 лет назад
Nick can you give us physics textbook recommendations, thanks man. P.s we love so much and wish you the very best in everything you do;your constantly enlightening us through your well explained high quality captivating videos,I appreciate and admire you so much. Have a great weekend Nick😁
@canyadigit6274
@canyadigit6274 5 лет назад
Me when The Science Asylum posts *STOP WHAT YOU ARE DOING AND WATCH!*
@Marijanus
@Marijanus 3 года назад
My God! It's CanYaDigIt himself! Can you teach me how to get all the fly honies like you do?
@canyadigit6274
@canyadigit6274 3 года назад
@@Marijanus you just gotta lead them and play it sly dog #gitgud
@7cosmo832
@7cosmo832 5 лет назад
Damn, your videos are so entertaining and interesting. Thanks to you, i learned more with this channel than my teachers did
@Ahlamm100
@Ahlamm100 5 лет назад
your videos are super fun! you are very funny! you always make me laugh and i like how you choose to talk about really interesting things and simplify every concept in an awesome way
@toonvdwielen96
@toonvdwielen96 2 года назад
Every time I think I take the next step I see so many more! Thanks for showing me the endless way
@gagan4012
@gagan4012 5 лет назад
Self-Esteem Reducer LMAO!!!!!
@seanreese3314
@seanreese3314 5 лет назад
Certainly how I felt when we used that text in my Electricity and Magnetism course.
@gagan4012
@gagan4012 5 лет назад
Sean Reese that's how almost everyone does
@GottfriedLeibnizYT
@GottfriedLeibnizYT 5 лет назад
I'd pay to see Nick Lucid and Dr. Don Lincoln debate over relativistic mass.
@charmquark2501
@charmquark2501 5 лет назад
Don Lincoln for the win!
@hirvonenjoonas7281
@hirvonenjoonas7281 5 лет назад
@2:22 In the upper equatiom Nick him self used "rest mass" as just mass. There is in fact no simple way of putting "relativistic mass" there. Also, the punch line of the video shows the uselessness of the term relativistic mass :)
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
In all fairness, Don would likely perform better in live debate. I'm not very comfortable live... but just because someone is comfortable and confident, it doesn't mean they're correct.
@harlesbalanta2299
@harlesbalanta2299 5 лет назад
I won't pay but I would love to see that.
@Plasmon19
@Plasmon19 2 года назад
Went to school for physics and I'm watching all of your videos for fun. Excellent work, very entertaining and I'm stealing your jokes too for future use.
@Vlaid65
@Vlaid65 5 лет назад
Excellent video. You just filled in a gap for me. Thumbs up.
@JanKentaur
@JanKentaur 5 лет назад
6:00 - error: Quarks are not leptons. Only electrons, muons, tauons and their neutrinos (and their antiparticles) are called leptons. If you want a general term for quarks and leptons, the most precise one is probably "elementary fermions."
@JanKentaur
@JanKentaur 5 лет назад
Also, saying that relativity is easier than QM is at the very least daring.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
Crap! You're right. I meant to say fermions. How did I get that mixed up in my head?!
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
I will pin a comment about it.
@robson6285
@robson6285 5 лет назад
Mistaking is human. And at least in an asylum we can easilly forgive such w minor wordmistake
@CraftyF0X
@CraftyF0X 5 лет назад
Sorry to be the slow guy but aren't the W and the Z bosons too get their mass via the Higgs mechanism ?
@canyadigit6274
@canyadigit6274 5 лет назад
2:45 You must have posted that scene because of the link I sent you of Dr.Don saying how relativistic mass isn’t real 😂.
@jamesweber1827
@jamesweber1827 5 месяцев назад
I am constantly amazed by Nick. Explaining complex topics in a way that most people can understand is a rare talent. The most massive thing I've seen is Beatleguise.
@pyotrpig
@pyotrpig 4 года назад
*The most massive thing is my appreciation to this channel!*
@sibusisomaseko1607
@sibusisomaseko1607 5 лет назад
That gangsta "whooooo" on the background nearly killed me :-)
@dvdrtrgn
@dvdrtrgn 5 лет назад
Sibusiso Maseko yo he droppin science like galileo dropped the orange
@isodoubIet
@isodoubIet 5 лет назад
The Higgs field does not "hover about a nonzero energy", it hovers about a nonzero _value of the field._ What the energy is at that value is irrelevant -- in particle physics you can add and subtract constants to the energy without changing anything. It is not the energy density of the vacuum that is important, especially since we have a very good measurement of that, and it's zero for all subgalactic purposes. Mass in quantum field theory is nothing more than a quadratic contribution to the field potential energy. It's actually really simple: it just means that if the value of the field at a certain point x is f(x), the energy density has a term that looks like m (f(x))² / 2. The various massive fermions have an interaction with the Higgs that is represented by a contribution to the energy which looks like g H(x) (f(x))² / 2, where g is a coupling strength that depends on the particle. If on average the value of the Higgs field is some number H not zero, this just means the particle gets a mass proportional to gH. Also, there's an inaccuracy in the distribution graph around the 6 minute mark. It says "gluon field energy" for almost the whole bar, but really the brunt of the mass in nuclei is (at this level) best thought of as due to the kinetic energies of the constituent quarks. You can see this clearly, for example, in charmonium or bottomonium states (e.g. the infamous J/psi), which are nonrelativistic and only slightly heavier than the sum of the quark masses would indicate (the J/psi weighs 3.1 GeV, and it's made of two charm quarks, each weighing 1.3 GeV. Because of asymptotic freedom, it's not terrible to think of a proton or a neutron as a hollow sphere in which the quarks are free to move and bounce around. This model isn't perfect, but it's pretty good for how simple it is, even though there's no gluon field energy to speak of!
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
While it is true that the value of energy can vary by an additive constant without affecting anything (a fact I've mentioned in videos before), that fact is not always useful when trying to explain a concept. When educating, you often have to decide what's important.
@isodoubIet
@isodoubIet 5 лет назад
I'm not saying you needed to mention that in this video. I just mention that as a simple reason why the vacuum energy density is not the relevant thing in the Higgs mechanism. A vacuum expected value for the field is a very different thing.
@mushfiqurrahman1107
@mushfiqurrahman1107 3 года назад
Man I love this channel. In age of simplicity, I'm glad to find "real" stuffs here.
@davedave6650
@davedave6650 5 лет назад
1:40 It's all about Satisfaction. Love the videos. Please keep posting.
@LeopoldoGhielmetti
@LeopoldoGhielmetti 5 лет назад
The more massive thing I've ever seen? Various possible answers: 1. Nothing. Because all I can see are photons, and photons have no mass. 2. The Earth. Because is the more massive object nearby. 3. The sun. It's even more massive, but usually I don't look at it. 4. Some star. Sometimes I look at them, but saying which one it the more massive...
@lawliet2263
@lawliet2263 2 года назад
I guess you're joking because he meant that in a different way 😜
@pradeepsethi90
@pradeepsethi90 5 лет назад
i wish i had a physics teacher like you in school...
@MultiSciGeek
@MultiSciGeek 5 лет назад
This actually explains a lot! Thank you
@stevenbateson8217
@stevenbateson8217 5 лет назад
Brilliantly explained 👍👍👍
@andrewolesen8773
@andrewolesen8773 5 лет назад
Legit lol'd with the shade you threw at fermi
@5kgBirnen
@5kgBirnen 5 лет назад
I would love to see a detailed video about the higgs boson and the higgs field, maybe even about how they discover it at the LHC as long its not too complicated
@tedarcher9120
@tedarcher9120 5 лет назад
xMcSK see PBS space-time
@TheJohnblyth
@TheJohnblyth 5 лет назад
Once again, wonderful moments of insight. Thank you.
@jupytr1
@jupytr1 4 года назад
Love it! Good stuff.
@obiwan8972
@obiwan8972 5 лет назад
Hey Nick at 2:49 did u poked prof.LINCOLN OR WERE U JUST REFFERING TO A PARTICLE PHYSICST'S view on relativistic mass? Either way nice vedio.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
Most of the comments I showed on the screen just before that referenced a specific video on the Fermilab YT channel, which why I used that graphic... but it's not limited to Don Lincoln. Particle physicists are working on a level where the word "mass" is the most confusing, so they've all agreed to only call something "mass" when they're talking about _rest_ mass. Sometimes they don't acknowledge that other types of physics use the word "mass" a little more broadly.
@obiwan8972
@obiwan8972 5 лет назад
The Science Asylum ... What do u mean, they don't take in account the effects of relativistic mass in subatomic world or take rest mass as standard and proceed with there calculations?
@maulikparekh776
@maulikparekh776 5 лет назад
The Science Asylum but wouldn't it be easier to learn if the more confusing relativistic mass is abandoned (at least while teaching) and the term "mass" is used to mean rest mass
@maulikparekh776
@maulikparekh776 5 лет назад
Obi Wan they do take into account it's effects, like the equation E=mc² becomes E²= (mc²)² + (pc)² and the m here is just the rest mass
@pguti778
@pguti778 5 лет назад
Is this bullying to prof Lincoln???
@Human_Evolution-
@Human_Evolution- 5 лет назад
I've heard a hundred explanations of mass. This is my favorite. Well done. Thanks for making me feel like I'm drowning in energy.
@charlesbromberick4247
@charlesbromberick4247 8 месяцев назад
I really like your bar graphs showing the kinetic energy part of mass, including the gluon part, too.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 7 месяцев назад
Thanks!
@chrisgoat3794
@chrisgoat3794 5 лет назад
Excellent. Thank you.
@feynstein1004
@feynstein1004 5 лет назад
Damn, did you just diss Dr. Lincoln from Fermilab? YOU SHALL PAY!!! Lol jk. It's a great channel though. I'd love to see you there.
@alexdagios28
@alexdagios28 5 лет назад
btw, you are simply the best, even a 6yo can understand your explanation
@apple54345
@apple54345 5 лет назад
that moment when you realize you're dumber than a 6 year old.
@apple54345
@apple54345 5 лет назад
rip
@thederpinator6636
@thederpinator6636 5 лет назад
apple54345 XD
@TechToppers
@TechToppers 4 года назад
Come on, that's too much.
@Toefuy
@Toefuy 5 лет назад
I really like your energy, great teacher.
@gagan4012
@gagan4012 5 лет назад
@0:27 NewTON rap about Mass!!!
@doughelms558
@doughelms558 5 лет назад
"When you measure the mass of something, you're measuring it's energy content." Hmmmm - interesting!
@nooshindeldari2504
@nooshindeldari2504 Год назад
This was so helpful. Thanks
@astropredo
@astropredo 5 лет назад
Best video about it! Good job!
@acuber1303
@acuber1303 4 года назад
"So what's the most massive thing you've ever seen?" *raises eyebrows* I may be young, but I got that.
Далее
What Are Particles? Do They ACTUALLY Exist?!
19:35
Просмотров 274 тыс.
Продаю тачку из гаража мечты :(
52:18
Coca-Cola 😂🫲
00:20
Просмотров 1,5 млн
Dark Matter Exists. Here's how we know.
15:32
Просмотров 355 тыс.
What the HECK is a Tensor?!?
11:47
Просмотров 736 тыс.
Photons, Entanglement, and the Quantum Eraser
11:49
Просмотров 304 тыс.
We Can't Measure* Distance In Outer Space!
21:25
Просмотров 533 тыс.
What the HECK is Time?! (in Einstein’s Relativity)
11:50
Why gravity bends light even without mass?
17:35
Просмотров 229 тыс.
Why Doesn't Light Have Mass?
6:34
Просмотров 818 тыс.
Продаю тачку из гаража мечты :(
52:18